Skip to main content



How should the US respond to China’s spy base in Cuba?

Jun 20, 2023


Adding further complexity to the U.S.-China relationship, it appears China is planning to erect an electronic eavesdropping facility in Cuba, approximately 100 miles from the American mainland. U.S. officials said China has agreed to pay billions of dollars for the facility

Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan breaks down three strategic options the U.S. can consider as it plans its future with Cuba.

Excerpted from Peter’s June 20 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

The news of a “new” Chinese listening post in Cuba sparks the question: why is Cuba so important to the US? No, we’re not talking about cigars. We’re talking about Cuba’s role in American strategic planning.

With control of the Florida Straits and the Straits of Yucatán, Cuba commands access to the Gulf of Mexico. For those who need a refresher, the gulf is critical to American power, capital generation, agriculture, and energy, second only to the Mississippi system. Hence the whole Cuban Missile Crisis back in the day.

Now I’m not worried about China playing any significant role in Cuba because they’ve had this post for years and China cannot command power at a distance. However, this doesn’t mean things won’t get interesting with Cuba. There are only a few ways that I could see this playing out.

Option one is the diplomatic route of bringing Cuba into the North American family or even NAFTA. Option two is the military route, which would involve America’s favorite pastime of overthrowing the government and/or occupation. OR Cuba and the US can meet somewhere in the middle and play a good ole fashion game of economic warfare.

In all reality, the US will probably just wait this out…unless a real threat to American security decides to try its luck.

Hey everyone, Peter Zion here coming to you from the slightly less smoky Okanagan. Today we’re talking a little bit about Kuba. Specifically, there’s news recently that the Chinese are maintaining a new listening post. That’s that’s pretty much bullshit. It’s been there for years. In fact, the Biden ministration came out a few days after the initial report said, yeah, it’s been there, at least since 2019. Probably been there a little bit earlier. Now, cubelet will always fit your hot and heavy and American strategic planning because it controls the Straits of Florida and the Yucatan straits, which command access to the Gulf of Mexico. And if for whatever reason, the greater Mississippi system could not trade with the rest of the world that is the core of American power, capital generation and agriculture and energy. So kind of a big deal. And this is the reason why JFK almost got us into a nuclear war over the Cuban Missile Crisis back in the 60s because the Soviets were militarizing Cuba. Cuba itself certainly doesn’t have the military capacity to challenge the United States or close the straits. But it could be a base for a hostile power from outer hemisphere. Of course, the conversation now is whether or not the Chinese are in that role. Not yet, and probably not ever. The Chinese don’t have the ability to project power that sort of distance without ironically American assistance. So the only Chinese military base abroad anywhere in the world is in Djibouti. And it is only able to function there because the Americans basically indirectly help out with logistics and Naval Patrol. So I’m not worried about that right now. That doesn’t mean that things with Cuba aren’t going to get interesting. In the post cold war environment with the Russians no longer a significant factor in Havana. The question has been, how long can Cuba last in this sort of environment. And there’s really two big paths that this could go. Number one is a diplomatic solution to the Imbruglia and relations between the two. This is something that Barack Obama attempted sloppily, and sophomore quickly, and ultimately was shot down by Congress. But the idea of bringing tuba into the North American family, perhaps even into NAFTA makes a lot of sense, because they’re the workers in Cuba are probably about a third as productive as Americans, but they work for 1/10 the cost, so it’d be a really good complement to what the Mexicans really need to industrialize more of their system right now, it’d be a huge value add, not to mention the boosts in agriculture, and tourism. So some sort of negotiated deal. Makes a lot of sense. But we’d probably need a better negotiating team than what we had under Obama. But that is literally every other president we’ve ever had. So you know, don’t rule it out. It’s a political question on both sides, there just has to be willingness to work on it again. The second option is a more direct military option, which would include overthrowing the government or occupying it. And we’ve done that in the past too, although not recently, at the moment that is off the table, it would take a lot more provocation from the Cubans than hosting a listening post, they would have to actually accept more advanced military assistance and have a base and the Chinese are simply not the power to do that. And the Russians no longer have the capacity either. So it would only happen if the United States president just woke up one day and said, You know what, let’s conquer Cuba. I don’t find that likely. And then between those two extremes, you get economic warfare. One of the things that we’ve discovered in a system that is as dysfunctional politically and economically as Cuba is there are a lot of weak points. Probably the single biggest one is food. And that’s one of the reasons why when we had that proto deal with the Obama administration, that the United States used its agricultural surpluses as a way to induce the Cubans into making concessions, and it worked. The other one would be energy, the Cubans get almost all of their fuels from Venezuela. And so if you have a break in the Venezuelan system, all of a sudden, the Cubans are high and dry, and without fuel, diesel or power. So there’s a lot of ways that the Cuban system can kind of collapse under its own weight. And as with everything with the United States, there is a belief in Washington accurately, that we can outwait this problem. And unless we have some sort of acute challenge to American security, that’s just kind of the safest thing to do. It’s probably a good bet. But that doesn’t mean it’s going to last forever. All right, everyone, take care. See you next time.

Video Library

Latest Commentary

We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.

The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Latest Opinions

In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.

The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Weekly Voices

Left Opinion Right Opinion


Left Opinion Right Opinion


Left Opinion Right Opinion


Left Opinion Right Opinion

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.