Skip to main content

Peter Zeihan

Geopolitical Strategist

Share
Commentary

What happened to the arms control treaties?

Sep 18, 2023

Share

Peter Zeihan

Geopolitical Strategist

Share

Mounting U.S. concerns over a potential Russian-North Korean arms deal has provoked a more comprehensive review of global arms control agreements. Key agreements were already disintegrating for several years before the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine took them off the table entirely.

Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan reminds readers that these deals matter perhaps more today than they have in the past, especially as Putin might attempt to use nuclear weapons to compensate for Russian conventional force weaknesses.

Excerpted from Peter’s Sept. 18 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

Towards the end of the Soviet period, arms control treaties with the U.S. peaked under Gorbachev, but each U.S. president has handled these differently. Treaties fell off under Clinton, had a bit of a resurgence under George W. Bush, and have since fallen off. Today, the post-Cold War arms treaties have all but vanished (at least in practice).

Now, onto the really stressful stuff — cue the second glass of whiskey. Without these treaties, several concerns arise… can Russia maintain its nuclear arsenal? What happens if things go nuclear? What if they launch a nuclear weapon and it fails?

There are too many moral and strategic dilemmas to even think through, but we should probably have some sort of roadmap to guide us through these scenarios. Unfortunately, policymakers have no established procedures for specific situations like a failed nuclear strike attempt, which is quite a conundrum.

Hey, everybody, Peter Zion here still in Arizona. Last Friday, we talked about the pending deal for weapons transfers between North Korea and Russia, with the Russians getting North Korean artillery and most likely the North Koreans getting Russian launch technology, probably long range missiles. I thought it might be worth to do a little walk down memory lane today about arms control. most meaningful arms control that the United States has participated in it. The shape the world was between the Americans and the Soviets at the end of the Soviet period under Gorbachev, things like the anti ballistic missile treaty, the start and the assault treaties and such. They hit their height under George Herbert Walker Bush, which under that administration, and then Gorbachev slash Yeltsin negotiated down the ceiling for nuclear weapons from 30,000 to under 6000, roughly 6000. And then things kind of stalled. Under the Clinton administration, Clinton saw himself as a domestic President really was not interested in foreign affairs much at all. And after it became apparent that Yeltsin was, well, let’s just call them mildly corrupt. The desire to be affiliated with the Yeltsin government was relatively thin anyway. Al Gore kinda was subcontracted out to handle foreign affairs. But once Clinton got involved in domestic scandals involving interns, pretty much all foreign policy just kind of melted away. And so we didn’t have much progress under that administration, the W administration came in and hit it off fairly well with Vladimir Putin in the early days. In fact, many things that the United States did, the global war on terror in Central Asia wouldn’t have been possible without a partnership with the Russians. And under that sort of environment, there was a bit of a renaissance and relations and there was another phase two arms control which negotiated down the level level. Further. It wasn’t perfect, because the net level went from roughly six to 7000, down about 1500. But the missiles I’m sorry, the warheads in between weren’t necessarily destroyed. They were simply removed and stored separately. Still better than being on the hair trigger. But it wasn’t perfect. Under Obama, Obama didn’t like to leave the Oval Office unless it was for the campaign trail and nothing happened under Trump. What was left of the treaties kind of fell apart as the Russians fell into this narcissistic fascism that they’re in today. And then obviously, under Biden relations of 10 torpedo completely because the Russians are on a genocidal war path. Where this leaves us is that the Cold War post cold war treaties for all intensive purposes are gone. as of a few years ago, no one was really abiding by them. And now everyone’s pretty much officially withdrawn from them, about the brightest spot we’ve gotten that is that the Russians very clearly are having industrial issues in maintaining their conventional weapons. It’s an open question whether or not they’re capable of maintaining their nucular weapons. Now. This puts the Biden administration really all administrations for countries that have nukes, which includes the French, and the British as well, and kind of an awkward spot, we now need to entertain scenarios where the Russians would actually be willing to hit the big red candy button. They probably wouldn’t do it unless regular Ukrainian or god forbid, NATO forces crossed the international recognized board into Russia proper, which case would be defensive use. Or if the Russians do manage to subdue Ukraine, that doesn’t really solve their security issues, they have to continue on into Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland in order to narrow the apertures of approach for foreign forces to Russia, Russian lands, that’s what this has always been about. But we now know that Russian forces are kind of hot crap. And in that scenario, where they’d face off against NATO regular forces, they’d probably be obliterated casualty ratios would be extreme on the Russian side, and that would only leave them with nukes in order to compensate. Which is one of the reasons why that’s the primary reason why Washington, London, Berlin, Paris, and the rest have been so gung ho in helping Ukraine in order to forestall that possibility. But it also raises what could potentially be the nightmare scenario. We know that the Russians are having problems maintaining everything. And we know the Russians have lacked the industrial capacity to build new stuff. So everything they have is old in the case of these missiles, things that were built in the 70s in many cases. So what happens if Putin hits that big button, and nothing happens? What do you do to someone who just tried to kill a half a billion people but failed? No criticism of the Biden ministration here that’s a tough call that no one has ever faced when they’re sitting in the big chair before. It’s not done. destined to happen. But I would say from an arms control slash nucular point of view, that is my single biggest concern right now, what do you do when the intent is there, when all the pieces are there, but on the day that you hit the button, it just doesn’t happen to work because you know, they’re going to hit that button again, again, again, again, again very, very quickly. And we no longer have the procedures in place to try to defuse that situation, largely because the Russians have ended them. So if you want to stress about something, I give you permission to stress about that. Take care

Video Library

Latest Commentary

We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.

The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.


Latest Opinions

In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.

The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Weekly Voices

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Tuesday

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Wednesday

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Thursday

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Friday

Left Opinion Right Opinion