Skip to main content
Commentary

Why I don’t care about the fallen bridge in Baltimore

Apr 1

Share

A substantial cleanup effort is underway to clear the wreckage caused by a cargo ship losing power and colliding with one of the pillars supporting the Key Bridge in the Baltimore Harbor. The Maryland governor’s office has confirmed that the cleanup operation at the site will run continuously, and President Biden has emphasized the critical importance of the bridge.

Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan explains why he believes that, despite the significance of water transport in the developed world, the temporary closure of one of America’s foremost ports will not severely impact the nation’s shipping industry.

Excerpted from Peter’s April 1 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

At this point, we’ve all heard about the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsing in Baltimore on March 26. While it may seem like this should drastically impact American shipping, I’m really not worried about it…

Before this catastrophe, I was convinced that the Jones Act hadn’t done anything good for America. However, I can now say that the Jones Act has one redeeming quality — since cargo transport on American waterways has drastically fallen since the Jones Act was introduced, the fallout of this bridge collapse won’t be as bad as it could have been. That’s a positive, right?

In a world without the Jones Act, natural port systems like the Chesapeake Bay would be teeming with manufacturing and short-haul shipping. I’m not convinced the prevention of some immediate disruptions is worth utterly stifling economic growth, but hey, I’ll let the policymakers come to their own conclusions.

Hey everybody, Peter Zion here come to you from Colorado. Several of you have written into the ask Peter forum asking why I haven’t had anything to say about the falling of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, back on the 26th of March. The idea is, you know, this is controlling the mouth of the Chesapeake. And shouldn’t this be a big issue? Considering how gung ho I am about water transport? It’s about 1/12 The cost of things by water that it takes to move them by truck. And so you would think that seeing an interruption of one of America’s greatest ports would be a problem. It’s should it really should, but it’s not. So let me give you the backstory. First of all, the Chesapeake is the world’s greatest natural port system. It has more miles of frontage that can be used for ports than any other part of the world, with the possible exception of the Texas coast. And even that’s a tight race. It’s in the mid Atlantic. So it’s the midpoint going north south on the American east coast for the parts that are densely populated from roughly Atlanta called whipped Boston. And it has access to what used to be the national roads for the Cumberland Gap getting into the Ohio River Valley. So it should should should be a crossroads of the greatest manufacturing zone on the planet. It is not because of something called the Jones Act, which was a program passed in 1920. That was designed to keep jobs within the American system. That says that any maritime Vehicle Any ship that transport any goods between any two American ports must be American built, owned, captained and crude. And as a result of having that restriction on maritime transport, but not on truck transport, or air transport, or rail transport, people stopped using the riverways completely. And we’ve seen cargo on America’s waterways dropped by over 99% in the century since. And so we’ve taken what is honestly the greatest natural gift that God could have possibly given to any culture and destroyed it. The United States has roughly 3000 miles of naturally navigable interconnected waterways, and we hardly use them at all anymore, we certainly don’t use them with small ships, we should should, should should should have 1000s of tiny ships, carrying a handful of containers here and there throughout the system, making our own multimodal manufacturing system that is the world’s most efficient. Instead, we move half of our cargo by truck, which is the most expensive way to do it, which it shouldn’t work because we removed the cheapest way of doing it. And then other stuff by rail. Well, because of this, our waterway networks including the Chesapeake Bay are barely used. And places like the Ohio River Valley and the Great Lakes system, which should be the busiest zones in the world are barely use. So we should have this rough Pentagon of territory going from roughly Buffalo, New York, to Duluth, Minnesota, to St. Louis, Missouri, to Pittsburgh, and then with an arc going down to Baltimore, that is the busiest section of waterways and the biggest manufacturing zone in the world, instead of the Rust Belt. There are many things that have caused the steel belt to become the Rust Belt. But I would argue that the Jones Act is the single biggest factor because it raised the cost of transport among these systems, and basically drove the business somewhere else. So this should the downing of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, this should be a really big deal. And stead The only thing it does is interrupt a few cargo shipments coming in container shipments, which can easily be rerouted to places like New Jersey or Savannah, as well as some internal petroleum fuel distribution systems within the Chesapeake Bay itself. It’s not that these are non issues, but these are like minor rounding errors considering how catastrophic event this should have been. If we had gone the other direction, we’d have an extra $10 trillion on the US economy right now most of that in manufacturing most of it in this zone, and then it would have been a very big deal. So I guess from a certain point of view, the Jones Act has saved us from problems by gutting our economic growth for the last century, the part of the United States that has suffered the most are those countries in the Midwest, that border both the Great Lakes and the Ohio River Valley so specifically Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois because these are the ones that should be at the heart of all of this and they can’t participate in almost any of it.

Video Library

Latest Commentary

We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.

The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.


Latest Opinions

In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.

The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Weekly Voices

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Monday

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Tuesday

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Wednesday

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Thursday

Left Opinion Right Opinion

Friday

Left Opinion Right Opinion