Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hey, everyone. Hello from my backyard. Not bad, is it? Any hoo, this story about the French and the Australians and the submarine sale — it’s just the gift that keeps on giving.
The Australians are now dealing with the fact that the French are trying to cancel, or at least delay, and the French have withdrawn their ambassadors from both Canberra and Washington, DC in protest.
Now, a couple of things from this, first of all, the French subscribe to a slightly different view of diplomacy, than the Anglos in general and the Americans in particular.
The Anglos and the Americans like to believe that all things are professional, all things can be separated, and we can use diplomacy to address issues point by point by point.
The French never had their political system completely ripped apart by the world war. So they subscribed to an older strategy where the nation and national prestige are interlinked with economic and security and intelligence issues, and they all go together. And what is right for the nation or for France is different from what is right for everyone else. And this allows the French in their mind to do things that other countries shouldn’t do.
So, for example, back in the 1980s, a counter-intelligence ring in the United States discovered that the French were spying on American companies to seal corporate secrets. And when confronted, the French were appalled, not that they were caught. They were appalled that the Americans were spying on them, spying on us. And that was a no go. Anyway, the point being this, this is a position that is practically Russian or Trumpian or, or even Chinese, but it’s old school. It doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
It’s just that it’s different. And it’s not something that kind of meshes with the way that we see diplomacy.
Second, the French, honestly, shouldn’t be surprised that the submarine deal fell through, and it’s all about geography. So the first issue, the most important issue for the French writ large are the relations to the east with Germany. Second, the relations with the Brits. Third with Spain and Portugal, fourth with Northwest Africa, fifth with Eastern Mediterranean, specifically the Turks, sixth with the Egyptians and Suez, seventh with the Persian Gulf.
Only if they have all those ducks road up can they then penetrate into the Indian Ocean.
And there has not been a period where the French have had to do that in an era of Indian independence.
And it’s not clear that the French have the political, diplomatic, and military power necessary to penetrate into the Indian Ocean basin.
If they are successful, then eighth, they go into Southeast Asia where they have a bit of a colonial legacy, but it’s a very hostile one.
Unlike the Brits who have reasonably passably friendly relations with many of their former colonies because they built educational infrastructure and physical infrastructure, the French treated their colonies as either a dumping ground or something to put a straw into and suck all the good parts out.
So, you know, they can’t just go into Vietnam and expect a warm welcome. Only then can, ninth, they start to penetrate in the Pacific basin.
So any sort of long-term deal to provide the Australians with military hardware is by definition dependent upon the Americans keeping that entire stretch all the way from Marseille to Darwin free and open for French commerce.
That’s a bit of a risk if you’re Australian, and if you’re French, you know better.
Now, the French are still going to be upset. There’s no way around that.
This is a tens of billions of dollar deal, and that’s just human psychology. If something that is known to you, something you have is denied, you get pissed off. But if you catch a Hail Mary, and then that is taken away from you, you get furious because all of a sudden this windfall is gone and that’s exactly what’s going on here.
So the French are going to be upset. They are going to throw a fit. They are going to be a little insufferable. They’re going to be French. But at the end of the day, American and French interests in Europe, broadly line up, and Australian and French interests in the Pacific have nothing to do with one another. So this too will pass. Until next time.
-
Is the US looking for a war?
With conflicts, skirmishes and tensions simmering around the globe, and with the United States playing supporting roles in several of them, the question of whether the country getting involved directly is legitimate. The war in Ukraine, for example, has forced several European countries to reintroduce mandatory military service to confront the growing threat from Moscow.…
-
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed a joint meeting of Congress on July 24, calling for increased bipartisan support for Israel amid its 10-month war with Hamas. He praised President Biden’s “half century of friendship to Israel” and referred to Hamas as “sheer evil.” In the video above, Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan analyzes…
-
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Ursula von der Leyen has been reelected to another five-year term as president of the European Commission after a vote by EU lawmakers. Von der Leyen will now preside over a coalition that shifted to the right after recent European elections, where ultra-conservative parties won a record number of seats. In July, von der Leyen…
-
Protests in Bangladesh signal more trouble ahead
Public protests in Bangladesh against government hiring practices — and against the government’s military response to those protests — have left at least 174 dead and 2,500 jailed. Bangladesh’s people face an acute jobs and unemployment crisis, so public disagreements over hiring practices carry significant weight. The regime recently enforced a nationwide internet blackout as…
-
In US election, early polling doesn’t tell us anything yet
From President Joe Biden’s declining health to the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, there’s been a series of major political developments in the United States that might impact the results of the November election. These developments have led to renewed confusion, concern and debate regarding which candidate might win, and in the Democrats’ case, which…
Latest Stories
-
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
-
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
-
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
-
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
-
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistHow future generations could shift US support for Israel
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Protests in Bangladesh signal more trouble ahead
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘I don’t know’: Swing voters debate who best to replace Biden
‘Mad as hell’: Americans vent anger, frustration over politics
‘On death’s door’: Undecided voters react to first debate