The United States is coming apart in all sorts of ways. Americans are lonelier than ever before. The Surgeon General this summer issued a report on the pandemic of loneliness, and a record 21% of Americans in a recent poll said they were extremely dissatisfied with the state of American democracy. Americans trust and like their countrymen much less than in past generations.
Compared to the middle of last century, we are much more likely to describe our fellow Americans as selfish or immoral, and much less likely to describe them as generous. America’s peak as far as neighborliness, civic mindedness and happiness seems to have been the two decades following World War Two. Unemployment was low, people were getting married, we had a baby boom, and Americans knew and trusted their neighbors.
That’s why some politicians and commentators look back to those golden years for a solution to our current polarization and alienation. They don’t call for another world war and mass deployment of men to the Pacific and continental Europe, but a more peaceful variation of war, a massive new National Service Corps, maybe even mandatory service.
The New York Times editorial board asked what could be objectionable in asking all young people to pause before plunging into the scramble of adult life to donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service at home or abroad? Well, here are two objections. First, the Times was writing about mandatory service, and so that’s not asking all young people to serve, it’s forcing them to do so.
The second objection is more quickly read those words of the New York Times again, they want young people to quote, “donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service.” While our society is so fractured that we could never get consensus on what is socially beneficial or critically needed. Take crisis pregnancy centers. These charitable organizations provide health care and pregnancy screenings to women in difficult pregnancies, typically unmarried women, young women, immigrant women. They also offer adoption referrals or parenting help, along with plenty of donated toys, baby clothes and maternity wear.
It’s hard to think of a more socially beneficial and critically needed service. Yet in the eyes of Democratic politicians. These crisis pregnancy centers are a scourge because they’re pro-life. Senator Elizabeth Warren has called on the federal government to crack down on them and to drive them out of business. What a Democratic administration allow a young person to fulfill her public service requirements by volunteering for a crisis pregnancy center?
Would a Republican administration considered public service to help Planned Parenthood with its abortion business? What if you volunteered for your church? Given the extreme ideas these days about separation of church and state even that would run into objections. The idea of national service to bridge our divides sounds appealing, but those very divides make the idea impossible in America today.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Soft power’: Americans debate US foreign aid cuts
Friday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Time for change’: Democrats debate their party’s future
Apr 3 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Broken’: Democrats reflect on state of their party
Mar 28 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Needs to be strategic’: Americans talk Trump tariffs
Mar 20 Dr. Frank LuntzPartisan divide makes a new national service corps impossible
By Straight Arrow News
Most Americans have less confidence in the country’s future, and many attribute that sentiment to an extreme partisan divide. To mend these relationships, some experts believe mandating national service could be unifying.
Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney says a new national service corps would likely prove ineffective. He asserts America’s polarizing climate would prevent agreement on what initiatives would benefit the country most.
That’s why some politicians and commentators look back to those golden years for a solution to our current polarization and alienation. They don’t call for another World War and mass deployment of men to the Pacific and continental Europe, but a more peaceful variation of war: a massive new national service corps — maybe even mandatory service.
The New York Times editorial board asked what could be objectionable in asking all young people to pause before plunging into the scramble of adult life to donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service at home or abroad.
Here are two objections:
First: The Times was writing about mandatory service, and so it’s not “asking all young people” to serve. It’s forcing them to do so.
The second objection is more prickly. Read those words of the New York Times again. They want young people to “donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service….”
Well, our society is so fractured that we could never get consensus on what is “socially beneficial” or “critically needed.”
The United States is coming apart in all sorts of ways. Americans are lonelier than ever before. The Surgeon General this summer issued a report on the pandemic of loneliness, and a record 21% of Americans in a recent poll said they were extremely dissatisfied with the state of American democracy. Americans trust and like their countrymen much less than in past generations.
Compared to the middle of last century, we are much more likely to describe our fellow Americans as selfish or immoral, and much less likely to describe them as generous. America’s peak as far as neighborliness, civic mindedness and happiness seems to have been the two decades following World War Two. Unemployment was low, people were getting married, we had a baby boom, and Americans knew and trusted their neighbors.
That’s why some politicians and commentators look back to those golden years for a solution to our current polarization and alienation. They don’t call for another world war and mass deployment of men to the Pacific and continental Europe, but a more peaceful variation of war, a massive new National Service Corps, maybe even mandatory service.
The New York Times editorial board asked what could be objectionable in asking all young people to pause before plunging into the scramble of adult life to donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service at home or abroad? Well, here are two objections. First, the Times was writing about mandatory service, and so that’s not asking all young people to serve, it’s forcing them to do so.
The second objection is more quickly read those words of the New York Times again, they want young people to quote, “donate some of their time and energies to some socially beneficial, critically needed service.” While our society is so fractured that we could never get consensus on what is socially beneficial or critically needed. Take crisis pregnancy centers. These charitable organizations provide health care and pregnancy screenings to women in difficult pregnancies, typically unmarried women, young women, immigrant women. They also offer adoption referrals or parenting help, along with plenty of donated toys, baby clothes and maternity wear.
It’s hard to think of a more socially beneficial and critically needed service. Yet in the eyes of Democratic politicians. These crisis pregnancy centers are a scourge because they’re pro-life. Senator Elizabeth Warren has called on the federal government to crack down on them and to drive them out of business. What a Democratic administration allow a young person to fulfill her public service requirements by volunteering for a crisis pregnancy center?
Would a Republican administration considered public service to help Planned Parenthood with its abortion business? What if you volunteered for your church? Given the extreme ideas these days about separation of church and state even that would run into objections. The idea of national service to bridge our divides sounds appealing, but those very divides make the idea impossible in America today.
Universal school choice best for student, parents and communities
Anti-deportation protests across US will hurt immigrants
How woke Democratic policies are fueling devastating wildfires
Democrats, GOP must urgently cooperate to block Trump tariffs
Why Democrats have soured on mail-in voting
Underreported stories from each side
Republicans in Colorado’s legislature want Trump AG to stop new gun control law
8 sources | 0% from the left The Washington Post/Contributor via Getty ImagesTrump advisor suggests deportation critics are breaking the law by ‘aiding and abetting’ terrorism
11 sources | 0% from the right Jason Davis/Contributor via Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Appeals court rules against Trump in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case
Aaron Rodgers upset about Jets meeting, still undecided on playing future
Stanley Cup Playoffs: Who will make a surprise run in the East?
Supreme Court to hear arguments on Trump’s birthright citizenship plan
Macron acknowledges France’s financial ‘ransom’ on Haiti after independence
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Anti-Tesla violence reveals deeper problem in American culture
Mar 28 Star ParkerWhat if the Trump, Musk grand plan is government privatization?
Mar 28 Dr. Rashad RicheyIt’s not about safety. It’s about silencing political dissent.
Mar 27 Jordan ReidTrump falling into familiar Putin trap as peace talks stall
Mar 27 Matthew Continetti