Skip to main content



Trump has no chance of winning general election

Jan 9


As the presidential general election approaches, and with Republicans in the House and Senate at odds over several issues, uncertainty surrounds former President Donald Trump’s chances of securing a second term. Despite facing two impeachments and numerous criminal indictments, there is a genuine possibility of Trump returning to the White House. But skepticism persists within Republican circles, with some asserting that Trump’s political standing may be too tarnished for a successful return to the presidency.

Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan sheds light on the challenges surrounding Trump’s path to victory in the general election. Zeihan attributes those challenges to the complexities of the American electoral system and a fractured Republican coalition.

Excerpted from Peter’s Jan. 9 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

If you watched yesterday’s video, then you already know that Donald Trump has no shot at winning the general election (assuming he’s not DQ’d or in jail). Today, we’re looking at WHY Trump can’t get elected.

The U.S. electoral system encourages two big-tent parties, comprised of various factions that rise and fall throughout the years. What the Republicans lack in numbers, they make up for in consistency and lack of conflict in the party (at least, they used to). The Democrats have the numbers but are incredibly inconsistent at the polls, and they fight like teenagers amid the “big change.”

Trump has introduced some unprecedented conflict into the Republican Party, and we’re seeing internal divisions among factions that have been historically aligned. With this Democratic-style conflict filtering its way through the Republican Party, the numbers just won’t work for Trump…and that’s before we even discuss independent voters.

Everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from the winter wonderland that is snowy Colorado. Today we’re talking about why Donald Trump has no chance of winning the general election, assuming he’s not disqualified assuming he’s not in jail. Okay, so you have to look at the way our electoral system works, we have a first past the post single member district system, which is a fancy way of saying that you vote for one person who is representing a very distinct geographic area. It’s not like the Netherlands, where you vote for a party, you’re voting for one specific person. And what that does is it encourages our parties to further to only be two of them, and for them to be very big tent parties, because they need to get that marginal vote more than whoever is running on the other side. It’s all about numbers of votes. It’s one of the reasons why whenever we do get a third or fourth party, they never last for more than one or two political cycles. And then other parties fall out, we go back to the two. I’m not saying that can’t happen this time around. But it’s getting really late in the day for like this election, maybe the next one. Anyway, first pass the post. So if you’re gonna have a big tent party, that means you’re gonna have a lot of power centers, a lot of factions within each party. And those factions are going to rise and fall in political power as technology and geopolitics. And social issues evolve. And we’ve certainly seen that the last 30 years, we’ve had hyperglobalisation, that we now have D globalization, we’ve had the rise of the information economy, and now social media, we’ve had the baby boomers being the prime to the baby boomers now retiring in mass, we are going through one of these transitions. So it’s really important to understand where all the factions are, especially as related to each other, either in their own political party. So for example, Republicans versus Democrats, the Republicans have always had a numerical disadvantage, because they just don’t have as many voters, they don’t have as many factions, you’ve got the pro lifers, the military voters, the law and order voters, business voters, for example. And the reason that this faction, despite having fewer numbers, and the Democrats has always done relatively well, is because their issues in play typically don’t clash. The Pro lifers really don’t care about business regulation, the business community really doesn’t care about military policy, and so on. So you have a smaller coalition, but a very solid Coalition, a very reliable coalition, and everybody shows up to vote every time. And so even though they don’t have as many members, you know, what you’re going to get in each electoral cycle. And if you can pull a few independents, you’re good to go. The Democrats have a different sort of system, they’ve thrown a very, very wide net, indeed. And I’m oversimplifying here a little bit, but they basically have a three part coalition, minorities, coastal, highly educated elites, and organized labor. And the problem with that coalition is when you start running on the issues and talking about the specifics of policy during the campaign, it’s very difficult to have anything that all three of those factions agree upon. So for example, those coastal educated elites, in order to get rid of racism, they started coming up with new terms to call people which, you know, we usually call racist, but whatever. Anyway, Latin x is my personal favorite, has no roots in any Latin culture, and something like 97% of Hispanics find it either pointless or a little offensive, but they tried to push it anyway. And so you got to split on social issues. Among those two groups. Another great example is the Green Revolution, which obviously the coastal educated folks are really big on. But the unions are not so much, because most of those jobs are not going to be unionized. So whenever you get a candidate, who is a little brainy and who runs on the issue, someone like Michael Dukakis, or Hillary Clinton, you know, tries to make practical pledges during the campaign, you’re going to start to enter nicing fight, and they’re gonna have entire chunks of the Democratic electorate that just don’t show up at all. And it’s very hard to win that way. What they need to win is a charismatic candidate who doesn’t really talk about anything real at all. And that’s why Barack Obama did so well. So this is the dyad that we have been facing for the last 3040 5060 70 years. Now, under normal circumstances, the Republicans have an advantage here, because there are very few issues that are wedge issues within their own coalition. But what Donald Trump has done is shaken up the race and introduced a number of wedge issues, not just across society, but across the Republican electorate. And we now have any number of candidates who are I don’t know if seeing if they’re in Trump’s pocket. Is that how about in Trump’s quarter? There we go. That really break up the decision making process for voters. So my personal favorite or guy love to hate the most was Tommy Tuberville, who for months this year prevented military Her motions in order to get his way on abortion policy. Those are two factions, military voters and abortion voters who never had anything to fight about before and all of a sudden they’re at each other’s necks. He’s shoveled, Trump has driven the business community out of the coalition, because he basically doesn’t like it when people tell him no, or when they say yes, but Mr. President, he wanted the adoration that was it. And so you have the business community that is now completely alienated from the social conservative voters and instance sort of environment, the Republicans are facing a democratic style cohesion test. The problem here is that the Republicans don’t have as many voters, as the Democrats. And even if they pass the cohesion test, then they have to deal with all the other things that Donald Trump brings to the table. So they’re not going to have their entire coalition showing up if Donald Trump becomes the candidate. And that means just on the numbers, there’s no way that Donald Trump can win. And that’s before you consider the independence. We’re gonna do that in a different video.

Video Library

Latest Commentary

We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.

The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Latest Opinions

In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.

The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Weekly Voices

Left Opinion Right Opinion


Left Opinion Right Opinion


Left Opinion Right Opinion


Left Opinion Right Opinion


Left Opinion Right Opinion

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.