Happy anniversary to me. Next month I’ll celebrate my 35th year in journalism. And this much I know for sure, there are several characteristics that make for a good journalist, and at least one that makes for a bad journalist. If you’re tenacious, curious, thoughtful, fair, independent and precise, you might have the stuff to one day become a good journalist.
But if you’re afraid, if you scare too easily, well, you’re going to be a bad one. You see, fear is incompatible with journalism. The two are like oil and water. You can’t tell good stories if you’re too afraid to go out and find them no matter where they are. You can’t give voice to the voiceless or challenge the powerful if you’re afraid that doing so will make you unpopular. You can’t, if you want to live up to the journalist creed of comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable, you can’t do that if you’re afraid of the consequences. You can’t turn up the heat on the powers that be if you’re afraid that making your bosses uncomfortable might make you unemployed.
And, as I have been reminded recently by Israel’s defensive war against Hamas, you can’t report on or write about a controversial topic if you’re afraid that digging into it might anger the wrong people and jeopardize your career. Every week, it seems I deal with editors who are terrified of appearing to be seen as pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian. The goal seems to be to get through the entire day without making anyone angry. I don’t have many days like that.
After 35 years of navigating this minefield, I consider myself bulletproof in the fear department. There are two ways to get there in this business. You can have $10 million in the bank so you don’t need your job and a newspaper or radio station magazine or TV network to pay the bills. Or you could have, as is true in my case, already been fired, canceled or laid off 15 times. That way, you’re not worried about losing your job, because you know there’s always another job, often a better one, around the corner. Sometimes the fear that grabs hold of a journalist isn’t about losing a job. Sometimes it’s fear of bodily harm or even death. When an ex-president who wants to be the future president does something so reckless as to label journalists “the enemy of the people,” well, you can’t be too careful. At anytime, a wing nut can fly off the MAGA machine.
There’s also the fear that some journalists have of saying or writing the wrong thing and making a bad situation worse. On September 11, 2001, I was working on the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News when terrorists toppled the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon. Five or six writers and editors spent that day, the whole day, adding our two cents to what would be the lead editorial on the morning after, September 12. The old joke, popular in newsrooms, is that a camel is a horse that was built by committee. Boy, did they ever get that one right. We wrote and rewrote the 500 words of that editorial until we squeezed every drop of life out of them. We were afraid of coming across as brutish or hawkish, keenly aware that the then-President George W. Bush was from Texas. We were, as the most important newspaper in the state of Texas, so afraid to come across like warmongers, that we wound up saying nothing at all. The only thing I remember about that editorial is that it was profoundly unmemorable. That’s what fear does to journalism, it washes it out. By contrast, the next day, the lead editorial from my other employer, the Washington Post, had a clear and direct one word title: War. At the time, as I read it, I remember thinking: “That’s perfect and fearless.”
Ruben Navarrette
Columnist, host & author
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
7 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Great journalists must be fearless in face of threats
Ruben Navarrette
Columnist, host & author
By Straight Arrow News
Journalists face many different pressures in their work, ranging from everyday biases to death threats and targeted assassination. These pressures come from actors at all levels, from readers and news company bosses to global corporations and federal governments. Many of these pressures use fear to intimidate the journalist into covering a specific story through a certain lens — or not covering a story at all.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette reflects on the 35th anniversary of his long career in journalism and has one key lesson to give to his junior colleagues in the field: Great journalism, like great journalists themselves, must be fearless and unafraid.
Happy anniversary to me. Next month I’ll celebrate my 35th year in journalism. And this much I know for sure: There are several characteristics that make for a good journalist, and at least one that makes for a bad journalist. If you’re tenacious, curious, thoughtful, fair, independent and precise, you might have the stuff to one day become a good journalist.
But if you’re afraid, if you scare too easily, well, you’re going to be a bad one. You see, fear is incompatible with journalism. The two are like oil and water. You can’t tell good stories if you’re too afraid to go out and find them no matter where they are. You can’t give voice to the voiceless or challenge the powerful if you’re afraid that doing so will make you unpopular. You can’t, if you want to live up to the journalist creed of comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable, you can’t do that if you’re afraid of the consequences. You can’t turn up the heat on the powers that be if you’re afraid that making your bosses uncomfortable might make you unemployed.
Happy anniversary to me. Next month I’ll celebrate my 35th year in journalism. And this much I know for sure, there are several characteristics that make for a good journalist, and at least one that makes for a bad journalist. If you’re tenacious, curious, thoughtful, fair, independent and precise, you might have the stuff to one day become a good journalist.
But if you’re afraid, if you scare too easily, well, you’re going to be a bad one. You see, fear is incompatible with journalism. The two are like oil and water. You can’t tell good stories if you’re too afraid to go out and find them no matter where they are. You can’t give voice to the voiceless or challenge the powerful if you’re afraid that doing so will make you unpopular. You can’t, if you want to live up to the journalist creed of comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable, you can’t do that if you’re afraid of the consequences. You can’t turn up the heat on the powers that be if you’re afraid that making your bosses uncomfortable might make you unemployed.
And, as I have been reminded recently by Israel’s defensive war against Hamas, you can’t report on or write about a controversial topic if you’re afraid that digging into it might anger the wrong people and jeopardize your career. Every week, it seems I deal with editors who are terrified of appearing to be seen as pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian. The goal seems to be to get through the entire day without making anyone angry. I don’t have many days like that.
After 35 years of navigating this minefield, I consider myself bulletproof in the fear department. There are two ways to get there in this business. You can have $10 million in the bank so you don’t need your job and a newspaper or radio station magazine or TV network to pay the bills. Or you could have, as is true in my case, already been fired, canceled or laid off 15 times. That way, you’re not worried about losing your job, because you know there’s always another job, often a better one, around the corner. Sometimes the fear that grabs hold of a journalist isn’t about losing a job. Sometimes it’s fear of bodily harm or even death. When an ex-president who wants to be the future president does something so reckless as to label journalists “the enemy of the people,” well, you can’t be too careful. At anytime, a wing nut can fly off the MAGA machine.
There’s also the fear that some journalists have of saying or writing the wrong thing and making a bad situation worse. On September 11, 2001, I was working on the editorial board of the Dallas Morning News when terrorists toppled the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon. Five or six writers and editors spent that day, the whole day, adding our two cents to what would be the lead editorial on the morning after, September 12. The old joke, popular in newsrooms, is that a camel is a horse that was built by committee. Boy, did they ever get that one right. We wrote and rewrote the 500 words of that editorial until we squeezed every drop of life out of them. We were afraid of coming across as brutish or hawkish, keenly aware that the then-President George W. Bush was from Texas. We were, as the most important newspaper in the state of Texas, so afraid to come across like warmongers, that we wound up saying nothing at all. The only thing I remember about that editorial is that it was profoundly unmemorable. That’s what fear does to journalism, it washes it out. By contrast, the next day, the lead editorial from my other employer, the Washington Post, had a clear and direct one word title: War. At the time, as I read it, I remember thinking: “That’s perfect and fearless.”
No one is innocent in Trump assassination attempt
After the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, both Democratic and Republican leaders have called for reducing divisive rhetoric. Some Republicans blame the shooting on the language Democrats used in attacking Trump. Meanwhile, some prominent Republican lawmakers, such as Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., have used similar rhetoric, calling Biden “a clear and present threat…
Tuesday
America must fix its broken Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court was envisioned by America’s founding fathers as an independent judiciary separate from the political world, designed as a fair arbiter of the law. But the 6-3 conservative majority of today’s Supreme Court has issued a number of impactful, partisan and unpopular opinions on everything from abortion access to presidential power, triggering…
Jul 16
Despite Biden’s stumble, rambling Trump can’t win debate
The first presidential debate of 2024 resulted in what many believe was a clear winner and loser. President Joe Biden’s performance was universally panned, affecting his fundraising efforts and intensifying calls for his ousting. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump, despite being criticized for his false claims during the debate, has kept a low profile, opting…
Jul 9
Why Republicans will never shut down US-Mexico border
A group of Republican senators expressed “grave concerns” to President Biden over his recent executive order that would provide a path to citizenship to approximately 500,000 people who have been in the country for a decade or more and are also married to United States citizens. The GOP lawmakers argued that Biden’s immigration relief “directly contravenes…
Jul 2
Why Democrats’ immigration playbook not working with Latino voters
In June 2012, as President Barack Obama campaigned for reelection, he ordered immigration enforcement agents to defer action against those who had arrived in the United States as children. This executive action, known as DACA, offered a path to work permits for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants. That November, Obama cruised to reelection, beating…
Jun 25
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
2 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
2 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
2 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
2 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
2 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
7 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
8 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich