Anyone who lives in California, as I do, can attest that the homelessness crisis is real. And it is intense and it is growing worse by the day. 30% of the nation’s unhoused population lives in California, that’s nearly 200,000 people. If you drive into the downtown area of La you, you’ll be stunned by the size of the tent cities that line block after block after block.
You know, I never really gave much thought as to why California is the epicenter for people experiencing homelessness. I guess, like a lot of people, I assumed it was the weather. If you don’t have anywhere to sleep at night, especially in the depths of winter, better here than Wisconsin, right?. But that is a ridiculous and massively reductive concept, if you think about it.
People who suddenly find themselves homeless, for whatever reason, tend not to have the resources or the desire to pack up and move to another state. Moving is expensive. Suddenly, finding oneself unhoused is also an intensely vulnerable situation. And instinctively, most people will want to stay close to family or to friends or to an environment that they recognize and in which they feel comfortable.
Homeless people are not moving to California in droves. The reason why so much of our country’s unhoused population lives in the state? It’s because that’s where they come from. Last month, researchers at UC San Francisco released the largest representative study of unhoused people in more than 25 years, and found that the overwhelming majority of homeless Californians surveyed were locals.
This is not an issue of people flooding California’s borders in search of better public services and sunny weather. It is an issue of housing affordability. There are not enough homes. There are certainly not enough low-income homes. See, when new housing is not being constructed at a level that fits the demand, what happens is that the high-income residents take over the more affordable units, bidding up the prices. Middle-income workers, then they take over the lowest price units, again bidding up the prices and low-income people are left with virtually no options at all.
For many workers, especially those who have found themselves experiencing homelessness due to an abrupt disruption in their finances, it is simply not possible to accumulate the funds required to pay for a deposit on an apartment. In California, even a studio apartment can easily go for $1,500 a month easily. And even these so-called affordable units are often located in areas that are far removed from access to jobs, public transportation, childcare.
When someone experiences an event that causes them to lose their housing, a job loss, a substance abuse issue, maybe even just a conflict with a roommate, the solution should be to move to a more affordable environment. But in California, I don’t know where that would be. There is no truly affordable housing here. The housing market is broken. And it is the government’s responsibility to step in, to remove barriers to construction and create more options, or really any options, for their most vulnerable citizens.
Jordan Reid
Author; Founding Editor, Ramshackle Glam
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
8 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
California needs more affordable housing for homeless
Jordan Reid
Author; Founding Editor, Ramshackle Glam
By Straight Arrow News
According to a University of California San Francisco study, nearly one-third of the homeless population in the United States resides in California. The primary reason Californians say they end up homeless is the loss of income. Most of them say that a modest subsidy of $300 per month could have prevented them from becoming homeless.
To tackle the crisis, Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid argues that California’s first priority should be addressing the shortage of affordable housing for low-income and unsheltered residents.
There are not enough homes. There are certainly not enough low-income homes. See, when new housing is not being constructed at a level that fits the demand, what happens is that the high-income residents take over the more affordable units, bidding up the prices. Middle-income workers, then they take over the lowest price units, again bidding up the prices, and low-income people are left with virtually no options at all.
For many workers, especially those who have found themselves experiencing homelessness due to an abrupt disruption in their finances, it is simply not possible to accumulate the funds required to pay for a deposit on an apartment. In California, even a studio apartment can easily go for $1,500 a month easily. And even these so-called affordable units are often located in areas that are far removed from access to jobs, public transportation, childcare.
Anyone who lives in California, as I do, can attest that the homelessness crisis is real. And it is intense and it is growing worse by the day. 30% of the nation’s unhoused population lives in California, that’s nearly 200,000 people. If you drive into the downtown area of La you, you’ll be stunned by the size of the tent cities that line block after block after block.
You know, I never really gave much thought as to why California is the epicenter for people experiencing homelessness. I guess, like a lot of people, I assumed it was the weather. If you don’t have anywhere to sleep at night, especially in the depths of winter, better here than Wisconsin, right?. But that is a ridiculous and massively reductive concept, if you think about it.
People who suddenly find themselves homeless, for whatever reason, tend not to have the resources or the desire to pack up and move to another state. Moving is expensive. Suddenly, finding oneself unhoused is also an intensely vulnerable situation. And instinctively, most people will want to stay close to family or to friends or to an environment that they recognize and in which they feel comfortable.
Homeless people are not moving to California in droves. The reason why so much of our country’s unhoused population lives in the state? It’s because that’s where they come from. Last month, researchers at UC San Francisco released the largest representative study of unhoused people in more than 25 years, and found that the overwhelming majority of homeless Californians surveyed were locals.
This is not an issue of people flooding California’s borders in search of better public services and sunny weather. It is an issue of housing affordability. There are not enough homes. There are certainly not enough low-income homes. See, when new housing is not being constructed at a level that fits the demand, what happens is that the high-income residents take over the more affordable units, bidding up the prices. Middle-income workers, then they take over the lowest price units, again bidding up the prices and low-income people are left with virtually no options at all.
For many workers, especially those who have found themselves experiencing homelessness due to an abrupt disruption in their finances, it is simply not possible to accumulate the funds required to pay for a deposit on an apartment. In California, even a studio apartment can easily go for $1,500 a month easily. And even these so-called affordable units are often located in areas that are far removed from access to jobs, public transportation, childcare.
When someone experiences an event that causes them to lose their housing, a job loss, a substance abuse issue, maybe even just a conflict with a roommate, the solution should be to move to a more affordable environment. But in California, I don’t know where that would be. There is no truly affordable housing here. The housing market is broken. And it is the government’s responsibility to step in, to remove barriers to construction and create more options, or really any options, for their most vulnerable citizens.
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
At the end of the Republican National Convention, Donald Trump accepted the nomination as the GOP candidate for president. In the first part of his acceptance speech, Trump called for unity and healing, although he derailed into partisanship as he continued. Critics have debated the media’s role in handling Trump’s speech. Some argued he was…
Yesterday
It’s time for Kamala Harris to pick up the torch
Debates have continued among Democrats about whether President Joe Biden is the best candidate for the 2024 election or whether an alternative Democratic leader might be more electable. While there’s no shortage of fellow Democratic leaders to choose from, President Biden and his supporters have continued to assert that Biden can and will win as…
Jul 18
Republicans want to sabotage US education
Former President Donald Trump’s official educational policy platform reveals plans to eliminate the Department of Education and seize the financial assets and endowments of elite U.S. universities. These proposals and others have convinced some liberal critics that the true goal of Republicans is to intentionally weaken U.S. education. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow…
Jul 11
Despite poor debate performance, Biden deserves our support
President Joe Biden himself admits that he delivered a “bad” performance in the first 2024 presidential debate. About a week after what some consider to be the worst debate performance in the history of televised debates, polls indicate that more voters than ever have an unfavorable opinion of the president, believe he is too old…
Jul 5
The modern-day Republican woman has terrifying role models
In a recent New York Magazine cover story entitled, “How Did Republican Women End Up Like This,” Rebecca Traister writes about some of the more polarizing examples of female Republican leaders and their positions on abortion, the transgender movement and women in general. With Republican women set to play a major role in the November…
Jun 27
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
3 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
3 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
3 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
3 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
4 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
9 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
10 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich