Okay, I think it’s time we have a conversation about term limits. I’m not just talking about term limits for politicians, I’m talking about term limits for everybody, including the United States Supreme Court, hear me out term limits, would do a few things. I know there are pros and cons to it. And I guarantee you, there are arguments in both parties to keep unlimited terms going on and on and on. Remember, the people who are telling you this are the ones that are currently serving in political office, you see, the foundation of this country was not built on the principle that said, politicians should be a professional industry. In other words, the idea that a politician is simply a politician was never the idea. In America, it was an idea that citizens, everyday people should be able to manage the affairs of the nation and be elected as a representative from their district. Okay. So if that’s the dynamic, we have significantly left that model a long time ago. You see, there are politicians that have been politicians longer than they’ve been anything else. They’re politicians who have been in office for 30 or 40 years, that’s a professional politician. How does that hurt you? How does that hurt communities? How does that create an adverse effect, here’s how, when you have that kind of colleague ship, for so many years, so many decades, all of a sudden this system sets in, we call it the good ol boy system, where votes are being done. By way of relationship, then by way of sentiment from the voter, the voters that put the person in power.
All of a sudden, this is a scratch my back, I scratch yours, rather than representing the best interest of the district. You see, this only happens when there’s this longevity, a culture sets in and then it, it crystallizes to where people say, There’s no way to uproot that system, there’s no way to come against that system. Well, there is what’s called term limits. You see, if you have someone in for a limited amount of time, more likely, they’re going to try to utilize that time in order to get stuff done, protect their legacy, honor their word, remember their commitment.
But when someone has been there forever, when someone has been there 1020 30 years, they know it’s going to be very difficult to ever lose in a primary, or a general election. They get reelected, reelected by name recognition alone. And they stop serving the community. They start serving special interests, they start serving their corporate friends, they start serving the leader of this, and the committee chairman of that rather than you. And the only way to destroy that kind of system is to have term limits. I think it is time to also have the conversation of term limits as it relates to the US Supreme Court. You see if they did it the way let’s say the FBI director is done, which is basically a 10 year term, which means they still can be fired. The Supreme Court would not have that same element, 10 years, 10 years, but they can be reaffirmed every 10 years, how would that help?
That means the decisions would not be so political. Because if they make a decision today, because they favor a particular, let’s say, President, they don’t know who will be president 10 years from that day, which means they may be more willing to make decisions, decisions based on congruence to law, rather than to their political ideology. Just a thought
Dr. Rashad Richey
National TV Political Analyst, Talk Radio Host, Univ. Prof.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
8 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Politicians and Supreme Court justices must have term limits
Dr. Rashad Richey
National TV Political Analyst, Talk Radio Host, Univ. Prof.
By Straight Arrow News
When the founders of the early American republic designed the Constitution, they envisioned a powerful judiciary separated from the influences of the legislative and executive branches. To try to reach that goal, the United States offers lifetime appointments to its federal Supreme Court justices.
In recent decades, however, Americans have raised a variety of arguments against these lifelong appointments. In 2024, 68% of Americans now say that they support term limits for Supreme Court justices, and the United States is the only advanced democracy in the world that still offers lifelong appointments to its senior-most federal justices.
Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Dr. Rashad Richey argues in favor of implementing term limits for United States Supreme Court justices and for U.S. politicians at all levels of government.
Be the first to know when Dr. Rashad Richey publishes a new opinion every Friday! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt of the above video:
You see, if you have someone in for a limited amount of time, more likely, they’re going to try to utilize that time in order to get stuff done, protect their legacy, honor their word, remember their commitment.
But when someone has been there forever, when someone has been there 10, 20, 30 years, they know it’s going to be very difficult to ever lose in a primary or a general election. They get reelected by name recognition alone. And they stop serving the community. They start serving special interests, they start serving their corporate friends, they start serving the leader of this, and the committee chairman of that, rather than you.
And the only way to destroy that kind of system is to have term limits. I think it is time to also have the conversation of term limits as it relates to the U.S. Supreme Court. You see, if they did it the way let’s say the FBI director is done, which is basically a 10-year term, which means they still can be fired, the Supreme Court would not have that same element, 10 years, but they can be reaffirmed every 10 years. How would that help?
That means the decisions would not be so political. Because if they make a decision today, because they favor a particular, let’s say, president, they don’t know who will be president 10 years from that day, which means they may be more willing to make decisions based on congruence to law, rather than to their political ideology.
Okay, I think it’s time we have a conversation about term limits. I’m not just talking about term limits for politicians, I’m talking about term limits for everybody, including the United States Supreme Court, hear me out term limits, would do a few things. I know there are pros and cons to it. And I guarantee you, there are arguments in both parties to keep unlimited terms going on and on and on. Remember, the people who are telling you this are the ones that are currently serving in political office, you see, the foundation of this country was not built on the principle that said, politicians should be a professional industry. In other words, the idea that a politician is simply a politician was never the idea. In America, it was an idea that citizens, everyday people should be able to manage the affairs of the nation and be elected as a representative from their district. Okay. So if that’s the dynamic, we have significantly left that model a long time ago. You see, there are politicians that have been politicians longer than they’ve been anything else. They’re politicians who have been in office for 30 or 40 years, that’s a professional politician. How does that hurt you? How does that hurt communities? How does that create an adverse effect, here’s how, when you have that kind of colleague ship, for so many years, so many decades, all of a sudden this system sets in, we call it the good ol boy system, where votes are being done. By way of relationship, then by way of sentiment from the voter, the voters that put the person in power.
All of a sudden, this is a scratch my back, I scratch yours, rather than representing the best interest of the district. You see, this only happens when there’s this longevity, a culture sets in and then it, it crystallizes to where people say, There’s no way to uproot that system, there’s no way to come against that system. Well, there is what’s called term limits. You see, if you have someone in for a limited amount of time, more likely, they’re going to try to utilize that time in order to get stuff done, protect their legacy, honor their word, remember their commitment.
But when someone has been there forever, when someone has been there 1020 30 years, they know it’s going to be very difficult to ever lose in a primary, or a general election. They get reelected, reelected by name recognition alone. And they stop serving the community. They start serving special interests, they start serving their corporate friends, they start serving the leader of this, and the committee chairman of that rather than you. And the only way to destroy that kind of system is to have term limits. I think it is time to also have the conversation of term limits as it relates to the US Supreme Court. You see if they did it the way let’s say the FBI director is done, which is basically a 10 year term, which means they still can be fired. The Supreme Court would not have that same element, 10 years, 10 years, but they can be reaffirmed every 10 years, how would that help?
That means the decisions would not be so political. Because if they make a decision today, because they favor a particular, let’s say, President, they don’t know who will be president 10 years from that day, which means they may be more willing to make decisions, decisions based on congruence to law, rather than to their political ideology. Just a thought
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
Republican rhetorical attacks on Vice President Kamala Harris, the leading Democratic candidate for president, escalated as soon as President Biden announced that he was stepping back from the election. Many Republicans accused Harris of being “a DEI hire” and indicated that she only got her position because of her skin color or gender, not her…
9 hrs ago
Violent rhetoric in politics amplified by Republican leaders
In the wake of the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, some Republicans were quick to blame Democrats for the attack, linking it to “incendiary rhetoric” about Trump. One recent example cited by his supporters is President Joe Biden’s comment: “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye. He’s gotten away with doing nothing…
Jul 19
America is in trouble
President Biden’s debate performance drew a variety of reactions from Democrats, with some calling for him to step down, others saying that he should support another candidate, and some still insisting that Biden remains the best choice. Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded presidential powers and criminal immunity in its Trump v. United States decision…
Jul 12
Americans deserve younger candidates, better ideas
On March 7, President Joe Biden delivered a well-received State of the Union address, speaking clearly and in detail about the challenges that the nation must confront. Less than four months later, on June 28, a very different-looking president took the stage to debate Donald Trump. In both speech and physical appearance, this Biden suddenly…
Jul 5
Time for Christian evangelicals to part ways with Trump
As former President Trump vies for another shot at the White House, one loyal demographic he is counting on is white Christian evangelicals. More than 80% of evangelicals backed Trump in the 2020 election, and after endorsing a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms, he’s gearing up for…
Jun 28
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
3 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
3 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
3 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
3 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
3 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
9 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
9 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich