
Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
When it comes to the latest in liberal news, our eyes and ears so often turn west to the city of San Francisco. And that’s no different today. The city’s official Advisory Committee on Reparations — yeah, you heard me, the city has an official Advisory Committee on Reparations — well this committee has unveiled its recommendations to the Mayor and other city officials. They decided that the city, the city of San Francisco, owes $5 million to each Black resident for decades of discrimination. Now, San Francisco wasn’t a slave state or a slave city, but anyway, discrimination. In explaining their reasoning, the committee’s chair said they landed on that number as a result of a journey, rather than a math formula, in quotes. Yes, they just grabbed a number out of the sky.
Not surprisingly, San Francisco doesn’t have that kind of money. They’re already broke from so many other left-wing policies. And even if they weren’t broke from being woke, they still have no way that they can afford this redistribution handout.
But the problem is not just with the price tag. The problem, most of all, is with the principle of the matter. My ancestors were slaves. And my life as a young woman was a mess. Was my life a mess because my ancestors were slaves? I don’t think so. Did I need reparations to turn things around for me? Certainly not.
I needed a wake up call, which to my great gratitude, I got from a few church going Black Christians who told me the way I was living was unacceptable to God. So I went to their church, took back responsibility for my life and turned my circumstances around. The problem with the idea of reparations is that it redirects attention away from an individual’s responsibility for their own unique lives. And it redirects attention in such a way to encourage individuals to believe that a collective problem from the past is the cause of all their individual problems in the present.
To be sure, compensation of what many referred to as restitution for damages, is a legitimate principle, but only in the very real here and now, not when it’s pushed to the abstract past. And most of the time, it’s in cases where one individual has caused damages against another — in other words, personal responsibility on both sides. After all, one of the main problems with racism is that it denies the uniqueness, the dignity and the personal responsibility of each individual.
And in that sense, reparation is not a counter to racism. They share more in common than one may realize. They both remain dedicated to the past. Slavery, although it never existed in San Francisco was, of course, a horrible, horrible, deplorable sin in our nation’s story. And the Jim Crow laws that followed, everything else that followed, there were sins as well, a lot of it government-induced, government-promoted sin. But in order to heal the present and build the future, we must not forget the principles of freedom that drive us forward, that actually drove us from slavery, the principles of freedom, that every individual, regardless of circumstances, and history, is unique and has free choice. Thus, we have personal responsibility as well. And although, let’s not lie, any of us would be psyched to take the free $5 million, there’s just no price worth our individuality and our personal freedom.
-
Voters are demanding a global course correction
The reelection of President Trump in the U.S., along with the rise of far-right populist figures like Javier Milei in Argentina, Giorgia Meloni in Italy, and Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre in Canada, reflects a growing backlash against traditional politicians. Economic struggles, frustration with government “elites,” and debates over cultural issues like gender ideology are… -
Why Trump is right to take aim at federal DEI programs
The new Trump administration is cracking down on the federal government’s diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, including in the military and in the Department of Education. Trump officials are ordering all federal DEI employees to be placed on leave and eliminating DEI considerations in hiring following an executive order the president signed on his… -
President Trump should reverse Biden’s abuses and protect human life
Donald Trump campaigned on leaving abortion laws for individual states to decide for themselves, but critics say that will be a tough position for him to maintain while president as he faces Republican pressures to enact stricter federal anti-abortion policies. President Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services has taken down the federal government website… -
Biden’s failed legacy leaves next generation without hope
As President Biden bids farewell as the 46th commander in chief, his legacy is under scrutiny. Many on the Right view him as a long-time politician who veered too far Left, struggled with immigration and inflation, and delivered a “below-average” presidency. Most Democrats rate him at or above average, however, saying that he leaves behind… -
Expect bold action from President Trump and Congress in 2025
President-elect Donald Trump has a long list of global and domestic issues to confront as he prepares his return to the presidency later this month. Among other things, he’ll be seeking to secure Senate approval for his cabinet nominations and will begin working with the new Congress on a budget reconciliation bill. Watch the above…
Latest Opinions
-
Getty Images
Arizona lawmaker urges White House to allow mining near Grand Canyon
-
Reuters
Trump tariffs force Coca-Cola to consider more plastic packaging, price hikes
-
Getty Images
Meta teaching teens how to avoid sextortion when using social media
-
Getty Images
Saints hire 36-year-old Kellen Moore, youngest head coach in NFL
-
Getty Images
The debate to cut or to keep USAID: Bias Breakdown
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.