Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hello from home. Welcome to my home office. I haven’t been here in awhile. There’s been some really fun news out in the last few days. Specifically, I’m talking about the new deal between the United States and the United Kingdom to provide new military equipment to the Australians.
Now, this abrogates a deal that the Australians had with the French and provides the possibility of the Australians getting some nuclear powered submarines. So, I mean, it’s a very, very sexy story. It’s got submarines and it’s got nuclear propulsion. It’s got the French getting pissed off. I mean, there’s something for everybody here.
And of course, everybody in France is all up in arms and everyone in America is like, oh, we had no idea there was a deal.
And there’s a lot of stupid diplomacy going on and it’s just hot, hot, hot.
Everyone of course was looking at the wrong thing. This is not just a deal about providing Australia with some very high end submarines that’ll either be our Virginia class or based off of them.
This is a broader technological exchange in military technologies among the Australians, the United Kingdom, and the United States of which nuclear powered submarines are only one small part of it.
A far bigger piece is that the Australians will very soon have air- and sea-launched cruise missiles, some of which have a range in excess of 1500 miles. And that makes this deal all about China.
Now, for those of you who have been following me for a while, you know that I really don’t worry about the Chinese at all from a strategic point of view.
Yes, they’ve got a lot of ships in their Navy. Something like 600, 700, but only 10% of them can sail more than a thousand miles from shore. And that assumes no one’s shooting at them. So they really only have a handful of ships that can go a long distance that’s necessary to protect any sort of power. And it’s not enough ships to project power.
So you put that into the context of what’s happening here.
Right now, the United States can wipe the floor with the Chinese Navy, anytime, anywhere except in sight of the Chinese homeland. The Japanese can do it in the deep sea no problem. The Indians can do it in the Indian Ocean, but everyone else is either too far away or they’re a local power so that the Chinese can bring their air force to bear.
That means powers that actually punch well above their weight like Korea or Singapore or Taiwan can only take on the Chinese if they’re willing to suffer some very serious blows to the Homeland. And honestly that goes for the Japanese as well. So it’s really just India and the United States. Until now.
Australia is over 3000 miles away from the Chinese coast. The Chinese don’t have weapons systems that can strike in any meaningful volume at that range. I mean, if they took their entire long reach maybe, the very small handful part, and sailed it all at Darwin, they could do a lot of damage, but the Australians now have the ability to launch weapons systems from their homeland, not even using their outlying islands from their homeland and strike Malacca, which means that Australia is now one of three countries on the planet that can shatter Chinese supply lines and the Chinese political and economic system, because China is 100% dependent upon accessing raw materials the world over and accessing markets the world over, and now Australia has the capacity to interrupt shipments through Malacca, which means that tiny Australia with 26 million people now has China by the throat.
That is the biggest geopolitical development of the year to date.
-
Japan’s navy gets an upgrade
Following their defeat in World War II, the people of Japan pursued a largely pacifist foreign policy. Today, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and with near-daily news regarding China’s threatening activities throughout the greater Pacific, the Japanese are reinvesting in military defense and reaffirming their alliances with Pacific partners like Australia and the United States.…
-
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Many Americans speculated about how a potential RFK, Jr. campaign might impact the 2024 elections. While RFK is neither a Democrat nor a Republican, many of his positions favor Donald Trump’s base over Joe Biden’s, particularly his various conspiracy theories on a wide range of subjects. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan says that GOP…
-
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
The seas above Russia’s northern coastline are too frozen for shipping, but some have wondered whether global warming might change that in the decades to come. If those seas were to become navigable for commercial shipping, new direct routes between Russia and China could theoretically open up. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan throws more…
-
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
The “shale revolution” has provided the United States with a bountiful domestic supply of oil. But extracting oil from shale is a highly technical process, and it is also dependent on specific geological formations. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan tackles the question of whether or not other nations might be able to replicate the…
-
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
A series of recent airstrikes between Israel and Iran inflamed fears of a wider regional war erupting in the Middle East. That concern now seems to have paid off, after third-party countries around the world successfully intervened and talked down military hardliners in both Israel and Iran in order to avoid such an outcome. Israel’s…
Latest Stories
-
Israel believes ICC is ready to issue arrest warrants over Hamas war
-
Deep sea mining may end US reliance on China, enviro concerns remain
-
Beijing auto show features next-gen EVs unavailable to US consumers
-
USDA assures public retail meat is safe, still plans to test beef samples
-
Study: Bottlenose dolphin tested positive for bird flu off Florida coast
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistHow could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Take the job seriously’: Why Americans are fed up with Congress
‘If we can shrink it, it will stop growing’: Americans talk debt, deficit
‘I don’t think they care’: Undecided voters explain their reasons
Pete Ricketts
U.S. Senator for Nebraska