Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hey everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from the great wilds and wide opens of Wyoming.
A few of you wrote in about rare earths, which are a series of materials that are used in everything from petroleum refining, to semiconductors, to safety, glass, to sunglasses.
There’s a little bit in pretty much any sort of modern industrial product and with everything with the Chinese going to hell, there is a concern that there’s a trade issue in a national security issue here.
Right now, the Chinese are responsible for producing about 90% of the world’s rare earth metals that are then used in everything else. So if relations with the Chinese really do tank or the trade system falls apart, are we then in a shortage? This is something I spend a lot of time not worrying about at all. A couple of things to keep in mind.
First of all, rare earths, aren’t rare. They are a by-product of metal mining, particularly lead and silver and copper. The problem is with processing. So for example, here in Wyoming, there’s probably enough rare earth for everything that the United States needs for decades to come. It’s also capable of being produced in Texas and Arkansas and New York and California and Colorado.
We have plenty, but they react very similarly when you try to refine them and you have to separate them out first from the, or, and then from one another, that takes a series of hundreds of acid bass to increase the concentrations of what you’re after. And that takes months just to get a few ounces of a stuff. So how this has gone down is the Chinese subsidize everything that they can technically command in order to ensure their population has as many jobs as possible.
They’ve done this for rare earth, just like they’ve done it for everything else. And so by the time we got to the 1990s, the Chinese had been dumping so much money into this industry that they had driven down the price of rare earth through overproduction.
In the 1990s prices for rare earths dropped by about three quarters. And they’ve never really bounced back in that sort of environment. You’ve got a very different cost structure and it drove a lot of the more traditional producers in the United States, in Europe, in Asia, out of business, but the Chinese never stopped over producing. They simply kept going. And so we were able to make a shift to a high-tech telephone commuting system, much more quickly and much more cheaply than we would have been able to otherwise.
And the second that the Chinese started to use this as a geopolitical issue, we found ways to get by without. So while global demand for rare earth has increased over the course of the last 20, 25 years, the concentration of those rare earths in the American system and the global system is actually gone down per unit of output.
Remember when we made the shift from hard drives to solid state drives? That was about the time the Chinese started to beat jerks about this issue. And so we started using less and that gave a solid state, which uses very few rare earths. Now, again, the issue is processing.
You have to build the infrastructure with that issue, having to build the infrastructure, knowing that they’re not rare. Everyone who uses rare earth in numbers has learned the lesson of the Chinese intervening in the market a long time ago. So everybody has six months to a year of reserves built up. In addition to having some savings programs in place in case they need to suddenly do make do with less.
So there’s a buffer. In addition, Malaysia, Australia, the United States, and others have gone ahead and invested in a lot of the infrastructure that we would need to produce rare earth in mass. Now there will be a lag to spin this up of six to 12 months. So if the Chinese were to vanish from the world tomorrow and take the rare earths with them, we would have a period of tightness that would last no more than a year. And then we’d be fine. This is not something I worry about. Next time we’ll talk about something I do. until then…
-
With globalization ending, the US can and should adapt
Geopolitical experts have cautioned that the era of globalization and “off-shoring” may be ending, and a new era of regionalization and “friend-shoring” might be replacing it. These changes are especially obvious in U.S.-Chinese trade relations over the past few years, although similar observations can be made around the world. Others warn that even “friend-shoring” may… -
Deglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Globalization has strengthened the interdependence of nations through trade in technology, services, and, most notably, food. It has reshaped the global agricultural system, improving both the variety and affordability of food while also influencing its quality and nutritional value. So what would happen to countries reliant on this system if the world became less interconnected?… -
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Wheat thrives in temperatures between 70°F and 75°F but has difficulty in temperatures above 90°F. So, what happens when climate change leads to rising heat that damages wheat crops and reduces yields? Models predict that by 2050, climate change will significantly lower global wheat production, particularly in Africa and South Asia, where food security is… -
Blue money for green energy in red states
President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funding, widely popular among Democrats, went mostly toward development projects in deep red Republican states, despite Republican legislators actually voting against the act. That may have generated some pushback and alarm from Democrats, but there are more complicated stories behind IRA numbers than the simple red-blue divide might suggest.… -
Tomorrow’s new world order
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States and its allies celebrated a new era of global hegemony. But in recent years, especially with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Chinese military aggression in the Pacific, that hegemony has come under attack. Meanwhile, major powers like France and Turkey are already preparing to play…
Latest Stories
-
Michigan’s first ‘I Voted’ sticker contest draws inspiration from folklore and more
-
IRS recovers $1.3B in unpaid taxes from high-income Americans
-
Rome considers timed ticket system for Trevi Fountain
-
NOAA says Vineyard Wind won’t kill sea life, issues permits for it to do just that
-
Trump campaign staffers involved in Arlington cemetery altercation identified
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistDeglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Blue money for green energy in red states
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Administration doesn’t care’: Jewish students on campus antisemitism
‘The prices on everything’: What keeps Americans up at night
‘Mean or extreme’: Americans discuss Harris and Trump