Alabama wants to be the first state to execute an inmate by making him breathe pure nitrogen. Now I am no scientist at all and the periodic table looks like hieroglyphics to me. But I still know that Bamas little plan presents a huge problem. And it should be shut down and stat.
Now before I go ahead and lay things out, let me get this out. I may be liberal, but I’m not an across the board hater of capital punishment. Yeah, I sincerely just believe that some folks should be voted off the island early. So my condemnation of Alabama’s nitrogen execution plan is not coming from a blanket anti execution stance. Where it comes from is a blanket anti human guinea pig stance.
No one knows how forcing someone to inhale only nitrogen will work. Yet Alabama authorities are trying to greenlight the execution method. The State Attorney General made this abundantly clear in a filing on Friday when they asked the Alabama Supreme Court to set the execution date for an inmate named Kenneth Eugene Smith. They had listed on Smith’s forms that the anticipated death would be by nitrogen hypoxia.
Now no death row inmate has ever been executed using that gas before and officials think that forcing an inmate to breathe only nitrogen would kill him because he’d be deprived of oxygen. Gosh, depriving a fully conscious human being of oxygen doesn’t sound particularly humane to me. And yeah, nitrogen makes up almost 80% of the air that humans inhale, and apparently it’s harmless when inhaled with oxygen. But what would happen to an inmate if oxygen is removed from the equation entirely?
Well, that’s merely a theoretical exercise. And it’s 2023. Yet we’re out here theorizing how a human being would physically respond as though they are test dummies. That’s incredibly gross. To make matters worse, the American Veterinary Medical Association says not to use nitrogen hypoxia to euthanize mammals other than pigs. It’s not even cleared to put down a rat. Yet Alabama is somehow confident that force feeding inmates nitrogen alone will be an effective painfree execution method.
Now I know the State is ranked near 50 in education but there has to be an intelligent mind somewhere there in the Heart of Dixie. Now of course, you know how nitrogen even got approved as an execution method there in Alabama does say a lot. It was 2018 when then Republican lawmaker Trip Pittman sponsored the bill to make this happen, theorizing that the execution would probably be somewhat similar to how airplane passengers pass out when a plane loses pressure. Sure. Cause we all know that it’s a real chill experience when an airplane passenger, you know, loses access to oxygen and just passes out.
Pittman had no idea how nitrogen would impact the human body when he got Alabama to go ahead and sign on for this, joining Oklahoma and Mississippi as the few states that allow nitrogen execution, he also didn’t likely care. The fact is that it is inhumane though, it’s inhumane to use human beings as a test case for whether or not a gas is an effective way to end human life. This is neither knots viler nor Nuremberg, and regardless of one’s criminality, this is not okay. If we as a society are going to vote someone off the island early, they should go with dignity, not as an experiment
Related
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Assassination attempt on Slovakia’s prime minister explained
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Will Nigeria become Africa’s first superpower?
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Why Putin axed Shoigu
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
New roles for Russia, North Korea, Iran in global arms trade
Monday
Peter Zeihan
Stop human nitrogen execution experiments in Alabama
Aug 30, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
Alabama’s attorney general has requested permission from the state’s Supreme Court to execute Kenneth Eugene Smith using nitrogen-induced hypoxia, a method that involves depriving the individual of oxygen using nitrogen gas. While nitrogen hypoxia is permitted in three states, it remains untested and has not been employed previously for executions.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence argues that using humans as guinea pigs to determine the efficacy of nitrogen as a method of execution is inhumane.
No one knows how forcing someone to inhale only nitrogen will work. Yet, Alabama authorities are trying to greenlight the execution method. The state attorney general made this abundantly clear in a filing on Friday, when they asked the Alabama Supreme Court to set the execution date for an inmate named Kenneth Eugene Smith. They had listed on Smith’s forms that the anticipated death would be by nitrogen hypoxia.
Now, no death row inmate has ever been executed using that gas before, and officials think that forcing an inmate to breathe only nitrogen would kill him because he’d be deprived of oxygen.
Gosh, depriving a fully conscious human being of oxygen doesn’t sound particularly humane to me. And yeah, nitrogen makes up almost 80% of the air that humans inhale — and apparently it’s harmless when inhaled with oxygen — but what would happen to an inmate if oxygen is removed from the equation entirely?
Alabama wants to be the first state to execute an inmate by making him breathe pure nitrogen. Now I am no scientist at all and the periodic table looks like hieroglyphics to me. But I still know that Bamas little plan presents a huge problem. And it should be shut down and stat.
Now before I go ahead and lay things out, let me get this out. I may be liberal, but I’m not an across the board hater of capital punishment. Yeah, I sincerely just believe that some folks should be voted off the island early. So my condemnation of Alabama’s nitrogen execution plan is not coming from a blanket anti execution stance. Where it comes from is a blanket anti human guinea pig stance.
No one knows how forcing someone to inhale only nitrogen will work. Yet Alabama authorities are trying to greenlight the execution method. The State Attorney General made this abundantly clear in a filing on Friday when they asked the Alabama Supreme Court to set the execution date for an inmate named Kenneth Eugene Smith. They had listed on Smith’s forms that the anticipated death would be by nitrogen hypoxia.
Now no death row inmate has ever been executed using that gas before and officials think that forcing an inmate to breathe only nitrogen would kill him because he’d be deprived of oxygen. Gosh, depriving a fully conscious human being of oxygen doesn’t sound particularly humane to me. And yeah, nitrogen makes up almost 80% of the air that humans inhale, and apparently it’s harmless when inhaled with oxygen. But what would happen to an inmate if oxygen is removed from the equation entirely?
Well, that’s merely a theoretical exercise. And it’s 2023. Yet we’re out here theorizing how a human being would physically respond as though they are test dummies. That’s incredibly gross. To make matters worse, the American Veterinary Medical Association says not to use nitrogen hypoxia to euthanize mammals other than pigs. It’s not even cleared to put down a rat. Yet Alabama is somehow confident that force feeding inmates nitrogen alone will be an effective painfree execution method.
Now I know the State is ranked near 50 in education but there has to be an intelligent mind somewhere there in the Heart of Dixie. Now of course, you know how nitrogen even got approved as an execution method there in Alabama does say a lot. It was 2018 when then Republican lawmaker Trip Pittman sponsored the bill to make this happen, theorizing that the execution would probably be somewhat similar to how airplane passengers pass out when a plane loses pressure. Sure. Cause we all know that it’s a real chill experience when an airplane passenger, you know, loses access to oxygen and just passes out.
Pittman had no idea how nitrogen would impact the human body when he got Alabama to go ahead and sign on for this, joining Oklahoma and Mississippi as the few states that allow nitrogen execution, he also didn’t likely care. The fact is that it is inhumane though, it’s inhumane to use human beings as a test case for whether or not a gas is an effective way to end human life. This is neither knots viler nor Nuremberg, and regardless of one’s criminality, this is not okay. If we as a society are going to vote someone off the island early, they should go with dignity, not as an experiment
Related
Why the United States must regulate ghost guns
“Ghost guns” – untraceable guns normally assembled with a build-it-yourself kit – have been increasingly blamed for homicides and violent gun crimes over the past few years. In 2022, the Biden administration imposed new regulations on ghost guns. The rules required ghost gun manufacturers to register, number and track each sale of a gun kit…
Wednesday
NYPD’s lack of lawsuit disclosure shields it from accountability
An examination of public records obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests revealed that nearly 13,000 legal cases brought against the New York City Police Department (NYPD) resulting in settlements or monetary awards over the past decade were not publicly disclosed, despite legal requirements to do so. Some analysts suggest that the NYPD’s failure…
May 8
Students learning brutal lesson on how police respond to protests
Student protests against Israel’s war in Gaza have escalated in the United States and around the world as civilian death counts in both Gaza and the West Bank continue to climb. Estimates show Israeli forces killed at least 42,500 Palestinians since Oct. 7, 2023, and another two million survivors have been displaced from their homes.…
May 1
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
Apr 24
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
Apr 17
Underreported stories from each side
NRA and conservative legal group sue New Mexico governor over 7-day waiting period to buy guns
6 sources | 0% from the left
Reuters
House passes TICKET Act targeting hidden concert fees
9 sources | 11% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
Ukraine launches major drone counter-attack on Russian sites
Watch 2:34
Friday
Honda will use Formula 1 technology in its upcoming EV lineup
Watch 1:35
Friday
‘Fake eyelashes,’ ‘butch body’: Insults fly in congressional hearing
Watch 2:33
Friday
Billionaires discuss how to shut down Columbia protests in group chat: Report
Watch 2:47
Friday
Congress launches probe of UCLA after violence on campus
Watch 2:59
Friday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Politicians and Supreme Court justices must have term limits
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
During Police Week, all Americans should honor fallen officers
Friday
Star Parker
Universities must blame themselves for protest hypocrisy
Thursday
Timothy Carney
It’s okay for Met Gala celebrities to avoid politics
Thursday
Jordan Reid