Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Okay, I want to have a real conversation with you about the word reparations and what it means. Listen, don’t judge it before you hear this part, the American government is not against reparations. As a matter of fact, you are likely not against reparations. Understand, reparations is simply a word that means repair. And in order to repair something, you have to acknowledge it is broken. Once you can acknowledge that it is broken, you must then acknowledge it needs to be fixed. Once these dynamics are established, you then look for the responsible party. In the case of reparations for the descendants of slaves, or reparations for black people in the United States of America at large, the party who broke it is the American government. We can all agree to that.
Let’s talk about America’s fascination with reparations. As a country, we have given reparations to Native Americans, not to the tune they deserved, but it is a form of reparations or repair. We’ve also given reparations to other groups, such as the Japanese, and members, family members, who were connected to those killed in the Holocaust. We did that recently. We gave governmental money and benefit because we thought it was worthy of repair — and rightfully so.
You see, here’s the thing. Reparations is not actually opposed by the United States government. It’s not opposed by lawmakers. Because this country has voted routinely to grant reparations to various groups that they have deemed to be worthy of this due to government action or even government inaction.
They are, however, seemingly against reparations for Black people. That’s different. Let me take you to a conversation that Dr. Phil had on his program not too long ago. And I want to I want you to understand why it’s offensive to many Black people in America. Dr, Phil said, if you give, if you give black folks $300,000 plus, or $800,000 plus, it will be a total disaster. He talked about how this would not create generational wealth, etc. Okay. That’s his opinion. Now, he tried to clean it up by saying if you give any group that much money, and then he started naming other groups, all right. Now he left off groups, like rich people; he said poor people, but he didn’t say rich people.
Here’s the reality. Dr. Phil, you can facilitate discussions like this, but you do not bear the credentials to conclusively say what Black people should or should not receive, because it is on us to have that conversation with you and others. We lead that conversation, not you. It’s very simple. To suggest that somehow in order to qualify for reparations, Black people need to be trained how to spend money. That’s basically what Dr. Phil said. There needs to be guidance and coaching. And I’m not saying those elements should not be in place. What I am saying is that you don’t use it as a prerequisite in order to get money that you are all ready owed. Remember, reparations is not a handout. It is based on this one reality.
There was an unfair government-approved or government-led operation that made this dysfunction and we have to create a remedy for it. So reparations is not based on race. It is based on the behavior of the government toward a particular demographic. And if that particular demographic happens to be of one race, then naturally that’s where the remedy resides. You know who else received reparations? Slave owners. Look it up. DC emancipation, because of the hurt and economic harm that slave owners would receive due to the freeing of the enslaved African. They were given reparations based on the number of enslaved human beings they could no longer legally enslave. Isn’t that interesting? So let’s count the ways various groups after receive reparations, even slave masters receive reparations during that era, but no reparations for African Americans. If you believe it was broken by the government, you have to believe that the government is part of or should be part of the remedy. Reparations should not be off the table as some kind of fringe discussion. It is a normative discussion, a credible discussion and a needed discussion.
-
It’s time to take failed capitalism out of Christmas
Capitalism has delivered some resounding triumphs and progress for humankind in recent centuries, but it has also created and sustained systems of gross injustice, exploitation and abuse. Many of those preparing to celebrate Christmas are familiar with the inequalities of modern U.S. capitalism, as families and individuals often struggle to pay for gifts or even… -
Trump’s nominees indicate betrayal of our democracy
Since President-elect Trump began announcing his administration and cabinet picks for his second term, much has been made of their collective lack of relevant experience, unwavering personal loyalty to Donald Trump and immense wealth. The net worth of Trump’s proposed cabinet, which does not include Elon Musk or Vivek Ramaswamy, is estimated to top $13… -
As Trump plans to weaponize FBI, Biden had to pardon Hunter
On Sunday, Dec. 1, President Joe Biden officially pardoned his son Hunter, who was due to be sentenced after being found guilty for tax evasion and for submitting false information on paperwork to obtain a firearm. Hunter has fully repaid the amount that he owed on his taxes. Joe Biden expressed his frustration and his… -
Jack Smith is wrong to drop all charges against Trump
Special Counsel Jack Smith has dropped all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump in the Trump v. United States of America case. He cited the results of the 2024 presidential election, where Trump won both the Electoral College and the national popular vote. In his motion to dismiss, Smith stated that the U.S. Department of… -
Trump’s terrible judgment is to blame for Matt Gaetz drama
One of President-elect Trump’s most controversial nominations was for former U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., as U.S. attorney general. Gaetz’s nomination met stiff resistance in the Senate from both parties, forcing him to withdraw. Gaetz had been accused of sex trafficking, illicit drug use, statutory rape, and numerous ethics violations in the House. Watch the…
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Have a little compassion’: Americans talk high holiday prices, anxiety
‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why