Well, I hope you had a fun and safe Labor Day. So while many of us were taking in the holiday Well, the New York City Police Department was arguably trampling our privacy rights. The largest police department in the United States made clear that it would be employing drones to monitor backyard gatherings this past holiday weekend. Now, I don’t know how you feel about being subjected to surveillance via drone, but I’m convinced the courts need to shut this down ASAP. The police are not employing this tactic to advance public safety. They’re using drones to trample the civil liberties of marginalized people, particularly those who are black and brown. And this is evident from the circumstances surrounding the NYPS decision to pilot the drone program. What are those circumstances? Well, we only learned about the drone surveillance plan at a security briefing last week on a celebration of the emancipation of enslaved Caribbean’s that’s coming up, as well as the West Indian American Day Parade. Yeah, so basically, the NYPD announced that it’s going to be using drones to look into people’s backyard parties in response to anticipated celebrations about the emancipation of black people. Of course, the assistant commissioner to the NYPD says that the department is simply, you know, making preparations in anticipation of complaints about large gatherings that extend beyond the parade route. Yeah, that’s quite interesting, as is the fact that the NYPD didn’t publish their plans of using this new surveillance technique 90 days in advance of using it. Yeah, because 90 days is the amount of notice that’s required under New York City’s post Act. The police department knew that they had to provide 90 days notice, but they simply chose not to because they flout the law. One thing they definitely seem to stick to, however, is trampling civil rights. And the mayor of New York City seems to support it. Mayor Eric Adams, who also happens to be a former police captain says that he fully embraces the endless potential of police using drones. At what point is he going to embrace the reality that this type of aerial surveillance is intrusive? The police will be looking into our backyards, our bedroom, Windows, and all else from a vantage point that what only birds previously enjoyed? How is that acceptable? How is that constitutional? How does it not violate the Fourth Amendment by being an unreasonable search and seizure? Don’t we have privacy rights? Or did they just fly out of the window because of technological advancements? I say, No, we still have these rights in place. The US Supreme Court, of course has yet to say anything on it. And in the meantime, apparently law enforcement is saying that they don’t give a damn. Then again, why shouldn’t they? It’s we the people who are the ones who have to pay to settle the litany of lawsuits against law enforcement for violating individual civil rights. They really have no skin in the game. So while the NYPD surveilled us from all angles. We’re left watching our civil rights die and democracy with it.
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
8 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
NYPD’s drone surveillance sparks civil rights violations
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
By Straight Arrow News
Shortly before Labor Day weekend, the New York Police Department announced its intention to deploy drones for monitoring potential disruptions at parties and similar large gatherings. Some privacy advocates have expressed concerns that this practice could potentially breach local surveillance laws.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence goes on to argue that the NYPD’s recent adoption of drones poses a significant threat to our civil rights and the integrity of our democracy.
Mayor Eric Adams, who also happens to be a former police captain, says that he fully embraces the endless potential of police using drones.
At what point is he going to embrace the reality that this type of aerial surveillance is intrusive? The police will be looking into our backyards, our bedroom windows, and all else from a vantage point that, what, only birds previously enjoyed. How is that acceptable? How is that constitutional? How does it not violate the Fourth Amendment by being an unreasonable search and seizure? Don’t we have privacy rights or did they just fly out of the window because of technological advancements?
I say, ‘No, we still have these rights in place.’ The U.S. Supreme Court, of course, has yet to say anything on it, and in the meantime, apparently law enforcement is saying that they don’t give a damn. Then again, why should they? It’s we the people who are the ones who have to pay to settle the litany of lawsuits against law enforcement for violating individual civil rights.
They really have no skin in the game. So while the NYPD surveils us from all angles, we’re left watching our civil rights die, and democracy with it.
Well, I hope you had a fun and safe Labor Day. So while many of us were taking in the holiday Well, the New York City Police Department was arguably trampling our privacy rights. The largest police department in the United States made clear that it would be employing drones to monitor backyard gatherings this past holiday weekend. Now, I don’t know how you feel about being subjected to surveillance via drone, but I’m convinced the courts need to shut this down ASAP. The police are not employing this tactic to advance public safety. They’re using drones to trample the civil liberties of marginalized people, particularly those who are black and brown. And this is evident from the circumstances surrounding the NYPS decision to pilot the drone program. What are those circumstances? Well, we only learned about the drone surveillance plan at a security briefing last week on a celebration of the emancipation of enslaved Caribbean’s that’s coming up, as well as the West Indian American Day Parade. Yeah, so basically, the NYPD announced that it’s going to be using drones to look into people’s backyard parties in response to anticipated celebrations about the emancipation of black people. Of course, the assistant commissioner to the NYPD says that the department is simply, you know, making preparations in anticipation of complaints about large gatherings that extend beyond the parade route. Yeah, that’s quite interesting, as is the fact that the NYPD didn’t publish their plans of using this new surveillance technique 90 days in advance of using it. Yeah, because 90 days is the amount of notice that’s required under New York City’s post Act. The police department knew that they had to provide 90 days notice, but they simply chose not to because they flout the law. One thing they definitely seem to stick to, however, is trampling civil rights. And the mayor of New York City seems to support it. Mayor Eric Adams, who also happens to be a former police captain says that he fully embraces the endless potential of police using drones. At what point is he going to embrace the reality that this type of aerial surveillance is intrusive? The police will be looking into our backyards, our bedroom, Windows, and all else from a vantage point that what only birds previously enjoyed? How is that acceptable? How is that constitutional? How does it not violate the Fourth Amendment by being an unreasonable search and seizure? Don’t we have privacy rights? Or did they just fly out of the window because of technological advancements? I say, No, we still have these rights in place. The US Supreme Court, of course has yet to say anything on it. And in the meantime, apparently law enforcement is saying that they don’t give a damn. Then again, why shouldn’t they? It’s we the people who are the ones who have to pay to settle the litany of lawsuits against law enforcement for violating individual civil rights. They really have no skin in the game. So while the NYPD surveilled us from all angles. We’re left watching our civil rights die and democracy with it.
Trump-Vance ticket will implement nationwide abortion ban
Donald Trump recently accepted the Republican nomination for president and named Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, as his running mate. Vance has previously advocated for strict anti-abortion laws, in sharp contrast to Kamala Harris, the leading Democratic candidate, who went on a nationwide tour to mobilize pro-choice voters. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News…
Wednesday
End of Chevron is an open invite for corporate corruption
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 40 years of “Chevron deference” in a landmark ruling that experts say will cause a “legal earthquake.” The 6-3 conservative opinion upends a long tradition of relying on neutral expertise to interpret and execute laws and regulations. Broadly speaking, the ruling empowers judges and corporations at the…
Jul 17
American democracy cannot survive if Trump wins
Public alarm over the chances of democracy surviving in America has reached a new high-water mark in the wake of the Supreme Court’s July 1 ruling in Trump v. United States, where the court expanded presidential powers for all current and future U.S. presidents. Among other things, the court may have granted U.S. presidents the…
Jul 10
Talk to your kids about sextortion
The FBI is warning Americans of a growing threat called sextortion, where online predators pose as young, single individuals to lure their victims, primarily single teenage boys, into a blackmail trap. After soliciting sexual photos or videos of the victim, the predator threatens to release the images or videos unless the victim sends money and/or…
Jul 3
Louisiana’s Ten Commandments law proves Gov. Landry is corrupt
On June 20, GOP Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana signed into law a new bill that requires all public Louisiana school and university classrooms to display a poster-sized printout of the Bible’s Ten Commandments. The law violates existing legal precedents regarding the First Amendment and is expected to be challenged in the Supreme Court, although…
Jun 26
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
3 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
3 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
3 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
3 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
4 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
9 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
10 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich