You’re probably told in junior high school that America’s national motto is e pluribus unum: out of many one. Well you were told wrong. Where the immigration debate is concerned, the real motto is there goes the neighborhood. You see dating back to the first immigrants — the Germans who came to what would later become the American colonies in the late 1600s — the American tradition has been for those who are already here to view those who have just arrived as dirty, defective and dangerous. The newcomers are always seen as inferior. As less than and not as good as the native born in every way.
Says who? Why the natives, of course, try to keep up. By the way, the first significant batch of German immigrants arrived in 1683, to be precise. That was the year that 13 families of German Mennonites seeking religious freedom arrived in Pennsylvania and founded Germantown just six miles north of Philadelphia. They were not exactly greeted with parades and cotton candy. In fact, by the mid 1700s, the Germans chief tormentor would be revealed. It was none other than inventor, newspaper publisher and founding father Benjamin Franklin.
Boston born by an English man heart, Franklin worried publicly that Pennsylvania would become, quote, a colony of aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our anglifying them and will never adopt our language or customs any more than they can acquire our complexion. You see, Franklin’s bigotry toward the Germans hinged on skin color. What the Englishman considered a swarthy complexion. Of course, that’s racism straight up. It doesn’t matter that there’s no German race per se. We know exactly what Franklin was and what he turned out to be was not unique in the story of US immigration policy.
Anti-immigrant bigotry in America was just getting started. In 1896, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, a blueblood Democrat from Massachusetts, had beef with Irish immigrants coming into Boston. He accused them of changing the quote, mental and moral qualities which make what we call our race, and diminishing quote the quality of our race and citizenship.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe. Read: Italy and Eastern Europe. Read: Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview, with the National pulse a right leaning website, Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are, quote, poisoning the blood of our country. Some critics said Trump’s remarks which sounded a lot like the race baiting rhetoric, he used to win the White House in 2016 carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the anti Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic, and said, quote, this kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics period. Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history in our society. It’s been there all along. Since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
In a way all this is refreshing. I’ve spent three decades writing about immigration and trying to get my fellow Americans to see the racism in the current immigration debate. No such luck. They refuse to acknowledge the obvious, instead preferring to talk about border security, public health, crime along the border and in the interior, anything but racism. I was just about to go out and try once more to make the case. Then what do you know Trump and his big mouth made the case for me
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘That was great’: Undecided voters react to Walz-Vance debate
Friday Dr. Frank Luntz‘A bipartisan problem’: Americans debate immigration policy
Sep 30 Dr. Frank LuntzHurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Sep 27 Peter ZeihanIsrael holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
Sep 25 Peter ZeihanTrump’s racist take on immigration has no place in American politics
By Straight Arrow News
In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, immigration has taken center stage, with lawmakers advocating for varied policies to manage migrant flows. Former President Donald Trump, who is expected to be the GOP’s presidential nominee, is advocating for stringent immigration policies, including his proposal to reinstate the controversial travel ban that primarily affected Muslim-majority countries.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette highlights the long-standing issue of discrimination against immigrants in the United States. Ruben argues that Trump’s policies and opinions are just another example of the pervasive racism that has woven itself into American history.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson-Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe — read, Italy — and Eastern Europe — read, Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti-immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed, lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview with the National Pulse — a right-leaning website — Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.” Some critics said Trump’s remarks — which sounded a lot like the race-baiting rhetoric he used to win the White House in 2016 — carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic and said, “This kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics, period.” Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history, in our society. It’s been there all along — since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
You’re probably told in junior high school that America’s national motto is e pluribus unum: out of many one. Well you were told wrong. Where the immigration debate is concerned, the real motto is there goes the neighborhood. You see dating back to the first immigrants — the Germans who came to what would later become the American colonies in the late 1600s — the American tradition has been for those who are already here to view those who have just arrived as dirty, defective and dangerous. The newcomers are always seen as inferior. As less than and not as good as the native born in every way.
Says who? Why the natives, of course, try to keep up. By the way, the first significant batch of German immigrants arrived in 1683, to be precise. That was the year that 13 families of German Mennonites seeking religious freedom arrived in Pennsylvania and founded Germantown just six miles north of Philadelphia. They were not exactly greeted with parades and cotton candy. In fact, by the mid 1700s, the Germans chief tormentor would be revealed. It was none other than inventor, newspaper publisher and founding father Benjamin Franklin.
Boston born by an English man heart, Franklin worried publicly that Pennsylvania would become, quote, a colony of aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our anglifying them and will never adopt our language or customs any more than they can acquire our complexion. You see, Franklin’s bigotry toward the Germans hinged on skin color. What the Englishman considered a swarthy complexion. Of course, that’s racism straight up. It doesn’t matter that there’s no German race per se. We know exactly what Franklin was and what he turned out to be was not unique in the story of US immigration policy.
Anti-immigrant bigotry in America was just getting started. In 1896, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, a blueblood Democrat from Massachusetts, had beef with Irish immigrants coming into Boston. He accused them of changing the quote, mental and moral qualities which make what we call our race, and diminishing quote the quality of our race and citizenship.
In 1924, Congress passed the Johnson Reed Act, which is also known as the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted by Representative Albert Johnson, a Republican from Washington State, and Senator David Reed, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The law limited the number of immigrants from Southern Europe. Read: Italy and Eastern Europe. Read: Russia. It also excluded outright Asians from entering the United States. Not surprisingly, the law was very popular with the Klu Klux Klan and nativist groups.
Today, the anti immigrant bigotry, exemplified by Franklin and Cabot Lodge and Johnson and Reed lives on in the body of former President Donald Trump. In a recent interview, with the National pulse a right leaning website, Trump said that recent waves of immigrants are, quote, poisoning the blood of our country. Some critics said Trump’s remarks which sounded a lot like the race baiting rhetoric, he used to win the White House in 2016 carry the stench of white supremacy and echoed back to Adolf Hitler.
They included Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the anti Defamation League, who called Mr. Trump’s comments racist and xenophobic, and said, quote, this kind of toxic rhetoric should have no place in our politics period. Unfortunately, that’s not right. Here in the United States, Trump’s racist take on immigrants does have a place in our politics, in our history in our society. It’s been there all along. Since before this region was even a country. It’s never going away. It’s baked into the DNA of this place.
In a way all this is refreshing. I’ve spent three decades writing about immigration and trying to get my fellow Americans to see the racism in the current immigration debate. No such luck. They refuse to acknowledge the obvious, instead preferring to talk about border security, public health, crime along the border and in the interior, anything but racism. I was just about to go out and try once more to make the case. Then what do you know Trump and his big mouth made the case for me
Donald Trump already blaming Jews for his expected loss
How Texas GOP policies are helping turn state purple
Tucker Carlson’s free speech isn’t a blank check for hate speech
Will anyone actually stand up for immigrants?
MAGA bullying Gus Walz will not help win elections for GOP
Underreported stories from each side
Scientists sue academic journal that retracted studies citing dangers from the abortion pill
13 sources | 18% from the left Getty ImagesMajor North Carolina newspaper knocks Trump over Helene response ‘falsehoods’
8 sources | 14% from the right ReutersLatest Stories
Media reacts to Trump’s ‘bad genes’ comment on migrant murderers
Migrant surge causes strain on schools: Survey
Trump wants 200% tariff on foreign cars, here’s how to tell where a car was made
Iran’s ballistic missile attack hit Israel air base, does little damage
A sex offender brought his case to court over a Halloween law, he won
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Future of GOP will be determined in 2024 election
9 hrs ago David PakmanSCOTUS does not need reform or expansion
Friday Star ParkerTrump’s lavish lifesyle makes a mockery of his own supporters
Thursday Jordan ReidChild car seat regulations might actually be impacting family planning
Thursday Timothy Carney