Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hey everyone. Hello from the woods of Georgia. Today I wanted to talk a little bit about the drones that the Russians have started using in the Ukraine War, specifically the ones that are imported from Iran. Now there’s three big takeaways here.
Number one, we’re now getting a front-row seat to find out just how collapsed the entire industrial base in the Russian system is. You know, this at one point was the second most powerful manufacturing power in the world at the height of the Soviet Empire in the 1960s. And now they are reliant upon what are basically flying mopeds from a country that has been under sanctions for 30 years and is a technological leader in nothing. It would be very easy in the west for us to retrofit a third-rate auto facility to produce things like this, and the Russians clearly cannot do it themselves. Not just not at scale, individually.
And when you look at some of their advanced weapons systems that we’ve all been hearing about for years, that at least on paper look really good, the Russians have had to handmake some of their new fighter bombers to the tune of one a year, because that’s all they can manage. So getting dozens and maybe even hundreds of drones from the Iranians all of a sudden is one of their more viable options for resupply. And that’s honestly, that’s kind of embarrassing. Second, the problems have a problem with leverage. Now, in the ongoing American-Iranian saga, I mean, the two sides don’t get along; they haven’t for a long time. But the Iranians have always kind of reserved the right to bring the Russians into the mix in order to disrupt things. And the Russians have always stuck their nose into relations between the Americans and the Iranians whenever it looks like the two of them might actually get along for a change in order to keep that alive.
All of a sudden it’s Iran that has all the leverage because yes, the Iranians are providing weapons to…a country that honestly, should not have a problem making these themselves. But the question is, how do you compensate the [Iran] for them? And the best guess from what we’ve seen so far is the Russians have promised to launch a satellite for Iran, which, you know, these drones go for about 20 grand a pop. So paying for a few dozen to a few hundred drones with a satellite launch to give Iran a fundamentally new capacity…wow, that is not an equitable trade. But it’s really all the Russians have on offer. I mean, what else are the Russians gonna send Iran, oil? Please.
Third and finally, there’s the question of war crimes. Now, the Iranian weapons are not very sophisticated. They can’t pick their own targets. They can’t dodge. You basically program in some coordinates and they take off. They fly at a relatively stable altitude, and they basically go in a straight line from the point of launch to the point of detonation. Which means that every single thing that the Russians hit was either something they were aiming for specifically, or something that just just happened to get in the way because it was too tall. So usually the former rather than the latter.
And because these things move so slowly – only about 60 to a hundred miles an hour – and because they’re so loud, then they can be downed by a small arms fire, the Russians have been launching them in groups of at least six, sometimes up to 20, just to make sure that at least one of them gets to the end location.
Look at the targets that the Russians have been choosing. Glass bridges, power plants, apartment blocks…things that are absolutely, 100 percent not military targets. That tells us two things. Number one, they’re not just deliberately committing war crimes, they’re programming those same coordinates in 5, 10, 20 times to make sure they hit the target, which is about as deliberate as war crimes can get. Second, there are almost no reports of the Russians targeting military targets. Now, military targets evolve. And so, in order to hit a building that has what you want, you need some intelligence. That’s probably why the Russians aren’t going after them, because they have none. Their satellite reconnaissance is not working, or at least it’s not being communicated to the people who are launching these assaults. They don’t have fighter or reconnaissance plane cover at all, and their drones aren’t good enough with optics and range to provide them with the basic information they need for military targeting. So all that’s left is civilian targeting.
Now, for the Ukrainians, this is the best and the worst of all worlds. The worst is obvious. What’s vulnerable are buildings that are of civilian make that…can’t move and that they’re the same thing every day. On the good side, it does mean that any logistical depot that the Ukrainians have are, I don’t wanna say immune to Russian assaults, but heavily resistant because the Russians are demonstrating they don’t have sufficient battlefield logistical intelligence to even provide some base targeting profiles. That would seem to suggest that at least for the remainder of this year and maybe into the first quarter of next year, that Ukraine absolutely has flipped the balance of forces when it comes to deep-strike options, despite the fact that it still doesn’t have nearly as much heavy equipment or aircraft as the Russians have. The Russians are just unable to leverage what they have, assuming it works at all.
For the Ukrainians, this is the best and worst of all worlds. The worst is obvious. Ukrainian buildings don’t move, Civilian assets don’t move. They don’t change day to day. So that’s what the Russians are capable of targeting. That’s what they’re going after. On the best, military equipment does move. What logistical depot or arms depot is important one day is not necessarily important the next. And that requires actual intelligence to provide the targeting coordinates that the other side needs in order to mess up your military operations. It is clear that the Russians lack the capacity to do that. So even though the Russians still have a lot more men and equipment with, uh, certainly a lot more men on the way, at least for the next few months, the Ukrainians actually have better deep strike capacity because they have eyes on the ground, either directly through their human operations or indirectly through the Americans. And when it comes down to making sure that every shot counts, that’s what you need. All right, that’s it for me. Until next time.
-
With globalization ending, the US can and should adapt
Geopolitical experts have cautioned that the era of globalization and “off-shoring” may be ending, and a new era of regionalization and “friend-shoring” might be replacing it. These changes are especially obvious in U.S.-Chinese trade relations over the past few years, although similar observations can be made around the world. Others warn that even “friend-shoring” may… -
Deglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Globalization has strengthened the interdependence of nations through trade in technology, services, and, most notably, food. It has reshaped the global agricultural system, improving both the variety and affordability of food while also influencing its quality and nutritional value. So what would happen to countries reliant on this system if the world became less interconnected?… -
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Wheat thrives in temperatures between 70°F and 75°F but has difficulty in temperatures above 90°F. So, what happens when climate change leads to rising heat that damages wheat crops and reduces yields? Models predict that by 2050, climate change will significantly lower global wheat production, particularly in Africa and South Asia, where food security is… -
Blue money for green energy in red states
President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funding, widely popular among Democrats, went mostly toward development projects in deep red Republican states, despite Republican legislators actually voting against the act. That may have generated some pushback and alarm from Democrats, but there are more complicated stories behind IRA numbers than the simple red-blue divide might suggest.… -
Tomorrow’s new world order
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States and its allies celebrated a new era of global hegemony. But in recent years, especially with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Chinese military aggression in the Pacific, that hegemony has come under attack. Meanwhile, major powers like France and Turkey are already preparing to play…
Latest Stories
-
Michigan’s first ‘I Voted’ sticker contest draws inspiration from folklore and more
-
IRS recovers $1.3B in unpaid taxes from high-income Americans
-
Rome considers timed ticket system for Trevi Fountain
-
NOAA says Vineyard Wind won’t kill sea life, issues permits for it to do just that
-
Trump campaign staffers involved in Arlington cemetery altercation identified
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistDeglobalization’s impact on world food exports
Will climate change be the death of wheat?
Blue money for green energy in red states
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Administration doesn’t care’: Jewish students on campus antisemitism
‘The prices on everything’: What keeps Americans up at night
‘Mean or extreme’: Americans discuss Harris and Trump