You’re probably told in junior high school that America’s national motto is e pluribus unum: out of many one. Well you were told wrong. Where the immigration debate is concerned, the real motto is there goes the neighborhood. You see dating back to the first immigrants — the Germans who came to what would later become the American colonies in the late 1600s — the American tradition has been for those who are already here to view those who have just arrived as dirty, defective and dangerous. The newcomers are always seen as inferior. As less than and not as good as the native born in every way.
Says who? Why the natives, of course, try to keep up. By the way, the first significant batch of German immigrants arrived in 1683, to be precise. That was the year that 13 families of German Mennonites seeking religious freedom arrived in Pennsylvania and founded Germantown just six miles north of Philadelphia. They were not exactly greeted with parades and cotton candy. In fact, by the mid 1700s, the Germans chief tormentor would be revealed. It was none other than inventor, newspaper publisher and founding father Benjamin Franklin.
Boston born by an English man heart, Franklin worried publicly that Pennsylvania would become, quote, a colony of aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our anglifying them and will never adopt our language or customs any more than they can acquire our complexion. You see, Franklin’s bigotry toward the Germans hinged on skin color. What the Englishman considered a swarthy complexion. Of course, that’s racism straight up. It doesn’t matter that there’s no German race per se. We know exactly what Franklin was and what he turned out to be was not unique in the story of US immigration policy.
Anti-immigrant bigotry in America was just getting started. In 1896, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, a blueblood Democrat from Massachusetts, had beef with Irish immigrants coming into Boston. He accused them of changing the quote, mental and moral qualities which make what we call our race, and diminishing quote the quality of our race and citizenship.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe. Read: Italy and Eastern Europe. Read: Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview, with the National pulse a right leaning website, Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are, quote, poisoning the blood of our country. Some critics said Trump’s remarks which sounded a lot like the race baiting rhetoric, he used to win the White House in 2016 carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the anti Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic, and said, quote, this kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics period. Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history in our society. It’s been there all along. Since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
In a way all this is refreshing. I’ve spent three decades writing about immigration and trying to get my fellow Americans to see the racism in the current immigration debate. No such luck. They refuse to acknowledge the obvious, instead preferring to talk about border security, public health, crime along the border and in the interior, anything but racism. I was just about to go out and try once more to make the case. Then what do you know Trump and his big mouth made the case for me
Ruben Navarrette
Columnist, host & author
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
12 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Trump’s racist take on immigration has no place in American politics
Ruben Navarrette
Columnist, host & author
By Straight Arrow News
In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, immigration has taken center stage, with lawmakers advocating for varied policies to manage migrant flows. Former President Donald Trump, who is expected to be the GOP’s presidential nominee, is advocating for stringent immigration policies, including his proposal to reinstate the controversial travel ban that primarily affected Muslim-majority countries.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette highlights the long-standing issue of discrimination against immigrants in the United States. Ruben argues that Trump’s policies and opinions are just another example of the pervasive racism that has woven itself into American history.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson-Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe — read, Italy — and Eastern Europe — read, Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti-immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed, lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview with the National Pulse — a right-leaning website — Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.” Some critics said Trump’s remarks — which sounded a lot like the race-baiting rhetoric he used to win the White House in 2016 — carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic and said, “This kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics, period.” Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history, in our society. It’s been there all along — since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
You’re probably told in junior high school that America’s national motto is e pluribus unum: out of many one. Well you were told wrong. Where the immigration debate is concerned, the real motto is there goes the neighborhood. You see dating back to the first immigrants — the Germans who came to what would later become the American colonies in the late 1600s — the American tradition has been for those who are already here to view those who have just arrived as dirty, defective and dangerous. The newcomers are always seen as inferior. As less than and not as good as the native born in every way.
Says who? Why the natives, of course, try to keep up. By the way, the first significant batch of German immigrants arrived in 1683, to be precise. That was the year that 13 families of German Mennonites seeking religious freedom arrived in Pennsylvania and founded Germantown just six miles north of Philadelphia. They were not exactly greeted with parades and cotton candy. In fact, by the mid 1700s, the Germans chief tormentor would be revealed. It was none other than inventor, newspaper publisher and founding father Benjamin Franklin.
Boston born by an English man heart, Franklin worried publicly that Pennsylvania would become, quote, a colony of aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our anglifying them and will never adopt our language or customs any more than they can acquire our complexion. You see, Franklin’s bigotry toward the Germans hinged on skin color. What the Englishman considered a swarthy complexion. Of course, that’s racism straight up. It doesn’t matter that there’s no German race per se. We know exactly what Franklin was and what he turned out to be was not unique in the story of US immigration policy.
Anti-immigrant bigotry in America was just getting started. In 1896, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, a blueblood Democrat from Massachusetts, had beef with Irish immigrants coming into Boston. He accused them of changing the quote, mental and moral qualities which make what we call our race, and diminishing quote the quality of our race and citizenship.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe. Read: Italy and Eastern Europe. Read: Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview, with the National pulse a right leaning website, Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are, quote, poisoning the blood of our country. Some critics said Trump’s remarks which sounded a lot like the race baiting rhetoric, he used to win the White House in 2016 carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the anti Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic, and said, quote, this kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics period. Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history in our society. It’s been there all along. Since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
In a way all this is refreshing. I’ve spent three decades writing about immigration and trying to get my fellow Americans to see the racism in the current immigration debate. No such luck. They refuse to acknowledge the obvious, instead preferring to talk about border security, public health, crime along the border and in the interior, anything but racism. I was just about to go out and try once more to make the case. Then what do you know Trump and his big mouth made the case for me
No one is innocent in Trump assassination attempt
After the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, both Democratic and Republican leaders have called for reducing divisive rhetoric. Some Republicans blame the shooting on the language Democrats used in attacking Trump. Meanwhile, some prominent Republican lawmakers, such as Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., have used similar rhetoric, calling Biden “a clear and present threat…
Tuesday
America must fix its broken Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court was envisioned by America’s founding fathers as an independent judiciary separate from the political world, designed as a fair arbiter of the law. But the 6-3 conservative majority of today’s Supreme Court has issued a number of impactful, partisan and unpopular opinions on everything from abortion access to presidential power, triggering…
Jul 16
Despite Biden’s stumble, rambling Trump can’t win debate
The first presidential debate of 2024 resulted in what many believe was a clear winner and loser. President Joe Biden’s performance was universally panned, affecting his fundraising efforts and intensifying calls for his ousting. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump, despite being criticized for his false claims during the debate, has kept a low profile, opting…
Jul 9
Why Republicans will never shut down US-Mexico border
A group of Republican senators expressed “grave concerns” to President Biden over his recent executive order that would provide a path to citizenship to approximately 500,000 people who have been in the country for a decade or more and are also married to United States citizens. The GOP lawmakers argued that Biden’s immigration relief “directly contravenes…
Jul 2
Why Democrats’ immigration playbook not working with Latino voters
In June 2012, as President Barack Obama campaigned for reelection, he ordered immigration enforcement agents to defer action against those who had arrived in the United States as children. This executive action, known as DACA, offered a path to work permits for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants. That November, Obama cruised to reelection, beating…
Jun 25
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
7 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
7 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
7 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
7 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
7 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
12 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
13 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich