When U.S. lawmakers sign up for their jobs, they likely have certain expectations. Intergalactic battles likely aren’t among them. But here we are. With Russia threatening to deploy nuclear-armed weapons into space, U.S. officials are in a new terrain. That being said, we must accept the fact that our disputes, both national, international and outside of this universe, are no longer limited to this planet.
That being the case, we need a whole new set of rules. And by rules, I mean laws. In mid-February, when news broke that the U.S. privately warned Russia not to deploy new nuclear- armed anti-satellite weapons in outer space, I kept scrolling down my feed. There are simply too many problems on this planet, or on this continent to be honest, for me to really give a damn. But now that I’ve had time to process it, I am utterly terrified, because we don’t have current laws and enforcement abilities in place, really, that reflect our current technological advancements, and the need to escape our current environmental crises.
Yeah, the world has an outer space treaty. And it’s cute, really, but it’s not all-encompassing, and it’s not really realistic. The outer space treaty, or OST as I like to call it, is a multilateral treaty that governs international space law. But one of the things it also does is prohibits weaponizing space. The problem is that OST was written and signed around 1967, before Star Trek gave us our first televised interracial kiss and before haters took from us MLK and RFK. We didn’t have half the technology or nuclear weapons that we have today. It’s a whole different world, figuratively, and kind of literally.
Moreover, OST simply is a treaty. For a nation to fear its impact is real, we need meaningful consequences here. If Russia isn’t afraid to kill thousands in Ukraine, in violation of numerous international agreements, why would it fear violating the OST by putting nuclear weapons into orbit?
Furthermore, we’d be foolish to just limit our fears to Russia when a U.S.-built spacecraft just landed on the moon for the first time in a half century due to the efforts of a private company. Billionaires are set to own extraterrestrial property, it appears. Between Mother Russia and King Capitalism, the fight for outer space is ever-concerning. And the reality of its domination is ever-present. There must be updated laws, restrictions, punishments, governing bodies, with sincere enforcement power and so forth. We can’t simply sit back and allow whomever can enter the terrain to control the destiny of our planet or of others.
Now, while I hate to sound imperialistic, we need to be realistic. And I’m not saying that it must be a U.S.-led effort, as I’m quite sure the United States already has its hands a little bit too far in too many cookie jars, and also has a history of being a little bit overbearing, shall we say. But what I am saying is that we must be prepared on a global scale. Nations must come together to lay the land in terms of what can and cannot be done in outer space, given the capitalistic-induced struggles our planet is currently facing, especially with climate. And those rules and regulations must be reflective of our current and prospective technological advancements, not really what we had back in the day, what 1967. Even though the climate crisis is killing us all, and the planet appears doomed if we don’t do something fast, we must be prepared for what our future holds off planet two, just in case there is potential for some kind of life out there. Because Lord knows that we may not be able to live here for very much longer, and the people who are here are destined to go to outer space.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘A promise’: Cadets describe their journeys at West Point
Jan 10 Dr. Frank Luntz‘A disturbing pick’: Americans debate Musk, Trump’s cabinet picks
Jan 3 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Dysfunctional’: Americans share criticisms of Congress
Dec 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Instill optimism’: Americans on how future generations can succeed
Dec 20 Dr. Frank LuntzWorld must update governing structures for outer space
By Straight Arrow News
The Odysseus lunar landing this past February marked the first soft landing on the moon for a commercial space vehicle. That historic event coincided with reports that the U.S. was warning Russia against deploying nuclear-armed anti-satellite weapons into space.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence argues that the nations of the world must come together to design much more comprehensive governing and legal structures for the next great frontier before the chaos gets out of hand. In addition, Lawrence argues leaders must be careful not to forget the many unresolved crises here on Earth.
That being the case, we need a whole new set of rules, and by rules I mean laws.
In mid-February, when news broke that the U.S. privately warned Russia not to deploy new nuclear-armed anti-satellite weapons in outer space, I kept scrolling down my feed. There are simply too many problems on this planet, or on this continent to be honest, for me to really give a damn. But now that I’ve had time to process it, I am utterly terrified, because we don’t have current laws and enforcement abilities in place, really, that reflect our current technological advancements, and the need to escape our current environmental crises.
Yeah, the world has an Outer Space Treaty. And it’s cute, really, but it’s not all-encompassing, and it’s not really realistic. The Outer Space Treaty, or OST as I like to call it, is a multilateral treaty that governs international space law. But one of the things it also does is prohibit weaponizing space. The problem is that OST was written and signed around 1967, before Star Trek gave us our first televised interracial kiss and before haters took from us MLK and RFK. We didn’t have half the technology or nuclear weapons that we have today. It’s a whole different world, figuratively, and kind of literally.
Moreover, OST simply is a treaty. For a nation to fear its impact is real, we need meaningful consequences here. If Russia isn’t afraid to kill thousands in Ukraine, in violation of numerous international agreements, why would it fear violating the OST by putting nuclear weapons into orbit?
When U.S. lawmakers sign up for their jobs, they likely have certain expectations. Intergalactic battles likely aren’t among them. But here we are. With Russia threatening to deploy nuclear-armed weapons into space, U.S. officials are in a new terrain. That being said, we must accept the fact that our disputes, both national, international and outside of this universe, are no longer limited to this planet.
That being the case, we need a whole new set of rules. And by rules, I mean laws. In mid-February, when news broke that the U.S. privately warned Russia not to deploy new nuclear- armed anti-satellite weapons in outer space, I kept scrolling down my feed. There are simply too many problems on this planet, or on this continent to be honest, for me to really give a damn. But now that I’ve had time to process it, I am utterly terrified, because we don’t have current laws and enforcement abilities in place, really, that reflect our current technological advancements, and the need to escape our current environmental crises.
Yeah, the world has an outer space treaty. And it’s cute, really, but it’s not all-encompassing, and it’s not really realistic. The outer space treaty, or OST as I like to call it, is a multilateral treaty that governs international space law. But one of the things it also does is prohibits weaponizing space. The problem is that OST was written and signed around 1967, before Star Trek gave us our first televised interracial kiss and before haters took from us MLK and RFK. We didn’t have half the technology or nuclear weapons that we have today. It’s a whole different world, figuratively, and kind of literally.
Moreover, OST simply is a treaty. For a nation to fear its impact is real, we need meaningful consequences here. If Russia isn’t afraid to kill thousands in Ukraine, in violation of numerous international agreements, why would it fear violating the OST by putting nuclear weapons into orbit?
Furthermore, we’d be foolish to just limit our fears to Russia when a U.S.-built spacecraft just landed on the moon for the first time in a half century due to the efforts of a private company. Billionaires are set to own extraterrestrial property, it appears. Between Mother Russia and King Capitalism, the fight for outer space is ever-concerning. And the reality of its domination is ever-present. There must be updated laws, restrictions, punishments, governing bodies, with sincere enforcement power and so forth. We can’t simply sit back and allow whomever can enter the terrain to control the destiny of our planet or of others.
Now, while I hate to sound imperialistic, we need to be realistic. And I’m not saying that it must be a U.S.-led effort, as I’m quite sure the United States already has its hands a little bit too far in too many cookie jars, and also has a history of being a little bit overbearing, shall we say. But what I am saying is that we must be prepared on a global scale. Nations must come together to lay the land in terms of what can and cannot be done in outer space, given the capitalistic-induced struggles our planet is currently facing, especially with climate. And those rules and regulations must be reflective of our current and prospective technological advancements, not really what we had back in the day, what 1967. Even though the climate crisis is killing us all, and the planet appears doomed if we don’t do something fast, we must be prepared for what our future holds off planet two, just in case there is potential for some kind of life out there. Because Lord knows that we may not be able to live here for very much longer, and the people who are here are destined to go to outer space.
Here’s how we respond to Trump’s threats in 2025
RFK Jr. at Health Department a chance to tackle drug addiction crisis
Justice demands Trump must not pardon Jan. 6 offenders
Give time, love and togetherness for the holidays
‘Hero’ label for CEO killer reveals health care system outrage
Underreported stories from each side
Bill Gates regrets ‘foolish’ Jeffrey Epstein association, calls it a huge mistake
34 sources | 19% from the left Getty ImagesFox panel backs idea of Trump on Mount Rushmore
10 sources | 13% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Trump wants between 1,200 and 1,500 ICE arrests per day: Report
Perplexity AI offers TikTok merger with US govt. ownership
Authorities dispute trafficking concerns over cryptic ‘HELP’ signs in LA lot
Speaker Johnson says Republicans will expand majority in 2026 election
Senate confirms Scott Bessent as Treasury Secretary
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Voters must hold Trump accountable to his economic promises
8 hrs ago David PakmanPresident Trump should reverse Biden’s abuses and protect human life
Friday Star ParkerTrump’s mass pardons of Capitol rioters undermines US democracy
Friday Dr. Rashad RicheyNew Orleans attack shows US must put ISIS on defense
Thursday Matthew Continetti