You’re probably told in junior high school that America’s national motto is e pluribus unum: out of many one. Well you were told wrong. Where the immigration debate is concerned, the real motto is there goes the neighborhood. You see dating back to the first immigrants — the Germans who came to what would later become the American colonies in the late 1600s — the American tradition has been for those who are already here to view those who have just arrived as dirty, defective and dangerous. The newcomers are always seen as inferior. As less than and not as good as the native born in every way.
Says who? Why the natives, of course, try to keep up. By the way, the first significant batch of German immigrants arrived in 1683, to be precise. That was the year that 13 families of German Mennonites seeking religious freedom arrived in Pennsylvania and founded Germantown just six miles north of Philadelphia. They were not exactly greeted with parades and cotton candy. In fact, by the mid 1700s, the Germans chief tormentor would be revealed. It was none other than inventor, newspaper publisher and founding father Benjamin Franklin.
Boston born by an English man heart, Franklin worried publicly that Pennsylvania would become, quote, a colony of aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our anglifying them and will never adopt our language or customs any more than they can acquire our complexion. You see, Franklin’s bigotry toward the Germans hinged on skin color. What the Englishman considered a swarthy complexion. Of course, that’s racism straight up. It doesn’t matter that there’s no German race per se. We know exactly what Franklin was and what he turned out to be was not unique in the story of US immigration policy.
Anti-immigrant bigotry in America was just getting started. In 1896, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, a blueblood Democrat from Massachusetts, had beef with Irish immigrants coming into Boston. He accused them of changing the quote, mental and moral qualities which make what we call our race, and diminishing quote the quality of our race and citizenship.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe. Read: Italy and Eastern Europe. Read: Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview, with the National pulse a right leaning website, Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are, quote, poisoning the blood of our country. Some critics said Trump’s remarks which sounded a lot like the race baiting rhetoric, he used to win the White House in 2016 carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the anti Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic, and said, quote, this kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics period. Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history in our society. It’s been there all along. Since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
In a way all this is refreshing. I’ve spent three decades writing about immigration and trying to get my fellow Americans to see the racism in the current immigration debate. No such luck. They refuse to acknowledge the obvious, instead preferring to talk about border security, public health, crime along the border and in the interior, anything but racism. I was just about to go out and try once more to make the case. Then what do you know Trump and his big mouth made the case for me
Related
Ruben Navarrette
Columnist, host & author
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Why Putin axed Shoigu
20 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
New roles for Russia, North Korea, Iran in global arms trade
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why interest rates will be higher for longer
Friday
Peter Zeihan
‘The worst it’s ever been’: Young Americans on democracy
Thursday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Trump’s racist take on immigration has no place in American politics
Oct 24, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, immigration has taken center stage, with lawmakers advocating for varied policies to manage migrant flows. Former President Donald Trump, who is expected to be the GOP’s presidential nominee, is advocating for stringent immigration policies, including his proposal to reinstate the controversial travel ban that primarily affected Muslim-majority countries.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette highlights the long-standing issue of discrimination against immigrants in the United States. Ruben argues that Trump’s policies and opinions are just another example of the pervasive racism that has woven itself into American history.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson-Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe — read, Italy — and Eastern Europe — read, Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti-immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed, lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview with the National Pulse — a right-leaning website — Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.” Some critics said Trump’s remarks — which sounded a lot like the race-baiting rhetoric he used to win the White House in 2016 — carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic and said, “This kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics, period.” Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history, in our society. It’s been there all along — since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
You’re probably told in junior high school that America’s national motto is e pluribus unum: out of many one. Well you were told wrong. Where the immigration debate is concerned, the real motto is there goes the neighborhood. You see dating back to the first immigrants — the Germans who came to what would later become the American colonies in the late 1600s — the American tradition has been for those who are already here to view those who have just arrived as dirty, defective and dangerous. The newcomers are always seen as inferior. As less than and not as good as the native born in every way.
Says who? Why the natives, of course, try to keep up. By the way, the first significant batch of German immigrants arrived in 1683, to be precise. That was the year that 13 families of German Mennonites seeking religious freedom arrived in Pennsylvania and founded Germantown just six miles north of Philadelphia. They were not exactly greeted with parades and cotton candy. In fact, by the mid 1700s, the Germans chief tormentor would be revealed. It was none other than inventor, newspaper publisher and founding father Benjamin Franklin.
Boston born by an English man heart, Franklin worried publicly that Pennsylvania would become, quote, a colony of aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our anglifying them and will never adopt our language or customs any more than they can acquire our complexion. You see, Franklin’s bigotry toward the Germans hinged on skin color. What the Englishman considered a swarthy complexion. Of course, that’s racism straight up. It doesn’t matter that there’s no German race per se. We know exactly what Franklin was and what he turned out to be was not unique in the story of US immigration policy.
Anti-immigrant bigotry in America was just getting started. In 1896, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, a blueblood Democrat from Massachusetts, had beef with Irish immigrants coming into Boston. He accused them of changing the quote, mental and moral qualities which make what we call our race, and diminishing quote the quality of our race and citizenship.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe. Read: Italy and Eastern Europe. Read: Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview, with the National pulse a right leaning website, Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are, quote, poisoning the blood of our country. Some critics said Trump’s remarks which sounded a lot like the race baiting rhetoric, he used to win the White House in 2016 carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the anti Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic, and said, quote, this kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics period. Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history in our society. It’s been there all along. Since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
In a way all this is refreshing. I’ve spent three decades writing about immigration and trying to get my fellow Americans to see the racism in the current immigration debate. No such luck. They refuse to acknowledge the obvious, instead preferring to talk about border security, public health, crime along the border and in the interior, anything but racism. I was just about to go out and try once more to make the case. Then what do you know Trump and his big mouth made the case for me
Related
US college protests test First Amendment limits
Protests against Israel’s alleged genocide in Gaza have spread across university campuses around the globe. While most protests initially coalesced around anti-genocide sentiments and a shared value for human life, some critics have observed slogans, rhetoric and behavior that they claim has become more alarming over time. Accusations have surfaced of “outside agitators” deliberately spoiling…
21 hrs ago
Arizona bill legalizing shooting migrants is part of GOP brand
In February 2024, Arizona Republicans proposed a bill that would have permitted property owners to murder anyone accused of trespassing on their property. Although the bill did not explicitly mention immigrants, Arizona State Rep. Justin Heap (R) stated in a hearing that the bill aimed to address a perceived loophole through which migrants have moved…
Wednesday
Republicans unraveling before our very eyes
In less than a year, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., has filed two motions to remove House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. Her latest motion came after she and other staunch conservative U.S. representatives expressed outrage with Johnson’s management of a $95 billion international defense bill and a $1.2 trillion federal funding bill, which were both…
Apr 30
Trump supporters want to be victims of anti-white racism
The racial anxieties of conservative white Americans are certainly nothing new to U.S. history, but in recent years observers have warned of a range of factors that may be radicalizing right-leaning Americans into political violence and extremism. Donald Trump, in particular, often receives credit for normalizing this extremism for a new generation of Americans. Straight…
Apr 23
Texas is Hispanic, and that’s not going to change
Hispanic people now make up the largest ethnic group in Texas, according to the latest U.S. census data, and almost half of all minors in the state are Hispanic or Latino. This data feeds the fears of some right-wing Americans who believe in the “great replacement” theory. The theory states that non-white populations are displacing…
Apr 16
Underreported stories from each side
Feds arrest Marine for threatening mass killing of White people
17 sources | 21% from the left
U.S. Marine Corp
Bowman accuses Latimer of pushing ‘angry Black man’ stereotype at debate
6 sources | 0% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
Boeing faces potential prosecution over 737 Max crashes
Watch 0:57
51 secs ago
TikTok users sue federal government over law that could ban app
Watch 0:50
1 min ago
Biden administration plans $1 billion weapons deal with Israel
Watch 6:53
51 mins ago
Hogan win could make anti-Trump candidate GOP's Senate savior
Watch 2:27
1 hr ago
Throwable cameras give users a 360 degree view: Weapon of the week
Watch 2:48
4 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Unfair Biden executive order favors Democrats in November
20 hrs ago
Ben Weingarten
US college protests test First Amendment limits
21 hrs ago
Ruben Navarrette
Polls give slight advantage to Trump in Electoral College
Yesterday
Larry Lindsey
Any issue, including Israel-Gaza, could impact 2024 election
Yesterday
David Pakman