As the year comes to a close, advertisements for tax prep companies are already rolling in. And with them comes the reminder of income, something that too many Americans did not have enough of coming into 2023. And they likely still don’t have enough.
When the year started, the U.S. poverty rate was coming off its largest one-year increase in history. 12.4% of the population was now living below the poverty line. That’s 38 million Americans entering this year without the ability to afford to meet their basic needs, despite many of them working one or more jobs and paying their fair share of taxes.
This is unjust. It’s also an easy fix, one that we all should be pursuing at all costs. It’s simple: Tax the rich. But in order for that basic concept to come to fruition, Americans, particularly those on the right, must get their heads right as it concerns poverty.
Foremost, fixing poverty is possible. In research for his new book “Poverty by America,” Princeton sociologist Matthew Desmond found that if the top 1% of Americans paid the taxes they owed, it would raise $175 billion each year. Using those tax dollars toward low-income Americans would be significant enough to ensure their basic needs are met and more.
Such a proposal should not offend the senses. Yet a number of people still take issue with using government aid to uplift the poor. That brings me to my next point. Poverty is not a personal failure; it is a societal one. As a member of our society, you should be entitled to basics like housing, food, healthcare, education, safety. Sweden and Norway seem to know how to make this work. These basics should not be deemed luxuries afforded only by those who can afford it.
Taking care of all of your citizens is not complicated, particularly when you’re wealthy enough to spend $877 billion on your military, right? We have the means, but we must make the way. That is, we need to update our mindsets. Those who are opposed to using government assistance for the poor may also need a wake-up call. Those high five and low and timid six-figure households are the biggest beneficiaries of government aid to begin with. Tax breaks on retirement accounts, wealth transfers, health insurance, college savings, mortgage interest, these are all economic benefits that the government gives back to the people. With these tax subsidies, the government is basically cutting a check back to Americans. On just homeowner base tax subsidies alone, for example, the United States spends an estimated $190 billion a year putting that amount back into the pockets of homeowners. How much does the US spend on housing assistance for low-income families? Around $50 billion a year. You can see the difference there, right?
Government aid is everywhere. But the vast majority of it doesn’t go to those who need it the most. And lastly, to fix poverty, what we need most is for Americans to uplift leaders who are willing to hold the 1% accountable. While not every leader on the left fits that bill, I can assure you no one on the right does. They’re just too busy protecting corporate greed rather than looking to meet constituents’ basic needs.
This is apparent in that what on average red states have long had higher rates of poverty than blue states. A vote for the red really keeps you in the red. Yet millions of those living in poverty in the United States continue to lean Republican. According to Pew Research, over 1/3 of those making $30,000 to $50,000 a year rock with the right, as do about one-third of those making less than $30,000 a year. The math ain’t mathin’ here. But hopefully, when it comes to tax season, all the math will line up. And when it comes to election season in November, the votes will, too.
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
7 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
To address poverty, tax the rich and vote blue
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
By Straight Arrow News
The United States is one of the wealthiest nations in the world today, yet many Americans remain trapped in cycles of poverty and homelessness. That problem is both an economic and a political one, as many on the Right insist that the government should not be protecting or providing for America’s poor in the first place.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence argues that the problem is really more political than economic, as she notes that, in purely financial terms, the United States is more than able to provide for every poor American. A key obstacle, Lawrence states, is getting the rich to pay their fair share in taxes — and that requires Democratic governments, not the Republican governments which many poor Americans continue to vote for.
When the year started, the U.S. poverty rate was coming off its largest one-year increase in history. 12.4% of the population was now living below the poverty line. That’s 38 million Americans entering this year without the ability to afford to meet their basic needs, despite many of them working one or more jobs and paying their fair share of taxes.
This is unjust. It’s also an easy fix, one that we all should be pursuing at all costs. It’s simple: Tax the rich. But in order for that basic concept to come to fruition, Americans, particularly those on the Right, must get their heads right as it concerns poverty.
Foremost, fixing poverty is possible. In research for his new book “Poverty by America,” Princeton sociologist Matthew Desmond found that if the top 1% of Americans paid the taxes they owed, it would raise $175 billion each year. Using those tax dollars toward low-income Americans would be significant enough to ensure their basic needs are met and more.
Such a proposal should not offend the senses. Yet a number of people still take issue with using government aid to uplift the poor. That brings me to my next point. Poverty is not a personal failure; it is a societal one…
As the year comes to a close, advertisements for tax prep companies are already rolling in. And with them comes the reminder of income, something that too many Americans did not have enough of coming into 2023. And they likely still don’t have enough.
When the year started, the U.S. poverty rate was coming off its largest one-year increase in history. 12.4% of the population was now living below the poverty line. That’s 38 million Americans entering this year without the ability to afford to meet their basic needs, despite many of them working one or more jobs and paying their fair share of taxes.
This is unjust. It’s also an easy fix, one that we all should be pursuing at all costs. It’s simple: Tax the rich. But in order for that basic concept to come to fruition, Americans, particularly those on the right, must get their heads right as it concerns poverty.
Foremost, fixing poverty is possible. In research for his new book “Poverty by America,” Princeton sociologist Matthew Desmond found that if the top 1% of Americans paid the taxes they owed, it would raise $175 billion each year. Using those tax dollars toward low-income Americans would be significant enough to ensure their basic needs are met and more.
Such a proposal should not offend the senses. Yet a number of people still take issue with using government aid to uplift the poor. That brings me to my next point. Poverty is not a personal failure; it is a societal one. As a member of our society, you should be entitled to basics like housing, food, healthcare, education, safety. Sweden and Norway seem to know how to make this work. These basics should not be deemed luxuries afforded only by those who can afford it.
Taking care of all of your citizens is not complicated, particularly when you’re wealthy enough to spend $877 billion on your military, right? We have the means, but we must make the way. That is, we need to update our mindsets. Those who are opposed to using government assistance for the poor may also need a wake-up call. Those high five and low and timid six-figure households are the biggest beneficiaries of government aid to begin with. Tax breaks on retirement accounts, wealth transfers, health insurance, college savings, mortgage interest, these are all economic benefits that the government gives back to the people. With these tax subsidies, the government is basically cutting a check back to Americans. On just homeowner base tax subsidies alone, for example, the United States spends an estimated $190 billion a year putting that amount back into the pockets of homeowners. How much does the US spend on housing assistance for low-income families? Around $50 billion a year. You can see the difference there, right?
Government aid is everywhere. But the vast majority of it doesn’t go to those who need it the most. And lastly, to fix poverty, what we need most is for Americans to uplift leaders who are willing to hold the 1% accountable. While not every leader on the left fits that bill, I can assure you no one on the right does. They’re just too busy protecting corporate greed rather than looking to meet constituents’ basic needs.
This is apparent in that what on average red states have long had higher rates of poverty than blue states. A vote for the red really keeps you in the red. Yet millions of those living in poverty in the United States continue to lean Republican. According to Pew Research, over 1/3 of those making $30,000 to $50,000 a year rock with the right, as do about one-third of those making less than $30,000 a year. The math ain’t mathin’ here. But hopefully, when it comes to tax season, all the math will line up. And when it comes to election season in November, the votes will, too.
Trump-Vance ticket will implement nationwide abortion ban
Donald Trump recently accepted the Republican nomination for president and named Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, as his running mate. Vance has previously advocated for strict anti-abortion laws, in sharp contrast to Kamala Harris, the leading Democratic candidate, who went on a nationwide tour to mobilize pro-choice voters. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News…
Wednesday
End of Chevron is an open invite for corporate corruption
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 40 years of “Chevron deference” in a landmark ruling that experts say will cause a “legal earthquake.” The 6-3 conservative opinion upends a long tradition of relying on neutral expertise to interpret and execute laws and regulations. Broadly speaking, the ruling empowers judges and corporations at the…
Jul 17
American democracy cannot survive if Trump wins
Public alarm over the chances of democracy surviving in America has reached a new high-water mark in the wake of the Supreme Court’s July 1 ruling in Trump v. United States, where the court expanded presidential powers for all current and future U.S. presidents. Among other things, the court may have granted U.S. presidents the…
Jul 10
Talk to your kids about sextortion
The FBI is warning Americans of a growing threat called sextortion, where online predators pose as young, single individuals to lure their victims, primarily single teenage boys, into a blackmail trap. After soliciting sexual photos or videos of the victim, the predator threatens to release the images or videos unless the victim sends money and/or…
Jul 3
Louisiana’s Ten Commandments law proves Gov. Landry is corrupt
On June 20, GOP Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana signed into law a new bill that requires all public Louisiana school and university classrooms to display a poster-sized printout of the Bible’s Ten Commandments. The law violates existing legal precedents regarding the First Amendment and is expected to be challenged in the Supreme Court, although…
Jun 26
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
2 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
2 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
2 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
2 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
2 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
7 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
8 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich