Entertainers among those most at risk for mental health struggles
By Kennedy Felton (Lifestyle Correspondent/Producer), Harry Fogle (Video Editor)
- Musicians, actors, and entertainers are among the top five occupational groups with the highest suicide rates, according to a study by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) from 2011 to 2015.
- The unpredictable nature of the entertainment industry, financial instability, intense public scrutiny and lack of healthcare access all contribute to the mental health challenges faced by entertainers.
- Researchers advocate for the music industry to adopt the Zero Suicide Framework. It includes increasing conversations about suicide prevention, providing training to recognize warning signs, implementing evidence-based interventions, ensuring continuity of care, and investing in ongoing research.
Full Story
Many entertainers face immense mental health challenges. A Frontiers new paper highlights that musicians and actors are among the professions with the highest suicide rates.
A report by Dr. George Musgrave, a musician and academic, and Dr. Dorian Lamis, a clinical psychologist, highlights the growing crisis. Their research draws from a study by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which ranks musicians, actors, and entertainers among the top five occupational groups with the highest suicide rates from 2011 to 2015.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Musgrave and Lamis point to several factors that contribute to these struggles. The unpredictable nature of the entertainment industry, financial instability, and intense public scrutiny all play a role.
Musgrave says some musicians enter the industry with pre-existing mental health conditions, but they’re stepping into a work environment that’s almost entirely unsuited to their emotional needs.
Lack of healthcare access creates a treatment gap
For many musicians, inconsistent healthcare makes it harder to get help. Lamis notes that their employment instability often means losing access to mental health resources. Touring artists, in particular, struggle to stay connected to their providers.
Industry-wide change needed
Musgrave and Lamis argue that the music industry must take a more proactive approach. They suggest using the Zero Suicide Framework, a seven-part model designed to prevent suicides in high-risk groups.
Applying this model to the music industry would include:
- Increasing conversations about suicide prevention among industry leaders.
- Providing training for managers, friends, and family to recognize warning signs.
- Implementing evidence-based interventions, such as the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale.
- Ensuring continuity of care for musicians on tour with scheduled mental health check-ins.
- Investing in ongoing research to improve mental health resources for entertainers.
Protecting entertainers’ mental health
The report calls for collaboration between researchers, industry executives, and mental health professionals. Musgrave and Lamis believe the industry must do more to protect its artists.
If you or someone you know is struggling, help is available. Call or text 988 for the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline or visit 988lifeline.org for support.
[KENNEDY FELTON]
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago
Chicago council committee approves $280K for woman hurt in 2020 protests
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor/Reporter), Zachary Hill (Video Editor)
- The Chicago City Council Finance Committee approved a $280,000 settlement for Miracle Boyd, injured during the July 2020 protests.
- Boyd claimed excessive force by a former police officer caused her injury. The Civilian Office of Police Accountability recommended the officer’s termination, but the officer resigned instead.
- The settlement will go before the full City Council on Wednesday.
Full Story
The Chicago City Council Finance Committee awarded $280,000 to a woman who had a tooth knocked out. The incident occurred during an altercation with police during the July 2020 protests.
During the chaos, protesters were attempting to tear down the Christopher Columbus statue, which was located in Grant Park at the time. Protesters threw objects like rocks, fireworks, and frozen water bottles at police officers.
Miracle Boyd filed a lawsuit claiming that a now-former Chicago police officer used excessive force, striking her in the face and knocking out a tooth. Boyd stated that the city should be responsible.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
“I just really hope that CPD gets itself together and these alders continue to grant justice to all victims and survivors of police violence through the city of Chicago,” Boyd said.
The Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA) concluded that the officer used excessive force and lied in his report. COPA recommended the officer’s termination, but he instead resigned from his position. The officer did not face criminal charges.
Alderman Jeanette Taylor of the 20th Ward said she personally knows Boyd and feels the settlement is insufficient.
“There’s plenty to be said here, and I’ll say what I got to say, but I just want to say this. I really don’t have to say anything. I feel like the young people, and Miracle herself said enough, but we gonna be here and $280,000 ain’t enough to fix what was broken that day,” Ald. Jeanette Taylor of the 20th Ward said.
Alderman Nicholas Sposato of the 38th Ward disagreed.
“These people were there to do nothing but wreak havoc, fight with the police, and tear down a statue because they didn’t agree with the art that’s been up for 90 years,” Ald. Nicholas Sposato of the 38th Ward said.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
The Finance Committee voted 22 to 7 in favor of Miracle Boyd’s $280,000 settlement. The settlement will go before the full City Council on Wednesday.
Chicago taxpayers funded at least $107.5 million in lawsuits alleging police misconduct in 2024 alone, according to WTTW News.
THE CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE AWARDED A WOMAN WHO HAD A TOOTH KNOCKED OUT DURING AN ALTERCATION WITH POLICE DURING JULY 2020 PROTESTS, $280,000 DOLLARS IN A SETTLEMENT.
DURING THE CHAOS, PROTESTERS WERE TRYING TO TEAR DOWN THE CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS STATUE, WHICH WAS AT THE TIME, LOCATED IN GRANT PARK. PROTESTERS THREW OBJECTS LIKE ROCKS, FIREWORKS AND FROZEN WATER BOTTLES AT POLICE OFFICERS.
MIRACLE BOYD CLAIMED IN A LAWSUIT THAT A NOW FORMER CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER USED EXCESSIVE FORCE, STRIKING HER IN HER FACE, KNOCKING OUT A TOOTH. BOYD SAID THE CITY SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE.
“I JUST REALLY HOPE THAT CPD GETS ITSELF TOGETHER AND THESE ALDERS CONTINUE TO GRANT JUSTICE TO ALL VICTIMS AND SURVIVORS OF POLICE VIOLENCE THROUGH THE CITY OF CHICAGO,” MIRACLE BOYD SAID.
THE CIVILIAN OFFICE OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY CONCLUDED THE OFFICER USED EXCESSIVE FORCE AND LIED IN HIS REPORT. COPA RECOMMENDED THE OFFICER BE FIRED AND INSTEAD, HE RESIGNED HIS POSITION.
THE OFFICER DID NOT FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES.
ALDERMAN JEANETTE TAYLOR OF THE 20TH WARD SAID SHE PERSONALLY KNOWS BOYD AND THE SETTLEMENT IS NOT ENOUGH.
“THERE’S PLENTY TO BE SAID HERE AND I’LL SAY WHAT I GOTT SAY, BUT I JUST WANT TO SAY THIS. I REALLY DON’T HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING. I FEEL LIKE THE YOUNG PEOPLE, A MIRACLE HERSELF SAID ENOUGH, BUT WE GONNA BE HERE AND $280,000 AIN’T ENOUGH TO FIX WHAT WAS BROKEN THAT DAY,” ALD. JEANETTE TAYLOR OF THE 20TH WARD SAID.
ALDERMAN SPOSATO OF THE 38TH WARD DISAGREED.
“THESE PEOPLE WERE THERE TO DO NOTHING BUT WREAK HAVOC, FIGHT WITH THE POLICE AND TEAR DOWN A STATUE BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T AGREE WITH THE ART THAT’S BEEN UP FOR 90 YEARS,” ALD. NICHOLAS SPOSATO OF THE 38TH WARD SAID.
THE FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTED 22 TO 7 IN FAVOR OF THE $280-THOUSAND DOLLAR SETTLEMENT TO MIRACLE BOYD.
THE SETTLEMENT WILL GO BEFORE THE FULL CITY COUNCIL WENDESDAY.
CHICAGO TAXPAYERS FUNDED AT LEAST $107.5 MILLION IN LAWSUITS ALLEGING POLICE MISCONDUCT IN 2024 ALONE, ACCORDING TO WTTW NEWS.
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago

- Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman announced he would withdraw a resentencing request for Erik and Lyle Menendez. The convicted murderers are serving life without parole for killing their parents in 1989.
- Hochman emphasized that the Menendez brothers’ decades-long claim of self-defense remains unconvincing and central to denying their release from prison.
- The consideration for resentencing stemmed from a California law enabling resentencing for certain cases. Former DA George Gascón initiated the policy before his defeat to Hochman in a recent election.
Full Story
Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman said on Monday that he would no longer seek to reconsider the life sentences of convicted murderers Erik and Lyle Menendez. Hochman told reporters on Monday that he would request to withdraw a resentencing proposal for the two convicted murderers.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman announced he opposes the resentencing of Lyle and Erik Menendez due to their continued dishonesty about the murders of their parents in 1989.
- Hochman emphasized that the brothers failed to demonstrate insight and responsibility for their actions during their trials, where they initially claimed they did not kill their parents.
- Family members of the Menendez brothers criticized Hochman's assertion, claiming the brothers have shown remorse and atonement for their actions.
- Governor Gavin Newsom is also reviewing the possibility of clemency for the Menendez brothers and has ordered an investigation into the brothers’ potential risk to the public if released.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman does not support reducing Lyle and Erik Menendez's prison sentences, stating they have repeatedly lied about their parents' murders in 1989.
- Hochman indicated that the brothers' claims of self-defense contradict the evidence showing premeditated actions, emphasizing their lack of accountability.
- Family members of the Menendez brothers criticized Hochman's stance, while the brothers' advocates believe they have shown remorse and deserve clemency.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
The Menendez brothers are currently serving life sentences without the possibility of parole in the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego.
Their backstory
The two brothers rose to infamy after a high-profile murder trial that led to their conviction for murdering their parents on Aug. 29, 1989. Several documentaries were produced about the Beverly Hills murders and subsequent 1996 conviction, including a Netflix series.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Why the reversal?
The brothers claimed self-defense at trial, saying they believed their parents were planning to kill them that night. They both maintain that was the case decades later, something Hochman believes is key in not letting them out of prison.
“…the Menendez brothers have continued to lie for over 30 years about their self-defense – that is, their purported actual fear that their mother and their father were going to kill them the night of the murders,” Hochman said in the filing.
The brothers attempted to overturn their convictions as recently as 2005.
What changed?
A California law that led to the resentencing of 227 people and the release of 174 was considered a reason for resentencing, according to a report from the nonprofit RAND.
The request for resentencing originated from former District Attorney George Gascón, who Hochman beat in a reelection bid last November. Gascón had been subject to multiple recall attempts in his time in Los Angeles.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman announced he opposes the resentencing of Lyle and Erik Menendez due to their continued dishonesty about the murders of their parents in 1989.
- Hochman emphasized that the brothers failed to demonstrate insight and responsibility for their actions during their trials, where they initially claimed they did not kill their parents.
- Family members of the Menendez brothers criticized Hochman's assertion, claiming the brothers have shown remorse and atonement for their actions.
- Governor Gavin Newsom is also reviewing the possibility of clemency for the Menendez brothers and has ordered an investigation into the brothers’ potential risk to the public if released.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman does not support reducing Lyle and Erik Menendez's prison sentences, stating they have repeatedly lied about their parents' murders in 1989.
- Hochman indicated that the brothers' claims of self-defense contradict the evidence showing premeditated actions, emphasizing their lack of accountability.
- Family members of the Menendez brothers criticized Hochman's stance, while the brothers' advocates believe they have shown remorse and deserve clemency.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago
Michelle Obama launches new podcast with brother amid divorce rumors
Published UpdatedBy Kennedy Felton (Lifestyle Correspondent/Producer), Joey Nunez (Video Editor)
- Former First Lady Michelle Obama and her brother, Craig Robinson, are launching a new podcast called “IMO” (In My Opinion). The show will feature candid conversations, personal stories, and a variety of high-profile guests.
- Higher Ground, the production company founded by Michelle and former President Barack Obama, is producing the podcast.
- The podcast’s launch comes amid speculation about Michelle and Barack Obama’s marriage.
Full Story
Former First Lady Michelle Obama and her brother, Craig Robinson, are launching a new podcast. The show, titled “IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson,” will be the first video podcast from their production company, Higher Ground.
The podcast, short for “In My Opinion,” was officially announced on Monday and will feature candid conversations, personal stories, and a variety of high-profile guests.
According to The New York Times, which previewed the first two episodes, the podcast will be available as an audio and video experience.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The debut episode will introduce the concept of the show. The second episode will feature actress and producer Issa Rae. Other confirmed guests include actor Seth Rogan with his wife, Lauren, filmmaker Tyler Perry and former NBA star Dwyane Wade alongside his wife, actress Gabrielle Union-Wade.
Michelle and Craig will also take questions from listeners, offering advice and insights on various aspects of life.
Podcast launch follows Obama divorce speculation
The podcast launch comes as speculation about Michelle and Barack Obama’s marriage continues.
Recently, Straight Arrow News investigated the swirling dating rumors involving Barack Obama and actress Jennifer Aniston. Neither Michelle nor Barack have publicly addressed the ongoing divorce speculation.
The former president attended a Los Angeles Clippers basketball game without Michelle, and social media users quickly noticed her absence. However, he was seen courtside with Clippers owner Steve Ballmer and his wife, Connie Snyder.
The night before the game, TMZ spotted the former president at dinner with his daughters, Sasha and Malia, without Michelle. Despite the rumors, Barack was still wearing his wedding band.
When does “IMO” premiere?
The first episode of “IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson” premieres Tuesday, March 11.
The sibling duo will also appear at SXSW on March 13 and tape a live episode of the podcast there.
[KENNEDY FELTON]
FORMER FIRST LADY MICHELLE OBAMA AND HER BROTHER – CRAIG ROBINSON – ARE TAKING THEIR SIBLING BANTER TO THE MIC WITH A BRAND NEW WEEKLY PODCAST.
TITLED “I-M-O” – SHORT FOR IN MY OPINION – THE SHOW PROMISES CANDID CONVERSATIONS… PERSONAL STORIES.. AND A LINEUP OF CELEBRITY GUESTS.
THE SHOW WAS ANNOUNCED MONDAY BY HIGHER GROUND.. THE PRODUCTION COMPANY FOUNDED BY MICHELLE AND FORMER PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.
ACCORDING TO THE NEW YORK TIMES – WHICH EXCLUSIVELY PREVIEWED THE FIRST TWO EPISODES – I-M-O WILL BE MORE THAN JUST AN AUDIO EXPERIENCE… VIEWERS CAN ALSO WATCH *VIDEO VERSIONS OF THE PODCAST – A FIRST FOR HIGHER GROUND. A-P NEWS REPORTS THE FIRST EPISODE WILL INTRODUCE THE PODCAST… WHILE THE SECOND FEATURES ACTRESS AND PRODUCER ISSA RAE.
ALONG WITH RAE – OTHER HIGH PROFILE FIGURES SET TO BE FEATURED INCLUDE ACTOR SETH ROGAN AND HIS WIFE LAUREN…
FILMMAKER TYLER PERRY…
AND FORMER N-B-A STAR DWAYNE WADE AND HIS WIFE ACTRESS GABRIELLE UNION-WADE.
BEYOND CELEBRITY GUESTS… MICHELLE AND CRAIG WILL ANSWER AUDIENCE QUESTIONS AND OFFERS THEIR TAKES ON HOW TO HANDLE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF LIFE.
SNIPPET FROM PODCAST INTRO — “WHETHER YOU’RE NAVIGATING THE GREAT AREAS OF MARRIAGE AND RAISING KIDS OR DEALING WITH A LITTLE FRIEND DRAMA… OR EVEN TRYING TO PUT YOURSELF OUT THERE IN THE DATING WORLD.”
THE PODCAST’S LAUNCH COMES AMID ONGOING SPECULATION ABOUT MICHELLE AND BARACK OBAMA’S MARRIAGE.
AT STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS… WE RECENTLY LOOKED INTO THE DATING RUMORS SURROUNDING BARACK OBAMA AND ACRES JENNIFER ANISTON – A RUMOR NEITHER BARACK NOR MICHELLE HAS PUBLICALLY ADDRESSED… BUT ONE THAT ANISTON DEBUNKED.
ON MARCH 5-TH… BARACK OBAMA WAS SPOTTED COURTSIDE AT A LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS GAME WHERE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS TOOK NOTICE OF ONE THING– MICHELLE WASN’T WITH HIM.
HE WAS SPOTTED WITH CLIPPERS OWNER STEVE BALLMER AND HIS WIFE – CONNIE SNYDER.
AND THE NIGHT *BEFORE THE CLIPPERS GAME… THE FORMER PRESIDENT WAS SOLO AS WELL… AS HE GRABBED DINNER WITH DAUGHTERS SASHA AND MALIA.
WHILE SPECULATION CONTINUES… ONE DETAIL STANDS OUT – BARACK IS STILL WEARING HIS WEDDING BAND.
THE FIRST EPISODE OF “I-M-O WITH MICHELLE OBAMA AND CRAIG ROBINSON” PREMIERES TUESDAY MARCH 11-TH.
THE SIBLING DUO WILL *ALSO TAKE THE STAGE AT SOUTH BY SOUTHWEST MARCH 13-TH.. WHERE THEY’LL TAPE A LIFE EPISODE OF THE PODCAST.
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago
Federal judge temporarily blocks deportation of Palestinian activist
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor/Reporter), Zachary Hill (Video Editor)
- A federal judge in New York temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to deport Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil. ICE arrested him for allegedly leading anti-Israel protests at Columbia University.
- The U.S. State Department revoked his green card, and he is being held in a Louisiana detention facility.
- Khalil, who has not been charged with any crimes, allegedly played a key role in last year’s pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia. A hearing is scheduled for Wednesday.
Full Story
A federal judge in New York has temporarily blocked efforts by the Trump administration to deport Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil. He allegedly led anti-Israel protests at Columbia University.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and leader in Columbia University's encampment movement, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, as his attorney Amy Greer stated.
- Khalil's attorney reported that the arrest was based on claims that his student visa had been revoked.
- A petition for habeas corpus was filed challenging Khalil's arrest, with his legal team unaware of his current location.
- Columbia University confirmed reports of ICE activities on campus and affirmed that it 'has and will continue to follow the law.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's efforts to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student arrested for organizing protests, pending a court ruling on his petition.
- Khalil is currently held at a detention facility in Jena, Louisiana, and will appear in court on Wednesday.
- Friends of Khalil assert he was a mediator and peacemaker, disputing allegations of anti-Semitism or terrorism support.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
“Following my previously signed executive orders, ICE proudly apprehended and detained Mahmoud Khalil, a radical foreign pro-Hamas student on the campus of Columbia University. This is the first arrest of many to come,” President Donald Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.
The U.S. State Department also revoked Khalil’s green card.
A green card holder is a noncitizen who has been granted authorization to live and work permanently in the United States. If a green card holder is found to have been involved in a riot or any criminal activity, they can face legal consequences such as arrest, fines, imprisonment or deportation, depending on the severity of their case.
Khalil has not been charged with any crimes.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
What’s next for Khalil?
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested Khalil on Saturday, March 8. He is currently being held in a detention facility in Louisiana. His lawyers have filed a motion for him to be returned to New York City, Fox News reports.
“To preserve the Court’s jurisdiction pending a ruling on the petition, Petitioner shall not be removed from the United States unless and until the Court orders otherwise,” the judge ruled Monday, March 10.
What else is happening with Khalil and the university?
The arrest comes just days after the Trump administration revoked $400 million in federal funding to Columbia University over what it calls “the school’s continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Khalil was a graduate student at Columbia University and served as a student negotiator who met with university administrators. He was allegedly a key figure in last year’s pro-Palestinian protests and encampment that erupted on the university’s campus in the spring, The Associated Press reports. Khalil graduated in December 2024.
A hearing in the case is scheduled for Wednesday, March 12.
[Lauren Taylor]
A FEDERAL JUDGE IN NEW YORK TEMPORARILY BLOCKED EFFORTS BY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO DEPORT A PALESTINIAN ACTIVIST WHO ALLEGEDLY LED ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTS AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY.
“FOLLOWING MY PREVIOUSLY SIGNED EXECUTIVE ORDERS, ICE PROUDLY APPREHENDED AND DETAINED MAHMOUD KHALIL, A RADICAL FOREIGN PRO-HAMAS STUDENT ON THE CAMPUS OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY. THIS IS THE FIRST ARREST OF MANY TO COME.” PRESIDENT TRUMP WROTE IN A POST ON TRUTH SOCIAL.
THE US STATE DEPARTMENT ALSO REVOKED KHALIL’S GREEN CARD.
A GREEN CARD HOLDER IS A NON-CITIZEN WHO HAS BEEN GRANTED AUTHORIZATION TO LIVE AND WORK PERMANENTLY IN THE UNITED STATES.
IF A GREEN CARD HOLDER IS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN A RIOT OR ANY CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, THEY CAN FACE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES, SUCH AS ARREST, FINES, IMPRISONMENT, OR DEPORTATION — DEPENDING ON THE SEVERITY OF THEIR CASES.
KHALIL HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED WITH ANY CRIMES.
US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT ARRESTED KHALIL SATURDAY AND HE’S CURRENTLY BEING HELD IN A DETENTION FACILITY IN LOUISIANA. HIS LAWYERS HAVE FILED A MOTION FOR HIM TO BE RETURNED TO NEW YORK CITY, FOX NEWS REPORTS.
“TO PRESERVE THE COURT’S JURISDICTION PENDING A RULING ON THE PETITION, PETITIONER SHALL NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE UNITED STATES UNLESS AND UNTIL THE COURT ORDERS OTHERWISE,” THE JUDGE RULED MONDAY.
THE ARREST COMES JUST DAYS AFTER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION REVOKED $400 MILLION DOLLARS IN FEDERAL FUNDING TO COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY OVER WHAT IT CALLS “THE SCHOOL’S CONTINUED INACTION IN THE FACE OF PERSISTENT HARASSMENT OF JEWISH STUDENTS. “
KHALIL WAS A GRADUATE STUDENT AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY AND SERVED AS A STUDENT NEGOTIATOR WHO MET WITH UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS. HE WAS A KEY FIGURE IN LAST YEAR’S PRO-PALESTINIAN PROTESTS AND ENCAMPMENT THAT ERUPTED ON THE UNIVERSITY’S CAMPUS IN THE SPRING, THE AP REPORTS. KHALIL GRADUTED IN DECEMBER.
A HEARING IN THE CASE IS SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY.
FOR SAN, I’M LT.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and leader in Columbia University's encampment movement, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, as his attorney Amy Greer stated.
- Khalil's attorney reported that the arrest was based on claims that his student visa had been revoked.
- A petition for habeas corpus was filed challenging Khalil's arrest, with his legal team unaware of his current location.
- Columbia University confirmed reports of ICE activities on campus and affirmed that it 'has and will continue to follow the law.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's efforts to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student arrested for organizing protests, pending a court ruling on his petition.
- Khalil is currently held at a detention facility in Jena, Louisiana, and will appear in court on Wednesday.
- Friends of Khalil assert he was a mediator and peacemaker, disputing allegations of anti-Semitism or terrorism support.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago

Trump-sanctioned ICC prosecutor pressed assault victim to recant: Report
By Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor)
- ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan faces allegations of pressuring an accuser to recant sexual harassment claims, which he has denied. The ICC learned of the allegations but did not act due to the victim’s hesitance.
- Amid these allegations, Khan announced arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes in Gaza. It drew condemnation from Israeli allies, including the U.S.
- President Donald Trump imposed sanctions on the ICC. Trump criticized its jurisdiction and actions against the U.S. and Israel, as neither country is a party to the Rome Statute.
Full Story
A British prosecutor who sought international criminal charges against Israeli and Palestinian leaders allegedly harassed a woman. She claimed he sexually abused her and then tried to get her to deny the matter.
Karim Khan is a British attorney who has served as chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court. He allegedly bombarded his accuser to recant her sexual abuse claims, according to the U.K.’s Daily Mail.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
What were the allegations?
Sources tell the British news outlet that Khan repeatedly pressed his alleged victim for more than five months to back away from the allegations of sexual harassment she had accused him of. He allegedly pushed for her to write a letter disavowing the claims.
Khan has repeatedly denied the accusations.
The ICC was made aware of the harassment claims against Khan from a third party in May 2024. However, the ICC didn’t take action due to the victim’s hesitance to cooperate with the investigation. An October 2024 statement from the president of the Assembly of States Parties acknowledged the allegations of misconduct.
“The Court has a zero-tolerance policy towards prohibited conduct, such as harassment, including sexual harassment, discrimination and abuse of authority,” said President Päivi Kaukoranta.
Amid these allegations, Khan had announced arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
How did the US respond to the warrants?
The filing brought swift condemnation from Israel’s allies, including the United States. President Donald Trump announced sanctions against the ICC in February.
“The ICC has, without a legitimate basis, asserted jurisdiction over and opened preliminary investigations concerning personnel of the United States and certain of its allies, including Israel, and has further abused its power by issuing baseless arrest warrants targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant,” the announcement said. “The ICC has no jurisdiction over the United States or Israel, as neither country is party to the Rome Statute or a member of the ICC.”
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago
Odell Beckham Jr., Druski respond after being named in lawsuit against Diddy
By Kennedy Felton (Lifestyle Correspondent), Harry Fogle (Video Editor)
- NFL star Odell Beckham Jr. and comedian Druski have been named in an amended lawsuit against Sean “Diddy” Combs, alleging their involvement in a 2018 sexual assault. Ashley Parham first sued Combs in October 2023, accusing him of a “violent gangbang-style rape” and other assaults.
- Parham amended her lawsuit on March 7, 2025, to include Beckham Jr. and Druski as defendants.
- Druski and Beckham Jr. have denied the allegations, with Druski calling the claims “a fabricated lie” and Beckham Jr. stating he has never met the accuser.
Full Story
NFL star Odell Beckham Jr. and comedian Druski have been named in an amended lawsuit against Sean “Diddy” Combs. The allegations claim they were involved in a 2018 sexual assault.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Comedian Druski and NFL player Odell Beckham Jr. Have been named in a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, which alleges sexual assault involving multiple individuals, including Ashley Parham.
- Both Druski and Beckham denied any involvement in the alleged incident of 2018, with Druski calling the claims a "fabricated lie."
- Plaintiff Ashley Parham accused several individuals, including Diddy, of assaulting her in 2018, claiming she was drugged and attacked.
- Diddy is currently in police custody facing sex trafficking charges, with a trial set to start on May 5.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Odell Beckham Jr. And Druski have been named as defendants in a lawsuit filed by Ashley Parham against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging involvement in her alleged gang rape in 2018.
- Parham claims Combs instructed Druski to rape her in March 2018 at a California home, as stated in the amended lawsuit.
- Druski denied the allegations, calling them a "fabricated lie," while Beckham Jr. Expressed confusion over the situation and stated he was 'fully confident' the truth would emerge.
- Combs has previously denied Parham's allegations, describing the lawsuits as a 'publicity stunt.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
A warning as this article contains graphic comments.
Ashley Parham first sued Combs in October 2023, accusing him of a “violent gangbang-style rape.” She alleged Combs’ chief of staff attempted to insert an IUD into her but failed. She also claimed Combs later sexually assaulted her using a TV remote.
Parham further alleged that Combs retaliated against her for suggesting he was involved in the 1996 murder of Tupac Shakur. According to the lawsuit, Combs told her she would “pay for her comments,” a claim tied to long-standing conspiracy theories.
Despite speculation surrounding Shakur’s murder, the only person charged in the case is Duane “Keefe D” Davis, who is currently serving time.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Beckham Jr. and Druski added to the lawsuit
On March 7, 2025, Parham amended her lawsuit to include Beckham Jr. and Druski as defendants.
She alleges that in 2018, at a California home, Combs forced Druski to rape her. A section of the lawsuit describes the incident in detail:
“Instead of immediately raping Plaintiff, Defendant Druski doused Plaintiff with more oil/lubricant and then jumped on top of Plaintiff’s naked and oiled body, treating it like a slip and slide and knocking the wind out of Plaintiff due to his enormous size.”
Parham initially listed three unidentified individuals in her lawsuit, as she did not know their names. However, in the amended filing, she claims one was Beckham Jr. because she remembered hearing the name “Cornelius” and found it “odd and unique.” Beckham’s middle name is Cornelious.
She accuses Beckham Jr. of assaulting her while others in the room took turns, as Combs allegedly masturbated and recorded the incident.
Druski and Beckham Jr. deny allegations
Druski addressed the lawsuit on social media, calling the claims “a fabricated lie.”
“I wasn’t a public figure in 2018 — I was broke, living with my mom, without any connections to the entertainment industry at the time of this allegation,” he wrote. “So the inclusion of my name is truly outlandish.”
Druski added that he sympathizes with victims of abuse and believes evidence will prove the allegations false.
The comedian first gained popularity between 2017-18 through social media skits, often impersonating different personalities. However, he did not collaborate with major artists like Drake and Jack Harlow until 2019-20.
Beckham Jr., who is friends with Druski, responded to his post in support.
“This world makes absolutely no sense. I am covered by God. He will prevail. I know who I am, I know who you are — keep your head up. That name will be cleared.”
He later issued his own statement, denying the claims.
“I do not know and have never met the person who filed this suit. I was not anywhere near Orinda, CA, at that time. In fact, I don’t think I have ever even been to Orinda, CA,” he wrote. “I have never done anything like that, and I would never do anything like that to anyone.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Authorities previously investigated claims
While these allegations remain in civil court, the Contra Costa Sheriff’s Department confirmed that a report was filed on March 23, 2018.
However, after an investigation, authorities determined the claims were unfounded.
Additionally, local news outlet KTVU reports that the owner of the home where the alleged assault occurred denied any connection to Combs. The homeowner stated that Shane Pearce, another defendant in the lawsuit, rented the house at the time but did not know Diddy.
The owner also claimed Pearce was battling cancer and ALS during the period in question.
[KENNEDY FELTON]
FIRST.. IT WAS JAY-Z’S NAME SWIRLING IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES AFTER BEING LINKED TO A LAWSUIT INVOLVING SEAN DIDDY COMBS.
NOW – N-F-L STAR ODELL BECKHAM JUNIOR AND COMEDIAN DRUSKI ARE BEING NAMED IN A SEPARATE LAWSUIT ALSO TIED THE HIP HOP MOGUL.
A WARNING – AS THIS STORY CONTAINS GRAPHIC COMMENTS.
ASHLEY PARHAM FIRST FILED A LAWSUIT BACK IN OCTOBER… ALLEGING THAT COMBS ENGAGED IN A “VIOLENT GANGBANG STYLE RAPE.”
THE LAWSUIT CLAIMS COMBS’ CHIEF OF STAFF ATTEMPTED TO INSERT AN I-U-D INTO PARHAM TO PREVENT PREGNANCY BUT FAILED.. AFTER WHICH COMBS ALLEGEDLY ASSAULTED HER WITH A T-V REMOTE.
PARHAM’S INITIAL FILING ALSO ACCUSED COMBS OF RETALIATING AGAINST HER FOR COMMENTS SHE MADE LINKING HIM TO THE 19-96 MURDER OF RAPPER TUPAC SHAKUR.
SHE ALLEGES COMBS TOLD HER SHE WOULD PAY FOR HER COMMENTS… ECHOING A LONG-STANDING CONSPIRACY THEORY ABOUT SHAKUR’S DEATH.
DESPITE THESE CLAIMS.. THE ONLY PERSON EVER CHARGED IN CONNECTION TO SHAKUR’S MURDER – DUANE “KEFFE D” DAVIS – WHO IS CURRENTLY SERVING TIME BEHIND BARS.
BUT NOW – IN AN AMENDED LAWSUIT FIELD MARCH 7-TH – PARHAM HAS NAMED BECKHAM JUNIOR AND DRUSKI.
THE LAWSUIT ALLEGES IN 20-18 AT A HOME IN CALIFORNIA… COMBS FORCED DRUSKI TO RAPE PARHAM.
A PORTION OF THE LAWSUIT READS –
Instead of immediately raping Plaintiff, Defendant Druski doused Plaintiff with
more oil/lubricant and then jumped on top of Plaintiff’s naked and oiled body
treating it like a slip and slide and knocking the wind out of Plaintiff due to his
enormous size.
AS FOR BECKHAM JUNIOR… PARHAM INITIALLY LISTED THREE UNIDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS IN HER ORIGINAL LAWSUIT BECAUSE SHE DID NOT KNOW THEIR NAMES.
IN THE AMENDED COMPLAINT… SHE CLAIMS SHE LATER LEARNED CORNELIUS – A NAME DEFENDANTS WERE SAYING THE NIGHT OF THE ASSAULT – WAS BECKHAM JUNIOR.. AND REMEMBERED THE NAME BECAUSE IT WAS QUOTE “ODD AND UNIQUE.”
BECKHAM JUNIOR’S MIDDLE NAME IS CORNELIUS.
SHE ACCUSES BECKHAM JUNIOR OF TAKING TURNS ASSAULTING HER WHILE COMBS MASTURBATED AND RECORDED THE INCIDENT.
DRUSKI RESPONDED TO THE ALLEGATIONS ON SOCIAL MEDIA MONDAY – WRITING “THIS ALLEGATION IS A FABRICATED LIE. I wasn’t a public figure in 2018 — I was broke living with my mom without any connections to the entertainment industry at the time of this allegation, so the inclusion of my name is truly outlandish.”
HE ADDED THAT HIS HEART BREAKS FOR VICTIMS OF ABUSE AND IS FULLY CONFIDENT EVIDENCE WILL EXPOSE THE FALSEHOOD.
DRUSKI FIRST GAINED POPULARITY AROUND 2017 AND 2018 THROUGH HIS COMEDIC SKITS ON SOCIAL MEDIA – PRIMARILY IMPERSONATING DIFFERENT PERSONALITIES. IT WASN’T UNTIL 20-19 WHEN HE BEGAN COLLABORATING WITH MAJOR CELEBRITIES LIKE DRAKE AND JACK HARLOW.
BECKHAM JUNIOR – WHO *IS FRIENDS WITH druski – RESPONDED TO HIS POST.. WRITING IN PART – “This world makes absolutely no sense. I am covered by God. He will prevail. I kno who am I , I kno who u are – REFERRING TO DRUSKI – , keep ur head. That name will be cleared.”
HE LATER POSTED HIS *OWN STATEMENT ALSO DEBUNKING THE CLAIMS – SAYING IN PART – “I do not know and have never met the person that filed the suit. I was not anywhere near Orinda, CA at that time. In fact, I don’t think I have ever even been to Orinda, CA. I have never done anything like that, and I would never do anything like that to anyone.”
WHILE THESE REMAIN ALLEGATIONS.. THE CONTRA COSTA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT – WHERE THE ALLEGED ASSAULT TOOK PLACE – CONFIRMED TO LOCAL NEWS OUTLET KTVU THAT A REPORT WAS FILED ON MARCH 23-RD 2018.
HOWEVER – AFTER A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION… AUTHORITIES DETERMINED THE CLAIMS WERE UNFOUNDED.
ADDITIONALLY – ALSO ACCORDING TO KTVU – THE OWNER OF THE HOME WHERE THE ALLEGED ASSAULT OCCURRED CLAIMED TO BE BEST FRIENDS WITH SHANE PEARCE – ONE OF THE OTHER DEFENDANTS BEING SUED BY PARHAM.
THE OWNER STATED THAT PEARCE DID NOT KNOW DIDDY… AND WAS BATTLING CANCER AND A-L-S AT THE TIME.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Comedian Druski and NFL player Odell Beckham Jr. Have been named in a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, which alleges sexual assault involving multiple individuals, including Ashley Parham.
- Both Druski and Beckham denied any involvement in the alleged incident of 2018, with Druski calling the claims a "fabricated lie."
- Plaintiff Ashley Parham accused several individuals, including Diddy, of assaulting her in 2018, claiming she was drugged and attacked.
- Diddy is currently in police custody facing sex trafficking charges, with a trial set to start on May 5.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Odell Beckham Jr. And Druski have been named as defendants in a lawsuit filed by Ashley Parham against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging involvement in her alleged gang rape in 2018.
- Parham claims Combs instructed Druski to rape her in March 2018 at a California home, as stated in the amended lawsuit.
- Druski denied the allegations, calling them a "fabricated lie," while Beckham Jr. Expressed confusion over the situation and stated he was 'fully confident' the truth would emerge.
- Combs has previously denied Parham's allegations, describing the lawsuits as a 'publicity stunt.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago
With $37 billion spent on homelessness since 2019, CA audits reveal more issues
By Kennedy Felton (Anchor/Reporter), Diane Duenez (Weekend Managing Editor), Joey Nunez (Video Editor)
- A recent audit of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) found that the city cannot track spending on homelessness programs and failed to reconcile funds with services provided, hindering evaluation of program effectiveness.
- California has spent $37 billion on homelessness since 2019. However, a state report reveals an undercounting of homeless individuals, with 34% of them coming from outside the state.
- State auditors recommend that California delay the next round of homelessness funding until agencies can prove their programs are effective. Agencies must submit reports by April 1, 2026.
Full Story
California officials are using audits to address concerns over the management of homelessness funding. Recent findings show mismanaged funds, a lack of accountability and individuals from outside the state using services.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 15% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- The audit by Alvarez & Marsal found that Los Angeles homeless programs lack adequate oversight, risking waste and inefficiency.
- The audit concluded that the city could not accurately track spending or service effectiveness for homeless programs.
- Elizabeth Mitchell, an attorney for the plaintiffs, stated that the audit confirms urgent needs for systemic reform, labeling the findings as deadly.
- Alvarez & Marsal noted the emotional impact of visiting homeless encampments, stating that every day that goes by there are people on the street who are not receiving the services that the city is paying for.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Los Angeles officials lost track of billions in spending on homelessness services, with an audit finding about $2.3 billion was inaccurately recorded and reported.
- The auditor found that approximately $2.3 billion intended for homeless services was difficult to quantify due to fragmented data systems and inconsistent reporting by the city, county and LAHSA.
- Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath stated that the findings support the need to replace LAHSA, highlighting failures in accountability and results.
- Mayor Karen Bass acknowledged that the audit reflects ongoing issues since her tenure began, validating her efforts to enact change in the city's homelessness management.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
What have recent audits revealed?
An audit released Thursday, March 6, of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) revealed the city is unable to track how much it has spent on homelessness programs. The audit also found that the city failed to reconcile spending with services provided, making it impossible to evaluate the effectiveness or delivery of those services.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
In response to the report, a member of the LA County Board of Supervisors, Lindsey Horvath, posted on X, saying, “I’m introducing a motion to create a consolidated County Department to end this nightmare. It’s another reminder of what we already know: the current system is broken.”
This marks the second critical report on LAHSA in recent months. A November 2024 report revealed failures to track millions of dollars in cash advances to contractors and delays in paying service providers, even when funds were available.
A statewide issue?
The issue is not limited to Los Angeles. A report by the California Legislative Analyst’s Office, also released during the week of March 2, shows that the state has spent $37 billion on homelessness since 2019. However, the report also indicated that the state is underreporting the number of homeless individuals.
In response, the governor’s office told FOX 26, “This is simply not true. The audit did not report that the state has failed to track funding. The state distributed funding to local governments to address homelessness through numerous state programs — all the money is accounted for. We know exactly where state funding has gone — to local governments who are building programs, shelter and housing.”
Additionally, a 2023 study found that 34% of homeless individuals in California are from out of state.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Recommendations to hold funds
Based on these findings, state auditors recommend withholding the next round of grant funding until proof of program effectiveness is provided. Agencies receiving funding in this cycle have until April 1, 2026, to submit their reports.
[Kennedy Felton]
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA USES AUDITS TO HELP GET A HANDLE ON FINANCING HOMELESSNESS. WHAT THEY FOUND WAS MISMANAGED FUNDS, LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE USE OF SERVICES BY PEOPLE WHO AREN’T EVEN FROM CALIFORNIA.
AN AUDIT RELEASED THURSDAY OF THE LOS ANGELES HOMELESS AUTHORITY SHOWS THE CITY IS UNABLE TO TRACK EXACTLY HOW MUCH IT SPENT ON HOMELESS PROGRAMS. THE CITY ALSO FAILED TO RECONCILE SPENDING WITH SERVICES PROVIDED, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO JUDGE HOW WELL THE SERVICES WORKED OR WHETHER THEY WERE EVEN PROVIDED.
AFTER THE REPORT WAS RELEASED, A MEMBER OF THE LA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POSTED ON X.
“I’M INTRODUCING A MOTION TO CREATE A CONSOLIDATED County DEPARTMENT TO END THIS NIGHTMARE.
IT’S ANOTHER REMINDER OF WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW: THE CURRENT SYSTEM IS BROKEN.’
THIS IS NOT THE FIRST SUCH REPORT IN RECENT MONTHS ON THE LHASA. A NOVEMBER REPORT SHOWED FAILURES TO TRACK MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CASH ADVANCES TO CONTRACTORS, AS WELL AS DELAYS IN PAYING PROVIDERS EVEN WHEN FUNDS WERE AVAILABLE
IN THE SAME WEEK A STATE OF CALIFORNIA REPORT SHOWS THE PROBLEM IS NOT JUST A LOS ANGELES ONE. THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE ANALYST’S OFFICE REPORTS THE STATE HAS SPENT $37 BILLION ON HOMELESSNESS SINCE 2019 AND UNDERCOUNTS THE HOMELESS.
THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE TELLS FOX 26 ““This is simply not true. The audit did not report that the state has failed to track funding. The state distributed funding to local governments to address homelessness through numerous state programs — all the money is accounted for. We know exactly where state funding has gone — to local governments who are building programs, shelter, and housing.”
COMBINE THAT WITH 2023 FINDINGS THAT 34 PERCENT OF HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE NOT FROM CALIFORNIA.
NOW STATE AUDITORS ARE RECOMMENDING HOLDING OFF ON THE NEXT ROUND OF GRANT FUNDING UNTIL THEY SEE PROOF THE PROGRAMS WORK.
THOSE RECEIVING FUNDS THIS ROUND HAVE UNTIL APRIL FIRST OF 20-26 TO FILED THEIR REPORTS.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 15% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- The audit by Alvarez & Marsal found that Los Angeles homeless programs lack adequate oversight, risking waste and inefficiency.
- The audit concluded that the city could not accurately track spending or service effectiveness for homeless programs.
- Elizabeth Mitchell, an attorney for the plaintiffs, stated that the audit confirms urgent needs for systemic reform, labeling the findings as deadly.
- Alvarez & Marsal noted the emotional impact of visiting homeless encampments, stating that every day that goes by there are people on the street who are not receiving the services that the city is paying for.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Los Angeles officials lost track of billions in spending on homelessness services, with an audit finding about $2.3 billion was inaccurately recorded and reported.
- The auditor found that approximately $2.3 billion intended for homeless services was difficult to quantify due to fragmented data systems and inconsistent reporting by the city, county and LAHSA.
- Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath stated that the findings support the need to replace LAHSA, highlighting failures in accountability and results.
- Mayor Karen Bass acknowledged that the audit reflects ongoing issues since her tenure began, validating her efforts to enact change in the city's homelessness management.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago
CDC to launch study on potential link between vaccines and autism: Report
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor/Reporter), Zachary Hill (Video Editor)
- The CDC is planning a study to explore a potential link between vaccines and autism, according to a report. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who expressed vaccine skepticism, oversees the CDC.
- While numerous studies have found no link between vaccines and autism, the CDC aims for thorough research.
- Experts, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, stress that vaccines are safe and effective. They warn that diverting resources to this study could delay important research into autism’s unknown causes.
Full Story
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is planning a large study to investigate a potential link between vaccines and autism, according to two sources who spoke to Reuters. The decision comes amid a measles outbreak in the country, with most cases occurring in Texas and New Mexico.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has requested the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to research vaccines and autism, despite strong evidence that vaccines do not cause autism.
- The study will utilize the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which monitors the safety of vaccines and examines serious adverse events, as reported by The Washington Post.
- Experts emphasize that the rise in autism prevalence is due to greater awareness and improved diagnostic practices, not vaccines.
- Alison Singer expressed concern that this decision may foster fear among new parents about vaccines and autism.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention plans to study possible connections between vaccines and autism, despite existing research disproving this theory, as reported by sources familiar with the matter.
- Nicole Saphier noted that the CDC's decision to study vaccine-autism links signifies a notable shift, possibly aimed at addressing public skepticism about vaccine safety, though it may provoke further controversy.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Nearly 200 cases have been reported in West Texas, while 30 cases have been confirmed in New Mexico. Two people have died, and 23 others have been hospitalized. It remains unclear how many of those infected had been vaccinated.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
President Trump’s newly sworn-in Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., oversees the CDC. A vaccine skeptic, he previously suggested that vaccines could play a role in children being diagnosed with autism. He refrained from making such claims during his confirmation hearings.
Kennedy released a statement addressing the measles outbreak, saying in part: “As healthcare providers, community leaders, and policymakers, we have a shared responsibility to protect public health. This includes ensuring that accurate information about vaccine safety and efficacy is disseminated. We must engage with communities to understand their concerns, provide culturally competent education, and make vaccines readily accessible for all those who want them.”
According to the Autism Community in Action, in 2000, autism was diagnosed in 1 in 150 children. By 2023, that number had increased to 1 in every 36.
Numerous peer-reviewed, high-quality studies have found no link between autism and vaccines.
“The CDC will leave no stone unturned in its mission to figure out what exactly is happening. The American people expect high-quality research and transparency, and that is what the CDC is delivering,” said a joint statement from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the CDC.
The Infectious Diseases Society of America also released a statement on the CDC’s vaccine-autism study, stating in part: “Vaccines have been thoroughly researched and administered to large numbers of people of all ages and have been proven to be very safe and effective in preventing the spread of many serious infectious diseases and dramatically reducing deaths. Decades of research and hundreds of carefully designed and scientifically sound studies show no link or association between vaccines and autism.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
“The announcement that the CDC will look at potential links between vaccines and autism means that significant federal resources will be diverted from crucial areas of study, including research into the unknown causes of autism, at a time when research funding is already facing deep cuts.”
The cause of autism remains unknown.
THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION IS PLANNING A LARGE STUDY INTO A POTENTIAL LINK BETWEEN VACCINES AND AUTISM, ACCORDING TO TWO SOURCES WHO SPOKE TO REUTERS.
THE DECISION COMES DURING A MEASLES OUTBREAK IN THE COUNTRY – WITH MOST CASES IN TEXAS AND NEW MEXICO. THERE’VE BEEN NEARLY 200 CASES IN WEST TEXAS AND 30 IN NEW MEXICO. TWO PEOPLE HAVE DIED AND 23 PEOPLE HAVE BEEN HOSPITALIZED.
IT’S UNCLEAR HOW MANY OF THOSE INFECTED WERE VACCINATED.
PRESIDENT TRUMP’S NEWLY SWORN-IN SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ROBERT F KENNEDY JR OVERSEES THE CDC, AND HAS BEEN A VACCINE SKEPTIC WHO HAS SUGGESTED VACCINES COULD PLAY A ROLE IN CHILDREN BEING DIAGNOSED WITH AUTISM ALTHOUGH HE STEERED AWAY FROM SAYING THAT DURING HIS CONFIRMATION HEARINGS.
RFK JR RELEASED A STATEMENT ON THE MEASLES OUTBREAKING SAYING IN PART: “AS HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS, COMMUNITY LEADERS, AND POLICYMAKERS, WE HAVE A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH. THIS INCLUDES ENSURING THAT ACCURATE INFORMATION ABOUT VACCINE SAFETY AND EFFICACY IS DISSEMINATED. WE MUST ENGAGE WITH COMMUNITIES TO UNDERSTAND THEIR CONCERNS, PROVIDE CULTURALLY COMPETENT EDUCATION, AND MAKE VACCINES READILY ACCESSIBLE FOR ALL THOSE WHO WANT THEM.”
ACCORDING TO THE AUTISM COMMUNITY IN ACTION, IN THE YEAR 2000, AUTISM WAS FOUND IN 1 OUT OF 150 CHILDREN. BY 2023, THAT NUMBER JUMPED TO 1 IN EVERY 36.
THERE’VE BEEN NUMEROUS PEER-REVIEWED, HIGH-QUALITY STUDIES FINDING NO SUCH LINK BETWEEN AUTISM AND VACCINES.
THE “CDC WILL LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED IN ITS MISSION TO FIGURE OUT WHAT EXACTLY IS HAPPENING. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT HIGH QUALITY RESEARCH AND TRANSPARENCY AND THAT IS WHAT CDC IS DELIVERING,” A JOINT STATEMENT FROM HHS AND CDC SAID.
THE INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY OF AMERICA RELEASED A STATEMENT ON THE CDC’S VACCINE-AUSTIM STUDYING SAYING IN PART:
“VACCINES HAVE BEEN THOROUGHLY RESEARCHED AND ADMINISTERED TO LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE OF ALL AGES AND HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE VERY SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING THE SPREAD OF MANY SERIOUS INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND DRAMATICALLY REDUCING DEATHS. DECADES OF RESEARCH AND HUNDREDS OF CAREFULLY DESIGNED AND SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND STUDIES SHOW NO LINK OR ASSOCIATION BETWEEN VACCINES AND AUTISM.
THE ANNOUNCEMENT THAT CDC WILL LOOK AT POTENTIAL LINKS BETWEEN VACCINES AND AUTISM MEANS THAT SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL RESOURCES WILL BE DIVERTED FROM CRUCIAL AREAS OF STUDY, INCLUDING RESEARCH INTO THE UNKNOWN CAUSES OF AUTISM, AT A TIME WHEN RESEARCH FUNDING IS ALREADY FACING DEEP CUTS.”
THE CAUSE OF AUTISM IS STILL UNKNOWN.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has requested the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to research vaccines and autism, despite strong evidence that vaccines do not cause autism.
- The study will utilize the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which monitors the safety of vaccines and examines serious adverse events, as reported by The Washington Post.
- Experts emphasize that the rise in autism prevalence is due to greater awareness and improved diagnostic practices, not vaccines.
- Alison Singer expressed concern that this decision may foster fear among new parents about vaccines and autism.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention plans to study possible connections between vaccines and autism, despite existing research disproving this theory, as reported by sources familiar with the matter.
- Nicole Saphier noted that the CDC's decision to study vaccine-autism links signifies a notable shift, possibly aimed at addressing public skepticism about vaccine safety, though it may provoke further controversy.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago
SCOTUS will not hear climate change case involving almost half of U.S. states
By Jack Aylmer (Energy Correspondent), Lauren Taylor (Anchor), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor), Oly Noneza (Graphics)
- The U.S. Supreme Court decided not to intervene in a legal dispute over climate change involving nearly half of the nation’s states. This decision allows lawsuits from five Democratic-led states to proceed against major oil and gas companies in state courts despite attempts from 19 Republican-led states to block the litigation.
- The lawsuits accuse energy companies of misleading the public about the dangers of fossil fuels. They argue this deception led to increased fossil fuel use and environmental harm. Red states argued state courts should not regulate activities beyond their borders, warning of impacts on the national energy system.
- Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, criticizing the decision undermining the Supreme Court’s constitutional role in resolving state disputes.
Full Story
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to intervene in a legal dispute involving nearly half of the nation’s states over climate change. The decision allows lawsuits brought by five Democratic-led states—California, Connecticut, Minnesota, New Jersey and Rhode Island—to proceed against major oil and gas companies in state courts despite attempts from a group of Republican-led states to block the litigation.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
What are these lawsuits claiming?
The lawsuits, filed between 2018 and 2023, accuse the energy companies of misleading the public about the dangers of fossil fuels despite allegedly knowing for decades that greenhouse gas emissions would contribute to climate change. The Democratic-led states claim that this deceptive marketing led consumers to use more fossil fuels, exacerbating environmental damage.
What was the argument from red states against the suits?
Meanwhile, Alabama and other 18 Republican-led states urged the Supreme Court to end these lawsuits. They argued that state courts should not be able to regulate activities beyond their borders, particularly those involving energy production governed by federal law. The red states warned that if the lawsuits succeed, they could have significant implications for the national energy system and the affordability of power.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
“If defendant states are right about the substance and reach of state law, their actions imperil access to affordable energy everywhere and inculpate every state and indeed every person on the planet,” the red states wrote. “Consequently, defendant states threaten not only our system of federalism and equal sovereignty among States, but our basic way of life.”
How did the blue states respond to these accusations?
However, the blue states that brought these lawsuits forward counter that the legal actions do not infringe upon the rights of other states to pursue their own energy policies. They maintain that holding energy companies accountable for alleged misinformation is a matter of state jurisdiction.
“Accurately understood, the state enforcement actions that Alabama targets do not intrude on the sovereign prerogatives of Alabama or any other state,” the blue states wrote. “Even if each one of those actions succeeds, Alabama and other states will remain free to pursue their own energy policy goals.”
Was the Supreme Court decision unanimous?
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case. Thomas argued that doing so undermines the Constitution’s provision for resolving disputes between states.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
“Our exclusive original jurisdiction over suits between states reflects a determination by the framers and by Congress about the need ‘to open and keep open the highest court of the nation’ for such suits, in recognition of the ‘rank and dignity of the states,” Thomas wrote. “Yet, this court has — essentially for policy reasons — assumed a power to summarily turn away suits between states.”
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT DECLINED TO INTERVENE IN A DISPUTE OVER CLIMATE CHANGE INVOLVING NEARLY HALF OF THE NATION’S STATES.
A GROUP OF REPUBLICAN-LED STATES HAD BEEN ATTEMPTING TO BLOCK FIVE DEMOCRATIC-LED STATES FROM BRINGING LEGAL ACTION AGAINST MAJOR OIL AND GAS COMPANIES OVER THEIR ALLEGED CONTRIBUTIONS TO GLOBAL WARMING.
THE HIGH COURT’S DECISION CLEARS THE WAY FOR LAWSUITS FILED BY CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, AND RHODE ISLAND TO PROCEED IN STATE JURISDICTIONS.
THESE SUITS, FILED BETWEEN 2018 AND 2023, ALLEGE THAT THE ENERGY COMPANIES MISLED THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE DANGERS OF FOSSIL FUEL PRODUCTS-
DESPITE KNOWING FOR DECADES THAT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO CLIMATE CHANGE.
THE DEMOCRATIC-LED STATES CLAIM THIS DECEPTIVE MARKETING CAUSED CONSUMERS TO USE MORE FOSSIL FUELS, EXACERBATING ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE.
MEANWHILE, ALABAMA AND 18 OTHER REPUBLICAN-LED STATES URGED THE SUPREME COURT TO HALT THE LITIGATION-
ARGUING THAT STATE COURTS SHOULD NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE ACTIVITIES BEYOND THEIR BORDERS-
ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO ENERGY PRODUCTION GOVERNED BY FEDERAL LAW.
WARNING THAT IF THE LAWSUITS SUCCEED, THEY COULD HAVE SWEEPING IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NATIONAL ENERGY SYSTEM AND ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE POWER.
HOWEVER, THE DEMOCRATIC-LED STATES MAINTAIN THIS LITIGATION DOES NOT INFRINGE UPON THE RIGHTS OF OTHER STATES TO PURSUE THEIR OWN ENERGY POLICIES.
JUSTICES CLARENCE THOMAS AND SAMUEL ALITO DISSENTED FROM THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION NOT TO HEAR THE CASE-
WITH THOMAS WRITING THE COURT’S REFUSAL UNDERMINES THE CONSTITUTION’S PROVISION FOR RESOLVING DISPUTES BETWEEN STATES.
TO GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS ONE, DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Reuters
European Union hits back after US’ 25% tariffs take effect
Watch 12:118 hrs ago -
Getty Images
USAID official orders documents to be shredded and burned, lawsuit filed
Watch 3:1914 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Did Trump violate the Hatch Act with his Tesla White House event?
Read15 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read18 hrs ago