The future of US electricity includes fossil fuels and green energy


In the recently passed bipartisan debt ceiling bill, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) successfully included his controversial Mountain Valley Pipeline, angering environmental groups. Many Democrats argue the pipeline, designed to transport methane gas across West Virginia and Virginia, will lock in more years of fossil-fuel dependency for the country.

Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan suggests a balanced approach, combining renewable energy and fossil fuels, as the key to building a successful electricity infrastructure for the nation.

Excerpted from Peter’s June 23 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

Democrat Joe Manchin managed to sneak a few clauses into the debt ceiling extension deal for the completion of his Mountain Valley Pipeline. Environmentalists are pissed, and fossil fuel lovers gave Manchin a double thumbs up. So who’s right and who’s wrong?

For those who think wind and solar are the future and there’s no use case for fossil fuels, you might want to check the math. For wind and solar to be viable, they need a complimentary energy source…and natural gas is the best option.

For those natural gas lovers who think green energy can only work with massive subsidies, your math needs some checking too. In the right geographies, solar and wind are the cheapest energy option on an hour-by-hour basis.

While the Mountain Valley Pipeline might seem to benefit only one side of the aisle, Manchin moved us one step closer to the inevitable future of American energy. It’s not green. It’s not fossil fuels. It’s both. And I’m okay with that.