Everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from snowy Colorado where in the last 18 hours, we’ve gotten 18 inches of snow, which means that this morning is a time for clearing and shoveling. But there is more to winter than shoveling and icicles are the her is also the fun and games that comes with agriculture. In fact, winter is arguably the single biggest factor for how our world got to be in the shape it is more or less the century and last century. The issue is that when winter hits, everything stops, and you have a layer of moisture that then insulates the ground. This is two things. Number one, it preserves a little bit moisture in there, and then we’ll get a little bit back in the spring. But more importantly, the thicker the snow, the greater the insulation. And so you actually still have biological processes going on under the surface, even right there in the topsoil. Basically, you’ve got organic material that is decaying, or as farmers like to call it the formation of free fertilizer. If you look at the map of the world’s agricultural zones, before roughly 1900, the pre industrial era, you’ll notice certain patterns, the American Midwest to a degree the American Piedmont Northern Europe, central Eurasia, the Rio de plata basin in South America, and the southeastern part of Australia, and South Africa. Oh, sorry, I forgot northern China as well. What are these areas all have in common? It’s cold, you get some snow. And so you get that recharge system there temperate climates where the free fertilizers kind of baked into the cake. If you go outside of those zones, pre 1900. It’s not that there’s not agriculture. But by definition, it’s almost not large scale, and most of the crops that feed most of humanity. So you’re talking about rice, soy, wheat, and corn. Those four crops grow best in those conditions, you move out of those zones, and you’re talking different crops, things like sweet potatoes or yams. And it’s not UK that you can’t support a population with those things. It’s that you can’t support a large population with those things. So they’re not nearly as amenable to row crop edge. It’s more subsistence farming as a rule. Now, that of course change right right around between 1900 1945 for some countries, and then between roughly 1990 and 1985. For the rest, what happened there was first the development and then the mass application of industrial level agricultural inputs, things like fuels and fertilizers, which allowed you to plant more traditional crops in zones that normally weren’t really great for it. In addition, those lower output crops per acre, if you started putting things like fertilizer, they would do a lot better. As a rule, the industrialization of agriculture had a bigger impact on marginal lands than it did on the prime lands, the prime lands still saw their output increased by 50% 250%. But it’s the marginal lands that saw tripling quadrupling, or even more. Now, something to keep in mind with all those secondary lands. If you’re talking about say a step where it’s just dry with our culture doesn’t nothing really happens. If you’re talking about the tropics, yes, you have a riot of growth, but the nutrients are consumed by that growth as soon as the growth rots. So if you clear the jungle on the rainforest, the soil that’s left behind is almost nutrient non existent. And without those industrial level inputs, you really can’t grow crops at scale in these zones. Now, because of industrialization of agriculture, we haven’t simply seen that the part of the world that humans cultivate expand by a factor of three, we seen the population expand by a factor of three as well. My concern is that we’re entering an era where the supply chains that allow those industrial inputs to function to exist, are going to break down. And for countries like China, or Brazil, who import the vast, vast, vast majority of those inputs, that means the ability to sustain post 1900 levels of population are going to be hugely hit. In the case of Brazil, they still have portions of the country that are still temperate. It’s not like they’re going to starve, but they’re no longer gonna be a massive agricultural exporter to places like Brazil. So for those of you who live in a place where you don’t have snow, yes, you get more time on the beach, and you don’t have to shuffle. But it also means the security of your food supply is decided by people in different climate zones with supply chains that are a continent away, that you have no ability to protect or even influence and the world we’re going into, that’s going to get a little rough
Related
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical Strategist
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Why interest rates will be higher for longer
20 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
‘The worst it’s ever been’: Young Americans on democracy
Yesterday
Dr. Frank Luntz
How to handle plunging US birth rate before it’s too late
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Japan must confront reality of military threats
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
How winter impacts agriculture and global food security
Feb 8
By Straight Arrow News
Cultivating crops can become more challenging in cold weather, but harsh winter conditions can, in fact, foster a robust agricultural industry. Snow is a natural insulator for plants, shielding them from extreme cold temperatures. Additionally, the freezing and thawing cycle of water helps to loosen the soil, and when the snow melts, it adds moisture to the soil in preparation for spring.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan explores how cold and snow have influenced the modern global agricultural system and shares a warning for some of the world’s developed nations.
Excerpted from Peter’s Feb. 8 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
Some of you out there might grovel when the first snowflakes of the season fall, but I’d be willing to bet that the geopolitical significance of that snow hasn’t crossed your mind. Today, we’ll be exploring winter’s impact on agriculture and global food security.
If you think of all the great agricultural zones in the world, most of them have a winter season. At face value, that might seem irrelevant, but the snow and moisture that winter brings serves as insulation for the ground and facilitates biological processes critical for agriculture.
Historically, regions with a cold winter season have been more conducive to growing crops capable of feeding large populations, such as soy, wheat, rice, and corn. However, the industrialization and development of fuels and fertilizers has enabled these crops to be grown in areas previously unsuitable for agriculture.
These advances gave way to increases in population and the cultivation of new lands, but is it sustainable? As soon as places like Brazil or China can no longer import the inputs necessary to grow enough crops to feed their populations, we’re in for a rude awakening…
Everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from snowy Colorado where in the last 18 hours, we’ve gotten 18 inches of snow, which means that this morning is a time for clearing and shoveling. But there is more to winter than shoveling and icicles are the her is also the fun and games that comes with agriculture. In fact, winter is arguably the single biggest factor for how our world got to be in the shape it is more or less the century and last century. The issue is that when winter hits, everything stops, and you have a layer of moisture that then insulates the ground. This is two things. Number one, it preserves a little bit moisture in there, and then we’ll get a little bit back in the spring. But more importantly, the thicker the snow, the greater the insulation. And so you actually still have biological processes going on under the surface, even right there in the topsoil. Basically, you’ve got organic material that is decaying, or as farmers like to call it the formation of free fertilizer. If you look at the map of the world’s agricultural zones, before roughly 1900, the pre industrial era, you’ll notice certain patterns, the American Midwest to a degree the American Piedmont Northern Europe, central Eurasia, the Rio de plata basin in South America, and the southeastern part of Australia, and South Africa. Oh, sorry, I forgot northern China as well. What are these areas all have in common? It’s cold, you get some snow. And so you get that recharge system there temperate climates where the free fertilizers kind of baked into the cake. If you go outside of those zones, pre 1900. It’s not that there’s not agriculture. But by definition, it’s almost not large scale, and most of the crops that feed most of humanity. So you’re talking about rice, soy, wheat, and corn. Those four crops grow best in those conditions, you move out of those zones, and you’re talking different crops, things like sweet potatoes or yams. And it’s not UK that you can’t support a population with those things. It’s that you can’t support a large population with those things. So they’re not nearly as amenable to row crop edge. It’s more subsistence farming as a rule. Now, that of course change right right around between 1900 1945 for some countries, and then between roughly 1990 and 1985. For the rest, what happened there was first the development and then the mass application of industrial level agricultural inputs, things like fuels and fertilizers, which allowed you to plant more traditional crops in zones that normally weren’t really great for it. In addition, those lower output crops per acre, if you started putting things like fertilizer, they would do a lot better. As a rule, the industrialization of agriculture had a bigger impact on marginal lands than it did on the prime lands, the prime lands still saw their output increased by 50% 250%. But it’s the marginal lands that saw tripling quadrupling, or even more. Now, something to keep in mind with all those secondary lands. If you’re talking about say a step where it’s just dry with our culture doesn’t nothing really happens. If you’re talking about the tropics, yes, you have a riot of growth, but the nutrients are consumed by that growth as soon as the growth rots. So if you clear the jungle on the rainforest, the soil that’s left behind is almost nutrient non existent. And without those industrial level inputs, you really can’t grow crops at scale in these zones. Now, because of industrialization of agriculture, we haven’t simply seen that the part of the world that humans cultivate expand by a factor of three, we seen the population expand by a factor of three as well. My concern is that we’re entering an era where the supply chains that allow those industrial inputs to function to exist, are going to break down. And for countries like China, or Brazil, who import the vast, vast, vast majority of those inputs, that means the ability to sustain post 1900 levels of population are going to be hugely hit. In the case of Brazil, they still have portions of the country that are still temperate. It’s not like they’re going to starve, but they’re no longer gonna be a massive agricultural exporter to places like Brazil. So for those of you who live in a place where you don’t have snow, yes, you get more time on the beach, and you don’t have to shuffle. But it also means the security of your food supply is decided by people in different climate zones with supply chains that are a continent away, that you have no ability to protect or even influence and the world we’re going into, that’s going to get a little rough
Related
Why interest rates will be higher for longer
At the start of 2024, the outlook for the U.S. economy was optimistic. Inflation was falling, unemployment was shrinking and the country was experiencing strong GDP growth. As 2024 progressed, that situation changed. Inflation proved stubborn, remaining above 3%, and economic output slowed down, making the Federal Reserve’s initial prediction for six rate cuts no…
20 hrs ago
How to handle plunging US birth rate before it’s too late
The latest CDC report on the U.S. birth rate reveals a decline in fertility rates, with 2023 seeing just 1.62 births per woman, marking the lowest level since data collection began in the 1930s. Births in the U.S. decreased for over a decade prior to the onset of COVID-19, and then experienced a 4% drop…
Yesterday
Japan must confront reality of military threats
The United States and Japan have been friendly since the aftermath of World War II, after which the U.S. committed around $38 billion (in 2024 dollars) to help rebuild its former enemy. Today, especially in light of the growing military threat from neighboring China, Japan is increasingly aligned with Western security alliances like AUKUS and…
Wednesday
US may need to find new sources of uranium
Russia is the world’s largest producer of enriched uranium, presenting a problem for U.S. supply chains as Western sanctions against Russia continue to escalate in response to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. In addition to uranium’s use in nuclear weapons, nuclear power provides around 20% of domestic American energy. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan explains…
Tuesday
China’s Fujian aircraft carrier is nothing to worry about
A number of U.S. commentators have raised alarms over China’s rapid construction of naval military vessels — and about China’s supposed ability to outproduce the United States in any long, protracted conflict. Recently, China unveiled a new aircraft supercarrier named the Fujian. These developments coincide with increasingly aggressive Chinese naval behavior. Straight Arrow News contributor…
Monday
Underreported stories from each side
Biden’s Israel weapons pause won’t dent Gaza protests, organizers say
15 sources | 11% from the left
USAF
World’s top climate scientists expect global heating to blast past 1.5C target
13 sources | 0% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
Chinese EV-maker Zeekr is coming to the US. Will Biden’s tariff hike stop it?
Watch 1:17
14 hrs ago
Anti-oil activists try to break into Magna Carta display
Watch 1:35
15 hrs ago
Charges dropped against 211 migrants who stormed border, DA appeals
Watch 1:30
15 hrs ago
Bumble founder: Future of dating could be one AI talking to another
Watch 2:39
15 hrs ago
VA school board votes to restore Confederate names changed in 2020
Watch 2:10
17 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Biden withholding weapons from Israel emboldens Hamas
21 hrs ago
Star Parker
Donald Trump has betrayed every conservative value
21 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Putin’s promise of a long war might be hollow threat
Yesterday
Leon Aron
Why the Trump family is missing from court appearances
Yesterday
Jordan Reid