Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan coming to you from Colorado. And today we’re going to talk about the Federal Reserve and monetary policy. Specifically on the 26th of April, the personal consumption expenditures index, which is the Feds preferred measure of inflation ticked up to 2.7%. When everyone’s been hoping that’s going to tick down,
the folks on Wall Street are starting to get very thoughtful, because they had all bet in the fourth quarter of last year in the first quarter of this year, that by now, we would have had a half a dozen rate cuts to stimulate the economy. And the Federal Reserve does not seem interested at all and playing to their preferred narrative. So I thought it was worth going back to understand why we are where we are, and why you should not expect rate cuts, probably at all, if anything rate increases for the remainder of the next two to five years. So step one, most of the inflation story that we’ve been experienced of late has been COVID. related. Every time that we saw a shift in consumption, because of an opening or closing or new variant or new vaccine, whatever it was, we changed what we consume in terms of goods. And every time we changed our consumption patterns,
we had to retool the supply chains to match the new demand. And it’s going to vary wildly by product and by region. But on average, you’re looking at an 18 to 24 month adjustment period before supply chains can catch up to what we want. Well, most of us reopened more than two years ago, and California, the last American state to reopen for good did so just under two years ago. So for the last two years, we’ve been seeing inflation steadily tick down, as supply chains catch up, and the goods mismatch in the supply payments mismatch becomes a smaller and smaller feature in the system.
Unfortunately, for the people who want lower rates, while this has brought inflation down from 19%, were roughly hitting the peak to something closer to three,
we’ve leveled off at three. And while we might have a little bit more to shake out, as California fully comes back into the system, I doubt we’re gonna get down to the 2%, which is the ceiling that the Federal Reserve prefers. So we’re probably at what is our new normal for inflation, low snap, not our new average. And unless we have a change in the Feds mandate, you shouldn’t expect interest rates to go down below where they are, if anything you should expect them to go up. Now that requires understanding the couple other things that are in play. One of them is a little petty, and one of them is definitely not first, the petty one, the Federal Reserve looks at Wall Street. And he says, You have been dealing with capital inflows of a huge volume and you’ve been fairly irresponsible with them. You’re responsible for the.com crash, you’re responsible for the subprime crash.
And we needed 10 years to rebuild the financial sector after each of those catastrophes. So if there’s something that people in Wall Street in the financial community, they go, Well, this has to happen. Well, it has to happen for their business plans, it doesn’t have to happen for the United States economy certainly doesn’t have to happen for the real economy. And it certainly doesn’t have to happen from the feds point of view. So there’s probably a certain about of where I revenge in play, when the Federal Reserve looks at what Wall Street once and then chooses to do something completely different for independent reasons. The second issue is that there really are independent reasons. And for that, we have to look at demographics. So when you’re 45, to 65, that is when you’re the most capital rich that you will ever be in your life. Because your kids are moving out, your house is being paid down, and you’re saving your money for retirement. Also, if you’ve been at your job for decades, you’re pretty good at it, your incomes, the highest it will ever be. So from 45 to 65, and especially 55 to 65. That is where all private capital comes from the savings of that capital rich group. Well, the largest generation we’ve had in human history are the baby boomers, not just here in the United States around the world.
The oldest baby boomers hit 45 in 1990. And the youngest baby boomers will hit 65 and retire and liquidate all their money or all their savings into low velocity investments. They’ll retire in 2030. So from roughly 2000 to 2020, almost all of the baby boomers were in that capital rich portion of their lives. And as a result, capital availability on a on an American basis on a global basis was the highest had ever been capital costs were the lowest it has ever been. And in that environment. The Fed will be the first to tell you that that made American Finance really matter. Because there is no way the United States
Could metabolize all of the baby boomer capital. So an entire financial class who rose up to take advantage of the trough, and to come up with new financial products to metabolize it, and send a great amount of it abroad. At the same time, the Chinese were going through something similar, from 2000 to 220 20, is roughly when their economy was firing on all cylinders. And while it’s not based on private savings to the same degree, as ours is, they do a lot more monetization, which is a fancy way of saying printing currency, all the gold bugs in the crypto guys how to certain degree are right, that that’s not great. That puts everything on a sugar high. But the Chinese central bank is the one that’s guilty of that not the US Federal Reserve. Anyway, for 20 years, we had all this capital just spamming out of the United States and out of China.
And Wall Street was necessary, the financial sector was necessary a way of above bottomless wave of financial professionals was necessary to use all that capital. And did they get it? All right? No, none of us do. Anyway, that wave is gone. The vast majority of baby boomers are now retired, and the rest of them will leak out of the system over the next five, six years, which means their capital is gone. It’s been turned into low velocity investments like T bills in cash. The Next Generation down Gen X is small. And the next large generation, the millennials won’t be entering that capital rich period for another 10 to 12 years. And that assumes they do everything on time. And to this point, whether it’s having a kid buying a house or getting married, the millennials have been doing everything about six years late.
Anyway, bottom line is there’s not nearly as much free capital available, which means we don’t need nearly as large of a financial sector. And so the Federal Reserve is looking at all this and feel like there’s less capital, demand is falling.
Our tools are designed to regulate capital and demand. That means we need to find a new model. And in this new model, the financial sector is no longer all knowing all seen, and omnipresent. So the Federal Reserve, rightly is concerned about inflation. And now that we’re in a period of D globalization, we’re seeing demand for American employment. And American capital, American materials skyrocket as the US steadily and with increasing speed disentangle itself from global supply chains. And that means me building a lot more industrial plant, and it absorbs all of the things that the private sector has always absorbed. But now to build a fundamentally new infrastructure, that’s expensive. That’s a lot of demand. That’s a lot of inflation. Now, I’d argue that it’s productive inflation, because it’s building the industrial plant that we’ll need for the next generation or two. But until and unless the Federal Reserve’s mandates changes, they’re not going to be able to get to a world of 2% inflation, certainly not if they lower interest rates. So when people say higher for longer, they may be thinking about another quarter or two before interest rates drop. But I say that until this industrial plant is built out, and until we have another large capital generating class in their 50s.
Higher for longer means another decade, before we see any appreciable relief and capital costs. So bottom line, if you’re gonna borrow, do it now. Because even today, with capital costs that have increased by a factor of four in the last five years, this is still the cheapest capital you’re going to be able to access until the mid 2030s.
Related
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical Strategist
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Does Iran actually have a nuclear weapon?
2 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Assassination attempt on Slovakia’s prime minister explained
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Will Nigeria become Africa’s first superpower?
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Why Putin axed Shoigu
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Why interest rates will be higher for longer
May 10
By Straight Arrow News
At the start of 2024, the outlook for the U.S. economy was optimistic. Inflation was falling, unemployment was shrinking and the country was experiencing strong GDP growth. As 2024 progressed, that situation changed. Inflation proved stubborn, remaining above 3%, and economic output slowed down, making the Federal Reserve’s initial prediction for six rate cuts no longer accurate.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan does not foresee any interest rate cuts in the distant future but believes rates will instead move in the opposite direction.
Excerpted from Peter’s May 10 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
Who doesn’t love spending their morning trying to understand what the Federal Reserve is doing? Oh, no takers? Well, let’s at least look at inflation trends and where I expect interest rates to go.
Thanks to COVID-related supply chain disruptions, inflation has stabilized around 3% (instead of the Fed’s magic 2%). Those baby boomers are also part of the problem. As they age into retirement, capital availability is going to decline and the Fed’s going to have [to] rethink their strategy.
I doubt we’ll see interest rates drop for the next few years, so if you’re planning on borrowing some money… you might want to get on that ASAP.
Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan coming to you from Colorado. And today we’re going to talk about the Federal Reserve and monetary policy. Specifically on the 26th of April, the personal consumption expenditures index, which is the Feds preferred measure of inflation ticked up to 2.7%. When everyone’s been hoping that’s going to tick down,
the folks on Wall Street are starting to get very thoughtful, because they had all bet in the fourth quarter of last year in the first quarter of this year, that by now, we would have had a half a dozen rate cuts to stimulate the economy. And the Federal Reserve does not seem interested at all and playing to their preferred narrative. So I thought it was worth going back to understand why we are where we are, and why you should not expect rate cuts, probably at all, if anything rate increases for the remainder of the next two to five years. So step one, most of the inflation story that we’ve been experienced of late has been COVID. related. Every time that we saw a shift in consumption, because of an opening or closing or new variant or new vaccine, whatever it was, we changed what we consume in terms of goods. And every time we changed our consumption patterns,
we had to retool the supply chains to match the new demand. And it’s going to vary wildly by product and by region. But on average, you’re looking at an 18 to 24 month adjustment period before supply chains can catch up to what we want. Well, most of us reopened more than two years ago, and California, the last American state to reopen for good did so just under two years ago. So for the last two years, we’ve been seeing inflation steadily tick down, as supply chains catch up, and the goods mismatch in the supply payments mismatch becomes a smaller and smaller feature in the system.
Unfortunately, for the people who want lower rates, while this has brought inflation down from 19%, were roughly hitting the peak to something closer to three,
we’ve leveled off at three. And while we might have a little bit more to shake out, as California fully comes back into the system, I doubt we’re gonna get down to the 2%, which is the ceiling that the Federal Reserve prefers. So we’re probably at what is our new normal for inflation, low snap, not our new average. And unless we have a change in the Feds mandate, you shouldn’t expect interest rates to go down below where they are, if anything you should expect them to go up. Now that requires understanding the couple other things that are in play. One of them is a little petty, and one of them is definitely not first, the petty one, the Federal Reserve looks at Wall Street. And he says, You have been dealing with capital inflows of a huge volume and you’ve been fairly irresponsible with them. You’re responsible for the.com crash, you’re responsible for the subprime crash.
And we needed 10 years to rebuild the financial sector after each of those catastrophes. So if there’s something that people in Wall Street in the financial community, they go, Well, this has to happen. Well, it has to happen for their business plans, it doesn’t have to happen for the United States economy certainly doesn’t have to happen for the real economy. And it certainly doesn’t have to happen from the feds point of view. So there’s probably a certain about of where I revenge in play, when the Federal Reserve looks at what Wall Street once and then chooses to do something completely different for independent reasons. The second issue is that there really are independent reasons. And for that, we have to look at demographics. So when you’re 45, to 65, that is when you’re the most capital rich that you will ever be in your life. Because your kids are moving out, your house is being paid down, and you’re saving your money for retirement. Also, if you’ve been at your job for decades, you’re pretty good at it, your incomes, the highest it will ever be. So from 45 to 65, and especially 55 to 65. That is where all private capital comes from the savings of that capital rich group. Well, the largest generation we’ve had in human history are the baby boomers, not just here in the United States around the world.
The oldest baby boomers hit 45 in 1990. And the youngest baby boomers will hit 65 and retire and liquidate all their money or all their savings into low velocity investments. They’ll retire in 2030. So from roughly 2000 to 2020, almost all of the baby boomers were in that capital rich portion of their lives. And as a result, capital availability on a on an American basis on a global basis was the highest had ever been capital costs were the lowest it has ever been. And in that environment. The Fed will be the first to tell you that that made American Finance really matter. Because there is no way the United States
Could metabolize all of the baby boomer capital. So an entire financial class who rose up to take advantage of the trough, and to come up with new financial products to metabolize it, and send a great amount of it abroad. At the same time, the Chinese were going through something similar, from 2000 to 220 20, is roughly when their economy was firing on all cylinders. And while it’s not based on private savings to the same degree, as ours is, they do a lot more monetization, which is a fancy way of saying printing currency, all the gold bugs in the crypto guys how to certain degree are right, that that’s not great. That puts everything on a sugar high. But the Chinese central bank is the one that’s guilty of that not the US Federal Reserve. Anyway, for 20 years, we had all this capital just spamming out of the United States and out of China.
And Wall Street was necessary, the financial sector was necessary a way of above bottomless wave of financial professionals was necessary to use all that capital. And did they get it? All right? No, none of us do. Anyway, that wave is gone. The vast majority of baby boomers are now retired, and the rest of them will leak out of the system over the next five, six years, which means their capital is gone. It’s been turned into low velocity investments like T bills in cash. The Next Generation down Gen X is small. And the next large generation, the millennials won’t be entering that capital rich period for another 10 to 12 years. And that assumes they do everything on time. And to this point, whether it’s having a kid buying a house or getting married, the millennials have been doing everything about six years late.
Anyway, bottom line is there’s not nearly as much free capital available, which means we don’t need nearly as large of a financial sector. And so the Federal Reserve is looking at all this and feel like there’s less capital, demand is falling.
Our tools are designed to regulate capital and demand. That means we need to find a new model. And in this new model, the financial sector is no longer all knowing all seen, and omnipresent. So the Federal Reserve, rightly is concerned about inflation. And now that we’re in a period of D globalization, we’re seeing demand for American employment. And American capital, American materials skyrocket as the US steadily and with increasing speed disentangle itself from global supply chains. And that means me building a lot more industrial plant, and it absorbs all of the things that the private sector has always absorbed. But now to build a fundamentally new infrastructure, that’s expensive. That’s a lot of demand. That’s a lot of inflation. Now, I’d argue that it’s productive inflation, because it’s building the industrial plant that we’ll need for the next generation or two. But until and unless the Federal Reserve’s mandates changes, they’re not going to be able to get to a world of 2% inflation, certainly not if they lower interest rates. So when people say higher for longer, they may be thinking about another quarter or two before interest rates drop. But I say that until this industrial plant is built out, and until we have another large capital generating class in their 50s.
Higher for longer means another decade, before we see any appreciable relief and capital costs. So bottom line, if you’re gonna borrow, do it now. Because even today, with capital costs that have increased by a factor of four in the last five years, this is still the cheapest capital you’re going to be able to access until the mid 2030s.
Related
Does Iran actually have a nuclear weapon?
Amid ongoing tensions in the Middle East, concerns over Iran’s nuclear program have resurfaced. The Islamic Republic has long claimed that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only, but an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei recently mentioned that it could review its “nuclear doctrine” should its existence be threatened. Watch the above…
2 hrs ago
Assassination attempt on Slovakia’s prime minister explained
On Wednesday, May 15, there was an assassination attempt on Slovakia Prime Minister Robert Fico. The populist leader is in critical condition but expected to survive, and a lone gunman — 71-year-old Juraj Cintula — has been taken into custody. Watch the above video for Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan‘s analysis of some of the factors…
Friday
Will Nigeria become Africa’s first superpower?
The security situation in West Africa continues to worsen following a string of military coups and ongoing armed conflicts. Additionally, in Mali and Niger, both former Western allies, new junta-led governments are aligning themselves with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Be the first to know when Peter Zeihan publishes a new commentary! Download the Straight Arrow…
Thursday
Why Putin axed Shoigu
On Monday, May 13, Russian President Vladimir Putin replaced Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu with Andrei Belousov. It was a surprising move to some observers, as Putin had previously refused to oust Shoigu from that position even after the Wagner Group rebelled against Shoigu specifically. Others, like Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan, predicted this move…
Tuesday
New roles for Russia, North Korea, Iran in global arms trade
As Russia’s war in Ukraine continues and its weapons supply dwindles, it appears the country is seeking alternative ways of replenishing its arms stockpiles. Iran has reported a 40% increase in arms sales to foreign states, with Russia being a significant recipient. Russia has also been attempting to buy artillery from North Korea. Straight Arrow…
May 13
Underreported stories from each side
Donald Trump demands Joe Biden submit drug test before first debate
27 sources | 17% from the left
Getty Images
Who is Iran’s first vice president, Mohammad Mokhber, appointed acting president after crash?
15 sources | 23% from the right
AP Images
Latest Stories
FDA clears Neuralink chip for 2nd human trial, company says wire issue fixed
Watch 2:55
1 hr ago
Biden has only weeks to safeguard policies from potential Trump victory
Watch 5:28
2 hrs ago
More Americans want journalists to hold their political views: Poll
Watch 2:14
4 hrs ago
Blue Origin breaks 2-year hiatus, launches 6 passengers to edge of space
Watch 0:55
5 hrs ago
Iranian president killed in helicopter crash
Watch 8:09
6 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Federal Reserve surpassed its own wildest expectations
2 hrs ago
Larry Lindsey
Crime is down under Biden. Why do Americans not believe it?
2 hrs ago
David Pakman
Politicians and Supreme Court justices must have term limits
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
During Police Week, all Americans should honor fallen officers
Friday
Star Parker