Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Opinion: Democrats playing tricks in D.C. swamp
Greetings from the swamp. I mean, our nation’s Capitol. Well, we have a tale that explains why the founding fathers who wrote the constitution did what they did.
Now, what they realized was that people who go into politics tend to be ambitious. They saw that in the Kings’ service servants who managed America and sort of cut the king out of a lot of decisions. We also saw it among themselves, the founding fathers were generally an ambitious bunch. The most famous of, in terms of ambition was probably Alexander Hamilton, something you can see in the show Hamilton. But you can also see that the constitution there’s a provision that says you have to be a native born or natural born citizen of the United States. And that was targeted toward exactly one person, Alexander Hamilton. They thought he was the type they really didn’t want to be president.
Well, these instincts of the founding fathers came into full display when chaos broke out in the Congress over the passage of the budget. And as you know, nothing much got passed despite the fact that the same party runs the White House, the House and the Senate.
Well, here’s the backstory: Back on July 28th, Chuck Schumer, who’s the Senate Majority Leader, democratic leader, needed a vote from Joe Manchin, who’s a Senator from West Virginia and a fiscal conservative. How did he get his vote? Well, he promised Manchin just about everything he wanted.
While Schumer, Pelosi, and the President were all talking about a $3.5 trillion dollar bill, Manchin put an absolute limit on what he would support at $1.5 trillion.
What did Schumer do? He signed a letter promising Manchin that that’s what he would get. And then he kept the letter secret.
He didn’t tell his colleague, Speaker Pelosi. He didn’t tell his colleague, President Biden. So those two went on as if $3.5 trillion was going to be the number despite the fact that he had promised Manchin it would only be $1.5 trillion.
Well, all of this broke and it really just threw everything into chaos because they never shared it.
Now, my hunch is that Schumer thought that in the end he could twist Manchin’s arm into doing the right thing.
Manchin figured that out when the letter came out, that must have been Schumer’s intent. And that, of course, made Manchin mad. So what does he do?
He adds more conditions, conditions that had nothing to do with money. They had to do with something called the Hyde amendment, which bans federal funding abortions. Of course, that was a key goal of the House and Senate Democrats. So he’s really punishing them, making them pay for having been tricked by Schumer.
And then Speaker Pelosi had a problem. She had promised her moderates that they would have a vote on the bi-partisan infrastructure project no later than Monday the 27th.
Well, the progressives in her caucus were insisting that there would not be a vote on that, or they would vote against it until they had support for their big $3.5 trillion dollar package.
But here Schumer had promised Manchin there would never be a $3.5 trillion package.
So they ended up blocking the vote. So what did speaker Pelosi do?
Well, first she delayed the September 27th vote to Thursday, the 30th. Nothing happened on this Thursday, the 30th. So they pulled an old Washington trick called stopping the clock. So Thursday, the 30th bled into Friday, October one, bled into the night of Friday, October one. And finally they decided they couldn’t stop the clock anymore.
So on October 2nd, they restarted it on October 2nd. So somehow in the House of Representatives, October one simply disappeared. That was the only trick Nancy could pull, excuse me. Speaker Pelosi could pull in order to get through the week.
Then she ended up saying, well, we can’t have the vote now that I promised for September 27th until later in the month, specifically October 31st.
Meanwhile, Schumer can’t get the bill through the Senate.
Manchin is blocking that, requiring other conditions.
The President got involved. He sort of threw another number in the mix and that number isn’t going to work.
So the next step in all of these goings-on is going to be that vote that Pelosi promised on October 31st, more than a month from what she had originally promised. That’s a hard deadline. Well, listeners, we know what October 31st is: trick or treat.
Black swan events make next US president difficult to predict
In November, Americans will cast their votes to elect a new president and Congress. Despite significant indicators suggesting dissatisfaction with the economy, posing a challenge for President Biden’s potential reelection, predicting the winner remains challenging due to all the variables at play. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey utilizes a recent Gallup poll to offer…
Immigration will lower wages and cause more income inequality
The impact of immigration on the U.S. economy is a subject of continued debate following failed negotiations on immigration reform in Congress. Recently, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published a report that attempted to sift through the arguments and lay out precise forecasts for economic growth linked to immigration over the next ten years. Straight…
Here’s why Americans are unhappy with the economy
There is a lively debate about how the U.S. economy is doing, and whether it’s been getting better or worse as the nation emerges from the pandemic. Democrats point to an increase in wages, record-low unemployment, and an increasing number of Americans who report they are now “happy” with their job. Meanwhile, Republicans point to…
Zelenskyy might no longer be the hero Ukraine needs
As the full-fledged Russian invasion of Ukraine approaches its two-year anniversary, it may help to review where the conflict currently stands. As of Dec. 2023, the Russians have suffered an estimated 320,000 casualties, while the Ukrainian casualty number sits closer to 120,000. And while the war has drained enormous wealth and resources from both sides,…
Claudine Gay, Harvard have lost sight of academic values
Claudine Gay resigned from her position as Harvard University president following a congressional hearing on campus antisemitism and heavy criticism from Harvard alumni in the wake of the testimony. Gay’s resignation completed a tumultuous year for the historic university, which found itself in the center of various public debates throughout 2023, including the debate on…
Underreported stories from each side
Newsom says Biden should ‘100%’ debate Trump ahead of election
6 sources | 17% from the left
Meta to set up team to counter disinformation, AI abuse in EU elections
24 sources | 18% from the right
SCOTUS hears arguments in case on Texas, Florida social media laws
AllSides study finds left-leaning bias in Google News, others
Study shows VR helping seniors as 'silver tsunami' approaches
The campaign employee behind fake robocall impersonating Biden
AT&T to credit customers affected by widespread network outage
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.