Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from the Lincoln Memorial in DC. Now I know I’ve already talked about the Chinese semiconductor shift in policy here in the United States. But there’s been a lot that has developed over the last 48 hours…so I feel I need to do a quick update.
The biggest thing to understand is…not only is China now unable to import the equipment to make semiconductors, or the tools to maintain and operate the equipment, or the software that’s necessary to operate the equipment, or any mid or high-level chips at all. Now, any Americans who want to assist with the Chinese semiconductor industry have to make a choice. You can have your job with China or you can have your citizenship. As a result, within about 48 hours of the policy being adopted last Friday, every single American citizen who was working in China in the industry either quit or their companies relocated their entire division so they would have to lose their staff. For all practical purposes, the Chinese semiconductor industry of everything over like Internet of Things, level-of-quality is now dead. And that has a lot more implications than it sounds.
The Chinese have proven incapable of the last 25 years of advancing sufficiently technologically in terms of the intellectual heft that’s required to operate this industry, beyond being able to simply operate the facilities that make the low-end chips. And even that had to be managed by …foreigners. So there is no indigenous capacity here to pick this up and move on. And since the United States has basically corralled the Japanese and the Dutch, two very pro-American countries from a strategic sense, to join in this ban, really all that’s left is potentially Korea and Taiwan. And even if they were fully on board — which they’re not — that is not enough to carry all the water that needs to be carried.
In terms of industrial fallout, this doesn’t just mean that the Chinese are never going to be able to make the chips that go into cars or computers. It also means that any industry that is dependent upon the hardware, dies. So when you think of some of the technological advancements that the Chinese have made in recent years, things like AI and mass automation, monitoring their own population, the great firewall, hypersonic cruise missiles, a space program… supercomputers. If the Chinese want to do any of this, they have to buy chips basically on the gray market, purchase prefinished products and then pull out the chips and apply them to something they weren’t designed for.
We are looking at at least an order of magnitude drop in the Chinese capacity to operate in anything that is tech focused. This is a deal killer, not just for the industry but for a modern technocratic system. From a technological point of view, China is done. The question, of course is what do they do about it? We’re dealing with a one-man government here that’s a little petulant when they don’t get their way. And where the bureaucracy is either completely static or over-enthusiastic and does things like work well for your diplomacy.
So I would expect this kind of bag of **** public diplomacy that has evolved in China to hit this hard and loud, which will probably only encourage the Americans to act more harshly and start targeting some of the lower end semiconductors. And that’s going to have consequences throughout the world. But we’ll get to that another time. All right. Take care.
-
With globalization ending, the US can and should adapt
Geopolitical experts have cautioned that the era of globalization and “off-shoring” may be ending, and a new era of regionalization and “friend-shoring” might be replacing it. These changes are especially obvious in U.S.-Chinese trade relations over the past few years, although similar observations can be made around the world. Others warn that even “friend-shoring” may… -
Deglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Globalization has strengthened the interdependence of nations through trade in technology, services, and, most notably, food. It has reshaped the global agricultural system, improving both the variety and affordability of food while also influencing its quality and nutritional value. So what would happen to countries reliant on this system if the world became less interconnected?… -
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Wheat thrives in temperatures between 70°F and 75°F but has difficulty in temperatures above 90°F. So, what happens when climate change leads to rising heat that damages wheat crops and reduces yields? Models predict that by 2050, climate change will significantly lower global wheat production, particularly in Africa and South Asia, where food security is… -
Blue money for green energy in red states
President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funding, widely popular among Democrats, went mostly toward development projects in deep red Republican states, despite Republican legislators actually voting against the act. That may have generated some pushback and alarm from Democrats, but there are more complicated stories behind IRA numbers than the simple red-blue divide might suggest.… -
Tomorrow’s new world order
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States and its allies celebrated a new era of global hegemony. But in recent years, especially with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Chinese military aggression in the Pacific, that hegemony has come under attack. Meanwhile, major powers like France and Turkey are already preparing to play…
Latest Stories
-
Viral ‘airport tray aesthetic’ could be slowing down TSA lines
-
Discount retailer Big Lots files for bankruptcy
-
Opposition presidential candidate flees Venezuela amid arrest threats, protests
-
Troops scheduled to leave Iraq by 2026, US shifts to advisory role
-
Defense secretary says temporary budget bill would severely impact military
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistDeglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Blue money for green energy in red states
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘The lesser of two evils’: Undecided Gen Z on 2024 election
‘Administration doesn’t care’: Jewish students on campus antisemitism
‘The prices on everything’: What keeps Americans up at night