You can’t have a debate with someone unless you share at least some values. I can’t convince you that turnstile-hopping is wrong if you don’t think theft is wrong.
This is a problem in our current debates over free speech. When politicians say the government needs to crack down on misinformation or hate speech — and when colleges or other large institutions impose speech codes — you can’t appeal to them on the grounds of free speech, because they evidently don’t believe in free speech.
Yes, the Constitution bars Congress from infringing on free speech, but the Constitution isn’t very popular these days either. It’s just an old-fashioned document we were told forged by racist and sexist white men more than 200 years ago. So appealing to the principle of free speech, or appealing to the Constitution, doesn’t fly with the speech police. How then can we convince them that censorship is a mistake? Maybe we can teach them a little bit of humility, and thus give them a practical reason not to silence misinformation. Specifically, some of what they call dangerous misinformation today will prove to be the truth tomorrow. How do I know? It’s already happened a bunch of times since the Left got on this misinformation kick a few years ago.
Let’s start with the origins of COVID. In 2020, Twitter suspended a Chinese virologist for suggesting that the virus leaked out of the Virology lab in Wuhan. The World Health Organization asked Facebook to remove any posts arguing that “COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured. This was misinformation that WHO insisted. Facebook complied. The mainstream media agreed with the WHO slapping the misinformation tag on any suggestion that the virus leaked out of a Virology lab.
Democrats, the news media and a huge swath of the intelligence community also branded as misinformation, the details of law breaking and cronyism leaking from Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop. The ultimate goal of calling something misinformation is to render that information undeserving of any free speech protections. Misinformation is knowingly false information that causes harm. Protecting the world from this supposed harm is more important than the freedom of speech, the misinformation cops insist.
Again, these people don’t value free speech as a principle. But they should value truth. And these days, the lab leak theory and the damning information about Hunter Biden both appear to be true. U.S. intelligence sources are now saying that the virus most likely emerged from the Wuhan Virology lab.
And the details of Hunter Biden’s debauchery and cronyism are now accepted fact. If the US intelligence community, the World Health Organization, big tech and the major media could repeatedly be so certain yet so wrong, maybe they could use a dose of humility. The beliefs or reports they want to censor as misinformation today might turn out to be true tomorrow. That alone is reason enough to refrain from censorship. American liberals used to talk about the right to be wrong. They no longer believe in that. Hopefully, though, the last few years will convince them of the possibility that the speech police are not immune from being wrong.
Timothy Carney
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
10 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
What Democrats get wrong about misinformation and free speech
Timothy Carney
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
By Straight Arrow News
College students protesting conservative campus speakers. The media arguing that all Hunter Biden critics are biased. Government officials promoting COVID-19 misinformation. These are just some of the examples many conservatives believe illustrate how “woke” liberals are promoting misinformation and threatening free speech in America.
Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney explains why some of what liberals call “dangerous misinformation” today can prove to be the truth tomorrow.
You can’t have a debate with someone unless you share at least some values. I can’t convince you that turnstile hopping is wrong if you don’t think theft is wrong.
This is a problem in our current debates over free speech. When politicians say the government needs to crack down on misinformation or hate speech — and when colleges or other large institutions impose speech codes — you can’t appeal to them on the grounds of free speech, because they evidently don’t believe in free speech.
Yes, the Constitution bars Congress from infringing on free speech, but the Constitution isn’t very popular these days either. It’s just an old-fashioned document, we were told, forged by racist and sexist white men more than 200 years ago. So appealing to the principle of free speech, or appealing to the Constitution, doesn’t fly with the speech police.
How then can we convince them that censorship is a mistake? Maybe we can teach them a little bit of humility, and thus give them a practical reason not to silence misinformation. Specifically, some of what they call dangerous misinformation today will prove to be the truth tomorrow. How do I know? It’s already happened a bunch of times since the Left got on this misinformation kick a few years ago.
You can’t have a debate with someone unless you share at least some values. I can’t convince you that turnstile-hopping is wrong if you don’t think theft is wrong.
This is a problem in our current debates over free speech. When politicians say the government needs to crack down on misinformation or hate speech — and when colleges or other large institutions impose speech codes — you can’t appeal to them on the grounds of free speech, because they evidently don’t believe in free speech.
Yes, the Constitution bars Congress from infringing on free speech, but the Constitution isn’t very popular these days either. It’s just an old-fashioned document we were told forged by racist and sexist white men more than 200 years ago. So appealing to the principle of free speech, or appealing to the Constitution, doesn’t fly with the speech police. How then can we convince them that censorship is a mistake? Maybe we can teach them a little bit of humility, and thus give them a practical reason not to silence misinformation. Specifically, some of what they call dangerous misinformation today will prove to be the truth tomorrow. How do I know? It’s already happened a bunch of times since the Left got on this misinformation kick a few years ago.
Let’s start with the origins of COVID. In 2020, Twitter suspended a Chinese virologist for suggesting that the virus leaked out of the Virology lab in Wuhan. The World Health Organization asked Facebook to remove any posts arguing that “COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured. This was misinformation that WHO insisted. Facebook complied. The mainstream media agreed with the WHO slapping the misinformation tag on any suggestion that the virus leaked out of a Virology lab.
Democrats, the news media and a huge swath of the intelligence community also branded as misinformation, the details of law breaking and cronyism leaking from Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop. The ultimate goal of calling something misinformation is to render that information undeserving of any free speech protections. Misinformation is knowingly false information that causes harm. Protecting the world from this supposed harm is more important than the freedom of speech, the misinformation cops insist.
Again, these people don’t value free speech as a principle. But they should value truth. And these days, the lab leak theory and the damning information about Hunter Biden both appear to be true. U.S. intelligence sources are now saying that the virus most likely emerged from the Wuhan Virology lab.
And the details of Hunter Biden’s debauchery and cronyism are now accepted fact. If the US intelligence community, the World Health Organization, big tech and the major media could repeatedly be so certain yet so wrong, maybe they could use a dose of humility. The beliefs or reports they want to censor as misinformation today might turn out to be true tomorrow. That alone is reason enough to refrain from censorship. American liberals used to talk about the right to be wrong. They no longer believe in that. Hopefully, though, the last few years will convince them of the possibility that the speech police are not immune from being wrong.
How Biden’s tax on Chinese metal harms Americans
President Joe Biden announced plans to triple tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum to protect American jobs from “unfair” competition. The White House said China is hurting the U.S. economy by selling steel at very low prices. Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney argues that while Biden’s new tariffs might…
Jul 18
Democrats use climate change issues to help sell liberal agenda
According to a January survey, only 12% of Republicans say dealing with climate change should be a top priority for the president and Congress, ranking the issue last among the 20 included in the survey. By contrast, 59% of Democrats say climate change should be a top priority for the president and Congress. While Democrats may…
Jun 20
HHS Secretary Becerra’s crusade against Catholicism
When President Joe Biden took office, he nominated Xavier Becerra, a former California congressman and attorney general, to run the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). As California’s attorney general, Becerra was at the forefront of legal efforts on health care. In his current position as HHS secretary, Becerra is a strong proponent…
May 30
Universities must blame themselves for protest hypocrisy
U.S. college protests over the Israel-Hamas war have divided college campuses, often pitting university officials and executives against their own students and faculty. And yet, as Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney points out, many of today’s university officials are actually the anti-Vietnam War protesters of a previous era’s student protest movement. Today, those same…
May 16
Subsidizing demand won’t fix real problems
The Biden administration recently announced an initiative to cap child care copay expenses for approximately 100,000 low-income working families in the United States. Instead of paying set fees, those families will pay 7% of whatever their total income is as a copay for the government-subsidized daycare program. The program also hopes to fully cover all…
Apr 18
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
5 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
5 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
6 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
6 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
6 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
11 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
12 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich