![When it comes to renewable energy, location is key. We can't move on from fossil fuels until we figure out where to put wind and solar.](https://san.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/solar-panel-2021-12-09-09-33-49-utc.jpeg?w=1920)
Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from the hike and bike trail in downtown Austin. Today, I wanted to talk a little bit about energy economics, specifically green energy economics. Now the idea that once you’ve paid for the sunk cost of the solar or the wind system, that you’re in the clear, you know, to a degree that’s true. But you first have to get the thing built. There’s two complications here that we’re facing. The first is capital. So when you’re going to build like a normal thermal power plant, about three quarters … 60% to three quarters of the cost of that plant is actually in the fuel, that you are going to burn over the lifespan of the project. You don’t have to finance that upfront, you pay for that as you go. And you typically use the income that you get from selling your electricity to your customers to pay for that. So the only part that you have to finance is that initial construction, which is typically a quarter to a third of the total.
With green tech, that’s not how it goes. With green tag, roughly 80% of the cost of the project over its lifespan is in construction. And even if you can get into a situation where you’re in a sufficiently sunny or windy place that the per-cost for the kilowatt hour or the power you generate is over the lifespan of the project, the same as it is for fossil fuel system, you still have to finance that all up front. And with the Baby Boomers moving into mass retirement and liquidating all of their holdings, because they can’t take the shock of a currency crash or market crash anymore, the cost of capital in the United States is going up and it will remain high until such time as the Millennials are the capital-rich group in our population. That won’t happen until most of them are in their 50s. and that won’t happen for another 10 to 12 years. So we’ve got this period of much higher capital costs, which means much higher development costs for electricity projects in the green space. There’s really no way around that.
The second problem has to do with the inelasticity of energy costs. So let’s say you need a gallon of gasoline in order to drive to work. If you can only get nine-tenths of a gallon, it’s not like you park your car and walk the rest of the way and just leave your car for all time. No, no, you will pay whatever you have to pay to get that last tenth and that price then applies to the entire market. And if you have a shift in demand of only like 10 to 15%, you can easily see a change in price of 50 to 100 percent. And we know this is true for electricity, for coal, for natural gas, for oil, and even for nuclear fuel.
Now, if we decide we are really going to go with the green transition en mass, then all of a sudden a lot of the components that go into electricity generation are going to become power fuels. That’s chromium, that’s copper, that’s aluminum, that’s fiberglass, that’s graphite, that’s lithium. We have not priced in that system. The bottom line of all this is not, ‘don’t go green.’ The bottom line of this is you only put these technologies in places where the geography matches the capacity for these things to work. So you put up solar where it’s sunny, you put up wind power where it’s windy, and if you’re going to put it somewhere else, you not only do you have to think of the cost in the long term in an entirely different light, you’ve got to change the metrics, because it’s going to cost more to build, it’s going to cost more to finance.
And that means we ultimately need better technologies than what we have now, especially in transmission, so that we can bring the electricity from where it’s produced in a reasonable manner to where most people actually live. And that requires, among other things, multiple acts of Congress both to appropriate the money for that research, and to make it easier for power to pass through different states’ jurisdictions and especially between the three power grids that the United States shares. Alright, that’s it for me. Talk to you guys later.
-
With globalization ending, the US can and should adapt
Geopolitical experts have cautioned that the era of globalization and “off-shoring” may be ending, and a new era of regionalization and “friend-shoring” might be replacing it. These changes are especially obvious in U.S.-Chinese trade relations over the past few years, although similar observations can be made around the world. Others warn that even “friend-shoring” may… -
Deglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Globalization has strengthened the interdependence of nations through trade in technology, services, and, most notably, food. It has reshaped the global agricultural system, improving both the variety and affordability of food while also influencing its quality and nutritional value. So what would happen to countries reliant on this system if the world became less interconnected?… -
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Wheat thrives in temperatures between 70°F and 75°F but has difficulty in temperatures above 90°F. So, what happens when climate change leads to rising heat that damages wheat crops and reduces yields? Models predict that by 2050, climate change will significantly lower global wheat production, particularly in Africa and South Asia, where food security is… -
Blue money for green energy in red states
President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funding, widely popular among Democrats, went mostly toward development projects in deep red Republican states, despite Republican legislators actually voting against the act. That may have generated some pushback and alarm from Democrats, but there are more complicated stories behind IRA numbers than the simple red-blue divide might suggest.… -
Tomorrow’s new world order
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States and its allies celebrated a new era of global hegemony. But in recent years, especially with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Chinese military aggression in the Pacific, that hegemony has come under attack. Meanwhile, major powers like France and Turkey are already preparing to play…
Latest Stories
-
Michigan State Department
Michigan’s first ‘I Voted’ sticker contest draws inspiration from folklore and more
-
Getty Images
IRS recovers $1.3B in unpaid taxes from high-income Americans
-
Getty Images
Rome considers timed ticket system for Trevi Fountain
-
Getty Images
NOAA says Vineyard Wind won’t kill sea life, issues permits for it to do just that
-
Reuters
Trump campaign staffers involved in Arlington cemetery altercation identified
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistDeglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Blue money for green energy in red states
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Administration doesn’t care’: Jewish students on campus antisemitism
‘The prices on everything’: What keeps Americans up at night
‘Mean or extreme’: Americans discuss Harris and Trump