I had a friend who is a very, very good financial investor, who turned to me the other day and said, Why are we allowing the colleges to take even more money when they’re already rich? And I said, what do you mean? She said, Well, look at Harvard. It has over 40 billion — not million — $40 billion in endowment. And why should we be paying student loans for somebody who goes to a place that already has $40 billion?
And then went on the suggestion. If you were to actually tax the endowments of the richest colleges in America, they could, in fact, help pay off the student loan program, without the average everyday worker having to pay for it. Suddenly, you’d have the college graduates, paying for the college graduates. It would be a very different approach, and frankly, it’s one I’ve thought about a lot.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in endowment fund, why aren’t you giving free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators.
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
There’s more than enough money in all the major endowments in the United States to do a great deal to help people learn, not just on their particular campus, but across the country. It’s an interesting idea — it’s at least worth talking about. And I think people would be shocked to learn just how much money some of these big universities have
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Overblown’: Americans debate the merits of DEI policies
Yesterday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Biased’: What Americans think of ‘mainstream media’
Feb 21 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Getting rid of them’: Americans discuss Trump and immigration
Feb 14 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Woke’: Why some Biden 2020 voters backed Trump in 2024
Feb 6 Dr. Frank LuntzUniversities should use endowments to pay off student loans
By Straight Arrow News
In an unsurprising ruling, the Supreme Court decided to repeal President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program, which was aimed at reducing federal education debt. College tuition has been steadily increasing, resulting in student loan debt that has nearly tripled in the past 15 years. As tuition continues to rise, top universities’ endowment funds are growing.
Straight Arrow News contributor Newt Gingrich argues that these substantial endowments should be used for paying off student loans and funding scholarships, rather than being allocated to administrative expenses.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in an endowment fund, why aren’t you given free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators?
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
I had a friend who is a very, very good financial investor, who turned to me the other day and said, Why are we allowing the colleges to take even more money when they’re already rich? And I said, what do you mean? She said, Well, look at Harvard. It has over 40 billion — not million — $40 billion in endowment. And why should we be paying student loans for somebody who goes to a place that already has $40 billion?
And then went on the suggestion. If you were to actually tax the endowments of the richest colleges in America, they could, in fact, help pay off the student loan program, without the average everyday worker having to pay for it. Suddenly, you’d have the college graduates, paying for the college graduates. It would be a very different approach, and frankly, it’s one I’ve thought about a lot.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in endowment fund, why aren’t you giving free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators.
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
There’s more than enough money in all the major endowments in the United States to do a great deal to help people learn, not just on their particular campus, but across the country. It’s an interesting idea — it’s at least worth talking about. And I think people would be shocked to learn just how much money some of these big universities have
Why Musk and DOGE are 100% doing the right thing
On Gaza and Ukraine, Trump’s answers are better than none
My White House visit left me more hopeful than ever
Trump moves at breakneck speed to enact bold changes
Breaking down Trump’s incredible inaugural address
Underreported stories from each side
Audit finds Illinois vastly underestimated cost of noncitizen health care on taxpayers
18 sources | 8% from the left Getty ImagesTrump ally demotes at least 8 senior federal prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases
12 sources | 0% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Stafford returns to Rams, what’s next for quarterback-needy teams?
Where does your state rank when it comes to people’s control over energy?
Watchdog group may not release reports on USAID cuts for fear of retaliation
Congress could overturn rule that treats payment apps like Venmo as banks
As many gov’t webpages are deleted, Wayback Machine aims to save data
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
America is a republic with a legislative sausage factory
4 hrs ago Star ParkerJoy Reid firing at MSNBC rooted in systemic bigotry
6 hrs ago Dr. Rashad RicheyRFK Jr.’s war on psychiatric meds risks decades of progress
Yesterday Jordan ReidWhy didn’t Netflix, Oscars vet Karla Gascón’s social media?
Wednesday Adrienne Lawrence