Like boxer Rocky Marciano, Father Time is undefeated. We can’t escape the fact that age comes for all of us, regardless of gender, race, class, and so on. Yet for some reason, we’re dodging serious conversations about the aging leadership in our country. We must confront the reality that the United States needs more than just term limits for those occupying the three branches of government. Even though we know that judiciary gets a pass.
For the sake of our future, we must set age limits and invest in greater representation of age groups in our government. This is necessary and it’s not a matter of ageism, or partisanship. This is a matter of democracy and common sense. With age comes a host of issues that can impact one’s intellectual and physical abilities. Not necessarily, no, but by and large, yes. If age weren’t an issue, then Congress wouldn’t mandate that pilots and Foreign Service Workers retire at 65. Numerous states like Minnesota and Maryland, Florida, Michigan, wouldn’t require judges to retire at 70. The FBI would allow 40 year olds to sign up as agents but they don’t.
Age limits matter for professions that have an important impact on society. Why not set age limits for those leading our government then? We can’t ignore that a certain level of physical and intellectual stamina, and rigor for that matter, is required to lead in government. It’s not a lax job, attending hearings and meetings, reviewing cases or constituent concerns, advancing or drafting legislation, executive orders, opinions, traveling to Washington, navigating complex issues and so forth. No matter the branch, the business is stressful. It has an impact on the mind and the body.
The American people should know that their leadership can handle it. We shouldn’t have to watch 81 year old Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, continue to freeze on live TV and then try to gaslight us about his health. Judicial Appointments shouldn’t be stalled because 90 year old Senator Dianne Feinstein is clearly suffering from such mental decline that she can’t even vote on the nominees.
Not only are age limits imperative for the effectiveness of our government, but also prioritizing issues of age is also essential to reflect our nation. The average American is 38 years old, the average Congress person 60, Supreme Court Justice 64, leading presidential candidate 78. That means the average leader or prospective leader in the three branches of government is 67 years old, three decades older than the average American.
Our future is being decided and guided by a gaggle of people who predate the invention of bubble wrap. A significant number of our leaders have had early adulthood shaped by post World War Two American exceptionalism. They know what it’s like to have affordable housing, good jobs and daily life without mass shootings. But my God, they cannot relate to the lives and the needs of a solid percentage of Americans today.
We see the age disparity play out at congressional hearings all the time. Between potential tick tock bans and conversations about AI, the culture has shifted and evolved such that many of our leaders are often wholly unfamiliar and totally detached from matters upon which they must decide. We deserve leadership that connects with the existing and evolving culture in a way of life that reflects us all.
They need to have the capacity to shape the future for all Americans. Yes, all. That’s why I’m not saying members of the silent generation should stay silent in Congress or that the boomers need to back out of the three branches. No, their voices are important and also their presence is essential as they too represent generations of a number of Americans. But what I am saying is that we need age limits and better efforts to ensure that we have representation in government that reflects we the people because when it comes to leadership, age is far more than just a number
Related
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘The worst it’s ever been’: Young Americans on democracy
Yesterday
Dr. Frank Luntz
How to handle plunging US birth rate before it’s too late
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Japan must confront reality of military threats
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
US may need to find new sources of uranium
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Some lawmakers are just too old to effectively do their jobs
Sep 13, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
Commercial pilots face mandatory retirement at 67. Foreign Service employees at the State Department are forced to retire at 65. Why, then, don’t members of Congress face mandatory retirement after a certain age? As some senior lawmakers grapple with health issues in public and with at least 20 members of Congress aged 80 or older, it prompts a debate about whether the time has come for change.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence expresses concerns regarding our older leaders’ abilities to effectively perform their duties, particularly in light of new legislation addressing modern topics such as TikTok bans and AI.
Our future is being decided and guided by a gaggle of people who predate the invention of bubble wrap. A significant number of our leaders have had early adulthood shaped by post-World War II American exceptionalism. They know what it’s like to have affordable housing, good jobs and daily life without mass shootings. But my God, they cannot relate to the lives and the needs of a solid percentage of Americans today.
We see the age disparity play out at congressional hearings all the time. Between potential TikTok bans and conversations about AI, the culture has shifted and evolved such that many of our leaders are often wholly unfamiliar and totally detached from matters upon which they must decide. We deserve leadership that connects with the existing and evolving culture in a way of life that reflects us all.
They need to have the capacity to shape the future for all Americans. Yes, all. That’s why I’m not saying members of the Silent Generation should stay silent in Congress or that the boomers need to back out of the three branches. No, their voices are important and also their presence is essential, as they too represent generations of a number of Americans. But what I am saying is that we need age limits and better efforts to ensure that we have representation in government that reflects we the people, because when it comes to leadership, age is far more than just a number.
Like boxer Rocky Marciano, Father Time is undefeated. We can’t escape the fact that age comes for all of us, regardless of gender, race, class, and so on. Yet for some reason, we’re dodging serious conversations about the aging leadership in our country. We must confront the reality that the United States needs more than just term limits for those occupying the three branches of government. Even though we know that judiciary gets a pass.
For the sake of our future, we must set age limits and invest in greater representation of age groups in our government. This is necessary and it’s not a matter of ageism, or partisanship. This is a matter of democracy and common sense. With age comes a host of issues that can impact one’s intellectual and physical abilities. Not necessarily, no, but by and large, yes. If age weren’t an issue, then Congress wouldn’t mandate that pilots and Foreign Service Workers retire at 65. Numerous states like Minnesota and Maryland, Florida, Michigan, wouldn’t require judges to retire at 70. The FBI would allow 40 year olds to sign up as agents but they don’t.
Age limits matter for professions that have an important impact on society. Why not set age limits for those leading our government then? We can’t ignore that a certain level of physical and intellectual stamina, and rigor for that matter, is required to lead in government. It’s not a lax job, attending hearings and meetings, reviewing cases or constituent concerns, advancing or drafting legislation, executive orders, opinions, traveling to Washington, navigating complex issues and so forth. No matter the branch, the business is stressful. It has an impact on the mind and the body.
The American people should know that their leadership can handle it. We shouldn’t have to watch 81 year old Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, continue to freeze on live TV and then try to gaslight us about his health. Judicial Appointments shouldn’t be stalled because 90 year old Senator Dianne Feinstein is clearly suffering from such mental decline that she can’t even vote on the nominees.
Not only are age limits imperative for the effectiveness of our government, but also prioritizing issues of age is also essential to reflect our nation. The average American is 38 years old, the average Congress person 60, Supreme Court Justice 64, leading presidential candidate 78. That means the average leader or prospective leader in the three branches of government is 67 years old, three decades older than the average American.
Our future is being decided and guided by a gaggle of people who predate the invention of bubble wrap. A significant number of our leaders have had early adulthood shaped by post World War Two American exceptionalism. They know what it’s like to have affordable housing, good jobs and daily life without mass shootings. But my God, they cannot relate to the lives and the needs of a solid percentage of Americans today.
We see the age disparity play out at congressional hearings all the time. Between potential tick tock bans and conversations about AI, the culture has shifted and evolved such that many of our leaders are often wholly unfamiliar and totally detached from matters upon which they must decide. We deserve leadership that connects with the existing and evolving culture in a way of life that reflects us all.
They need to have the capacity to shape the future for all Americans. Yes, all. That’s why I’m not saying members of the silent generation should stay silent in Congress or that the boomers need to back out of the three branches. No, their voices are important and also their presence is essential as they too represent generations of a number of Americans. But what I am saying is that we need age limits and better efforts to ensure that we have representation in government that reflects we the people because when it comes to leadership, age is far more than just a number
Related
NYPD’s lack of lawsuit disclosure shields it from accountability
An examination of public records obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests revealed that nearly 13,000 legal cases brought against the New York City Police Department (NYPD) resulting in settlements or monetary awards over the past decade were not publicly disclosed, despite legal requirements to do so. Some analysts suggest that the NYPD’s failure…
Wednesday
Students learning brutal lesson on how police respond to protests
Student protests against Israel’s war in Gaza have escalated in the United States and around the world as civilian death counts in both Gaza and the West Bank continue to climb. Estimates show Israeli forces killed at least 42,500 Palestinians since Oct. 7, 2023, and another two million survivors have been displaced from their homes.…
May 1
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
Apr 24
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
Apr 17
Congress should repeal the Foreign Dredge Act
The collapse of Baltimore’s Key Bridge presents challenges for cleanup and construction crews who rely on dredging vessels to complete their work. That’s partly because of the Foreign Dredge Act, a 1906 law that prohibits foreign-made dredging vessels. Congress is now introducing a measure to revise parts of that law, although previous attempts to do…
Apr 10
Underreported stories from each side
US law could force Biden to pull UN funding if Palestinian recognition bypass succeeds, experts say
7 sources | 0% from the left
Reuters
Police dismantle pro-Palestinian encampment at MIT, move to clear Philadelphia and Arizona protests
24 sources | 0% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
Man acquitted in Michigan Gov. Whitmer kidnapping plot runs for sheriff
Watch 2:19
6 mins ago
'Doomsday Vault' creators win award in fight to save crop diversity
Watch 2:09
2 hrs ago
Senate passes sweeping FAA bill focused on safety, consumer protections
Watch 0:44
2 hrs ago
Federal appeals court rejects Hunter Biden’s dismissal request in gun case
Watch 0:54
3 hrs ago
Judge denies Trump's request for mistrial after Daniels' testimony
Watch 6:50
4 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Biden withholding weapons from Israel emboldens Hamas
1 hr ago
Star Parker
Donald Trump has betrayed every conservative value
1 hr ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Putin’s promise of a long war might be hollow threat
Yesterday
Leon Aron
Why the Trump family is missing from court appearances
Yesterday
Jordan Reid