Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
House Republicans recently followed through on their promise to kick radical Democrat Congresswoman Ilhan Omar off the House Foreign Affairs Committee.Her ouster was more than deserved — and for reasons even deeper than those detailed in the resolution removing her from the panel. Omar’s hostility towards Jews and the Jewish state, her attempts to equate jihadists with the U.S. military and IDF, and the anti-American, anti-Western worldview underlying her vile words, as detailed in the resolution, make her a uniquely repugnant figure – disqualifyingly so, as her colleagues deemed.
However, even before Omar did her best Farrakhan impression as a congresswoman, she should have never been allowed to serve on the HFAC in the first place. By tabbing her for that post, Democrats knowingly and recklessly endangered our national security.
That’s because the Foreign Affairs Committee touches on virtually every issue vital to our national security, and foreign policy. Yet an extensive investigation into Omar’s history suggests she would have never been able to pass a basic background check for any national security position, let alone one at the level required of a member of the HFAC. I laid out this argument in painstaking detail in my 2020 book-length exposé on Ilhan Omar, titled American Ingrate. In that book, I detailed the “links and/or coordination” – to use Russiagate parlance – between Omar and Islamist, often terror-tied individuals, affiliated with organizations like Muslim Brotherhood-linked CAIR, and the Muslim American Society, and officials foreign and domestic, revealing an open-and-shut case of collusion with American adversaries like Turkey, and corrupted regimes like that of her native Somalia.
I also produced overwhelming evidence suggesting Omar engaged in at least four forms of fraud – marriage, immigration, student loan, and tax — as well as perjury. The fraud stemmed from the bizarre circumstances surrounding two of her marriages – one of which may have been to her biological brother, I kid you not. In fact, many of those crimes may have occurred regardless of whether one of her husbands was her brother. This is to say nothing of a whole raft of ethical concerns raised by conduct like Omar’s shelling out of hundreds of thousands of dollars to a political consultant alleged to have been engaged in an affair with her – a consultant who Omar would ultimately wed – and more petty violations like receiving honoraria in violation of Minnesota House rules, or unlawfully using campaign funds for travel as a state legislator.
In researching my book, I also came to learn that Somali-Americans in her congressional district claimed they faced threats to life and limb from Omar-tied goons for speaking out about her. One source whom I met, would only do so in public locations where there was visible security, for the source’s safety. Were we talking about a mob boss, or a congresswoman here? Omar also constantly evaded scrutiny and gave contradictory accounts when questioned about her background and conduct. Ever the cry bully, she has repeatedly called those, including myself, who dared to confront her with legitimate inquiries, bigots – engaging in total projection. Put it all together and you have a figure totally compromised based on open source materials alone – so much so it would be unthinkable to put that person in any position in the U.S. government, let alone one touching on national security, where devotion to country and character are of the utmost importance.
But elected officials don’t have to pass a background check to get a security clearance. Only the voters vet them. They have failed to do so by electing Omar to Congress twice. And when Democrats put her on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, they compounded that failure, imperiling us all. That her rhetoric and policies have proven consistent with her anti-American allies and supporters was entirely predictable. The House therefore is a better place today with Omar booted from the Foreign Affairs Committee. And that it condemned Omar by name, and condemned her vile rhetoric specifically, rectifies a great wrong done four years ago by House Democrats, who, in March 2019, protected Omar from censure for her anti-Semitic hatred, in watering down a resolution that originally would have called it out, but instead, under pressure from progressives, condemned anti-Jewish, anti-Muslim, and anti-minority bigotry generally. Still, the issues I detailed in American Ingrate about Omar remain.
Law enforcement has seemed unwilling to pursue an investigation into the congresswoman on the merits, while it undertakes all manner of politically charged investigations into other officials.
Omar’s constituents have again refused to punish her by throwing her out of office. So House Republicans have done maybe the next best thing by beginning the process of stripping her of her power by removing her from the Foreign Affairs Committee. They should dig even deeper into Omar’s background to determine if still further action is merited.
-
Trump’s loyal cabinet picks to drive his policy agenda
The prospective nominees for key cabinet positions in President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration have taken Congress by surprise and have triggered alarms from both Democrats and Republicans. Unlike in 2016, when Trump initially assumed office, he is steering clear of anyone he deems insufficiently loyal. Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Ben… -
Trump defies all odds with historic 2024 win
Former President Donald Trump defeated current Vice President Kamala Harris in the U.S. 2024 presidential elections, and will return to the White House in 2025. Trump’s win, which included an important surprise victory in the national popular vote, may set the stage for a GOP “trifecta” if Republicans can win a majority in the U.S.… -
Three ways the Washington Post can restore its credibility
Jeff Bezos, owner of the Washington Post, has come under fire recently for vetoing the editorial board’s endorsement of Kamala Harris for U.S. president just days before the election, forcing the paper to adopt a last-minute rule of not endorsing any presidential candidates. A number of senior writers and editors resigned in protest following the… -
The global censorship-industrial complex
Misinformation and disinformation have become enormous problems for people and governments around the world and have contributed to a rise in political violence and extremism, among other serious concerns. Technology experts have issued public warnings that these problems may become more severe in the near-term future as AI deepfakes become more realistic, as credible news… -
Trump is America’s best defense against global threats
With an escalating war in the Middle East, the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict, and an increasingly assertive China, the stakes for the next U.S. presidential election are exceptionally high. Democratic candidate Vice President Harris and Republican opponent former President Trump offer starkly different approaches to these global challenges, and the future of U.S. policy toward these…
Latest Opinions
-
China grants visa-free access to more countries to boost tourism
-
Jonathan Majors’ ex-girlfriend drops assault and defamation lawsuit
-
Existence of US military drone task force in Philippines revealed
-
How Singapore’s ‘sewage beer’ could help water conservation efforts
-
Chinese hackers listening to calls, reading texts of US government officials
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.