About a decade ago, I agreed to have an off-the-record lunch in San Diego with the sector chief of the Border Patrol. The meeting lasted three hours. At one point, I asked my lunch companion a simple question: What do you need?
You see, most politicians show up for photo ops at the border, like former President Donald Trump and current President Joe Biden did recently in Texas, and then they pontificate about what they’re prepared to give the Border Patrol. Its politicians lecturing the cops about what should be done. And it’s a total farce.
As a son of a retired cop who was on the job for 37 years, and the grandson of a Mexican immigrant who came legally before 1920 and left the country better than he found it, I can appreciate just how complicated the immigration debate really is. So I want to know from an expert on border security, what the chief needed to make the U.S.-Mexico border more secure and make it easier for his agents to do their jobs. As a journalist, I was prepared to do something that politicians won’t ever do: Shut up and listen.
The chief didn’t want a 2,000-mile “big beautiful wall” or more Border Patrol agents. Basically every bad or half-baked idea you can think of that some politician has dreamt up, this border cop wanted no part of it, nothing to do with. Instead, the chief explained, what he could really use was just three things—tunnel detection equipment, high-tech surveillance gadgets, and better roads to allow Border Patrol vehicles to access what is often rugged terrain on the border. Everything the chief wanted would likely have been more effective than the political soundbites and applause lines we have now.
That conversation and what it taught me comes to mind now as I see what Trump is planning to do to solve the immigration crisis, and that is create a whole new crisis.
Trump is promising mass deportations. If he’s reelected, he wants to forcibly remove as many as 10 million people. He says he plans to pull this off by creating a force magnifier. He wants to deputize local and state police and federalize State National Guard units, and then unleash them to hunt for suspected undocumented immigrants. In other words, anyone who these officials, none of whom have training in immigration enforcement, think maybe in the country illegally, could be rounded up and deported. This is a cut and dried recipe for ethnic profiling. And the number one target for inconvenience and maybe even incarceration will be Latinos, including those in the southwest, whose family sometimes go back as far as the early 1800s. That’s right, it may go. We were here to welcome your people.
We’ve traveled this road before in U.S. history as Americans and always wind up at a dead end. In the 1930s, President Herbert Hoover needed a scapegoat for the Great Depression caused by the stock market crash of 1929. And he centered on a group of simple and hardworking people living out in the southwest. Don’t ask me why, those dots are hard to connect. Anyway, Hoover gave tacit approval to efforts by state and local governments to round up and expel scores of Mexicans and Mexican Americans and send them south of the border. In all, between 1930 and 1939, as many as 2 million people wound up leaving the United States from Mexico, some voluntarily after losing their jobs, and others forcibly removed after being put on railroad cars.
Between 1930 and 1933, federal government officers deported more than 80,000 people. By some estimates, more than half of those who were rounded up, deported and pressured to leave, more than half were U.S. citizens, Mexican Americans born in the United States.
That was a tragedy and an injustice as egregious as the wrongful incarceration of Japanese Americans in internment camps during World War Two. It just didn’t make it into all that many history books. Not to worry though, historians may get another chance. If Trump is reelected and keeps his evil promise, a sequel could be in the works.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
With globalization ending, the US can and should adapt
Yesterday Peter ZeihanDeglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Thursday Peter Zeihan‘The lesser of two evils’: Undecided Gen Z on 2024 election
Wednesday Dr. Frank LuntzWill climate change be the death of wheat?
Wednesday Peter ZeihanTrump’s xenophobia risks repeating past US mistakes
By Straight Arrow News
Former President Donald Trump has sworn that, if reelected, he will deport immigrants by the millions, telling his supporters that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.” Critics have flagged that language as dangerous and labeled Trump a racist and a xenophobe, but many of his supporters see border security as the real threat.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette compares this moment with the U.S. in 1929-39, when Mexicans and American citizens of Mexican heritage were rounded up and deported. Navarrette warns that Trump intends to run a much larger version of that operation if he wins reelection in November, and then history might repeat itself.
We’ve traveled this road before in U.S. history as Americans and always wind up at a dead end. In the 1930s, President Herbert Hoover needed a scapegoat for the Great Depression caused by the stock market crash of 1929. And he centered on a group of simple and hardworking people living out in the southwest. Don’t ask me why, those dots are hard to connect. Anyway, Hoover gave tacit approval to efforts by state and local governments to round up and expel scores of Mexicans and Mexican Americans and send them south of the border. In all, between 1930 and 1939, as many as two million people wound up leaving the United States from Mexico, some voluntarily after losing their jobs, and others forcibly removed after being put on railroad cars.
Between 1930 and 1933, federal government officers deported more than 80,000 people. By some estimates, more than half of those who were rounded up, deported and pressured to leave, more than half were U.S. citizens, Mexican Americans born in the United States.
That was a tragedy and an injustice as egregious as the wrongful incarceration of Japanese Americans in internment camps during World War II. It just didn’t make it into all that many history books. Not to worry though. Historians may get another chance. If Trump is reelected and keeps his evil promise, a sequel could be in the works.
About a decade ago, I agreed to have an off-the-record lunch in San Diego with the sector chief of the Border Patrol. The meeting lasted three hours. At one point, I asked my lunch companion a simple question: What do you need?
You see, most politicians show up for photo ops at the border, like former President Donald Trump and current President Joe Biden did recently in Texas, and then they pontificate about what they’re prepared to give the Border Patrol. Its politicians lecturing the cops about what should be done. And it’s a total farce.
As a son of a retired cop who was on the job for 37 years, and the grandson of a Mexican immigrant who came legally before 1920 and left the country better than he found it, I can appreciate just how complicated the immigration debate really is. So I want to know from an expert on border security, what the chief needed to make the U.S.-Mexico border more secure and make it easier for his agents to do their jobs. As a journalist, I was prepared to do something that politicians won’t ever do: Shut up and listen.
The chief didn’t want a 2,000-mile “big beautiful wall” or more Border Patrol agents. Basically every bad or half-baked idea you can think of that some politician has dreamt up, this border cop wanted no part of it, nothing to do with. Instead, the chief explained, what he could really use was just three things—tunnel detection equipment, high-tech surveillance gadgets, and better roads to allow Border Patrol vehicles to access what is often rugged terrain on the border. Everything the chief wanted would likely have been more effective than the political soundbites and applause lines we have now.
That conversation and what it taught me comes to mind now as I see what Trump is planning to do to solve the immigration crisis, and that is create a whole new crisis.
Trump is promising mass deportations. If he’s reelected, he wants to forcibly remove as many as 10 million people. He says he plans to pull this off by creating a force magnifier. He wants to deputize local and state police and federalize State National Guard units, and then unleash them to hunt for suspected undocumented immigrants. In other words, anyone who these officials, none of whom have training in immigration enforcement, think maybe in the country illegally, could be rounded up and deported. This is a cut and dried recipe for ethnic profiling. And the number one target for inconvenience and maybe even incarceration will be Latinos, including those in the southwest, whose family sometimes go back as far as the early 1800s. That’s right, it may go. We were here to welcome your people.
We’ve traveled this road before in U.S. history as Americans and always wind up at a dead end. In the 1930s, President Herbert Hoover needed a scapegoat for the Great Depression caused by the stock market crash of 1929. And he centered on a group of simple and hardworking people living out in the southwest. Don’t ask me why, those dots are hard to connect. Anyway, Hoover gave tacit approval to efforts by state and local governments to round up and expel scores of Mexicans and Mexican Americans and send them south of the border. In all, between 1930 and 1939, as many as 2 million people wound up leaving the United States from Mexico, some voluntarily after losing their jobs, and others forcibly removed after being put on railroad cars.
Between 1930 and 1933, federal government officers deported more than 80,000 people. By some estimates, more than half of those who were rounded up, deported and pressured to leave, more than half were U.S. citizens, Mexican Americans born in the United States.
That was a tragedy and an injustice as egregious as the wrongful incarceration of Japanese Americans in internment camps during World War Two. It just didn’t make it into all that many history books. Not to worry though, historians may get another chance. If Trump is reelected and keeps his evil promise, a sequel could be in the works.
MAGA bullying Gus Walz will not help win elections for GOP
Harris-Walz must do more than bring ‘joy’ to the Democratic ticket
Call in the National Guard at first sign of trouble
The trait Trump, Vance lack could make them better leaders
DEI attacks on Kamala Harris are racist and unfair
Underreported stories from each side
Grassley releases new details of Iran-backed assassination plots against Trump, Biden and others
8 sources | 0% from the left ReutersTrump staffers in Arlington incident identified
7 sources | 0% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Michigan’s first ‘I Voted’ sticker contest draws inspiration from folklore and more
IRS recovers $1.3B in unpaid taxes from high-income Americans
Rome considers timed ticket system for Trevi Fountain
NOAA says Vineyard Wind won’t kill sea life, issues permits for it to do just that
Trump campaign staffers involved in Arlington cemetery altercation identified
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Don’t blame Israel, and keep the pressure on Hamas
Yesterday Star ParkerThe reckoning of the Trump campaign has begun
Yesterday Dr. Rashad RicheyAs Trump goes lower, Harris aims higher
Thursday Jordan ReidThe government isn’t the answer to a stressed-out parenting culture
Thursday Timothy Carney