Everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from San Francisco Bay, where I’m pulling my heels waiting for my flight. I’ve been here for the last several days. And as you might guess, I get a few more environmentally-themed questions in California than they do in other places. The one that I got that I found most interesting, however, came from a series of economists in Europe, who were talking about how the solution to the climate crisis ultimately may well be that we just need to use less. The idea is if we’re using X number of amount of energy, and that’s too much, and solar and wind and the rest are just not ready for primetime, then perhaps they didn’t stick their reputations on this. And then perhaps the only way to go is to go down. Maybe here’s thing, there’s a direct correlation between economic activity and energy use. So while you can make efficiency gains, they tend to be incremental. We have made a lot of those over the last 30 years things like ovens and dishwashers, and refrigerators use about about half the energy that they did back in the 90s. But that’s a relatively small fry. The real issue has to do with location. If you’re living in a place where climate control is required for daily life, I mean, you’re it’s really hard to to use less. So let me kind of give you an example here that put some numbers behind this. If you go back to World War Two, the populations of Iowa, Minnesota and Florida were all between two and 3 million. But if you fast forward to today, Florida has over 21 million. Minnesota has about six and I was still below three. The differences climate, say what you will about the Midwest, it tends to have summers to oppressively hot and winters that are not too oppressively cold. And so if you’re in the middle of it like an Iowa climate control is nice to have. But it’s not required for modern life in the same way that it might be say in hot, humid Florida, or frigid, frigid, frigid Minnesota. But once the Minnesota is could have heat and once the Floridians could have air conditioning, the math changed. Well, that means that living in these places generates a lot of energy demand in order to get the concentrations of populations and the economic activity we have now. So to those economists, I could say this, you know, yes, we could all use less. But that would mean that we all have to move to Iowa.
Related
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical Strategist
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Russia unveils drone-resistant ‘turtle tanks’
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Gen Z debates capitalism vs. socialism, meritocracy vs. equality
Thursday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Texas heat challenges a strained energy grid
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Japan’s navy gets an upgrade
Monday
Peter Zeihan
Does a green future mean less energy usage?
Mar 18
By Straight Arrow News
The Department of Energy claims that cutting down on energy usage is important in the fight against climate change. So why don’t we simply use less energy to improve the environment? It turns out that implementing this plan might not be straightforward. Research indicates that in the coming decades, the combination of rising temperatures and growing urban populations will significantly change how energy is used, with the demand for electricity to cool urban buildings expected to rise by at least 20% in specific regions.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan expands on this dilemma and explains that while there have been some advancements in energy efficiency, such as cleaner appliances, these improvements are relatively minor.
Excerpted from Peter’s March 18 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
Some European economists came up with a super-duper-hyper-revolutionary solution to the green problem… just use less energy! Crazy, right? Before we write off this idea completely, let’s break it down.
One of the big problems facing the green transition is that we must double our energy output in order to make it feasible. What if we didn’t need to ramp up output and could just cut energy usage? With all the efficiency gains we’ve made over the years, it seems like a possibility.
Unfortunately, it’s not that simple. With the correlation between economic activity and energy usage remaining strong, the “use less” solution loses its legs. And then you start to break down populations and climates, and things get even harder. Sure, there are places where using less might work, but good luck getting everyone to move to Iowa…
Everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from San Francisco Bay, where I’m pulling my heels waiting for my flight. I’ve been here for the last several days. And as you might guess, I get a few more environmentally-themed questions in California than they do in other places. The one that I got that I found most interesting, however, came from a series of economists in Europe, who were talking about how the solution to the climate crisis ultimately may well be that we just need to use less. The idea is if we’re using X number of amount of energy, and that’s too much, and solar and wind and the rest are just not ready for primetime, then perhaps they didn’t stick their reputations on this. And then perhaps the only way to go is to go down. Maybe here’s thing, there’s a direct correlation between economic activity and energy use. So while you can make efficiency gains, they tend to be incremental. We have made a lot of those over the last 30 years things like ovens and dishwashers, and refrigerators use about about half the energy that they did back in the 90s. But that’s a relatively small fry. The real issue has to do with location. If you’re living in a place where climate control is required for daily life, I mean, you’re it’s really hard to to use less. So let me kind of give you an example here that put some numbers behind this. If you go back to World War Two, the populations of Iowa, Minnesota and Florida were all between two and 3 million. But if you fast forward to today, Florida has over 21 million. Minnesota has about six and I was still below three. The differences climate, say what you will about the Midwest, it tends to have summers to oppressively hot and winters that are not too oppressively cold. And so if you’re in the middle of it like an Iowa climate control is nice to have. But it’s not required for modern life in the same way that it might be say in hot, humid Florida, or frigid, frigid, frigid Minnesota. But once the Minnesota is could have heat and once the Floridians could have air conditioning, the math changed. Well, that means that living in these places generates a lot of energy demand in order to get the concentrations of populations and the economic activity we have now. So to those economists, I could say this, you know, yes, we could all use less. But that would mean that we all have to move to Iowa.
Related
Russia unveils drone-resistant ‘turtle tanks’
The Russian military has unveiled a new drone-resistant tank, which has gained the nickname “turtle tank” due to its heavy shell-like armor and low mobility. While heavy artillery can stop the advance of these turtle tanks, Ukrainian forces have run desperately low on artillery and heavy munitions. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan dives into…
Friday
Texas heat challenges a strained energy grid
As May begins, much of the country is experiencing the gradual onset of warmer weather. Texas is already feeling the full force of it, with temperatures in many areas reaching the 80s and 90s. During this time of the year in Texas, power grids can become strained due to increased demand spurred on by early…
Wednesday
Japan’s navy gets an upgrade
Following their defeat in World War II, the people of Japan pursued a largely pacifist foreign policy. Today, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and with near-daily news regarding China’s threatening activities throughout the greater Pacific, the Japanese are reinvesting in military defense and reaffirming their alliances with Pacific partners like Australia and the United States.…
Monday
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Many Americans speculated about how a potential RFK, Jr. campaign might impact the 2024 elections. While RFK is neither a Democrat nor a Republican, many of his positions favor Donald Trump’s base over Joe Biden’s, particularly his various conspiracy theories on a wide range of subjects. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan says that GOP…
Apr 26
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
The seas above Russia’s northern coastline are too frozen for shipping, but some have wondered whether global warming might change that in the decades to come. If those seas were to become navigable for commercial shipping, new direct routes between Russia and China could theoretically open up. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan throws more…
Apr 25
Underreported stories from each side
House Republicans Ask NPR CEO To Appear At Hearing After Bias Allegations
6 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testifies ‘Access Hollywood’ tape roiled campaign
65 sources | 6% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
Israel calls for people in parts of Rafah to 'evacuate immediately'
Watch 6:31
59 mins ago
EPA says San Francisco dumped billions of gallons of wastewater into ocean
Watch 2:09
Friday
Bill would have immigrants reported to ICE if they illegally try to buy guns
Watch 1:35
Friday
A US county is seeing success with 32-hour workweeks
Watch 2:50
Friday
VP hopeful Kristi Noem faces further backlash for memoir yet to be released
Watch 2:01
Friday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Today’s college protesters are tomorrow’s world leaders
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Left-leaning politicians too lenient with pro-Palestinian protesters
Friday
Star Parker
Careful Left, campus protests will end up benefiting Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
US elections have become much more secure since 2000
Thursday
John Fortier