This is going to be a very unusual election in America for a lot of reasons. One of them is that it’s probably going to be very class based. Now, that’s not that unusual for America. What’s unusual is that appears that the economic elites are leaning toward the Democrats, and the working stiffs are going to vote Republican.
Let’s think a little bit about how that came about. Well, first of all, we certainly have a more complex society than we used to. And we’re defining relationships between people in a lot of different ways, including race, gender, what have you. Well, when you have a more complex social arrangement, that creates a demand for expertise, to define how to deal with all the complexity.
And what does expertise require? It requires credentialism, people who get a degree in how to solve the problem. Well, but once you have a credentialed group of people, you have a natural source of demand for even more social complexity. And so the cycle builds and builds and builds.
I consider an example. Recently, there was a move called ESG, which was designed to promote good causes [in] a variety of areas. Well, the ESG movement became actually a professional movement, there are now ESG specialists out there. In effect, they define, promote, and regulate what ESG is all about. You know, they used to make a joke about religion as having a monopoly on defining sin and [a] monopoly on how to get rid of it. Not too much different than what the ESG professionals do right now.
Well, let’s see how that actually breaks down. Bloomberg recently did a study of political campaign donors in the last half of 2023. The U.S. Federal Election Commission data, where people have to give the amount that they contributed, who their employer is, and a description of their job title or function.
Well, people who marked down that they were professors, surprise, surprise, gave to the Democrats by a margin of 93% to 7%.
That’s quite dramatic. And as we’ve seen in recent events on campuses, such as Harvard, you have a decidedly left-leaning group of people there, and [not] only that, they’re pretty fervent. So they’re a little bit like the Mean Girls Club back in, in junior high.
Aside from professors, the other big Democrat donors were psychologists, social workers, scientists, and writers, all people who claim to have expertise and generally have credentials to back them.
Who were the big donor types for Trump? Well, generally, they were people who didn’t go to anything like a faculty club, they tended to work on their own: farmers, truckers, entrepreneurs, mechanics and construction workers. They’re certainly people who [you] wouldn’t call streetwise. And they definitely are not credentialed. And no faculty club in the country would take them in as members.
Well, the same thing is true when you look at employers. Employees of Google contributed 90 to 10 to Biden, and as their recent experience with AI shows where they ended up, you know, basically not having any White historical figures, that they’ve even admitted was a major mistake. It shows the bias of the employer. But similarly, those people are experts, and they are credentialed. And aside from Google employees, Microsoft and IBM employees also gave overwhelmingly to the Democrats. The other big employer was Kaiser Permanente.
So you had high-tech and national health-oriented people going for Biden. On the other hand, what companies employed people who contributed to Trump? Walmart, Federal Express, and UPS, so the people who bring us all the stuff we consume, tend to be on Trump’s side.
Another interesting tell was the size of the contribution. The study broke it down into three categories under $200, which is kind of the break-even point for where contributions must be reported, over $3,300, $3,300 is the maximum contribution you can make to either the primary or the general election and those in between.
Among small dollar donors, Trump led by a margin of three to two. Among big-dollar donors, Biden led by a margin of 2.3 to one. In fact, Biden got more money just from big, high-roller donors than Trump got from all donors combined. Again, it’s the elites, experts and credential people who are on one side, they can afford to give those that money. The working guys could not.
Again, this is a switch from history. From the New Deal on, it was thought that the economic elites were Republicans, and the working class were the Democrats. But now it’s obvious the working class are the Republicans and the economic elites are the Democrats.
Whatever happens in November 5, it’s going to be a very, very interesting result, because the class divisions within America, as showing up at the ballot box, have never been wider. And so whichever side wins is going to really have a big impact on how class in America is defined going forward.
Larry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey Group
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
8 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Social and economic class will define 2024 election
Larry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey Group
By Straight Arrow News
Following in the footsteps of FDR, Democratic support in the past hundred years has drawn largely from working-class individuals, labor unions, and civil society organizations. Republican support, conversely, tended to rely upon larger corporate donations and the support of high-income individuals. In 2024, these traditional roles are evolving, and the new reality of campaign finance is becoming something far more nuanced and complicated.
Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey dives into the newest data about who is contributing to political campaigns and argues the data are representative of a much larger shift in American political society. Social and economic class, Lindsey contends, will play a critical role in the upcoming election, and which side wins might determine how American concepts of class are shaped in the years to come.
Among small-dollar donors, Trump led by a margin of three to two. Among big-dollar donors, Biden led by a margin of 2.3 to one. In fact, Biden got more money just from big, high-roller donors than Trump got from all donors combined. Again, it’s the elites, experts and credentialed people who are on one side. They can afford to give those that money. The working guys could not.
Again, this is a switch from history. From the New Deal on, it was thought that the economic elites were Republicans, and the working class were the Democrats. But now it’s obvious the working class are the Republicans, and the economic elites are the Democrats.
Whatever happens on November 5, it’s going to be a very, very interesting result because the class divisions within America as showing up at the ballot box have never been wider. And so whichever side wins is going to really have a big impact on how class in America is defined going forward.
This is going to be a very unusual election in America for a lot of reasons. One of them is that it’s probably going to be very class based. Now, that’s not that unusual for America. What’s unusual is that appears that the economic elites are leaning toward the Democrats, and the working stiffs are going to vote Republican.
Let’s think a little bit about how that came about. Well, first of all, we certainly have a more complex society than we used to. And we’re defining relationships between people in a lot of different ways, including race, gender, what have you. Well, when you have a more complex social arrangement, that creates a demand for expertise, to define how to deal with all the complexity.
And what does expertise require? It requires credentialism, people who get a degree in how to solve the problem. Well, but once you have a credentialed group of people, you have a natural source of demand for even more social complexity. And so the cycle builds and builds and builds.
I consider an example. Recently, there was a move called ESG, which was designed to promote good causes [in] a variety of areas. Well, the ESG movement became actually a professional movement, there are now ESG specialists out there. In effect, they define, promote, and regulate what ESG is all about. You know, they used to make a joke about religion as having a monopoly on defining sin and [a] monopoly on how to get rid of it. Not too much different than what the ESG professionals do right now.
Well, let’s see how that actually breaks down. Bloomberg recently did a study of political campaign donors in the last half of 2023. The U.S. Federal Election Commission data, where people have to give the amount that they contributed, who their employer is, and a description of their job title or function.
Well, people who marked down that they were professors, surprise, surprise, gave to the Democrats by a margin of 93% to 7%.
That’s quite dramatic. And as we’ve seen in recent events on campuses, such as Harvard, you have a decidedly left-leaning group of people there, and [not] only that, they’re pretty fervent. So they’re a little bit like the Mean Girls Club back in, in junior high.
Aside from professors, the other big Democrat donors were psychologists, social workers, scientists, and writers, all people who claim to have expertise and generally have credentials to back them.
Who were the big donor types for Trump? Well, generally, they were people who didn’t go to anything like a faculty club, they tended to work on their own: farmers, truckers, entrepreneurs, mechanics and construction workers. They’re certainly people who [you] wouldn’t call streetwise. And they definitely are not credentialed. And no faculty club in the country would take them in as members.
Well, the same thing is true when you look at employers. Employees of Google contributed 90 to 10 to Biden, and as their recent experience with AI shows where they ended up, you know, basically not having any White historical figures, that they’ve even admitted was a major mistake. It shows the bias of the employer. But similarly, those people are experts, and they are credentialed. And aside from Google employees, Microsoft and IBM employees also gave overwhelmingly to the Democrats. The other big employer was Kaiser Permanente.
So you had high-tech and national health-oriented people going for Biden. On the other hand, what companies employed people who contributed to Trump? Walmart, Federal Express, and UPS, so the people who bring us all the stuff we consume, tend to be on Trump’s side.
Another interesting tell was the size of the contribution. The study broke it down into three categories under $200, which is kind of the break-even point for where contributions must be reported, over $3,300, $3,300 is the maximum contribution you can make to either the primary or the general election and those in between.
Among small dollar donors, Trump led by a margin of three to two. Among big-dollar donors, Biden led by a margin of 2.3 to one. In fact, Biden got more money just from big, high-roller donors than Trump got from all donors combined. Again, it’s the elites, experts and credential people who are on one side, they can afford to give those that money. The working guys could not.
Again, this is a switch from history. From the New Deal on, it was thought that the economic elites were Republicans, and the working class were the Democrats. But now it’s obvious the working class are the Republicans and the economic elites are the Democrats.
Whatever happens in November 5, it’s going to be a very, very interesting result, because the class divisions within America, as showing up at the ballot box, have never been wider. And so whichever side wins is going to really have a big impact on how class in America is defined going forward.
Election 2024 will boil down to the Great Lakes states
Pollsters and pundits have been engaged in a long debate about how Biden or Trump might win the 2024 election, with much of their focus spent on the “swing state” electoral battlegrounds. While the winners of Alabama or California may be obvious, for instance, who wins Pennsylvania is a more difficult question. Watch the above…
Jun 10
Why the Fed should consider Theory of Reflexivity when fixing policy
The Theory of Reflexivity, often used in the context of economics and financial markets, implies that investors don’t base their decisions on reality but on their perceptions of reality. This creates a feedback loop where investors’ perceptions influence economic fundamentals, which in turn alter investor perceptions. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor…
Jun 3
Federal Reserve surpassed its own wildest expectations
On May 14, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released the most current producer price index (PPI) report, which showed an increase of 0.5% month-over-month in April. After the report’s release, U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome “Jay” Powell said that while he believes the current policy rate is restrictive by many measures, the Fed needs…
May 20
Polls give slight advantage to Trump in Electoral College
With the U.S. general election only six months away, leading candidates President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump appear to be engaged in a very close contest. In their 2020 race, the winner of the Electoral College was ultimately determined by a relative handful of voters in just a few swing states, even though…
May 13
College sports is big money but not everyone benefits
March Madness has wrapped up and Caitlin Clark has emerged as a household name as well as a wealthy student athlete. Earning over $3 million throughout her college career, her success stands in stark contrast to the previous notion that collegiate athletes shouldn’t earn anything beyond their scholarship. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey examines…
Apr 29
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
3 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
3 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
3 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
3 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
4 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
9 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
10 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich