Opinion

US green energy transition benefits red China


All opinions expressed in this article are solely the opinions of the contributors.

Given the growing concern over climate change, there’s been more and more focus on the possibilities and potential of green energy. Many of the material components necessary for that transition, however, come from China, and that puts the United States in a bind.

Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten argues that U.S. green energy goals and policies are “unfeasible,” “untenable” and “undesirable,” and that the costs of empowering China should be weighed more heavily against the benefits of a U.S. energy transition.

Casting global warming as “the single-most existential threat to humanity we’ve ever faced,” the Biden administration has called for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050. To pursue this goal, the White House has sought to spur a radical transformation in power generation and usage — from conventional energy sources like oil and natural gas, to alternatives like wind and solar.

It’s backed bills containing hundreds of billions of dollars in funding and incentives, and used executive and regulatory powers to accelerate the development and deployment of “clean” technologies from electric vehicles to heat pumps, and remake the entire power grid.

There are many issues with this revolutionary effort. It’s arguably economically unfeasible, practically untenable, and plain undesirable if not even environmentally dubious. It’s a recipe for higher energy prices and hardship — while we ignore our incredible energy advantages.

But it gets worse: China would appear to be the main beneficiary of our greening.

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.