When we learned about rampid covert government surveillance of US citizens, Congress gave us FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The Act was structured to limit how and when the FBI, CIA, NSA and other agencies could spy on the American people. Since that legislation draft back in 1978. However, surveillance techniques have evolved. Also in the wake of 911. Restrictions on spying have relaxed as the alphabet of defense agencies have expanded with the DHS and the DOD and so on. So here we are in 2023. With the government now surveilling people sounds warrant basically respecting privacy rights, like Trump respects gag orders, we need to push back. Specifically, we need to support the government surveillance Reform Act of 2023 gsra They call it the bipartisan legislation that was put up in the Senate last week takes FISA a step further by preventing abuses of power while taking us a step back in terms of reversing the erosion of privacy rights. This legislation would be a big deal as law enforcement illegal surveillance has been a big problem. According to a report recently released by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, intelligence officials conducted more than 200,000 purportedly inadvertent searches of Americans communications in just 2022 alone, and that was a stark improvement from previous years. It was in fact a 98% improvement to be exact, before being reined in by the FISA court for persistent and widespread FISA violations. The FBI was intercepting communications of hundreds of 1000s of Americans from social justice protesters to members of Congress to congressional campaign donors. Everybody’s business was in these government streets. I’m talking about warrantless search. I’m talking like all the time. It’s like the Fourth Amendment was merely advisory for the feds, and all they had to offer us in response was oops, we the people deserve better. Like actual privacy rights. We deserve to know that the intelligence community isn’t simply trimming a little fat off of the constitution so it can surveil my DNS. If passed the gsra would help curb such abuses. It will require officials to obtain a warrant and a criminal or FISA court before performing searches for Americans communications. Last I checked that would simply be complying with the Fourth Amendment, but hey, I will take it at this point.
The gsra also would prohibit agencies from accessing and buying databases of vast amounts of highly sensitive information on Americans. You know, because capitalism is king and everything’s for sale, this data broker business has been going on behind closed doors for decades now giving law enforcement a workaround to otherwise warrant requisite searches. Another pivotal part of gsra is a provision that would restrict law enforcement ability to capture location information from cell phones, car computers and other digital signals without a warrant. None of these proposed changes are wild. Perhaps that’s why both Republicans and Democrats in the Senate can get behind it. But now we must as citizens do the same by contacting our representatives, demanding they support the gsra slicer was good for where we were back in 78. But we need legislation that aligns with the times and the government level of abuses. Because no matter how many decades pass, protecting privacy rights never goes out of style,
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
Wednesday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Nov 21 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
Nov 4 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Strong’: Why some men say they’ll vote for Trump
Oct 29 Dr. Frank LuntzAll Americans should support proposed privacy bill
By Straight Arrow News
The aftermath of 9/11 ushered in a new era of warrantless mass surveillance in the United States. Now, a proposed bill with broad bipartisan support hopes to change that. The Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA) seeks to restrict U.S. government agencies from exploiting loopholes and bulk purchasing sensitive personal data on American citizens.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence encourages all Americans to support the bill regardless of their political opinions. She reminds us that the GSRA has broad bipartisan support and concludes that this is our best opportunity to regulate government surveillance.
The GSRA also would prohibit agencies from accessing and buying databases of vast amounts of highly sensitive information on Americans. You know, because capitalism is king and everything’s for sale, this data broker business has been going on behind closed doors for decades now, giving law enforcement a workaround to otherwise warrant-requisite searches. Another pivotal part of GSRA is a provision that would restrict law enforcement’s ability to capture location information from cell phones, car computers and other digital signals without a warrant.
None of these proposed changes are wild. Perhaps that’s why both Republicans and Democrats in the Senate can get behind it. But now we must as citizens do the same by contacting our representatives, demanding they support the GSRA.
FISA was good for where we were back in 1978, but we need legislation that aligns with the times and the government level of abuses. Because no matter how many decades pass, protecting privacy rights never goes out of style.
When we learned about rampid covert government surveillance of US citizens, Congress gave us FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The Act was structured to limit how and when the FBI, CIA, NSA and other agencies could spy on the American people. Since that legislation draft back in 1978. However, surveillance techniques have evolved. Also in the wake of 911. Restrictions on spying have relaxed as the alphabet of defense agencies have expanded with the DHS and the DOD and so on. So here we are in 2023. With the government now surveilling people sounds warrant basically respecting privacy rights, like Trump respects gag orders, we need to push back. Specifically, we need to support the government surveillance Reform Act of 2023 gsra They call it the bipartisan legislation that was put up in the Senate last week takes FISA a step further by preventing abuses of power while taking us a step back in terms of reversing the erosion of privacy rights. This legislation would be a big deal as law enforcement illegal surveillance has been a big problem. According to a report recently released by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, intelligence officials conducted more than 200,000 purportedly inadvertent searches of Americans communications in just 2022 alone, and that was a stark improvement from previous years. It was in fact a 98% improvement to be exact, before being reined in by the FISA court for persistent and widespread FISA violations. The FBI was intercepting communications of hundreds of 1000s of Americans from social justice protesters to members of Congress to congressional campaign donors. Everybody’s business was in these government streets. I’m talking about warrantless search. I’m talking like all the time. It’s like the Fourth Amendment was merely advisory for the feds, and all they had to offer us in response was oops, we the people deserve better. Like actual privacy rights. We deserve to know that the intelligence community isn’t simply trimming a little fat off of the constitution so it can surveil my DNS. If passed the gsra would help curb such abuses. It will require officials to obtain a warrant and a criminal or FISA court before performing searches for Americans communications. Last I checked that would simply be complying with the Fourth Amendment, but hey, I will take it at this point.
The gsra also would prohibit agencies from accessing and buying databases of vast amounts of highly sensitive information on Americans. You know, because capitalism is king and everything’s for sale, this data broker business has been going on behind closed doors for decades now giving law enforcement a workaround to otherwise warrant requisite searches. Another pivotal part of gsra is a provision that would restrict law enforcement ability to capture location information from cell phones, car computers and other digital signals without a warrant. None of these proposed changes are wild. Perhaps that’s why both Republicans and Democrats in the Senate can get behind it. But now we must as citizens do the same by contacting our representatives, demanding they support the gsra slicer was good for where we were back in 78. But we need legislation that aligns with the times and the government level of abuses. Because no matter how many decades pass, protecting privacy rights never goes out of style,
Linda McMahon is bad news for US education system
How Gov. Gavin Newsom is ‘Trump-proofing’ his state
Sonia Sotomayor can and should remain on Supreme Court
Six disturbing takeaways from Project 2025
Forced prison labor is modern-day slavery in California
Underreported stories from each side
Democratic senators say they bungled border security in 2024: Hill
15 sources | 0% from the left Getty ImagesWisconsin officials certify Trump’s victory in back-to-the-routine teleconference
21 sources | 6% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Mexico votes to end watchdog agencies, critics question gov’t transparency
Hurricane season comes to an end after record-breaking year
Hasbro stock jumps as Elon Musk toys with idea of buying company
FTC probe targets Microsoft’s business model in Lina Khan’s last stand
Pair of tax preparers charged with stealing $65M worth of COVID-19 funds
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Why US must stand firm against ICC warrants for Netanyahu
Yesterday Star ParkerJack Smith is wrong to drop all charges against Trump
Yesterday Dr. Rashad RicheyLinda McMahon is bad news for US education system
Wednesday Adrienne LawrenceThanksgiving 2024 brings new president and fresh opportunities
Wednesday Newt Gingrich