Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hey everyone. Hello from the woods of Georgia. Today I wanted to talk a little bit about the drones that the Russians have started using in the Ukraine War, specifically the ones that are imported from Iran. Now there’s three big takeaways here.
Number one, we’re now getting a front-row seat to find out just how collapsed the entire industrial base in the Russian system is. You know, this at one point was the second most powerful manufacturing power in the world at the height of the Soviet Empire in the 1960s. And now they are reliant upon what are basically flying mopeds from a country that has been under sanctions for 30 years and is a technological leader in nothing. It would be very easy in the west for us to retrofit a third-rate auto facility to produce things like this, and the Russians clearly cannot do it themselves. Not just not at scale, individually.
And when you look at some of their advanced weapons systems that we’ve all been hearing about for years, that at least on paper look really good, the Russians have had to handmake some of their new fighter bombers to the tune of one a year, because that’s all they can manage. So getting dozens and maybe even hundreds of drones from the Iranians all of a sudden is one of their more viable options for resupply. And that’s honestly, that’s kind of embarrassing. Second, the problems have a problem with leverage. Now, in the ongoing American-Iranian saga, I mean, the two sides don’t get along; they haven’t for a long time. But the Iranians have always kind of reserved the right to bring the Russians into the mix in order to disrupt things. And the Russians have always stuck their nose into relations between the Americans and the Iranians whenever it looks like the two of them might actually get along for a change in order to keep that alive.
All of a sudden it’s Iran that has all the leverage because yes, the Iranians are providing weapons to…a country that honestly, should not have a problem making these themselves. But the question is, how do you compensate the [Iran] for them? And the best guess from what we’ve seen so far is the Russians have promised to launch a satellite for Iran, which, you know, these drones go for about 20 grand a pop. So paying for a few dozen to a few hundred drones with a satellite launch to give Iran a fundamentally new capacity…wow, that is not an equitable trade. But it’s really all the Russians have on offer. I mean, what else are the Russians gonna send Iran, oil? Please.
Third and finally, there’s the question of war crimes. Now, the Iranian weapons are not very sophisticated. They can’t pick their own targets. They can’t dodge. You basically program in some coordinates and they take off. They fly at a relatively stable altitude, and they basically go in a straight line from the point of launch to the point of detonation. Which means that every single thing that the Russians hit was either something they were aiming for specifically, or something that just just happened to get in the way because it was too tall. So usually the former rather than the latter.
And because these things move so slowly – only about 60 to a hundred miles an hour – and because they’re so loud, then they can be downed by a small arms fire, the Russians have been launching them in groups of at least six, sometimes up to 20, just to make sure that at least one of them gets to the end location.
Look at the targets that the Russians have been choosing. Glass bridges, power plants, apartment blocks…things that are absolutely, 100 percent not military targets. That tells us two things. Number one, they’re not just deliberately committing war crimes, they’re programming those same coordinates in 5, 10, 20 times to make sure they hit the target, which is about as deliberate as war crimes can get. Second, there are almost no reports of the Russians targeting military targets. Now, military targets evolve. And so, in order to hit a building that has what you want, you need some intelligence. That’s probably why the Russians aren’t going after them, because they have none. Their satellite reconnaissance is not working, or at least it’s not being communicated to the people who are launching these assaults. They don’t have fighter or reconnaissance plane cover at all, and their drones aren’t good enough with optics and range to provide them with the basic information they need for military targeting. So all that’s left is civilian targeting.
Now, for the Ukrainians, this is the best and the worst of all worlds. The worst is obvious. What’s vulnerable are buildings that are of civilian make that…can’t move and that they’re the same thing every day. On the good side, it does mean that any logistical depot that the Ukrainians have are, I don’t wanna say immune to Russian assaults, but heavily resistant because the Russians are demonstrating they don’t have sufficient battlefield logistical intelligence to even provide some base targeting profiles. That would seem to suggest that at least for the remainder of this year and maybe into the first quarter of next year, that Ukraine absolutely has flipped the balance of forces when it comes to deep-strike options, despite the fact that it still doesn’t have nearly as much heavy equipment or aircraft as the Russians have. The Russians are just unable to leverage what they have, assuming it works at all.
For the Ukrainians, this is the best and worst of all worlds. The worst is obvious. Ukrainian buildings don’t move, Civilian assets don’t move. They don’t change day to day. So that’s what the Russians are capable of targeting. That’s what they’re going after. On the best, military equipment does move. What logistical depot or arms depot is important one day is not necessarily important the next. And that requires actual intelligence to provide the targeting coordinates that the other side needs in order to mess up your military operations. It is clear that the Russians lack the capacity to do that. So even though the Russians still have a lot more men and equipment with, uh, certainly a lot more men on the way, at least for the next few months, the Ukrainians actually have better deep strike capacity because they have eyes on the ground, either directly through their human operations or indirectly through the Americans. And when it comes down to making sure that every shot counts, that’s what you need. All right, that’s it for me. Until next time.
-
Japan’s navy gets an upgrade
Following their defeat in World War II, the people of Japan pursued a largely pacifist foreign policy. Today, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and with near-daily news regarding China’s threatening activities throughout the greater Pacific, the Japanese are reinvesting in military defense and reaffirming their alliances with Pacific partners like Australia and the United States.…
-
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Many Americans speculated about how a potential RFK, Jr. campaign might impact the 2024 elections. While RFK is neither a Democrat nor a Republican, many of his positions favor Donald Trump’s base over Joe Biden’s, particularly his various conspiracy theories on a wide range of subjects. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan says that GOP…
-
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
The seas above Russia’s northern coastline are too frozen for shipping, but some have wondered whether global warming might change that in the decades to come. If those seas were to become navigable for commercial shipping, new direct routes between Russia and China could theoretically open up. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan throws more…
-
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
The “shale revolution” has provided the United States with a bountiful domestic supply of oil. But extracting oil from shale is a highly technical process, and it is also dependent on specific geological formations. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan tackles the question of whether or not other nations might be able to replicate the…
-
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
A series of recent airstrikes between Israel and Iran inflamed fears of a wider regional war erupting in the Middle East. That concern now seems to have paid off, after third-party countries around the world successfully intervened and talked down military hardliners in both Israel and Iran in order to avoid such an outcome. Israel’s…
Latest Stories
-
USC commencement speakers pull out after valedictorian speech canceled
-
Ukraine retreats from villages as it waits for US aid to arrive
-
Texas Gov. Abbott warns migrants of alligators in Rio Grande
-
Study: 56 of leading brands responsible for more than 50% of plastic pollution
-
Musk visits Beijing as Tesla’s China-made cars clear data security hurdles
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistHow could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Take the job seriously’: Why Americans are fed up with Congress
‘If we can shrink it, it will stop growing’: Americans talk debt, deficit
‘I don’t think they care’: Undecided voters explain their reasons
Pete Ricketts
U.S. Senator for Nebraska