Tech elites must do their part to make SF safer after Bob Lee’s death


Violent crime isn’t relegated to an income bracket. When will the wealthy realize that simply because someone is impoverished doesn’t mean they’re criminal? It means the city isn’t taking care of its people.

Poverty is a policy choice, and it’s clearly one chosen by San Francisco. The city has the third-largest income inequality gap in the country, just behind New York and Chicago. The average incomes among the highest-earning Bay Area households are $149,000 higher than they are nationwide. There’s plenty of wealth in Frisco [sic], it’s just segregated among the few rather than dispersed among the many. Speaking of the many… even if you take it out of the hands of private citizens, the public sector is wealthy. The city of San Francisco has a budget north of $13 billion — the fourth largest budget of American cities. And it sits in a state with the world’s fourth largest economy, overtaking Germany.

You’d think that San Francisco could find the resources to provide adequate housing and social services to its entire unhoused population. But no. Mind you, as much as Elon Musk and others complain about the homeless in the Bay, the numbers really aren’t that great in comparison to unhoused populations in other cities. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), San Francisco has an estimated 7,745 people experiencing homelessness. That number is eclipsed by the unhoused population in Los Angeles, which is eight times larger.

There are more homeless in New York, Seattle, San Jose, the neighboring Alameda County and many other cities. It seems that when San Francisco’s elite are complaining about the unhoused population in San Fran, it’s not the number that bothers them but the mere presence of them.