It’s human nature for everyone to like to think that they’re right. And part of that is to get news that tells you that what you believe is true. This is often called confirmation bias. And Washington DC is more guilty than most about wanting to believe confirmation bias. Well, one of the publications that does that is an online service called Axios. Axios. is a political broadsheet that everyone who thinks of themselves as part of the beltway cognitive center a Be sure to read. They recently ran a big story called historic credit tightening is occurring.
Well, okay. Why do beltway denizens the animals in the swamp so to speak, want to hear that? Well, they believe that it was banks that caused inflation,
with their reckless lending, that throws them in the same camp of inflation causes like Putin, corporate greed, global warming, what have you, everything is on the list for causing inflation, except for Washington, of course. Then, in addition, the banks through their reckless lending, caused a meltdown back in March, and was only saved by aggressive action by our fearless beltway powerhouses, the Fed and the Treasury.
That’s what we want to believe. So being told that, in fact, we have historic credit tightening going on is a good thing, because it’s going to take care of those banks. Well,
let’s think about that a little bit more carefully. The data that was presented in the article comes from something called the Fed senior loan officer survey.
And the survey says at asked the chief credit officer at the bank, are you tightening lending standards or easing lending standards or leaving them the same? Now, you’re the chief credit officer, and obviously, you’re going to read the financial press. And unless you’re totally clueless, you know, that the Fed is trying to rein in the economy? Well, you know, what you should do? So along comes the Fed in sends you a survey asking you that question, are you tightening or easing credit standards? What do you think your answer should be? Regardless what you’re doing? Of course, you’re going to say tightening, I suppose at least you don’t have to say,
tightening, sir, standing up with a salute. You just have to check the box, but you’re tightening there. That’s the right answer to give your regulator.
But what’s actually happening? Well, the data they show shows tightening lending standards beginning of the start of 2022. And rising very quickly, the overall rise from marine zero to number like 60, the highest on record, it was historic credit tightness, if you believe senior loan officer survey, but what actually happened to lending. Now these senior loan officers are in charge generally of commercial and industrial loans. Well, during 2022 commercial industrial loans, increased 14.3% Despite supposedly record tightening of credit standards, then we had SVB. And they’ve basically been flat since but it wasn’t just commercial industrial loans. Commercial real estate, which we’ve heard a lot of problems about Rose 11.2% and consumer lending Rose 11 and a half percent. All this wall credit standards were supposedly being tightened. Well, you tell the Fed one answer to that survey, and you do what’s profitable. Now, banks did cut one part of their portfolio, government bonds. They kept lending but government bonds are supposed to be risk free. Nonetheless, they cut them 2.7% in 2022, and an annual rate of 5.2% in the first quarter of this year, and an annual rate of 9.6% in the second quarter. It’s government bonds that were too long maturity that were the problem and not the decisions made by the chief credit officers. Their decision
about who to lend to seem to work out quite well. Now, that fact is not reported, because of course the beltway cognitive Sanjay doesn’t want to hear that. They’re the ones who aren’t being lent to not the general commercial and industrial sector. So don’t believe all of your own propaganda. If you’re a policymaker, it’s only going to make your policy, just a repetition of the same old, same old and let’s face it, that hasn’t been working.
Larry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey Group
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Is the US looking for a war?
7 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
How future generations could shift US support for Israel
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Why election of European Commission president is so important
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
‘Both completely corrupt’: What Americans think of Biden, Trump
Tuesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
The truth about corporate lending and credit tightening
Larry Lindsey
President & CEO, The Lindsey Group
By Straight Arrow News
Banks have started to tighten credit due to the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes, which represent a deliberate strategy to temper economic growth and reduce inflation. According to the most recent Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey, a majority of banks reported that they had tightened lending standards for larger and medium-sized businesses in the past three months.
But Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey raises doubts about the survey’s reliability. He cautions against policymakers depending on potentially biased information and recommends a more nuanced analysis to make informed policy decisions.
It’s human nature for everyone to like to think that they’re right. And part of that is to get news that tells you that what you believed is true. This is often called “confirmation bias.” And Washington, D.C. is more guilty than most about wanting to believe confirmation bias. Well, one of the publications that does that is an online service called Axios. Axios is a political broadsheet that everyone who thinks of themselves as part of the beltway cognoscente will be sure to read. They recently ran a big story called, “Historic Credit Tightening is Occurring.“
Well, okay. Why do beltway denizens, the animals in the swamp, so to speak, want to hear that? Well, they believe that it was banks that caused inflation with their reckless lending. That throws them in the same camp of inflation causes like Putin, corporate greed, global warming, what have you. Everything is on the list for causing inflation, except for Washington, of course. Then, in addition, the banks, through their reckless lending, caused a meltdown back in March, and were only saved by aggressive action by our fearless beltway powerhouses, the Fed and the Treasury.
That’s what we want to believe. So being told that, in fact, we have historic credit tightening going on, is a good thing, because it’s going to take care of those banks.
Well, let’s think about that a little bit more carefully.
It’s human nature for everyone to like to think that they’re right. And part of that is to get news that tells you that what you believe is true. This is often called confirmation bias. And Washington DC is more guilty than most about wanting to believe confirmation bias. Well, one of the publications that does that is an online service called Axios. Axios. is a political broadsheet that everyone who thinks of themselves as part of the beltway cognitive center a Be sure to read. They recently ran a big story called historic credit tightening is occurring.
Well, okay. Why do beltway denizens the animals in the swamp so to speak, want to hear that? Well, they believe that it was banks that caused inflation,
with their reckless lending, that throws them in the same camp of inflation causes like Putin, corporate greed, global warming, what have you, everything is on the list for causing inflation, except for Washington, of course. Then, in addition, the banks through their reckless lending, caused a meltdown back in March, and was only saved by aggressive action by our fearless beltway powerhouses, the Fed and the Treasury.
That’s what we want to believe. So being told that, in fact, we have historic credit tightening going on is a good thing, because it’s going to take care of those banks. Well,
let’s think about that a little bit more carefully. The data that was presented in the article comes from something called the Fed senior loan officer survey.
And the survey says at asked the chief credit officer at the bank, are you tightening lending standards or easing lending standards or leaving them the same? Now, you’re the chief credit officer, and obviously, you’re going to read the financial press. And unless you’re totally clueless, you know, that the Fed is trying to rein in the economy? Well, you know, what you should do? So along comes the Fed in sends you a survey asking you that question, are you tightening or easing credit standards? What do you think your answer should be? Regardless what you’re doing? Of course, you’re going to say tightening, I suppose at least you don’t have to say,
tightening, sir, standing up with a salute. You just have to check the box, but you’re tightening there. That’s the right answer to give your regulator.
But what’s actually happening? Well, the data they show shows tightening lending standards beginning of the start of 2022. And rising very quickly, the overall rise from marine zero to number like 60, the highest on record, it was historic credit tightness, if you believe senior loan officer survey, but what actually happened to lending. Now these senior loan officers are in charge generally of commercial and industrial loans. Well, during 2022 commercial industrial loans, increased 14.3% Despite supposedly record tightening of credit standards, then we had SVB. And they’ve basically been flat since but it wasn’t just commercial industrial loans. Commercial real estate, which we’ve heard a lot of problems about Rose 11.2% and consumer lending Rose 11 and a half percent. All this wall credit standards were supposedly being tightened. Well, you tell the Fed one answer to that survey, and you do what’s profitable. Now, banks did cut one part of their portfolio, government bonds. They kept lending but government bonds are supposed to be risk free. Nonetheless, they cut them 2.7% in 2022, and an annual rate of 5.2% in the first quarter of this year, and an annual rate of 9.6% in the second quarter. It’s government bonds that were too long maturity that were the problem and not the decisions made by the chief credit officers. Their decision
about who to lend to seem to work out quite well. Now, that fact is not reported, because of course the beltway cognitive Sanjay doesn’t want to hear that. They’re the ones who aren’t being lent to not the general commercial and industrial sector. So don’t believe all of your own propaganda. If you’re a policymaker, it’s only going to make your policy, just a repetition of the same old, same old and let’s face it, that hasn’t been working.
Election 2024 will boil down to the Great Lakes states
Pollsters and pundits have been engaged in a long debate about how Biden or Trump might win the 2024 election, with much of their focus spent on the “swing state” electoral battlegrounds. While the winners of Alabama or California may be obvious, for instance, who wins Pennsylvania is a more difficult question. Watch the above…
Jun 10
Why the Fed should consider Theory of Reflexivity when fixing policy
The Theory of Reflexivity, often used in the context of economics and financial markets, implies that investors don’t base their decisions on reality but on their perceptions of reality. This creates a feedback loop where investors’ perceptions influence economic fundamentals, which in turn alter investor perceptions. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor…
Jun 3
Federal Reserve surpassed its own wildest expectations
On May 14, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released the most current producer price index (PPI) report, which showed an increase of 0.5% month-over-month in April. After the report’s release, U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome “Jay” Powell said that while he believes the current policy rate is restrictive by many measures, the Fed needs…
May 20
Polls give slight advantage to Trump in Electoral College
With the U.S. general election only six months away, leading candidates President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump appear to be engaged in a very close contest. In their 2020 race, the winner of the Electoral College was ultimately determined by a relative handful of voters in just a few swing states, even though…
May 13
College sports is big money but not everyone benefits
March Madness has wrapped up and Caitlin Clark has emerged as a household name as well as a wealthy student athlete. Earning over $3 million throughout her college career, her success stands in stark contrast to the previous notion that collegiate athletes shouldn’t earn anything beyond their scholarship. Straight Arrow News contributor Larry Lindsey examines…
Apr 29
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
2 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
2 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
3 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
3 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
3 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
8 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
9 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich