Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hey, everyone. Peter Zeihan here coming to you from Colorado. The news on March 21 was all about how the Europeans are starting to seriously discuss the concept of a full ban on all Russian oil, natural gas, and refined product exports.
Now, this is still in progress. It’s probably not gonna happen this week because it requires a lot of countries that have been very hostile to the idea over the years of agreeing to go with it. But it’s time to start talking about what that looks like because it probably is inevitable, and it’ll almost certainly happen in April.
So first a little bit of background about how the Russian system works. When the Soviet Union broke up, they had a lot of big fields that were being tapped, not necessarily to generate the most money, but just because the Soviet system didn’t value efficiency.
We’ve heard that for, from time to time.
Anyway, everything went west. There were a series of pipelines that started in northwest Siberia, traced, southwest and west to eventually getting to three specific locations.
The first one is a major pipeline that goes through major pipeline system, which goes through Belarus and Ukraine and into Poland. And then on to Germany.
The second one is a pipe that terminates near St. Petersburg that finally came online in the post Cold War era at a place called Primorsk. So it’s on the Baltic Sea.
And the third one goes to a preexisting super port Novorossiysk, which is on the Black Sea.
So two Russian ports, one pipeline system. These are the ones that are to a degree interconnected because these pipeline networks trace not just through Siberia or Europe, but all the lands in between.
So this is what the Russians also use for their own internal distribution.
And during the Soviet times, that’s what they used for distribution into Belarus and Ukraine as well.
All of these are gonna get shut down. The ones, the pipes going to Poland and Germany, probably the first ones to go down because they’re either gonna be damaged in the war or Ukrainian partisans, are going to target a source of income. So that that’s gonna go away.
Novorossiysk on the Black Sea is a shallow water port. It can only take small shuttle tankers and anything that goes out then needs to go through the Turkish straits as well.
Well, the Turks have declared Russia, a belligerent because it is, and there’s a war on. And so insurance companies have been pulling insurance policies for any ships that try to go to Novorossiysk.
So the only ships that can go are those that can get a sovereign indemnification from another country.
So there are signs that the Chinese are trying to send a fleet of small tankers into this port in order to load them up. And then once they get through the Turkish Straits at sea, offload them from the small tankers to a super tanker, then can then make the transcontinental trip to China.
Up north on the Baltic Sea, in Primorsk, there’s not an insurance issue there. It’s a captain’s issue. Captains are refusing to dock at a Russian port, and then there are dock workers in Europe that are refusing to unload the cargo. So again, the Chinese are looking at potentially going there as well.
Now all of this is getting shut down because the Europeans, once they do a full sanctions package, so obviously the pipes they can shut off themselves.
But the EU working with NATO can shut down both the Danish straits and the Turkish straits and that blocks it. All, nothing can get in and out. The Turks may still be getting a little bit of oil from the Russians on the side. That might be the price of getting this deal in, but it is coming and that is four to five million barrels a day that’ll fall offline.
Now some people say, why don’t you just send it to China? I mean the Chinese, they’re not price sensitive. They’ll do anything. Well, there there’s an infrastructure issue.
First of all, what the Chinese are trying now is to load up at Primorsk and Novorossiysk and then within sight of NATO ports transfer this cargo from a small ship to a large ship. And just to assume that no one’s going to do anything about it. It’s one of the dumber things that I’ve heard, but apparently the Chinese are gonna try it.
Because right now Russian Euros blend is trading at a $30 discount to other global trades. So they’re thinking that it’s worth the risk.
And if they do get slapped down, it’s no big, no big loss.
The real problem is that those fields in northwest Siberia, all the pipeline, all the infrastructure goes to the west.
The fields that supply the Asian routes are not connected. So you’ve got a couple big ones. There’s some in the Ekusk area which supplies a pipeline that’s known as Espo, E S P O, which terminates near Vladivostok on the Pacific. And there’s a little spur line that goes down from that into Daking in northern China proper. And then you’ve got a Sakhalin project, which is this far eastern island, north of Japan, used to be Japanese territory before World War II, where there’s a couple of projects that send natural gas by pipe or by LNG to the wider world.
Now the problem that the Chinese and everyone are gonna have with these projects is that the Russians can’t operate any of them themselves.
These are all post Cold War developments. Companies like Shell and Exxon are on the Sakhalin projects, and services firms like Schlumberger and Halliburton are the only ones who, who can do the operations on shore that supply the Espo line. Well over the course of the war, they’ve all pulled out. In fact, Halliburton and Schlumberger just announced their withdrawal on March 18 and March 19. Whereas Exxon was one of the first out the door. So the Russians can’t keep this stuff going.
And linking the western infrastructure to the eastern infrastructure would require a series of pipelines that are longer in the distance from Anchorage, Alaska to Miami through largely virgin terrain.
That’s a 10-year project. That’s a $50 billion project minimum, assuming nothing else goes wrong.
So not only are we looking at a collapse in Russia’s ability to send crude west, we’re looking at a slower collapse in Russia’s ability to send its preexisting flows south to China, that’s going to weaken over time and don’t think that the Chinese can come in and take care of this for the Russians because the Chinese are even worse at oil tech than the Russians are.
So the outcome of this war so far is condemning the Chinese to get less product out of Russia as opposed to more product. Fun times. Okay. That’s it from me today until next time.
-
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Many Americans speculated about how a potential RFK, Jr. campaign might impact the 2024 elections. While RFK is neither a Democrat nor a Republican, many of his positions favor Donald Trump’s base over Joe Biden’s, particularly his various conspiracy theories on a wide range of subjects. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan says that GOP…
-
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
The seas above Russia’s northern coastline are too frozen for shipping, but some have wondered whether global warming might change that in the decades to come. If those seas were to become navigable for commercial shipping, new direct routes between Russia and China could theoretically open up. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan throws more…
-
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
The “shale revolution” has provided the United States with a bountiful domestic supply of oil. But extracting oil from shale is a highly technical process, and it is also dependent on specific geological formations. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan tackles the question of whether or not other nations might be able to replicate the…
-
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
A series of recent airstrikes between Israel and Iran inflamed fears of a wider regional war erupting in the Middle East. That concern now seems to have paid off, after third-party countries around the world successfully intervened and talked down military hardliners in both Israel and Iran in order to avoid such an outcome. Israel’s…
-
Global internet in a precarious state, but that could be a positive
Over 500 underwater cables span over 870,000 miles worldwide, serving as the foundation of the modern global internet. Despite their critical role in facilitating communication, these cables often go unnoticed, even as the amount of data transmitted through them has surged. So what happens if the cables fail? Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan contends…
Latest Stories
-
Biden uses NFL draft ad to try to connect with young voters
-
Powering pot: Energy for US cannabis industry could electrify 13.5M homes
-
Allies plan for Trump to have more control over interest rates
-
FDA: Bird flu found in 1/5 commercial milk samples, suggests greater spread
-
China permanently deploys warships to second overseas base
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistGlobal warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Take the job seriously’: Why Americans are fed up with Congress
‘If we can shrink it, it will stop growing’: Americans talk debt, deficit
‘I don’t think they care’: Undecided voters explain their reasons
Pete Ricketts
U.S. Senator for Nebraska