College tuitions are insanely high. They’re so high, in fact, that almost nobody pays sticker price. Only 1/4 of students at private universities pay full tuition. And even at public universities, most students get financial aid. That’s why it’s disturbing that the federal government’s brand new financial aid formula explicitly and intentionally shortchanges families with more than one child in college. It’s a direct attack on families, and it’s Congress’s fault. The central figure in the world of financial aid is Uncle Sam. The U.S. Department of Education publishes the FAFSA form, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, and sets a formula that calculates a family’s ability to pay, and thus their financial need. This formula determines federal aid, such as Pell grants and subsidized student loans. Many private colleges also rely on this formula in doling out their own aid. For dependent students, college kids whose parents can help them pay for college, FAFSA asks for the parents’ assets, basically their savings and checking accounts, and their income. Looking at a family’s income and cash, the education department calculates a family’s ability to pay tuition.
According to the federal formula, a family earning $100,000 and sitting on $25,000 in savings can afford about $32,000 a year in tuition. What if their family has multiple kids in college? For years, the federal government did the sensible thing. They divided the $32,000 by the number of kids in college. But Congress just changed that. As of 2024, a family deemed capable of affording $32,000 in college tuition is now expected to pay $32,000 per student in college. That is, the Education Department expects them to pay double what the Education Department says they can afford to pay. How did this happen?
Back in 2019, Senators Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray wrote a bill to simplify the FAFSA form and tweak its formula. In 2020, as part of a massive spending bill, Congress passed the FAFSA reform, and Donald Trump signed it into law. The Education Department implemented the new system, effective January 1, 2024. And now the “sibling discount” is gone. But it was never a sibling discount. It was always just a sibling count. The logic of the new law is that only one child per family gets financial aid. And if you were dumb enough to have two kids within four years, well, that’s your problem. It makes no sense unless the policy of the federal government is that nobody should have more than one child, or that only the oldest should go to college, or maybe that all children should be spaced four years apart. Congress can, of course, repeal this one child policy in the FAFSA formula. The question is whether Congress can be made to care.
Related
Timothy Carney
Timothy Carney, Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
College just got much pricier for American families
Jan 11
By Straight Arrow News
American colleges and universities are among the very best in the world. They are also notoriously expensive, with many graduates working for decades to pay back their college loans. But for many new students and parents hoping to help their children pay for college, tuition just became even more expensive, thanks to a new federal student loan policy that went into effect on Jan. 1, 2024.
Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney reviews how the new policy impacts American families and considers what it might mean for their financial planning.
College tuitions are insanely high. They’re so high, in fact, that almost nobody pays sticker price. Only 1/4 of students at private universities pay full tuition. And even at public universities, most students get financial aid. That’s why it’s disturbing that the federal government’s brand new financial aid formula explicitly and intentionally shortchanges families with more than one child in college. It’s a direct attack on families, and it’s Congress’s fault. The central figure in the world of financial aid is Uncle Sam.
The U.S. Department of Education publishes the FAFSA form, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, and sets a formula that calculates a family’s ability to pay and, thus, their financial need. This formula determines federal aid, such as Pell grants and subsidized student loans. Many private colleges also rely on this formula in doling out their own aid. For dependent students, college kids whose parents can help them pay for college, FAFSA asks for the parents’ assets, basically their savings and checking accounts, and their income. Looking at a family’s income and cash, the education department calculates a family’s ability to pay tuition.
According to the federal formula, a family earning $100,000 and sitting on $25,000 in savings can afford about $32,000 a year in tuition. What if their family has multiple kids in college? For years, the federal government did the sensible thing. They divided the $32,000 by the number of kids in college. But Congress just changed that. As of 2024, a family deemed capable of affording $32,000 in college tuition is now expected to pay $32,000 per student in college. That is, the Education Department expects them to pay double what the Education Department says they can afford to pay. How did this happen?
College tuitions are insanely high. They’re so high, in fact, that almost nobody pays sticker price. Only 1/4 of students at private universities pay full tuition. And even at public universities, most students get financial aid. That’s why it’s disturbing that the federal government’s brand new financial aid formula explicitly and intentionally shortchanges families with more than one child in college. It’s a direct attack on families, and it’s Congress’s fault. The central figure in the world of financial aid is Uncle Sam. The U.S. Department of Education publishes the FAFSA form, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, and sets a formula that calculates a family’s ability to pay, and thus their financial need. This formula determines federal aid, such as Pell grants and subsidized student loans. Many private colleges also rely on this formula in doling out their own aid. For dependent students, college kids whose parents can help them pay for college, FAFSA asks for the parents’ assets, basically their savings and checking accounts, and their income. Looking at a family’s income and cash, the education department calculates a family’s ability to pay tuition.
According to the federal formula, a family earning $100,000 and sitting on $25,000 in savings can afford about $32,000 a year in tuition. What if their family has multiple kids in college? For years, the federal government did the sensible thing. They divided the $32,000 by the number of kids in college. But Congress just changed that. As of 2024, a family deemed capable of affording $32,000 in college tuition is now expected to pay $32,000 per student in college. That is, the Education Department expects them to pay double what the Education Department says they can afford to pay. How did this happen?
Back in 2019, Senators Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray wrote a bill to simplify the FAFSA form and tweak its formula. In 2020, as part of a massive spending bill, Congress passed the FAFSA reform, and Donald Trump signed it into law. The Education Department implemented the new system, effective January 1, 2024. And now the “sibling discount” is gone. But it was never a sibling discount. It was always just a sibling count. The logic of the new law is that only one child per family gets financial aid. And if you were dumb enough to have two kids within four years, well, that’s your problem. It makes no sense unless the policy of the federal government is that nobody should have more than one child, or that only the oldest should go to college, or maybe that all children should be spaced four years apart. Congress can, of course, repeal this one child policy in the FAFSA formula. The question is whether Congress can be made to care.
Related
Subsidizing demand won’t fix real problems
The Biden administration recently announced an initiative to cap child care copay expenses for approximately 100,000 low-income working families in the United States. Instead of paying set fees, those families will pay 7% of whatever their total income is as a copay for the government-subsidized daycare program. The program also hopes to fully cover all…
Apr 18
America’s baby bust portends tough times ahead
In 2007, Americans welcomed approximately 4.3 million babies. But following a decline in birth rates during the Great Recession, birth rates have not recovered. Over the past 15 years, the number of U.S. births has decreased annually, with the most recent 12-month period on record indicating only 3.6 million babies born. Straight Arrow News contributor…
Mar 7
Inflation is still too high and Biden is still to blame
Democrats are busy celebrating a consistently strong economy under President Biden, citing shocking GDP growth and record-low unemployment. Republicans are responding to the celebration with concerns about rising living costs, housing unaffordability, and continuing inflation. Straight Arrow News contributor Tim Carney points out that many Americans feel left behind by “Bidenomics” and argues that they…
Feb 8
College just got much pricier for American families
American colleges and universities are among the very best in the world. They are also notoriously expensive, with many graduates working for decades to pay back their college loans. But for many new students and parents hoping to help their children pay for college, tuition just became even more expensive, thanks to a new federal…
Jan 11
Hunter Biden’s tax evasion charges not the worst part of controversy
On Dec. 7, Hunter Biden was indicted on nine tax charges in California, relating to over $1.4 million in taxes owed between 2016 and 2019. While the back taxes have been settled, a potential conviction could result in a maximum 17-year prison sentence for the president’s son. On Dec. 13, House Republicans voted to formalize…
Dec 14
Underreported stories from each side
Biden’s 13th-Quarter Approval Average Lowest Historically
8 sources | 13% from the left
AP Images
Jamie Raskin Slams Supreme Court Over Trump Immunity Case: ‘Acting Like A Bunch Of Partisan Operatives’
6 sources | 0% from the right
AP Images
Latest Stories
Biden uses NFL draft ad to try to connect with young voters
Watch 2:16
Yesterday
Powering pot: Energy for US cannabis industry could electrify 13.5M homes
Watch 1:29
Yesterday
Allies plan for Trump to have more control over interest rates
Watch 3:07
Yesterday
FDA: Bird flu found in 1/5 commercial milk samples, suggests greater spread
Watch 1:21
Yesterday
China permanently deploys warships to second overseas base
Watch 2:58
Yesterday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
House Speaker Johnson’s foreign aid bill shows a focused GOP
Yesterday
Star Parker
Trump’s own behavior betrays his guilt
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Portraying far-left and far-right as equal in ‘Civil War’ is wrong
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Who will Trump pick for vice presidential running mate?
Thursday
Matthew Continetti