Many reformers see an opportunity for a third party presidential candidate. The argument goes like this, America is more polarized than ever. And add on top of that. The most likely matchup in the general election is a rematch of President Joe Biden versus former President Donald Trump. What better time for third party candidate voter disgust at the two stale choices of parties and candidates paves the way for a third alternative that Americans crave to fill this need the group No Labels has stepped in to facilitate such a third party run. They are securing a ballot line in states for such a campaign. And the general speculation is that the ticket will consist of a prominent moderate Democrat and moderate republican names have been floated, including Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Republican former Governor Larry Hogan of Maryland. The reaction to this effort has been twofold. reformers like what they see in the No Labels effort. A candidacy of the center might be able to win in this environment, or at least shake up our politics. On the other side, many establishment Democrats view the No Labels effort as a threat to the Democratic Party. To Joe Biden’s reelection and even to democracy itself. The reformers and establishment Democrats have in common the belief that the No Labels candidates can attract a large share of the popular vote. establishment Democrats, however, also see the effort as taking more votes from the Democratic side. So are they right? Will a no labels presidential ticket gain a large share of the vote? And will it hurt Democrats more than Republicans? First, how well will the new third party ticket do in 2024? The answer is likely not very well. While America has a long history of third party presidential candidates, it also has a strong history of two party dominance. In 2020, Joe Biden and Donald Trump combined to receive over 98% of ballots cast with just a smattering of votes going to the libertarian and Green parties and others. Even in the 2016 election, which some saw as a strong third party turnout, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump received 94% of the vote. The only elections since 1968 that stand out are the first two runs of Ross Perot who received 90% of the vote in 1992 and less than 9% in 1996. In general, third party candidates take a small share of the vote, but even here Parowan no states and receive no Electoral College votes. Further, interest in third parties wanes as Election Day approaches perosa much higher poll numbers early in the race. And in general, voters are more enamored with third parties in the abstract. But once the real election decision is upon them, they returned to the major party candidates. Finally, the emphasis on the difficulty of getting a candidate on the ballot in all 50 states is exaggerated. It is true that it takes a significant amount of money and manpower to qualify for a ballot line in all states. But we saw an effort in the 2012 election called Americans Elect. They went through the work to get a ballot line in all states only to end up not fielding a ticket and the libertarian and Green parties are on the ballot in many states. By itself, the ballot line has not guaranteed their success. The bottom line is that while it is difficult to get on the ballot everywhere. There are many other challenges beyond that to any third party run. Second, with the No Labels effort hurt Democrats more than Republicans. It is impossible to know for sure, but the way it is being pitched it would likely be slightly more attractive to Democratic leaning voters. The core audience for such an effort is college educated centrists. And this group, Democratic leaning voters are more likely than Republicans to favor values such as bipartisanship, non partisanship, and getting along. In this way. This effort looks very different than the runs of Ross Perot, who had a more populous campaign, focusing on trade and other issues of greater interest to blue collar voters. The bottom line is that the No Labels third party effort is not likely to have much of an effect. It is hard to see such a ticket cracking 5% of the vote. And while voters attracted to the ticket might lean slightly democratic, it would only be in the closest of elections that one could imagine no labels affecting the outcome.
Related
John Fortier
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
21 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
How a No Labels candidate might affect outcome of 2024 election
Sep 28, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
Amid increasing polarization in the United States and the anticipation of a rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, a third-party organization is gaining momentum. The No Labels group has successfully registered 15,000 voters in the pivotal state of Arizona and is on a path to expand its presence to all 50 states by Election Day.
Some Democrats worry that a third-party candidate could siphon votes away from Biden. At the same time, some Republicans are concerned that an alternative to Trump may diminish their chances of securing the White House.
Straight Arrow News contributor John Fortier explores the potential candidates No Labels might endorse and breaks down which of the two major parties might face more consequences if No Labels were to field a presidential candidate.
The reaction to this effort has been twofold. Reformers like what they see in the No Labels effort. A candidacy of the center might be able to win in this environment, or at least shake up our politics. On the other side, many establishment Democrats view the No Labels effort as a threat to the Democratic Party, to Joe Biden’s reelection, and even to democracy itself.
The reformers and establishment Democrats have in common the belief that the No Labels candidates can attract a large share of the popular vote. Establishment Democrats, however, also see the effort as taking more votes from the Democratic side. So are they right? Will a No Labels presidential ticket gain a large share of the vote, and will it hurt Democrats more than Republicans?
First, how well will the new third-party ticket do in 2024? The answer is, likely, not very well. While America has a long history of third-party presidential candidates, it also has a strong history of two-party dominance.
Many reformers see an opportunity for a third party presidential candidate. The argument goes like this, America is more polarized than ever. And add on top of that. The most likely matchup in the general election is a rematch of President Joe Biden versus former President Donald Trump. What better time for third party candidate voter disgust at the two stale choices of parties and candidates paves the way for a third alternative that Americans crave to fill this need the group No Labels has stepped in to facilitate such a third party run. They are securing a ballot line in states for such a campaign. And the general speculation is that the ticket will consist of a prominent moderate Democrat and moderate republican names have been floated, including Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Republican former Governor Larry Hogan of Maryland. The reaction to this effort has been twofold. reformers like what they see in the No Labels effort. A candidacy of the center might be able to win in this environment, or at least shake up our politics. On the other side, many establishment Democrats view the No Labels effort as a threat to the Democratic Party. To Joe Biden’s reelection and even to democracy itself. The reformers and establishment Democrats have in common the belief that the No Labels candidates can attract a large share of the popular vote. establishment Democrats, however, also see the effort as taking more votes from the Democratic side. So are they right? Will a no labels presidential ticket gain a large share of the vote? And will it hurt Democrats more than Republicans? First, how well will the new third party ticket do in 2024? The answer is likely not very well. While America has a long history of third party presidential candidates, it also has a strong history of two party dominance. In 2020, Joe Biden and Donald Trump combined to receive over 98% of ballots cast with just a smattering of votes going to the libertarian and Green parties and others. Even in the 2016 election, which some saw as a strong third party turnout, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump received 94% of the vote. The only elections since 1968 that stand out are the first two runs of Ross Perot who received 90% of the vote in 1992 and less than 9% in 1996. In general, third party candidates take a small share of the vote, but even here Parowan no states and receive no Electoral College votes. Further, interest in third parties wanes as Election Day approaches perosa much higher poll numbers early in the race. And in general, voters are more enamored with third parties in the abstract. But once the real election decision is upon them, they returned to the major party candidates. Finally, the emphasis on the difficulty of getting a candidate on the ballot in all 50 states is exaggerated. It is true that it takes a significant amount of money and manpower to qualify for a ballot line in all states. But we saw an effort in the 2012 election called Americans Elect. They went through the work to get a ballot line in all states only to end up not fielding a ticket and the libertarian and Green parties are on the ballot in many states. By itself, the ballot line has not guaranteed their success. The bottom line is that while it is difficult to get on the ballot everywhere. There are many other challenges beyond that to any third party run. Second, with the No Labels effort hurt Democrats more than Republicans. It is impossible to know for sure, but the way it is being pitched it would likely be slightly more attractive to Democratic leaning voters. The core audience for such an effort is college educated centrists. And this group, Democratic leaning voters are more likely than Republicans to favor values such as bipartisanship, non partisanship, and getting along. In this way. This effort looks very different than the runs of Ross Perot, who had a more populous campaign, focusing on trade and other issues of greater interest to blue collar voters. The bottom line is that the No Labels third party effort is not likely to have much of an effect. It is hard to see such a ticket cracking 5% of the vote. And while voters attracted to the ticket might lean slightly democratic, it would only be in the closest of elections that one could imagine no labels affecting the outcome.
Related
SCOTUS case on threat of disinformation raises thorny questions
The Supreme Court recently heard arguments concerning government communications with social media platforms in Murthy v. Missouri. Plantiffs in the case claim that government agencies pressured social media companies to remove or restrict posts spreading disinformation about vaccines, elections and COVID-19. Straight Arrow News contributor John Fortier delves into the complex questions raised by the…
Mar 28
Trump v. Anderson is more complicated than it looks
The Supreme Court case Trump v. Anderson will decide whether former President Donald Trump is eligible to run as a candidate for president in 2024. Some constitutional law experts have argued that Trump cannot run as a candidate, citing what they say is a clear violation of the 14th Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, which…
Feb 29
Era of Iowa, New Hampshire kicking off election season is ending
In American politics, tradition dictates that Iowa and New Hampshire kick off the election season as the two major parties elect their primary candidates. Recently, however, Democrats have suggested revising this tradition, arguing that Iowa and New Hampshire do not present an optimal, comprehensive sample of American voters, and suggesting states like South Carolina or…
Feb 1
Why the frenzy over Georgia’s voting laws was misplaced
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) changed state voting laws after President Joe Biden narrowly won Georgia’s electoral votes over former President Donald Trump in 2020. Voting advocacy groups responded and the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the legislation. These lawsuits alleged that the Georgia GOP in the state legislature aimed to restrict…
Dec 28
Changing speakers isn’t actually going to help Republicans
After three weeks without a speaker and three unsuccessful attempts to secure the required votes for a new one, the U.S. House of Representatives elected a little-known Congressman from Louisiana, Rep. Mike Johnson. But was the decision to elect Rep. Johnson, who leans hard-right and pro-Trump, a wise move for the Republican Party? Straight Arrow…
Nov 2
Underreported stories from each side
Biden’s 13th-Quarter Approval Average Lowest Historically
8 sources | 13% from the left
AP Images
Jamie Raskin Slams Supreme Court Over Trump Immunity Case: ‘Acting Like A Bunch Of Partisan Operatives’
6 sources | 0% from the right
AP Images
Latest Stories
Biden uses NFL draft ad to try to connect with young voters
Watch 2:16
16 hrs ago
Powering pot: Energy for US cannabis industry could electrify 13.5M homes
Watch 1:29
16 hrs ago
Allies plan for Trump to have more control over interest rates
Watch 3:07
17 hrs ago
FDA: Bird flu found in 1/5 commercial milk samples, suggests greater spread
Watch 1:21
17 hrs ago
China permanently deploys warships to second overseas base
Watch 2:58
17 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
House Speaker Johnson’s foreign aid bill shows a focused GOP
22 hrs ago
Star Parker
Trump’s own behavior betrays his guilt
23 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Portraying far-left and far-right as equal in ‘Civil War’ is wrong
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Who will Trump pick for vice presidential running mate?
Yesterday
Matthew Continetti