The $11 billion Nord Stream 2 pipeline was built to reduce soaring energy prices for those living in the EU, but the project was controversial from the start. Fears around the EU relying so heavily on Russia’s cheap natural gas supply only increased since Russia invaded Ukraine. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey explains that while some argue the U.S. benefits from the leaks, the damage was most likely due to Russian sabotage.
Recently, there’s a huge tragedy. The Nord Stream pipeline that takes natural gas from Russia to Germany developed a number of leaks. And it was not just the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which was recently completed. it was also the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, and they occurred in different spots. Well, it was pretty obvious this wouldn’t happen spontaneously in four or five places. And so the world agrees that it was likely sabotage.
And what we’ve been seeing is mutual blame. NATO blames Russia. General Jens Stoltenberg, who’s the Secretary General of NATO, called this an attack by Russia on critical infrastructure, which he tried to make as a pretext for a military response.
On the other hand, Russia points out that it’s a Russian asset. Gazprom owns 51% of it and Gazprom is an arm of the Russian government. So the question would arise, why would Russia damage something that cost it $11 billion to build and continues to be an asset that might possibly in the future, again, carry gas from Russia to Europe?
Well, this is a bit of a problem for the claim that Russia did it. Now, let me be clear, Russia is the most likely person to have done it. Putin is a bad guy and bad guys do things like that. On the other hand, why would you blow up your own stuff?
So a number of commentators who are clearly not pro-Russia, have begun pointing it out. A longtime friend of mine, Radek Sikorski, who used to be both the foreign minister and also the defense minister of Poland, and believe me, he is no fan of Russia or Putin, said the other day, “Thank you, USA. Now 20 billion of scrap metal lies at the bottom of the sea — another cost to Russia.”
Recently, there’s a huge tragedy. The Nord Stream pipeline that takes natural gas from Russia to Germany developed a number of leaks. And it was not just the Nord Stream two pipeline, which was recently completed was also the Nord Stream, one pipeline, and they occurred in different spots. Well, it was pretty obvious this wouldn’t happen spontaneously in four or five places. And so the world agrees that it was likely sabotage. And what we’ve been seeing is mutual blame. NATO blames Russia.
General von Stoltenberg, who’s the Secretary General of NATO, called this an attack by Russia on critical infrastructure, which he tried to make as a pretext for a military response.
On the other hand, Russia points out that it’s a Russian assets. Gazprom owns 51% of it, and Gazprom is an arm of the Russian government. So the question would arise, why would Russia damage something that costed $11 billion to build and is continues to be an asset that might possibly in the future, again, carry gas from Russia to Europe?
Well, this is a bit of a problem for the claim that Russia did it. Now, let me be clear, Russia is the most likely person to have done it. Putin is a bad guy and bad guys do things like that.
On the other hand, why would you blow up your own stuff? So a number of commentators who are clearly not pro Russia, have begun pointing it out. A longtime friend of mine, Radek Sikorski, who used to be both the Foreign Minister and also the defense minister of Poland, and believe me, he is no fan of Russia or Putin said the other day.
Thank you, USA. Now 20 billion of scrap metal lies at the bottom of the see another cost to Russia.
Jeff Sachs, who I’ve also known a long time, who’s important economist in a whole variety of roles and global economic development, pointed out most of the world blames the US a for this.
Sacks, by the way, is would be very pro administration. He’s on the left. Finally, there’s Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, whose first comment was that this was in no one’s interest. But then, four days later, he said the following thing at a press conference about the Nord Stream incident, quote,
it’s a tremendous opportunity to once and for all removed dependence on Russian energy.
Well, I hardly think of this as an opportunity that’s hard to see what a winning thing it was. But in saying what he said, blinking is Lincoln is repeating exactly the Russian line it uses for accusing America. Europe doesn’t benefit Russia doesn’t benefit. But America by breaking Russia’s oil exports, and by allowing itself to export more to Europe is a beneficiary. Again, we’re not saying America did it. But why would Blinken say that?
So it has long been US policy after the Ukraine War started to permanently remove Russia as an economic and military threat. And frankly, Lincoln’s observation would go along with that long standing policy.
How will it affect markets? Well, at first, not very much gas already didn’t flow through the Nord Stream pipeline.
The EU is going to stop all imports in December from Russia. And Russia said shut down the pipeline, ostensibly because it had a break in one of its transmission stations and could not repair it because of sanctions. Whatever. Why don’t we blame Russia explicitly? Well, the fact is
Russia transmits oil through natural gas in other ways, including through Poland. Those transit fees represent 8% of Ukrainian GDP. That’s a lot and Ukraine would put a big hit. They also might cut off the flow there, and that would be harmful to Europe.
So there is no concrete proof one way or the other, it’s likely that Putin did it. We also know that there was huge environmental damage. The amount of methane that was released when the pipeline broke was the equivalent in terms of global warming gases to 2 million cars driving for a year.
Finally, there are permanent economic damages, and it also lowers the chance that trade will ever resume. The world has benefited a lot from globalization. And this is another nail in its coffin.
Larry Lindsey
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Larry
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict paused, not over
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Why Azerbaijan launched a military operation against Armenia
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Putin most likely sabotaged the Nord Stream 2 pipeline
Oct 24, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
The $11 billion Nord Stream 2 pipeline was built to reduce soaring energy prices for those living in the EU, but the project was controversial from the start. Fears around the EU relying so heavily on Russia’s cheap natural gas supply only increased since Russia invaded Ukraine. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey explains that while some argue the U.S. benefits from the leaks, the damage was most likely due to Russian sabotage.
Recently, there’s a huge tragedy. The Nord Stream pipeline that takes natural gas from Russia to Germany developed a number of leaks. And it was not just the Nord Stream two pipeline, which was recently completed was also the Nord Stream, one pipeline, and they occurred in different spots. Well, it was pretty obvious this wouldn’t happen spontaneously in four or five places. And so the world agrees that it was likely sabotage. And what we’ve been seeing is mutual blame. NATO blames Russia.
General von Stoltenberg, who’s the Secretary General of NATO, called this an attack by Russia on critical infrastructure, which he tried to make as a pretext for a military response.
On the other hand, Russia points out that it’s a Russian assets. Gazprom owns 51% of it, and Gazprom is an arm of the Russian government. So the question would arise, why would Russia damage something that costed $11 billion to build and is continues to be an asset that might possibly in the future, again, carry gas from Russia to Europe?
Well, this is a bit of a problem for the claim that Russia did it. Now, let me be clear, Russia is the most likely person to have done it. Putin is a bad guy and bad guys do things like that.
On the other hand, why would you blow up your own stuff? So a number of commentators who are clearly not pro Russia, have begun pointing it out. A longtime friend of mine, Radek Sikorski, who used to be both the Foreign Minister and also the defense minister of Poland, and believe me, he is no fan of Russia or Putin said the other day.
Thank you, USA. Now 20 billion of scrap metal lies at the bottom of the see another cost to Russia.
Jeff Sachs, who I’ve also known a long time, who’s important economist in a whole variety of roles and global economic development, pointed out most of the world blames the US a for this.
Sacks, by the way, is would be very pro administration. He’s on the left. Finally, there’s Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, whose first comment was that this was in no one’s interest. But then, four days later, he said the following thing at a press conference about the Nord Stream incident, quote,
it’s a tremendous opportunity to once and for all removed dependence on Russian energy.
Well, I hardly think of this as an opportunity that’s hard to see what a winning thing it was. But in saying what he said, blinking is Lincoln is repeating exactly the Russian line it uses for accusing America. Europe doesn’t benefit Russia doesn’t benefit. But America by breaking Russia’s oil exports, and by allowing itself to export more to Europe is a beneficiary. Again, we’re not saying America did it. But why would Blinken say that?
So it has long been US policy after the Ukraine War started to permanently remove Russia as an economic and military threat. And frankly, Lincoln’s observation would go along with that long standing policy.
How will it affect markets? Well, at first, not very much gas already didn’t flow through the Nord Stream pipeline.
The EU is going to stop all imports in December from Russia. And Russia said shut down the pipeline, ostensibly because it had a break in one of its transmission stations and could not repair it because of sanctions. Whatever. Why don’t we blame Russia explicitly? Well, the fact is
Russia transmits oil through natural gas in other ways, including through Poland. Those transit fees represent 8% of Ukrainian GDP. That’s a lot and Ukraine would put a big hit. They also might cut off the flow there, and that would be harmful to Europe.
So there is no concrete proof one way or the other, it’s likely that Putin did it. We also know that there was huge environmental damage. The amount of methane that was released when the pipeline broke was the equivalent in terms of global warming gases to 2 million cars driving for a year.
Finally, there are permanent economic damages, and it also lowers the chance that trade will ever resume. The world has benefited a lot from globalization. And this is another nail in its coffin.
US debt interest is cause for concern
Economist Paul Krugman recently said that interest payments on U.S. debt won’t be a major concern in the years ahead. The U.S. national debt is almost at $33 trillion, and the interest payments alone on that debt are approaching $500 billion per year. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey disagrees with Krugman and instead urges
Sep 11
The truth about corporate lending and credit tightening
Banks have started to tighten credit due to the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes, which represent a deliberate strategy to temper economic growth and reduce inflation. According to the most recent Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey, a majority of banks reported that they had tightened lending standards for larger and medium-sized businesses in the past
Sep 5
China’s economic decline mirroring Japan’s past
China is currently experiencing record high youth unemployment and a decrease in economic growth. Japan faced similar issues in 1989 when deflation and over-investment caused their stock market to collapse. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey suggests that China could end up mirroring Japan’s crash. But he believes that China might be hit harder due
Aug 28
Even after BRICS summit, US dollar is not going away
The BRICS summit is scheduled to take place Aug. 22-24 in Johannesburg, South Africa with member nations Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Together, these nations account for 16 percent of international trade, a substantial portion of which is conducted in U.S. dollars. These countries want to decrease their dependence on the dominant U.S.
Aug 21
Don’t underestimate Putin’s grip on power
Is the Ukraine war also a public relations war? The U.S. has sometimes promoted the idea that Putin’s power may be weakening. First, rumors that Putin had cancer began circulating. Then there was the Wagner Group’s short-lived rebellion against Russia’s military leadership. Putin, on the other hand, is pushing the argument that the West is
Jul 31
Stories each side is underreporting
Border apprehensions up nearly 27 percent from July to August
11 sources | 0% from the left
Six young activists devote years to climate fight with 32 governments. Now comes their day in court
13 sources | 9% from the right
Latest Opinions
Current Media
Whale strandings fuel controversy: Are offshore wind farms to blame?
Watch 14:49
16 hrs ago
AP Images
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watch 3:42
Yesterday
AP Images
Brightline opens first US passenger line in a century with high-speed Florida train
Watch 1:57
Yesterday
Reuters
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Watch 2:26
Yesterday
Government Accountability Office
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
Watch 2:12
Yesterday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Weak House Speaker McCarthy controlled by far-right colleagues
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Wasteful government spending not the answer to America’s problems
Yesterday
Star Parker
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
Thursday
Timothy Carney
Politics
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Yesterday
Biden admin sending $325 million in military resources to Ukraine
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
Reuters
U.S.
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Yesterday
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
US Air Force needs to ‘reoptimize’ or it could lose to China
AP Images
International
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Thursday
Railway stops operations after migrants injured as thousands hop trains to US border
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to UN: Russia should be removed from Security Council
AP Images
Tech
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
Thursday
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
Israel Prime Minister urges Elon Musk to stop hate speech on X
Philip Paxson via FaceBook