Earlier this month, we learned that the recently bankrupt VICE is not paying bills and has been unable to pay laid-off staff and freelancers for months. But guess what? It had no problem mustering the money to pay execs moments before going belly up. Yeah, that’s right. A day after slashing more than 100 jobs and going bankrupt in May, Vice doled out more than $1 million in performance-related bonuses to its C-suite, which already commanded salaries between 6 and $800,000 a year.
We’re seeing this seemingly self-dealing type of behavior from a number of companies nowadays, where those in positions of power go for a cash grab of some kind, knowing that the organization is going under. Earlier this year, it was Silicon Valley Bank, where the CEO, who made roughly $9.9 million last year, unloaded his stock just weeks before the tech-heavy bank went bust. The CEO of Signature Bank did the exact same thing. These people were in positions to know that their companies were not going to survive. And what did they do? They used that knowledge to financially benefit before the news broke.
In 2021, the Security and Exchange Commission — yeah, the SEC — well, it said it was launching an effort really to close this kind of loophole, to crack down on this insider trading type of behavior, as it concerns opportunistic stock sales before bad news hits.
But so much more must be done. In addition to beefing up SEC laws — and the government must implement measures that authorize the feds to hold executives, and any type of leadership civilly, and I would also argue criminally, accountable for taking these big paydays and bonuses, knowing that they’re on the verge of bankruptcy. It’s a form of fraud as far as I’m concerned. These leaders, they took oaths to do what was in the company’s best interest — to lead, not to fill their coffers before D-Day. Unionizing will not stop this form of corporate greed. VICE had a union. Their execs easily pocketed what little money was left in the 24 hours after that mass round of layoffs. We need far more, we need laws, laws that regard such behavior as a type of self-dealing in the corporate context. There has to be something out there so that they can empower employees and shareholders to sue executives in their personal capacity for their pre-perilous payday.
Why should they get to use their position and knowledge to come up while the employees are wondering whether they can make their rent, pay their mortgage, feed their families due to layoffs, cutbacks and all else, after these executives ran it to the ground? There has to be a private right of action. We the people who invest our time, our energy, blood, sweat, vision into an organization should not be asked out because the execs opt to CYA. These ideas of regulation and criminalization are not crazy. And I know I’m not asking for too much. To the extent that you may think that your position is that these corporations, their leaders should go unscathed and be able to pocket cash, ask yourself why is that? Why is it that we think that certain people at organizations should be able to use their knowledge to make themselves wealthy while everyone else suffers and struggles.
As far as I’m concerned, that’s kind of that whole capitalism-corporatism thing. And that’s kind of the reason why we’re in this not so great situation as a society where we have poverty, we have class divide, we have all sorts of problems. We need to take a different look at how our life, our world, our government is structured, and actually implement some changes that would actually help us all as one people come up and rise, as opposed to allowing those execs to get their comeups off of the back of the people. But then again, maybe those are just my thoughts. In the meantime, I am not going to be investing in any companies that have no parameters put in place to ensure that their leaders don’t get big paydays at the end of the day, because damn sure, no, it ain’t right.
Related
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Does Iran actually have a nuclear weapon?
5 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Assassination attempt on Slovakia’s prime minister explained
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Will Nigeria become Africa’s first superpower?
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Why Putin axed Shoigu
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Stop corporate execs from cashing out before bankruptcy
Jul 19, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
In the past three years, companies including Chesapeake Energy, Hertz, VICE Media, and Silicon Valley Bank have all filed for bankruptcy. But that’s not all they have in common. Their top executives either cashed out company stock or received millions of dollars in bonuses soon before their companies filed. And apparently, it’s all legal.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence thinks it’s time to make new laws that prevent top executives from taking big paydays when their companies are on the edge of bankruptcy. She says corporations are acting fraudulently and failing to protect employees.
But so much more must be done. In addition to beefing up SEC laws, the government must implement measures that authorize the feds to hold executives and any type of leadership civilly — and I would also argue criminally — accountable for taking these big paydays and bonuses, knowing that they’re on the verge of bankruptcy. It’s a form of fraud as far as I’m concerned.
These leaders, they took oaths to do what was in the company’s best interest — to lead, not to fill their coffers before D-Day. Unionizing will not stop this form of corporate greed. VICE had a union. Their execs easily pocketed what little money was left in the 24 hours after that mass round of layoffs.
We need far more, we need laws, laws that regard such behavior as a type of self-dealing in the corporate context. There has to be something out there so that they can empower employees and shareholders to sue executives in their personal capacity for their pre-perilous payday.
Earlier this month, we learned that the recently bankrupt VICE is not paying bills and has been unable to pay laid-off staff and freelancers for months. But guess what? It had no problem mustering the money to pay execs moments before going belly up. Yeah, that’s right. A day after slashing more than 100 jobs and going bankrupt in May, Vice doled out more than $1 million in performance-related bonuses to its C-suite, which already commanded salaries between 6 and $800,000 a year.
We’re seeing this seemingly self-dealing type of behavior from a number of companies nowadays, where those in positions of power go for a cash grab of some kind, knowing that the organization is going under. Earlier this year, it was Silicon Valley Bank, where the CEO, who made roughly $9.9 million last year, unloaded his stock just weeks before the tech-heavy bank went bust. The CEO of Signature Bank did the exact same thing. These people were in positions to know that their companies were not going to survive. And what did they do? They used that knowledge to financially benefit before the news broke.
In 2021, the Security and Exchange Commission — yeah, the SEC — well, it said it was launching an effort really to close this kind of loophole, to crack down on this insider trading type of behavior, as it concerns opportunistic stock sales before bad news hits.
But so much more must be done. In addition to beefing up SEC laws — and the government must implement measures that authorize the feds to hold executives, and any type of leadership civilly, and I would also argue criminally, accountable for taking these big paydays and bonuses, knowing that they’re on the verge of bankruptcy. It’s a form of fraud as far as I’m concerned. These leaders, they took oaths to do what was in the company’s best interest — to lead, not to fill their coffers before D-Day. Unionizing will not stop this form of corporate greed. VICE had a union. Their execs easily pocketed what little money was left in the 24 hours after that mass round of layoffs. We need far more, we need laws, laws that regard such behavior as a type of self-dealing in the corporate context. There has to be something out there so that they can empower employees and shareholders to sue executives in their personal capacity for their pre-perilous payday.
Why should they get to use their position and knowledge to come up while the employees are wondering whether they can make their rent, pay their mortgage, feed their families due to layoffs, cutbacks and all else, after these executives ran it to the ground? There has to be a private right of action. We the people who invest our time, our energy, blood, sweat, vision into an organization should not be asked out because the execs opt to CYA. These ideas of regulation and criminalization are not crazy. And I know I’m not asking for too much. To the extent that you may think that your position is that these corporations, their leaders should go unscathed and be able to pocket cash, ask yourself why is that? Why is it that we think that certain people at organizations should be able to use their knowledge to make themselves wealthy while everyone else suffers and struggles.
As far as I’m concerned, that’s kind of that whole capitalism-corporatism thing. And that’s kind of the reason why we’re in this not so great situation as a society where we have poverty, we have class divide, we have all sorts of problems. We need to take a different look at how our life, our world, our government is structured, and actually implement some changes that would actually help us all as one people come up and rise, as opposed to allowing those execs to get their comeups off of the back of the people. But then again, maybe those are just my thoughts. In the meantime, I am not going to be investing in any companies that have no parameters put in place to ensure that their leaders don’t get big paydays at the end of the day, because damn sure, no, it ain’t right.
Related
Why the United States must regulate ghost guns
“Ghost guns” – untraceable guns normally assembled with a build-it-yourself kit – have been increasingly blamed for homicides and violent gun crimes over the past few years. In 2022, the Biden administration imposed new regulations on ghost guns. The rules required ghost gun manufacturers to register, number and track each sale of a gun kit…
Wednesday
NYPD’s lack of lawsuit disclosure shields it from accountability
An examination of public records obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests revealed that nearly 13,000 legal cases brought against the New York City Police Department (NYPD) resulting in settlements or monetary awards over the past decade were not publicly disclosed, despite legal requirements to do so. Some analysts suggest that the NYPD’s failure…
May 8
Students learning brutal lesson on how police respond to protests
Student protests against Israel’s war in Gaza have escalated in the United States and around the world as civilian death counts in both Gaza and the West Bank continue to climb. Estimates show Israeli forces killed at least 42,500 Palestinians since Oct. 7, 2023, and another two million survivors have been displaced from their homes.…
May 1
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
Apr 24
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
Apr 17
Underreported stories from each side
Report: 84% of Chicago’s Measles Cases Traced to Venezuelan Migrants
9 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Stefanik, Fox News anchor spar over New York Times report questioning her support of Trump
10 sources | 10% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Rep. Green raises alarm over record 10 million migrant encounters under Biden
Watch 1:43
51 mins ago
Biden admin to end mining leases in largest coal-producing region
Watch 1:42
1 hr ago
IDF releases Hamas video of young Israeli hostages
Watch 1:59
1 hr ago
Questions swirl over Iran’s future after President Raisi’s sudden death
Watch 2:35
2 hrs ago
Water war grows, US officials try to block funds to Mexico over treaty fight
Watch 2:45
2 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Federal Reserve surpassed its own wildest expectations
5 hrs ago
Larry Lindsey
Crime is down under Biden. Why do Americans not believe it?
5 hrs ago
David Pakman
Politicians and Supreme Court justices must have term limits
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
During Police Week, all Americans should honor fallen officers
Friday
Star Parker