FBI Director Christopher Wray narrowly avoided being held in contempt of Congress after weeks of concealing a document from it, containing a trusted informant’s allegation that then-Vice President Biden took a $5 million bribe from a Ukrainian oligarch. This saga touches on a trio of seeming scandals. The first long known concerns the Biden family’s likely criminal, corrupting, national security-imperiling influence peddling.
The GOP-led House Oversight Committee has shown the Bidens and associates created a web of over 20 companies — most formed during Joe’s vice presidency — through which they received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ companies, from China to Romania. That money flowed to Bidens many with no relevant skills or experience and at times of that evidence, they did any work.
Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson previously detailed dubious Biden family dealings with Russians, Kazakhs and Ukrainians. Ukraine is where the alleged Biden bribe originated and where son Hunter served on the board of corruption wait an energy company Burisma, while Biden managed U.S. foreign policy there. The Biden’s monetizing of Joe’s office, including in Ukraine, and its apparent efforts to disguise the associated transactions, dovetail with the bribery allegation.
“After foreign companies sent money to business associates’ companies, the House Oversight Committee has reported the Biden family received incremental payments over time to different bank accounts. These complicated financial transactions appear to conceal the source of the funds and reduce the conspicuousness of the total amounts made into the Biden bank accounts. Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer says the FBI’s form FD 1023 memorializing the Biden bribe allegation, suggest the then-VP “asked that the bribe money be sent through shell companies and various banks to launder it to where no one would know about it. Comer says FBI officials confirm the allegation has not been disproven and stated several times the information contained within it is currently being used in an ongoing investigation. The source of the allegation is a longtime FBI informant reportedly highly credible who the FBI has seen fit to pay $200,000+ for his work. The specifics of the allegation and logic to it further speak to its veracity or at least plausibility.
One Republican Oversight Committee member declared after reviewing the 1023 that there’s no doubt in my mind that Joe Biden is guilty of bribery 100%. Democrat efforts to dismiss the claim have been convincingly debunked. Even if no bribe occurred, Americans must ask what money did the Biden’s make, from whom, for what and when? Did it flow directly or indirectly to Joe? What did he know? And when did he know about it? Meanwhile, where was foreign interference-obsessed law enforcement in all this? That’s the second potential scandal here, that it was protecting the Biden’s and turning a blind eye to their dubious dealings. This is what drove Chairman Comer and Senator Grassley to pursue the 1023 in the first place. In recent years, whistleblowers came to Grassley claiming hyper-politicization of the FBI and DOJ. Grassley wrote a letter to the agencies in July 2022, covering some of these disclosures, including ones indicating the agencies had evidence of Hunter Biden’s criminal financial activity, and sat on it, opening and assessment used to claim the derogatory information was disinformation, and then burying it in a restricted access subfile. Whistleblowers also made Grassley and Comer aware of the existence of the 1023. Grassley recently linked the two disclosures asking, “Did the FBI tried to improperly use the August 2020 assessment to shut down the 1023 reporting by falsely labeling it disinformation?” Grassley himself may have been targeted during that period. Democrats in the FBI seemingly coordinated to discredit his probe of the Biden family as being infected by, what else but, foreign disinformation. The apparent protection of the Biden family during and after the 2020 election raises a critical question. What do these agencies know about the Biden’s dealings? When did it learn it and what has it done about it? Chairman Comer says we don’t know how many form 1023s are pertaining to Biden bribery.
The third potential scandal is the FBI seeming cover up of its covering for the Bidens. Why exactly did it go through so much trouble to hide the 1023 from Congress. It obstructed oversight on a number of ways, slowly replying to the subpoena for the 1023, giving tangential briefings, refusing at one point to even confirm the documents existence, calling for investigators to narrow the search and more, before finally relenting when Director Wray faced contempt proceedings.
The pattern of obstruction dates back to Russia gate. Republicans seek documents they believe illustrate Deep State corruption, Deep State cries state secrets and sources and methods. Ultimately, Republican concerns proved right after the documents appear. The deep state’s real concern seems to be protecting itself by hiding its malfeasance. With this 1023 The FBI went with the sources and methods excuse, despite Republican assurances they’d be happy to receive the document in a form that protects the source. One oversight committee member tweeted, “the FBI is afraid their informants will be killed if unmasked based on the info he has brought forward about the Biden family.”
This was remarkable on two levels. First, could the FBI really not protect the informant’s identity? Does it still stand by this position, or was it more concerned about protecting Biden or hiding its protection of Biden? If the FBI really believes the informant could be killed, what does that say about the bribe allegation? And who does the FBI fear? Director Wray may not have been held in contempt, but this trio of apparent scandals reflects our leader’s contempt for us.
Related
Ben Weingarten
Federalist Senior Contributor; Claremont Institute Fellow
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Assassination attempt on Slovakia’s prime minister explained
13 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Will Nigeria become Africa’s first superpower?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why Putin axed Shoigu
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
New roles for Russia, North Korea, Iran in global arms trade
Monday
Peter Zeihan
Did the FBI cover up an alleged bribe paid to Biden?
Jun 13, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee claim an FBI document describes how President Joe Biden engaged in a bribery scheme when he was vice president. They claim the alleged bribe was from a major Ukrainian oil company that wanted the Bidens’ help in gaining U.S. drilling rights in exchange for millions of dollars.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten takes a look at the complicated financial transactions that he says are evidence of Joe and Hunter Biden engaging in a criminal scheme where money was exchanged for policy decisions.
The GOP-led House Oversight Committee has shown the Bidens and associates created a web of over 20 companies — most formed during Joe’s vice presidency — through which they received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ companies, from China to Romania. That money flowed to Bidens, many with no relevant skills or experience, and at times without evidence they did any work.
Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson previously detailed dubious Biden family dealings with Russians, Kazakhs and Ukrainians. Ukraine is where the alleged Biden bribe originated and where son Hunter served on the board of corruption-laden energy company Burisma, while Biden managed U.S. foreign policy there. The Bidens’ monetizing of Joe’s office, including in Ukraine, and its apparent efforts to disguise the associated transactions, dovetail with the bribery allegation.
“After foreign companies sent money to business associates’ companies,” the House Oversight Committee has reported, “the Biden family received incremental payments over time to different bank accounts. These complicated financial transactions appear to conceal the source of the funds and reduce the conspicuousness of the total amounts made into the Biden bank accounts.”
FBI Director Christopher Wray narrowly avoided being held in contempt of Congress after weeks of concealing a document from it, containing a trusted informant’s allegation that then-Vice President Biden took a $5 million bribe from a Ukrainian oligarch. This saga touches on a trio of seeming scandals. The first long known concerns the Biden family’s likely criminal, corrupting, national security-imperiling influence peddling.
The GOP-led House Oversight Committee has shown the Bidens and associates created a web of over 20 companies — most formed during Joe’s vice presidency — through which they received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ companies, from China to Romania. That money flowed to Bidens many with no relevant skills or experience and at times of that evidence, they did any work.
Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson previously detailed dubious Biden family dealings with Russians, Kazakhs and Ukrainians. Ukraine is where the alleged Biden bribe originated and where son Hunter served on the board of corruption wait an energy company Burisma, while Biden managed U.S. foreign policy there. The Biden’s monetizing of Joe’s office, including in Ukraine, and its apparent efforts to disguise the associated transactions, dovetail with the bribery allegation.
“After foreign companies sent money to business associates’ companies, the House Oversight Committee has reported the Biden family received incremental payments over time to different bank accounts. These complicated financial transactions appear to conceal the source of the funds and reduce the conspicuousness of the total amounts made into the Biden bank accounts. Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer says the FBI’s form FD 1023 memorializing the Biden bribe allegation, suggest the then-VP “asked that the bribe money be sent through shell companies and various banks to launder it to where no one would know about it. Comer says FBI officials confirm the allegation has not been disproven and stated several times the information contained within it is currently being used in an ongoing investigation. The source of the allegation is a longtime FBI informant reportedly highly credible who the FBI has seen fit to pay $200,000+ for his work. The specifics of the allegation and logic to it further speak to its veracity or at least plausibility.
One Republican Oversight Committee member declared after reviewing the 1023 that there’s no doubt in my mind that Joe Biden is guilty of bribery 100%. Democrat efforts to dismiss the claim have been convincingly debunked. Even if no bribe occurred, Americans must ask what money did the Biden’s make, from whom, for what and when? Did it flow directly or indirectly to Joe? What did he know? And when did he know about it? Meanwhile, where was foreign interference-obsessed law enforcement in all this? That’s the second potential scandal here, that it was protecting the Biden’s and turning a blind eye to their dubious dealings. This is what drove Chairman Comer and Senator Grassley to pursue the 1023 in the first place. In recent years, whistleblowers came to Grassley claiming hyper-politicization of the FBI and DOJ. Grassley wrote a letter to the agencies in July 2022, covering some of these disclosures, including ones indicating the agencies had evidence of Hunter Biden’s criminal financial activity, and sat on it, opening and assessment used to claim the derogatory information was disinformation, and then burying it in a restricted access subfile. Whistleblowers also made Grassley and Comer aware of the existence of the 1023. Grassley recently linked the two disclosures asking, “Did the FBI tried to improperly use the August 2020 assessment to shut down the 1023 reporting by falsely labeling it disinformation?” Grassley himself may have been targeted during that period. Democrats in the FBI seemingly coordinated to discredit his probe of the Biden family as being infected by, what else but, foreign disinformation. The apparent protection of the Biden family during and after the 2020 election raises a critical question. What do these agencies know about the Biden’s dealings? When did it learn it and what has it done about it? Chairman Comer says we don’t know how many form 1023s are pertaining to Biden bribery.
The third potential scandal is the FBI seeming cover up of its covering for the Bidens. Why exactly did it go through so much trouble to hide the 1023 from Congress. It obstructed oversight on a number of ways, slowly replying to the subpoena for the 1023, giving tangential briefings, refusing at one point to even confirm the documents existence, calling for investigators to narrow the search and more, before finally relenting when Director Wray faced contempt proceedings.
The pattern of obstruction dates back to Russia gate. Republicans seek documents they believe illustrate Deep State corruption, Deep State cries state secrets and sources and methods. Ultimately, Republican concerns proved right after the documents appear. The deep state’s real concern seems to be protecting itself by hiding its malfeasance. With this 1023 The FBI went with the sources and methods excuse, despite Republican assurances they’d be happy to receive the document in a form that protects the source. One oversight committee member tweeted, “the FBI is afraid their informants will be killed if unmasked based on the info he has brought forward about the Biden family.”
This was remarkable on two levels. First, could the FBI really not protect the informant’s identity? Does it still stand by this position, or was it more concerned about protecting Biden or hiding its protection of Biden? If the FBI really believes the informant could be killed, what does that say about the bribe allegation? And who does the FBI fear? Director Wray may not have been held in contempt, but this trio of apparent scandals reflects our leader’s contempt for us.
Related
Unfair Biden executive order favors Democrats in November
In March 2021, President Biden issued an executive order aimed at expanding voter registration and election information for all eligible Americans. Federal agencies were directed to collaborate with state and local election officials to achieve these goals. However, some GOP lawmakers and conservative critics express concerns that the order could favor left-wing election financing and potentially impact…
Tuesday
Governments could be censoring social media content
U.S. policymakers have struggled to agree on the rules of engagement with social media platforms, especially regarding violent, threatening or otherwise dangerous content. In the wake of recent events — namely the COVID-19 pandemic and the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection, both of which were amplified by online dis- and mis-information — some have also argued…
May 7
Action required to combat anti-Jewish sentiment at elite schools
On Tuesday, April 30, student protesters took over a building on Columbia University’s main campus and demanded that the university divest from Israel, which the university has so far refused to do. This occupation at Columbia follows months of similar protests by pro-Palestinian demonstrators around the country. The occupied building, Hamilton Hall, holds a significant…
Apr 30
Biden greenlit Iranian strike on Israel
The past 30 days have witnessed tense exchanges of airstrikes between Israel and Iran, beginning with Israel’s alleged bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus on April 1. Iran retaliated in a widely telegraphed response designed to minimize human casualties and to provide room for de-escalation. Israel responded similarly with an even smaller second strike,…
Apr 23
Why misguided Biden is siding with Iran over Israel
The situation in the Middle East is becoming more complex, and President Biden faces a delicate situation as he seeks to prevent a broader conflict in the region. Following Iran’s unprecedented airstrikes on Israel, prompted by Israel’s alleged destruction of Iran’s consulate in Damascus, Biden asserts that he’s against participating in Israeli retaliatory strikes on…
Apr 16
Underreported stories from each side
NRA and conservative legal group sue New Mexico governor over 7-day waiting period to buy guns
6 sources | 0% from the left
Reuters
House passes TICKET Act targeting hidden concert fees
9 sources | 11% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
Ukraine launches major drone counter-attack on Russian sites
Watch 2:34
7 hrs ago
Honda will use Formula 1 technology in its upcoming EV lineup
Watch 1:35
7 hrs ago
‘Fake eyelashes,’ ‘butch body’: Insults fly in congressional hearing
Watch 2:33
8 hrs ago
Billionaires discuss how to shut down Columbia protests in group chat: Report
Watch 2:47
8 hrs ago
Congress launches probe of UCLA after violence on campus
Watch 2:59
8 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Politicians and Supreme Court justices must have term limits
13 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
During Police Week, all Americans should honor fallen officers
13 hrs ago
Star Parker
Universities must blame themselves for protest hypocrisy
Yesterday
Timothy Carney
It’s okay for Met Gala celebrities to avoid politics
Yesterday
Jordan Reid