![Russia is unlikely to resort to chemical warfare in Ukraine because those types of weapon are too hard and too costly to implement.](https://san.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/we-can-stop-worrying-about-russia-using-chemical-warfare.png?w=1920)
Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Everyone, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from just below is Isberg Pass on the border between the Ansel Adams Wilderness and Yosemite National Park. I’m on the Yosemite side. Back behind me…that is the head of what used to be the Merced Glacier. I’ve always liked this part of the park because it has some fascinating geology and almost no one comes here. Isberg is the least visited of the major passes.
Anywhoo, today is day four of my backpacking trip. And all of those of you who backpack semi-regularly know what day four means – it means fresh socks. And so on that topic, I thought today would be a great time to talk about chemical and biological warfare. Now, despite all of the concerns that we have had for the last several decades about weapons of mass destruction getting in the wrong hands,
I don’t mean to suggest that it’s a non concern, but it’s a relatively low concern. As the superpowers both discovered during the Cold War, chemical weapons are hard. It’s not so much the chemistry, it’s the delivery and dispersion. Because if it takes like a 100th of a gram of something to kill you, and you can put a few kilos into an artillery shell…but then you have to deal with simple atmospherics. And as they used to say in the 1980s, the solution to pollution is dilution.
And so you really need, if you want high casualty counts with chemical weapons, to disperse it in an area that is contained like a building. And all of a sudden you’re talking about a multibillion, really multi-hundred billion dollar project to kill what is in essence just a few 100 people – and if someone is smart enough to turn off the AC system, not even that. So it’s no surprise to me that conventions on chemical weapons actually passed and were adopted, were being implemented during the Cold War. Because they’re just not very effective at a battlefield weapon or even as a mass casualty weapon. There is a little wind here. I’m using my fancy microphone, and if that’s a problem, you can just skip to the next video, which will be even windier.
Anyhoo, that is chemical. Let’s talk biological. In many ways, everything that is difficult about chemical is also true for biological, it is very, very expensive to do and delivering the bug is very, very difficult. Because it’s not like most pathogens can just be released in the air and then they’ll do their thing and kill a lot of people. Excuse me, high elevation is going to my head. It’s…the bugs themselves are incredibly, incredibly non-viable in most environments. So now you’re talking tailored bugs for specific climates and elevations. And so the cost just keeps going up. And then of course, you still have the same delivery and dispersion problem that you have with chemicals. So as a rule biologicals cost more and achieve less.
Now, there are a couple of exceptions to these general rules, and really comes down to fear and terror attacks. If a terror group were able to get a hold of some of this stuff, they don’t really care what the economics of it are, because they’re not the ones who developed it. They…it would be a use it and lose it. But again, you’re talking about very, very low case counts and even lower casualty counts. The one possible exception is when you have a certain former superpower who likes to use chemical and biological agents as a assassination weapon. And there’s really nothing we can do about that.
Now we’re talking single digit number of people that the Russians have killed that way. So should you be concerned. You probably should reserve your caution for something that has a lot more likelihood of happening, like being killed by a vending machine. Okay, that’s it from me. Tomorrow is day five. Day five is a very exciting day for backpackers because that’s the day we get new underwear. No, we don’t. Until next time.
-
Is the US looking for a war?
With conflicts, skirmishes and tensions simmering around the globe, and with the United States playing supporting roles in several of them, the question of whether the country getting involved directly is legitimate. The war in Ukraine, for example, has forced several European countries to reintroduce mandatory military service to confront the growing threat from Moscow.…
-
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed a joint meeting of Congress on July 24, calling for increased bipartisan support for Israel amid its 10-month war with Hamas. He praised President Biden’s “half century of friendship to Israel” and referred to Hamas as “sheer evil.” In the video above, Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan analyzes…
-
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Ursula von der Leyen has been reelected to another five-year term as president of the European Commission after a vote by EU lawmakers. Von der Leyen will now preside over a coalition that shifted to the right after recent European elections, where ultra-conservative parties won a record number of seats. In July, von der Leyen…
-
Protests in Bangladesh signal more trouble ahead
Public protests in Bangladesh against government hiring practices — and against the government’s military response to those protests — have left at least 174 dead and 2,500 jailed. Bangladesh’s people face an acute jobs and unemployment crisis, so public disagreements over hiring practices carry significant weight. The regime recently enforced a nationwide internet blackout as…
-
In US election, early polling doesn’t tell us anything yet
From President Joe Biden’s declining health to the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, there’s been a series of major political developments in the United States that might impact the results of the November election. These developments have led to renewed confusion, concern and debate regarding which candidate might win, and in the Democrats’ case, which…
Latest Stories
-
U.S. Department of Defense
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
-
DVIDS
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
-
Getty Images
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
-
Getty Images
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
-
Getty Images
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistHow future generations could shift US support for Israel
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Protests in Bangladesh signal more trouble ahead
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘I don’t know’: Swing voters debate who best to replace Biden
‘Mad as hell’: Americans vent anger, frustration over politics
‘On death’s door’: Undecided voters react to first debate