The United States is coming apart in all sorts of ways. Americans are lonelier than ever before. The Surgeon General this summer issued a report on the pandemic of loneliness, and a record 21% of Americans in a recent poll said they were extremely dissatisfied with the state of American democracy. Americans trust and like their countrymen much less than in past generations.
Compared to the middle of last century, we are much more likely to describe our fellow Americans as selfish or immoral, and much less likely to describe them as generous. America’s peak as far as neighborliness, civic mindedness and happiness seems to have been the two decades following World War Two. Unemployment was low, people were getting married, we had a baby boom, and Americans knew and trusted their neighbors.
That’s why some politicians and commentators look back to those golden years for a solution to our current polarization and alienation. They don’t call for another world war and mass deployment of men to the Pacific and continental Europe, but a more peaceful variation of war, a massive new National Service Corps, maybe even mandatory service.
The New York Times editorial board asked what could be objectionable in asking all young people to pause before plunging into the scramble of adult life to donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service at home or abroad? Well, here are two objections. First, the Times was writing about mandatory service, and so that’s not asking all young people to serve, it’s forcing them to do so.
The second objection is more quickly read those words of the New York Times again, they want young people to quote, “donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service.” While our society is so fractured that we could never get consensus on what is socially beneficial or critically needed. Take crisis pregnancy centers. These charitable organizations provide health care and pregnancy screenings to women in difficult pregnancies, typically unmarried women, young women, immigrant women. They also offer adoption referrals or parenting help, along with plenty of donated toys, baby clothes and maternity wear.
It’s hard to think of a more socially beneficial and critically needed service. Yet in the eyes of Democratic politicians. These crisis pregnancy centers are a scourge because they’re pro-life. Senator Elizabeth Warren has called on the federal government to crack down on them and to drive them out of business. What a Democratic administration allow a young person to fulfill her public service requirements by volunteering for a crisis pregnancy center?
Would a Republican administration considered public service to help Planned Parenthood with its abortion business? What if you volunteered for your church? Given the extreme ideas these days about separation of church and state even that would run into objections. The idea of national service to bridge our divides sounds appealing, but those very divides make the idea impossible in America today.
Timothy Carney
Timothy Carney, Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘You need to speak English’: Americans debate immigration crisis
Friday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Russia and China provoke Finland short of war
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Is geothermal energy a viable solution to electricity shortage?
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Why Siberian rail network attacks are a potential setback for Russia
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Partisan divide makes a new national service corps impossible
Aug 24
By Straight Arrow News
Most Americans have less confidence in the country’s future, and many attribute that sentiment to an extreme partisan divide. To mend these relationships, some experts believe mandating national service could be unifying.
Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney says a new national service corps would likely prove ineffective. He asserts America’s polarizing climate would prevent agreement on what initiatives would benefit the country most.
That’s why some politicians and commentators look back to those golden years for a solution to our current polarization and alienation. They don’t call for another World War and mass deployment of men to the Pacific and continental Europe, but a more peaceful variation of war: a massive new national service corps — maybe even mandatory service.
The New York Times editorial board asked what could be objectionable in asking all young people to pause before plunging into the scramble of adult life to donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service at home or abroad.
Here are two objections:
First: The Times was writing about mandatory service, and so it’s not “asking all young people” to serve. It’s forcing them to do so.
The second objection is more prickly. Read those words of the New York Times again. They want young people to “donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service….”
Well, our society is so fractured that we could never get consensus on what is “socially beneficial” or “critically needed.”
The United States is coming apart in all sorts of ways. Americans are lonelier than ever before. The Surgeon General this summer issued a report on the pandemic of loneliness, and a record 21% of Americans in a recent poll said they were extremely dissatisfied with the state of American democracy. Americans trust and like their countrymen much less than in past generations.
Compared to the middle of last century, we are much more likely to describe our fellow Americans as selfish or immoral, and much less likely to describe them as generous. America’s peak as far as neighborliness, civic mindedness and happiness seems to have been the two decades following World War Two. Unemployment was low, people were getting married, we had a baby boom, and Americans knew and trusted their neighbors.
That’s why some politicians and commentators look back to those golden years for a solution to our current polarization and alienation. They don’t call for another world war and mass deployment of men to the Pacific and continental Europe, but a more peaceful variation of war, a massive new National Service Corps, maybe even mandatory service.
The New York Times editorial board asked what could be objectionable in asking all young people to pause before plunging into the scramble of adult life to donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service at home or abroad? Well, here are two objections. First, the Times was writing about mandatory service, and so that’s not asking all young people to serve, it’s forcing them to do so.
The second objection is more quickly read those words of the New York Times again, they want young people to quote, “donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service.” While our society is so fractured that we could never get consensus on what is socially beneficial or critically needed. Take crisis pregnancy centers. These charitable organizations provide health care and pregnancy screenings to women in difficult pregnancies, typically unmarried women, young women, immigrant women. They also offer adoption referrals or parenting help, along with plenty of donated toys, baby clothes and maternity wear.
It’s hard to think of a more socially beneficial and critically needed service. Yet in the eyes of Democratic politicians. These crisis pregnancy centers are a scourge because they’re pro-life. Senator Elizabeth Warren has called on the federal government to crack down on them and to drive them out of business. What a Democratic administration allow a young person to fulfill her public service requirements by volunteering for a crisis pregnancy center?
Would a Republican administration considered public service to help Planned Parenthood with its abortion business? What if you volunteered for your church? Given the extreme ideas these days about separation of church and state even that would run into objections. The idea of national service to bridge our divides sounds appealing, but those very divides make the idea impossible in America today.
How to avoid child smartphone dependency
Smartphones have revolutionized our world — and our behavior, too. While billions of humans now have entire encyclopedias within arm’s reach, those same humans are also at risk of developing an addiction to various apps, social media platforms, games and so on. Questions surrounding the health and wellness of smartphones — as relevant to adults
Nov 16
Government can and should solve housing crisis
Millennials are marrying later, having children later and buying homes later than previous American generations — and that’s if they marry, have children or buy a home at all. Housing, which was once considered fair game on a single income, is now out of reach for even many dual-income couples. While observers blame a range
Oct 19
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
During his presidency, Donald Trump launched an immigration policy requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico until their scheduled immigration court date. President Joe Biden later terminated this policy and introduced his own approach, which has sparked controversy among some who argue that Biden’s changes have resulted in an influx of migrants and dangerous conditions.
Sep 21
Partisan divide makes a new national service corps impossible
Most Americans have less confidence in the country’s future, and many attribute that sentiment to an extreme partisan divide. To mend these relationships, some experts believe mandating national service could be unifying. Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney says a new national service corps would likely prove ineffective. He asserts America’s polarizing climate would prevent
Aug 24
What Democrats get wrong about misinformation and free speech
College students protesting conservative campus speakers. The media arguing that all Hunter Biden critics are biased. Government officials promoting COVID-19 misinformation. These are just some of the examples many conservatives believe illustrate how “woke” liberals are promoting misinformation and threatening free speech in America. Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney explains why some of what
Jul 13
Media Miss
Underreported stories from each side
White House reups Biden’s pledge not to pardon son if convicted: ‘Nothing has changed’
8 sources | 17% from the left
Reuters
Pro-Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro cooperating in multiple state probes into 2020 fake electors plot
10 sources | 0% from the right
AP Images
Latest Stories
Battle of the bench: Biden nearly even with Trump on judicial confirmations
Watch 4:17
2 hrs ago
US electric school bus adoption hits new high, detractors debate practicality
Watch 4:55
2 hrs ago
Trump says he won’t testify again in civil fraud trial
Watch 1:06
3 hrs ago
Penn president, Magill, resigns after antisemitism testimony
Watch 1:24
4 hrs ago
Ukraine President Zelenskyy to meet with Biden in D.C. as funding efforts flounder: The Morning Rundown, Dec. 11, 2023
Watch 7:06
5 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Conservatives will make immigration crisis worse
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Transgender athletes are a threat to women’s sports
Friday
Star Parker
US must respond to threat from Iran-backed Houthis
Thursday
Katherine Zimmerman
Think before canceling Hollywood celebrities over Israel-Hamas war
Thursday
Jordan Reid