Today I’d like to introduce what’s probably a new term to most people. It’s called reflexivity. It’s a term used in markets. It was actually George Soros who popularized the use of it. What is reflexivity? It’s a study of circular relationships cause and effect, particularly psychological ones. So you may see an event that would cause something to go one way. But sometimes when it goes that way, it creates pushback that leads things the other way. That is reflexivity? Well, we have a great example of reflexivity that’s going on now. And that’s actually part of causing inflation. At the end of last year, Chairman Powell and other members of the Federal Reserve Board said that they were thinking about cutting rates in 2024. The markets went ecstatic. They said, Oh, they’re going to cut them seven times, well, that’s probably never going to happen. But anyway, that was a strong signal of rate cuts. Now, it was not an irrational decision. If you looked at what was happening, for example, that prints for the Producer Price Index, we’re coming in at two tenths of a percent a month, which is pretty consistent with where the Fed wants to go. The CPI, the end of last year was running at just 1.9%, which was at the Feds target. So Powell said, Oh, we’re going to cut rates. Well guess what happened immediately thereafter, literally, starting in January, when he sent the signal in November and December, inflation soared. The producer price index every month went from point two to point four, the Consumer Price Index went from 1.9% at the end of last year to 4.4% in the first four months of this year. That’s quite a change. Now, did the Fed simply saying something did that cause the inflation? Well, here you go back to the question of what is causal. Someone just saying something doesn’t cause inflation. But as in reflexivity, it causes other reactions and the cause and effect gets mixed up. For example, you’re a businessman. Do you want to raise prices? Oh, yes, you do. You always want to raise prices if you can. The problem is you may not be able to. At the end of last year, when the Fed had been acting tough all along, were not going to cut rates until inflation is solidly down. The businessman got a little bit worried, because if he tried to raise rates, it might not go through because the economy wasn’t there to support the higher prices. Well, now Powell remove that threat, the Fed isn’t going to be a meanie and take away the economy. So go ahead, raise your prices. I’m sorry, you’re gonna have the money still being printed now to support them. And so more price increases went through. And the same thing is true on the demand side. stock market and housing prices began to soar. For example, the stock market in a mere six months from Halloween until April Fool’s Day went up 27%. That’s a lot of money. People were about $11 trillion richer. On April Fool’s Day, they had been on Halloween. All thanks to a market that was responding to pals promise of cutting rates. Well, if you’re that much more rich, and you’ve got 11 trillion more dollars, you’re probably going to be less frugal, you’re going to spend more and what we call the personal saving rate went down. So people are out there spending their newfound wealth. And businessmen are figuring out that gee, the Fed isn’t going to be a meanie, so maybe I can get ahead with my price increases, push them through, they’re not going to be pushed back. And that’s what happened. That’s reflexivity. Again, the Fed didn’t necessarily cause the acceleration of inflation. But the cause and effect was such that it caused other people to say, Hey, let’s go for it. And that pushed inflation back up. When Soros introduced the notion of reflexivity, it was as a caution to policymakers. Be careful things are are not as simple as they look. And this is what just happened to the Fed. Rather than look in the rearview mirror at the numbers that are just coming in on something like inflation, the Fed might better be better off looking at some forward looking indicators, such as the stock market. If the stock market is booming, well, that means there’s going to be more demand. That means businessmen are optimistic, and maybe you shouldn’t give it any more encouragement. On the other hand, if the stock market is falling, even if the economy is doing well, you might want to think about cutting some rates. That’s going to require a change in behavior by the Fed. But if the Fed is going to use financial markets, it should do so bearing in mind that everything in the financial world is governed by the laws of reflexivity. This is Larry Lindsey for straight arrow News.
Larry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey Group
Why the Fed should consider Theory of Reflexivity when fixing policy
Larry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey Group
By Straight Arrow News
The Theory of Reflexivity, often used in the context of economics and financial markets, implies that investors don’t base their decisions on reality but on their perceptions of reality. This creates a feedback loop where investors’ perceptions influence economic fundamentals, which in turn alter investor perceptions.
Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey explains the Theory of Reflexivity in the context of current inflation challenges and argues that Fed Chair Jerome Powell should consider it when fixing monetary policy.
Be the first to know when Larry Lindsey publishes a new opinion every Monday! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt from the above video:
Well, we have a great example of reflexivity that’s going on now and that’s actually part of causing inflation. At the end of last year, Chairman Powell and other members of the Federal Reserve Board said that they were thinking about cutting rates in 2024. The markets went ecstatic. They said, “Oh, they’re going to cut them seven times.” Well, that’s probably never going to happen. But anyway, that was a strong signal of rate cuts.
Now, it was not any irrational decision. If you looked at what was happening, for example, that prints for the producer price index were coming in at 0.2% a month, which is pretty consistent with where the Fed wants to go. The CPI at the end of last year was running at just 1.9%, which was at the Fed’s target. So Powell said, “Oh, we’re going to cut rates.” Well guess what happened immediately thereafter, literally, starting in January, when he sent the signal in November and December? Inflation soared. The producer price index every month went from .2% to .4%. The consumer price index went from 1.9% at the end of last year to 4.4% in the first four months of this year. That’s quite a change.
Now, did the Fed simply saying something, did that cause the inflation? Well, here you go back to the question of what is causal. Someone just saying something doesn’t cause inflation. But as in reflexivity, it causes other reactions and the cause and effect gets mixed up.
Today I’d like to introduce what’s probably a new term to most people. It’s called reflexivity. It’s a term used in markets. It was actually George Soros who popularized the use of it. What is reflexivity? It’s a study of circular relationships cause and effect, particularly psychological ones. So you may see an event that would cause something to go one way. But sometimes when it goes that way, it creates pushback that leads things the other way. That is reflexivity? Well, we have a great example of reflexivity that’s going on now. And that’s actually part of causing inflation. At the end of last year, Chairman Powell and other members of the Federal Reserve Board said that they were thinking about cutting rates in 2024. The markets went ecstatic. They said, Oh, they’re going to cut them seven times, well, that’s probably never going to happen. But anyway, that was a strong signal of rate cuts. Now, it was not an irrational decision. If you looked at what was happening, for example, that prints for the Producer Price Index, we’re coming in at two tenths of a percent a month, which is pretty consistent with where the Fed wants to go. The CPI, the end of last year was running at just 1.9%, which was at the Feds target. So Powell said, Oh, we’re going to cut rates. Well guess what happened immediately thereafter, literally, starting in January, when he sent the signal in November and December, inflation soared. The producer price index every month went from point two to point four, the Consumer Price Index went from 1.9% at the end of last year to 4.4% in the first four months of this year. That’s quite a change. Now, did the Fed simply saying something did that cause the inflation? Well, here you go back to the question of what is causal. Someone just saying something doesn’t cause inflation. But as in reflexivity, it causes other reactions and the cause and effect gets mixed up. For example, you’re a businessman. Do you want to raise prices? Oh, yes, you do. You always want to raise prices if you can. The problem is you may not be able to. At the end of last year, when the Fed had been acting tough all along, were not going to cut rates until inflation is solidly down. The businessman got a little bit worried, because if he tried to raise rates, it might not go through because the economy wasn’t there to support the higher prices. Well, now Powell remove that threat, the Fed isn’t going to be a meanie and take away the economy. So go ahead, raise your prices. I’m sorry, you’re gonna have the money still being printed now to support them. And so more price increases went through. And the same thing is true on the demand side. stock market and housing prices began to soar. For example, the stock market in a mere six months from Halloween until April Fool’s Day went up 27%. That’s a lot of money. People were about $11 trillion richer. On April Fool’s Day, they had been on Halloween. All thanks to a market that was responding to pals promise of cutting rates. Well, if you’re that much more rich, and you’ve got 11 trillion more dollars, you’re probably going to be less frugal, you’re going to spend more and what we call the personal saving rate went down. So people are out there spending their newfound wealth. And businessmen are figuring out that gee, the Fed isn’t going to be a meanie, so maybe I can get ahead with my price increases, push them through, they’re not going to be pushed back. And that’s what happened. That’s reflexivity. Again, the Fed didn’t necessarily cause the acceleration of inflation. But the cause and effect was such that it caused other people to say, Hey, let’s go for it. And that pushed inflation back up. When Soros introduced the notion of reflexivity, it was as a caution to policymakers. Be careful things are are not as simple as they look. And this is what just happened to the Fed. Rather than look in the rearview mirror at the numbers that are just coming in on something like inflation, the Fed might better be better off looking at some forward looking indicators, such as the stock market. If the stock market is booming, well, that means there’s going to be more demand. That means businessmen are optimistic, and maybe you shouldn’t give it any more encouragement. On the other hand, if the stock market is falling, even if the economy is doing well, you might want to think about cutting some rates. That’s going to require a change in behavior by the Fed. But if the Fed is going to use financial markets, it should do so bearing in mind that everything in the financial world is governed by the laws of reflexivity. This is Larry Lindsey for straight arrow News.
Election 2024 will boil down to the Great Lakes states
Pollsters and pundits have been engaged in a long debate about how Biden or Trump might win the 2024 election, with much of their focus spent on the “swing state” electoral battlegrounds. While the winners of Alabama or California may be obvious, for instance, who wins Pennsylvania is a more difficult question. Watch the above…
Jun 10
Federal Reserve surpassed its own wildest expectations
On May 14, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released the most current producer price index (PPI) report, which showed an increase of 0.5% month-over-month in April. After the report’s release, U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome “Jay” Powell said that while he believes the current policy rate is restrictive by many measures, the Fed needs…
May 20
Polls give slight advantage to Trump in Electoral College
With the U.S. general election only six months away, leading candidates President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump appear to be engaged in a very close contest. In their 2020 race, the winner of the Electoral College was ultimately determined by a relative handful of voters in just a few swing states, even though…
May 13
College sports is big money but not everyone benefits
March Madness has wrapped up and Caitlin Clark has emerged as a household name as well as a wealthy student athlete. Earning over $3 million throughout her college career, her success stands in stark contrast to the previous notion that collegiate athletes shouldn’t earn anything beyond their scholarship. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey examines…
Apr 29
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
2 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
2 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
2 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
2 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
2 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
8 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
9 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich