“The Chinese Communist Party using TikTok to spy on Americans, violate their privacy, and collect their personal, private, and sensitive information is well-documented,” Montana’s Gov. Greg Gianforte, R, said. TikTok is fighting back, filing a lawsuit that alleges the ban — slated to start early next year — violates the U.S. Constitution.
Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman wonders if any of this matters because even if the ban holds up in court, he thinks it’ll be nearly impossible to enforce.
I don’t believe it’s the role of state government to decide which apps people can or cannot use based on whatever is being used to determine that TikTok isn’t allowed, but Facebook or whatever, is. If you want to pass a law that specifically addresses what information can or cannot be collected by an app — or as has been done in Europe, you have to pop up a disclaimer saying, “Hey, we collect ABC in a way that is conspicuous” — that’s one thing and I would be fine with that if that’s what Montana or the United States wanted to do.
But this is, at the end of the day, going to be a law that is targeted in a particular way and that I do believe is limiting on speech, and unfairly is targeting TikTok. Doesn’t mean there aren’t concerns, but pass the laws based on activities, rather than saying we are banning TikTok.
Now, what do I think the long-term trajectory of this ban is going to be? I actually don’t think it’s going to hold up. And even if it does, it’s not really going to prevent Montanans from using TikTok, because as I said, if you already have it on your phone, you can have until December 31 to install it. If you leave Montana, install it and come back, that’s all allowed. You can also use a proxy. You can use a VPN — there’s all these different things. I think it has very little teeth. It’s a virtue signal from the governor, Greg Gianforte. I believe it will not stand. And even if it does, it won’t really change very much.
The state of Montana has become the first US state to ban the social media app. TikTok. This is something that’s been floated and discussed for a while now on the basis of TikTok being used by China to collect information about Americans and for other reasons. Now, there’s a few different layers to this. The first is what does it mean to ban TikTok. The second is whether this is in general, the right approach in terms of dealing with an app that is seen as potentially a national security risk or in some way adversarial to US interest. So first and foremost, when we say that Montana ban TikTok, what we mean is, Montana is saying that within the state on on internet connected devices within the state TikTok can’t be listed in the Android Google Play Store, or the Apple store. Now, they have also said as part of this bill, that if you already have the app on your phone, or you leave Montana and go to a different state, install the app, come back, but use it in Montana, you are not going to be persecuted, they are not going to go after you for that. Now, what about the facts? There is not any direct evidence right now that the Chinese Communist Party or the Chinese government have ever access TikTok user data? The criticism is laws in China allow the government to access a company’s customer records. And could they do it? It’s not clear when the CEO of tick tock testified before Congress, he said, well, the data centers are in other countries, the data centers are in the United States and they’re in Singapore. So I don’t think today, we are going to be able to ascertain exactly how likely it is that the Chinese government would access my user data or your user data from TikTok. The other aspect of this is will it stand legally? And what I mean by that is the ban is scheduled to start January 1. And TikTok is certainly going to challenge the bill in federal court. The ACLU has said the bill is unconstitutional. Let’s put aside the legal question. As a progressive what is my opinion about such a move? I believe that the Montana TikTok ban is misguided. And it is an authoritarian attempt to censor and to stifle creativity. Now, I would never deny that there are legitimate concerns about tick tock and data handling, as there are with Google, as there are with Facebook and others. The difference is the China element, which is what makes it sort of qualitatively different. But you could also argue that it’s qualitatively different in a xenophobic way with unfounded claims about tick tock as a national security and privacy risk of some form. I also do believe that there are First Amendment concerns. If you’re a Montanan. And you use tick tock for expression and communication of whatever your views are, your views might be liberal, your views might be conservative, whatever. I don’t believe it’s the role of state government to decide which apps people can or cannot use, based on whatever is being used to determine that TikTok isn’t allowed, but Facebook or whatever it is, if you want to pass a law, excuse me, that specifically addresses what information can or cannot be collected by an app, or as has been done in Europe, you have to pop up a disclaimer saying, Hey, we collect ABC in a way that is conspicuous. That’s one thing and I would be fine with that if that’s what Montana or the United States wanted to do. But this is, at the end of the day, going to be a law that is targeted in a particular way. And that I do believe is limiting on speech and unfairly is targeting tick tock doesn’t mean there aren’t concerns, but pass the laws based on activities, rather than saying we are banning TikTok. Now, what do I think the long term trajectory of this band is going to be? I actually don’t think it’s going to hold up. And even if it does, it’s not really going to prevent Montanans from using TikTok because as I said, if you already have it on your phone, you can’t you have until December 31 to install it. If you leave Montana, install it and come back. That’s all allowed. You can also use a proxy. You can use a VPN it does all these different things. I think it has very little teeth. It’s a virtue signal from the Governor Greg Gianforte, I believe it will not stand and Even if it does it won’t really change very much
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
David Pakman
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from David
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How shifting Russian targets impact global economy
Friday
Peter Zeihan
What explains West African coups? Will France respond?
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Chinese housing overbuild may erode support for Xi Jinping
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Americans debate government shutdowns, spending priorities
Wednesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Montana’s TikTok ban will be nearly impossible to enforce
May 30
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
Montana is the first state to ban the use of TikTok. The state cited fears that the Chinese-owned company is stealing the private data of its U.S. users.
“The Chinese Communist Party using TikTok to spy on Americans, violate their privacy, and collect their personal, private, and sensitive information is well-documented,” Montana’s Gov. Greg Gianforte, R, said. TikTok is fighting back, filing a lawsuit that alleges the ban — slated to start early next year — violates the U.S. Constitution.
Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman wonders if any of this matters because even if the ban holds up in court, he thinks it’ll be nearly impossible to enforce.
I don’t believe it’s the role of state government to decide which apps people can or cannot use based on whatever is being used to determine that TikTok isn’t allowed, but Facebook or whatever, is. If you want to pass a law that specifically addresses what information can or cannot be collected by an app — or as has been done in Europe, you have to pop up a disclaimer saying, “Hey, we collect ABC in a way that is conspicuous” — that’s one thing and I would be fine with that if that’s what Montana or the United States wanted to do.
But this is, at the end of the day, going to be a law that is targeted in a particular way and that I do believe is limiting on speech, and unfairly is targeting TikTok. Doesn’t mean there aren’t concerns, but pass the laws based on activities, rather than saying we are banning TikTok.
Now, what do I think the long-term trajectory of this ban is going to be? I actually don’t think it’s going to hold up. And even if it does, it’s not really going to prevent Montanans from using TikTok, because as I said, if you already have it on your phone, you can have until December 31 to install it. If you leave Montana, install it and come back, that’s all allowed. You can also use a proxy. You can use a VPN — there’s all these different things. I think it has very little teeth. It’s a virtue signal from the governor, Greg Gianforte. I believe it will not stand. And even if it does, it won’t really change very much.
The state of Montana has become the first US state to ban the social media app. TikTok. This is something that’s been floated and discussed for a while now on the basis of TikTok being used by China to collect information about Americans and for other reasons. Now, there’s a few different layers to this. The first is what does it mean to ban TikTok. The second is whether this is in general, the right approach in terms of dealing with an app that is seen as potentially a national security risk or in some way adversarial to US interest. So first and foremost, when we say that Montana ban TikTok, what we mean is, Montana is saying that within the state on on internet connected devices within the state TikTok can’t be listed in the Android Google Play Store, or the Apple store. Now, they have also said as part of this bill, that if you already have the app on your phone, or you leave Montana and go to a different state, install the app, come back, but use it in Montana, you are not going to be persecuted, they are not going to go after you for that. Now, what about the facts? There is not any direct evidence right now that the Chinese Communist Party or the Chinese government have ever access TikTok user data? The criticism is laws in China allow the government to access a company’s customer records. And could they do it? It’s not clear when the CEO of tick tock testified before Congress, he said, well, the data centers are in other countries, the data centers are in the United States and they’re in Singapore. So I don’t think today, we are going to be able to ascertain exactly how likely it is that the Chinese government would access my user data or your user data from TikTok. The other aspect of this is will it stand legally? And what I mean by that is the ban is scheduled to start January 1. And TikTok is certainly going to challenge the bill in federal court. The ACLU has said the bill is unconstitutional. Let’s put aside the legal question. As a progressive what is my opinion about such a move? I believe that the Montana TikTok ban is misguided. And it is an authoritarian attempt to censor and to stifle creativity. Now, I would never deny that there are legitimate concerns about tick tock and data handling, as there are with Google, as there are with Facebook and others. The difference is the China element, which is what makes it sort of qualitatively different. But you could also argue that it’s qualitatively different in a xenophobic way with unfounded claims about tick tock as a national security and privacy risk of some form. I also do believe that there are First Amendment concerns. If you’re a Montanan. And you use tick tock for expression and communication of whatever your views are, your views might be liberal, your views might be conservative, whatever. I don’t believe it’s the role of state government to decide which apps people can or cannot use, based on whatever is being used to determine that TikTok isn’t allowed, but Facebook or whatever it is, if you want to pass a law, excuse me, that specifically addresses what information can or cannot be collected by an app, or as has been done in Europe, you have to pop up a disclaimer saying, Hey, we collect ABC in a way that is conspicuous. That’s one thing and I would be fine with that if that’s what Montana or the United States wanted to do. But this is, at the end of the day, going to be a law that is targeted in a particular way. And that I do believe is limiting on speech and unfairly is targeting tick tock doesn’t mean there aren’t concerns, but pass the laws based on activities, rather than saying we are banning TikTok. Now, what do I think the long term trajectory of this band is going to be? I actually don’t think it’s going to hold up. And even if it does, it’s not really going to prevent Montanans from using TikTok because as I said, if you already have it on your phone, you can’t you have until December 31 to install it. If you leave Montana, install it and come back. That’s all allowed. You can also use a proxy. You can use a VPN it does all these different things. I think it has very little teeth. It’s a virtue signal from the Governor Greg Gianforte, I believe it will not stand and Even if it does it won’t really change very much
Trump is behind Biden impeachment inquiry
Mounting pressure from House Republicans has led House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to officially endorse an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. These impeachment efforts have escalated alongside another unfolding legal drama — that of former President Donald Trump. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman argues that Trump, himself, is behind the scheme to impeach Biden.
Monday
McCarthy’s impeachment stunt lacks any evidence
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) recently announced his support for an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. McCarthy’s announcement contradicts his prior position and aligns with the far-right’s ongoing push for impeachment. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman breaks down GOP arguments and concerns, concluding that no evidence exists to merit the inquiry in the
Sep 18
Are Trump’s lawyers really going to make these legal arguments?
Former President Donald Trump faced his fourth indictment, centered on his attempts to overturn his 2020 general election loss in Georgia, in August. Trump’s legal team is portraying this indictment as an assault on his freedom of speech, while prosecutors hold a different perspective. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman questions whether Trump’s legal team
Sep 11
Be mindful of Ramaswamy’s lying techniques
Following the first Republican presidential debate, Vivek Ramaswamy has climbed to the third position in the polls, trailing former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. In an effort to impede his momentum, other candidates have initiated a barrage of negative attacks against Ramaswamy, highlighting his shifting stance on critical issues. Straight Arrow News
Sep 5
Polling predicts Trump-Biden rematch, but key questions remain
Early polling for the 2024 presidential election reveals Donald Trump dominating the GOP field with no contender in sight, while President Joe Biden is performing evenly against him. Yet with so much of Trump’s near-term future now in question, critics have wondered how helpful or relevant this polling data can be. Straight Arrow News contributor
Aug 28
Media Miss
Stories each side is underreporting
Suicide bomber detonates a device in the Turkish capital. A second assailant is killed in a shootout
12 sources | 17% from the left
Pennsylvania governor’s voter registration change draws Trump’s ire in echo of 2020 election clashes
18 sources | 0% from the right
Latest Stories
Getty Images
Biden proposes limited offshore oil and gas leases to support wind energy
Watch 2:20
Yesterday
The Elephant Sanctuary
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
Watch 2:15
Yesterday
Getty Images
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
Watch 2:54
Yesterday
Premier of Ontario
Climate advocates, indigenous tribes protest efforts to mine $67B of minerals in Canada
Watch 2:50
Yesterday
Getty Images
Retailers report record $112B in lost inventory amid theft, violence
Watch 2:22
Friday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Politics of lesser evils is bad for all Americans
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
How a No Labels candidate might affect outcome of 2024 election
Thursday
John Fortier
Why is accused sexual predator Russell Brand getting right-wing support?
Thursday
Jordan Reid
High housing mortgage costs are a risk to whole economy
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Dr. Rashad Richey
National TV Political Analyst, Talk Radio Host, Univ. Prof.John Fortier
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise InstituteWeekly Voices
Monday
David Pakman
Host of The David Pakman ShowLarry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey GroupTuesday
Ruben Navarrette
Columnist, host & authorBen Weingarten
Federalist Senior Contributor; Claremont Institute FellowWednesday
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal commentatorNewt Gingrich
Former House Speaker; Chairman of Gingrich 360Thursday
Jordan Reid
Author; Founding Editor, Ramshackle GlamJohn Fortier
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise InstituteOther AEI Contributors
Katherine Zimmerman
Timothy Carney
Matthew Continetti
Robert Doar
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
National TV Political Analyst, Talk Radio Host, Univ. Prof.Star Parker
Founder & President, Center for Urban Renewal and EducationPolitics
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
Yesterday
Members of Congress still get paid during government shutdown
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, longest serving woman senator, dies at 90
Getty Images
U.S.
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
Yesterday
Elon Musk weighs in on immigration policy in visit to US-Mexico border
DHS collects migrants’ DNA for growing database, raising privacy concerns
The Elephant Sanctuary
International
Cuban officials call Molotov cocktail attack on its US embassy terrorism
Tuesday
Canadian lawmakers apologize after celebrating Ukrainian Nazi fighter
Nicaragua’s Catholic president is persecuting members of his own religion
Reuters
Tech
TikTok workers: China may have more control over user data than we think
Thursday
Musk makes cuts to X election integrity team
Ford pauses construction on $3.5 billion EV battery plant
Getty Images