Commercial pilots face mandatory retirement at 67. Foreign Service employees at the State Department are forced to retire at 65. Why, then, don’t members of Congress face mandatory retirement after a certain age? As some senior lawmakers grapple with health issues in public and with at least 20 members of Congress aged 80 or older, it prompts a debate about whether the time has come for change.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence expresses concerns regarding our older leaders’ abilities to effectively perform their duties, particularly in light of new legislation addressing modern topics such as TikTok bans and AI.
Our future is being decided and guided by a gaggle of people who predate the invention of bubble wrap. A significant number of our leaders have had early adulthood shaped by post-World War II American exceptionalism. They know what it’s like to have affordable housing, good jobs and daily life without mass shootings. But my God, they cannot relate to the lives and the needs of a solid percentage of Americans today.
We see the age disparity play out at congressional hearings all the time. Between potential TikTok bans and conversations about AI, the culture has shifted and evolved such that many of our leaders are often wholly unfamiliar and totally detached from matters upon which they must decide. We deserve leadership that connects with the existing and evolving culture in a way of life that reflects us all.
They need to have the capacity to shape the future for all Americans. Yes, all. That’s why I’m not saying members of the Silent Generation should stay silent in Congress or that the boomers need to back out of the three branches. No, their voices are important and also their presence is essential, as they too represent generations of a number of Americans. But what I am saying is that we need age limits and better efforts to ensure that we have representation in government that reflects we the people, because when it comes to leadership, age is far more than just a number.
Like boxer Rocky Marciano, Father Time is undefeated. We can’t escape the fact that age comes for all of us, regardless of gender, race, class, and so on. Yet for some reason, we’re dodging serious conversations about the aging leadership in our country. We must confront the reality that the United States needs more than just term limits for those occupying the three branches of government. Even though we know that judiciary gets a pass.
For the sake of our future, we must set age limits and invest in greater representation of age groups in our government. This is necessary and it’s not a matter of ageism, or partisanship. This is a matter of democracy and common sense. With age comes a host of issues that can impact one’s intellectual and physical abilities. Not necessarily, no, but by and large, yes. If age weren’t an issue, then Congress wouldn’t mandate that pilots and Foreign Service Workers retire at 65. Numerous states like Minnesota and Maryland, Florida, Michigan, wouldn’t require judges to retire at 70. The FBI would allow 40 year olds to sign up as agents but they don’t.
Age limits matter for professions that have an important impact on society. Why not set age limits for those leading our government then? We can’t ignore that a certain level of physical and intellectual stamina, and rigor for that matter, is required to lead in government. It’s not a lax job, attending hearings and meetings, reviewing cases or constituent concerns, advancing or drafting legislation, executive orders, opinions, traveling to Washington, navigating complex issues and so forth. No matter the branch, the business is stressful. It has an impact on the mind and the body.
The American people should know that their leadership can handle it. We shouldn’t have to watch 81 year old Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, continue to freeze on live TV and then try to gaslight us about his health. Judicial Appointments shouldn’t be stalled because 90 year old Senator Dianne Feinstein is clearly suffering from such mental decline that she can’t even vote on the nominees.
Not only are age limits imperative for the effectiveness of our government, but also prioritizing issues of age is also essential to reflect our nation. The average American is 38 years old, the average Congress person 60, Supreme Court Justice 64, leading presidential candidate 78. That means the average leader or prospective leader in the three branches of government is 67 years old, three decades older than the average American.
Our future is being decided and guided by a gaggle of people who predate the invention of bubble wrap. A significant number of our leaders have had early adulthood shaped by post World War Two American exceptionalism. They know what it’s like to have affordable housing, good jobs and daily life without mass shootings. But my God, they cannot relate to the lives and the needs of a solid percentage of Americans today.
We see the age disparity play out at congressional hearings all the time. Between potential tick tock bans and conversations about AI, the culture has shifted and evolved such that many of our leaders are often wholly unfamiliar and totally detached from matters upon which they must decide. We deserve leadership that connects with the existing and evolving culture in a way of life that reflects us all.
They need to have the capacity to shape the future for all Americans. Yes, all. That’s why I’m not saying members of the silent generation should stay silent in Congress or that the boomers need to back out of the three branches. No, their voices are important and also their presence is essential as they too represent generations of a number of Americans. But what I am saying is that we need age limits and better efforts to ensure that we have representation in government that reflects we the people because when it comes to leadership, age is far more than just a number
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Adrienne Lawrence
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Adrienne
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
9 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why Azerbaijan launched a military operation against Armenia
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
China’s collapse years in the making, not an overnight event
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Some lawmakers are just too old to effectively do their jobs
Sep 13
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
Commercial pilots face mandatory retirement at 67. Foreign Service employees at the State Department are forced to retire at 65. Why, then, don’t members of Congress face mandatory retirement after a certain age? As some senior lawmakers grapple with health issues in public and with at least 20 members of Congress aged 80 or older, it prompts a debate about whether the time has come for change.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence expresses concerns regarding our older leaders’ abilities to effectively perform their duties, particularly in light of new legislation addressing modern topics such as TikTok bans and AI.
Our future is being decided and guided by a gaggle of people who predate the invention of bubble wrap. A significant number of our leaders have had early adulthood shaped by post-World War II American exceptionalism. They know what it’s like to have affordable housing, good jobs and daily life without mass shootings. But my God, they cannot relate to the lives and the needs of a solid percentage of Americans today.
We see the age disparity play out at congressional hearings all the time. Between potential TikTok bans and conversations about AI, the culture has shifted and evolved such that many of our leaders are often wholly unfamiliar and totally detached from matters upon which they must decide. We deserve leadership that connects with the existing and evolving culture in a way of life that reflects us all.
They need to have the capacity to shape the future for all Americans. Yes, all. That’s why I’m not saying members of the Silent Generation should stay silent in Congress or that the boomers need to back out of the three branches. No, their voices are important and also their presence is essential, as they too represent generations of a number of Americans. But what I am saying is that we need age limits and better efforts to ensure that we have representation in government that reflects we the people, because when it comes to leadership, age is far more than just a number.
Like boxer Rocky Marciano, Father Time is undefeated. We can’t escape the fact that age comes for all of us, regardless of gender, race, class, and so on. Yet for some reason, we’re dodging serious conversations about the aging leadership in our country. We must confront the reality that the United States needs more than just term limits for those occupying the three branches of government. Even though we know that judiciary gets a pass.
For the sake of our future, we must set age limits and invest in greater representation of age groups in our government. This is necessary and it’s not a matter of ageism, or partisanship. This is a matter of democracy and common sense. With age comes a host of issues that can impact one’s intellectual and physical abilities. Not necessarily, no, but by and large, yes. If age weren’t an issue, then Congress wouldn’t mandate that pilots and Foreign Service Workers retire at 65. Numerous states like Minnesota and Maryland, Florida, Michigan, wouldn’t require judges to retire at 70. The FBI would allow 40 year olds to sign up as agents but they don’t.
Age limits matter for professions that have an important impact on society. Why not set age limits for those leading our government then? We can’t ignore that a certain level of physical and intellectual stamina, and rigor for that matter, is required to lead in government. It’s not a lax job, attending hearings and meetings, reviewing cases or constituent concerns, advancing or drafting legislation, executive orders, opinions, traveling to Washington, navigating complex issues and so forth. No matter the branch, the business is stressful. It has an impact on the mind and the body.
The American people should know that their leadership can handle it. We shouldn’t have to watch 81 year old Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, continue to freeze on live TV and then try to gaslight us about his health. Judicial Appointments shouldn’t be stalled because 90 year old Senator Dianne Feinstein is clearly suffering from such mental decline that she can’t even vote on the nominees.
Not only are age limits imperative for the effectiveness of our government, but also prioritizing issues of age is also essential to reflect our nation. The average American is 38 years old, the average Congress person 60, Supreme Court Justice 64, leading presidential candidate 78. That means the average leader or prospective leader in the three branches of government is 67 years old, three decades older than the average American.
Our future is being decided and guided by a gaggle of people who predate the invention of bubble wrap. A significant number of our leaders have had early adulthood shaped by post World War Two American exceptionalism. They know what it’s like to have affordable housing, good jobs and daily life without mass shootings. But my God, they cannot relate to the lives and the needs of a solid percentage of Americans today.
We see the age disparity play out at congressional hearings all the time. Between potential tick tock bans and conversations about AI, the culture has shifted and evolved such that many of our leaders are often wholly unfamiliar and totally detached from matters upon which they must decide. We deserve leadership that connects with the existing and evolving culture in a way of life that reflects us all.
They need to have the capacity to shape the future for all Americans. Yes, all. That’s why I’m not saying members of the silent generation should stay silent in Congress or that the boomers need to back out of the three branches. No, their voices are important and also their presence is essential as they too represent generations of a number of Americans. But what I am saying is that we need age limits and better efforts to ensure that we have representation in government that reflects we the people because when it comes to leadership, age is far more than just a number
California’s vital food safety ban takes aim at America’s health crisis
California’s State Senate has passed the California Food Safety Act into law, the first of its kind in the nation. This law prohibits the production, sale, or distribution of certain harmful food additives, including brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben, and red dye No. 3, an additive found in products like Peeps, the marshmallow snack associated
Yesterday
Some lawmakers are just too old to effectively do their jobs
Commercial pilots face mandatory retirement at 67. Foreign Service employees at the State Department are forced to retire at 65. Why, then, don’t members of Congress face mandatory retirement after a certain age? As some senior lawmakers grapple with health issues in public and with at least 20 members of Congress aged 80 or older,
Sep 13
NYPD’s drone surveillance sparks civil rights violations
Shortly before Labor Day weekend, the New York Police Department announced its intention to deploy drones for monitoring potential disruptions at parties and similar large gatherings. Some privacy advocates have expressed concerns that this practice could potentially breach local surveillance laws. Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence goes on to argue that the NYPD’s recent
Sep 6
Stop human nitrogen execution experiments in Alabama
Alabama’s attorney general has requested permission from the state’s Supreme Court to execute Kenneth Eugene Smith using nitrogen-induced hypoxia, a method that involves depriving the individual of oxygen using nitrogen gas. While nitrogen hypoxia is permitted in three states, it remains untested and has not been employed previously for executions. Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne
Aug 30
Spain’s soccer president was wrong to kiss World Cup champion
Royal Spanish Football Federation President Luis Rubiales has had to apologize for kissing Spanish player Jennifer Hermoso on the mouth during the medal ceremony after Spain won the Women’s World Cup. The kiss was widely viewed as inappropriate given the sport’s long-standing allegations of sexual misconduct by male soccer presidents and coaches against female players
Aug 23
Stories each side is underreporting
Ukraine Suspends Spokeswoman From US Over Unapproved Comments
17 sources | 13% from the left
Departure of Murdoch as Fox leader comes as conservative media landscape is increasingly fractured
13 sources | 11% from the right
Latest Stories
AP Images
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Watch 1:36
5 hrs ago
U.S. Air Force
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
Watch 2:41
5 hrs ago
AP Images
AG Garland’s testimony got heated as Republicans, Democrats traded barbs
Watch 10:55
5 hrs ago
Getty Images
What’s the difference between a government shutdown and debt default?
Watch 1:18
6 hrs ago
Straight Arrow News
MindGym helping Air and Space Forces get mental reps
Watch 4:10
7 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
8 hrs ago
Jordan Reid
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
10 hrs ago
Timothy Carney
Biden’s use of fake names raises new questions
Yesterday
Newt Gingrich
California’s vital food safety ban takes aim at America’s health crisis
Yesterday
Adrienne Lawrence
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Jordan Reid
Author; Founding Editor, Ramshackle GlamTimothy Carney
Timothy Carney, Senior Fellow, American Enterprise InstituteWeekly Voices
Monday
David Pakman
Host of The David Pakman ShowLarry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey GroupTuesday
Ruben Navarrette
Columnist, host & authorBen Weingarten
Federalist Senior Contributor; Claremont Institute FellowWednesday
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal commentatorNewt Gingrich
Former House Speaker; Chairman of Gingrich 360Thursday
Jordan Reid
Author; Founding Editor, Ramshackle GlamTimothy Carney
Timothy Carney, Senior Fellow, American Enterprise InstituteOther AEI Contributors
John Fortier
Katherine Zimmerman
Matthew Continetti
Robert Doar
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
National TV Political Analyst, Talk Radio Host, Univ. Prof.Star Parker
Founder & President, Center for Urban Renewal and EducationPolitics
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
5 hrs ago
AG Garland’s testimony got heated as Republicans, Democrats traded barbs
Thousands protest in Canada over controversial gender, sexual education
U.S. Air Force
U.S.
MindGym helping Air and Space Forces get mental reps
7 hrs ago
Government offering more free at-home COVID tests
US granting Venezuelan migrants temporary legal status: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 21, 2023
Straight Arrow News
International
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
5 hrs ago
Railway stops operations after migrants injured as thousands hop trains to US border
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to UN: Russia should be removed from Security Council
AP Images
Tech
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
10 hrs ago
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
Israel Prime Minister urges Elon Musk to stop hate speech on X
Philip Paxson via FaceBook