President Biden and General Secretary Xi Jinping had their first meeting in a year in San Francisco. Expectations were low. The U.S. media basically said it was a snooze. Or, as Winston Churchill said, it’s still a good thing, “it’s better to jaw jaw than to wah wah.” Using Churchill’s accent, it rhymes.
Well, the Chinese media had a different take. They called what happened the creation of “the San Francisco vision.” They said this summit is a strategic and far-reaching meeting, leaving a profound mark in the history of U.S.-China relations. Well, of course they’re going to tell that to their own people, because they’re trying to make Jinping look good. Okay. So, certainly their reaction was propaganda. But it was not totally implausible propaganda. I think that looking at it, they had three good points.
First, Xi established China as America’s equal in the world. Now consider Xi’s line that was repeated over and over again: “The world is big enough to accommodate both our countries.” Fair enough. How about everyone else, like the Philippines, which is having its navy ships and fishing boats rammed by the Chinese navy all the time, or the other nations that border on the South China Sea, which China is trying to claim in its entirety, right up to the three-mile limit of the other countries, or Japan, which is had interdictions between planes of their two air forces?
So Xi, what he was trying to do with [this] line is not trying to say peace, but saying, hey, it’s really just the two of us. We’re all that matter. In fact, the Washington Post, which tends to reflect thinking at the top levels of the American elite, said, for audiences in China, Xi’s comments position China as an equal to America as a global superpower. One person they also cited was supposedly an American expert at a Shanghai Think Tank. He said, Xi is saying China and the U.S. are superpowers on equal footing. Well, okay, I really don’t care what he thinks. But Xi thinks that he bested Biden, because he established China, which had been thought of as number two, as an equal with America.
The second thing that was in all of the Chinese news was stories about the rather fawning treatment by corporate America. They listed all the attendees at the dinner that Xi had with American business executives. They ran stories about how businessmen, top-level businessmen, were scrambling for seats, and were standing outside the venue in hope that some last-minute seats might become available for them. In other words, they described it as about as fawning as it could be, and a number of the executives that spoke after the dinner were very praiseworthy of President Xi. In other words, it made Xi look good, not only to his home audience, but it looked like he had very important allies here in America.
Third, in San Francisco, though not at the summit, Senate Democrats scored an own-goal against Biden and for Xi. For many months now, President Biden has been trying to advance the Inter-Pacific Economic Framework, IPEF. This would be a deal which would establish trade relations between the U.S. and non-Chinese Asian countries. It was our main offensive against China. Well, what happened?
Oh, Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, who is Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, and Ron Wyden, who’s Chairman of the Democratic Senate Finance Committee, prevailed on Biden to pull the trade deal. So there would be no Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. Biden had been hoping to present that in San Francisco, with Xi there as sort of a push against G. We now have no push against Xi. The President’s main initiative was blocked by his own party colleagues in the United States Senate. And not only that, Biden’s U.S. trade representative, who had previously served in the Obama administration, said that it was the Obama administration’s Trans-Pacific Partnership that then-candidate Clinton endorsed, that was the reason Clinton lost the 2016 election. So this was all about U.S. politics.
And the Chinese media noted that they weren’t necessarily counting on Biden to follow through, because he is now going to be consumed with his reelection and controlling the Congress. But again, that was a put down to the U.S. So, was it like the media said in the U.S., that it was basically a snooze? Or was it like what the Chinese, said that Xi clearly bested Biden? Well, let’s face it, the Chinese media is full of propaganda. But at least in these instances, it sure seems like plausible propaganda. This is Larry Lindsey for Straight Arrow News.
Related
Larry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey Group
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Japan’s navy gets an upgrade
1 hr ago
Peter Zeihan
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
How Chinese media covered Biden-Xi meeting
Nov 20, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
U.S. President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping recently met in San Francisco, marking their first in-person meeting in more than a year. After years of rising U.S.-China tensions, expectations for the meeting were understandably low.
Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey examined Chinese domestic media coverage of the meeting to identify the hopes, expectations and perceptions of the Chinese public regarding the events in San Francisco. Lindsey concludes that Chinese domestic coverage was overly favorable and propagandistic, yet also very plausible, and that Chinese writers ultimately noted a number of sound arguments and observations.
President Biden and General Secretary Xi Jinping had their first meeting in a year in San Francisco. Expectations were low. The U.S. media basically said it was a snooze. Or, as Winston Churchill said, it’s still a good thing, “It’s better to jaw jaw than to wah wah.” Using Churchill’s accent, it rhymes.
Well, the Chinese media had a different take. They called what happened the creation of “the San Francisco vision.” They said this summit is a strategic and far-reaching meeting, leaving a profound mark in the history of U.S.-China relations. Well, of course they’re going to tell that to their own people, because they’re trying to make Jinping look good. Okay. So, certainly their reaction was propaganda. But it was not totally implausible propaganda. I think that looking at it, they had three good points.
First, Xi established China as America’s equal in the world. Now consider Xi’s line that was repeated over and over again: “The world is big enough to accommodate both our countries.” Fair enough. How about everyone else, like the Philippines, which is having its navy ships and fishing boats rammed by the Chinese navy all the time, or the other nations that border on the South China Sea, which China is trying to claim in its entirety, right up to the three-mile limit of the other countries, or Japan, which [has] had interdictions between planes of their two air forces? So Xi, what he was trying to do with [this] line is not trying to say peace, but saying, “Hey, it’s really just the two of us. We’re all that matter.“
President Biden and General Secretary Xi Jinping had their first meeting in a year in San Francisco. Expectations were low. The U.S. media basically said it was a snooze. Or, as Winston Churchill said, it’s still a good thing, “it’s better to jaw jaw than to wah wah.” Using Churchill’s accent, it rhymes.
Well, the Chinese media had a different take. They called what happened the creation of “the San Francisco vision.” They said this summit is a strategic and far-reaching meeting, leaving a profound mark in the history of U.S.-China relations. Well, of course they’re going to tell that to their own people, because they’re trying to make Jinping look good. Okay. So, certainly their reaction was propaganda. But it was not totally implausible propaganda. I think that looking at it, they had three good points.
First, Xi established China as America’s equal in the world. Now consider Xi’s line that was repeated over and over again: “The world is big enough to accommodate both our countries.” Fair enough. How about everyone else, like the Philippines, which is having its navy ships and fishing boats rammed by the Chinese navy all the time, or the other nations that border on the South China Sea, which China is trying to claim in its entirety, right up to the three-mile limit of the other countries, or Japan, which is had interdictions between planes of their two air forces?
So Xi, what he was trying to do with [this] line is not trying to say peace, but saying, hey, it’s really just the two of us. We’re all that matter. In fact, the Washington Post, which tends to reflect thinking at the top levels of the American elite, said, for audiences in China, Xi’s comments position China as an equal to America as a global superpower. One person they also cited was supposedly an American expert at a Shanghai Think Tank. He said, Xi is saying China and the U.S. are superpowers on equal footing. Well, okay, I really don’t care what he thinks. But Xi thinks that he bested Biden, because he established China, which had been thought of as number two, as an equal with America.
The second thing that was in all of the Chinese news was stories about the rather fawning treatment by corporate America. They listed all the attendees at the dinner that Xi had with American business executives. They ran stories about how businessmen, top-level businessmen, were scrambling for seats, and were standing outside the venue in hope that some last-minute seats might become available for them. In other words, they described it as about as fawning as it could be, and a number of the executives that spoke after the dinner were very praiseworthy of President Xi. In other words, it made Xi look good, not only to his home audience, but it looked like he had very important allies here in America.
Third, in San Francisco, though not at the summit, Senate Democrats scored an own-goal against Biden and for Xi. For many months now, President Biden has been trying to advance the Inter-Pacific Economic Framework, IPEF. This would be a deal which would establish trade relations between the U.S. and non-Chinese Asian countries. It was our main offensive against China. Well, what happened?
Oh, Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, who is Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, and Ron Wyden, who’s Chairman of the Democratic Senate Finance Committee, prevailed on Biden to pull the trade deal. So there would be no Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. Biden had been hoping to present that in San Francisco, with Xi there as sort of a push against G. We now have no push against Xi. The President’s main initiative was blocked by his own party colleagues in the United States Senate. And not only that, Biden’s U.S. trade representative, who had previously served in the Obama administration, said that it was the Obama administration’s Trans-Pacific Partnership that then-candidate Clinton endorsed, that was the reason Clinton lost the 2016 election. So this was all about U.S. politics.
And the Chinese media noted that they weren’t necessarily counting on Biden to follow through, because he is now going to be consumed with his reelection and controlling the Congress. But again, that was a put down to the U.S. So, was it like the media said in the U.S., that it was basically a snooze? Or was it like what the Chinese, said that Xi clearly bested Biden? Well, let’s face it, the Chinese media is full of propaganda. But at least in these instances, it sure seems like plausible propaganda. This is Larry Lindsey for Straight Arrow News.
Related
College sports is big money but not everyone benefits
March Madness has wrapped up and Caitlin Clark has emerged as a household name as well as a wealthy student athlete. Earning over $3 million throughout her college career, her success stands in stark contrast to the previous notion that collegiate athletes shouldn’t earn anything beyond their scholarship. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey examines…
52 mins ago
Biden’s EV math just doesn’t add up
In March, the Biden administration issued a new directive requiring U.S. automakers to cut the average carbon emissions of their fleets by almost 50% before 2032. That order is one component of President Biden’s larger goal to cut total U.S. carbon emissions in half by 2030. A primary method for reaching these goals will involve…
Apr 22
President Biden just isn’t cool
For some Americans, politics is only about policy, while others prioritize core values, ideas, aspirations or beliefs. Still, for others, politics may be a reflection of culture, where voting serves as a symbolic act to proclaim cultural group identity. But for some Americans, who they vote for and support is more of a popularity contest,…
Apr 15
Federal Reserve policy should be more restrictive
The American economy is booming, with high GDP growth, record-low unemployment, and wage gains for median workers. Over the past few quarters, U.S. economic growth indicators have consistently outperformed official projections. But the U.S. Federal Reserve recently conceded that its policies might be too restrictive, hindering the full potential of the U.S. economy, which the…
Apr 8
Celebrate tight labor market, but don’t cut interest rates
While President Joe Biden has been celebrating U.S. economic success, many Americans are still unhappy about the economy. So who’s right? The most recent jobs report for February showed that while the unemployment rate rose slightly to 3.9%, job gains were higher than expected, with the total coming in at 275,000 versus the expected increase…
Mar 18
Underreported stories from each side
Fetterman decries college campus ‘pup tents for Hamas’
6 sources | 0% from the left
Reuters
Columbia University president says negotiations with protesters have stalled, school will not divest from Israel
9 sources | 13% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
Study: 56 of leading brands responsible for more than 50% of plastic pollution
Watch 1:54
18 mins ago
Musk visits Beijing as Tesla’s China-made cars clear data security hurdles
Watch 0:45
4 hrs ago
Trump holds private meeting with former GOP rival DeSantis
Watch 0:43
4 hrs ago
Several dead after tornadoes sweep through Midwest
Watch 5:57
5 hrs ago
Biden uses NFL draft ad to try to connect with young voters
Watch 2:16
Friday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
College sports is big money but not everyone benefits
52 mins ago
Larry Lindsey
Will MAGA GOP remove Speaker Johnson?
2 hrs ago
David Pakman
House Speaker Johnson’s foreign aid bill shows a focused GOP
Friday
Star Parker
Trump’s own behavior betrays his guilt
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey