Skip to main content
Business

Rupert Murdoch, Warren Buffett top the list of 5 oldest executives


President Joe Biden officially launched his reelection campaign on April 25. Poll after poll shows the 80-year-old’s age is a major concern for Republicans and even Democrats. But in business, age is just another sign of experience. Here are the executives working well into their golden years in this week’s Five For Friday

#5: Frederick Smith

78-year-old Frederick Smith founded Federal Express with a $4 million inheritance from his father in 1971. FedEx is one of the largest courier services in the world, but getting off the ground 50 years ago was an uphill battle.

In the early years, as the company struggled to pay its fuel bills, Smith took the company’s last $5,000 to Las Vegas and turned it into $27,000, which kept the company afloat. Smith was the chief executive until 2022 at the age of 77. He still serves as FedEx’s executive chair

#4: Alan Miller

85-year-old Alan Miller knew the health care industry was the place to make money in the U.S. He founded Universal Health Services with just six employees in 1979 after losing his first venture to a hostile takeover. UHS is one of the 400 largest public companies in the nation today and made more than $13 billion last year.

Miller left his position as chief executive at the end of 2020 as part of a previously established succession plan. He still serves as board chair for Universal Health Services.

#3: Roger Penske

Roger Penske made a name for himself on the track driving race cars and later started his own team. Penske Racing has more Indianapolis 500 wins than any other team with 18. They’re so dominant, he bought the Indianapolis Motor Speedway and IndyCar Series in 2020.

His drivers also have three championship titles in NASCAR as well. At 86 years old, Penske still serves as chairman of the board and CEO of Penske Automotive Group, which does everything from transportation services to selling cars on lots throughout the country.  

#2: Rupert Murdoch

92-year-old Rupert Murdoch is best known for his ownership of Fox News. He hasn’t been CEO of any of his properties since 2018, when he finished out a stint as acting CEO at Fox News after Roger Ailes resigned his position in disgrace. Murdoch is still the chairman of the board at Fox Corp., with his son serving as CEO.

Murdoch has also ended up in the news himself, from a phone-hacking scandal involving the British Royal family to the defamation case levied against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems, which resulted in a $787.5 million settlement.

He was also reportedly behind the Fox News decision to part ways with its top-rated anchor Tucker Carlson. Fox remained the No. 1 cable news network after Bill O’Reilly’s ouster, so all eyes are on whether the 92-year-old can make it happen again. 

#1: Warren Buffett

Warren Buffett will turn 93 years old this year. He’s the longest-tenured CEO of any S&P 500 company, having helmed Berkshire Hathaway since 1970.

Interestingly, Buffett has said buying Berkshire, a textile company at the time, out of spite was the dumbest move he ever made. But it all worked out after transitioning to a major conglomerate with $90 billion in profit in 2022.

Buffett is the world’s fifth richest person and despite naming his successor, has no plan to leave his post as CEO. But the Oracle of Omaha could face some shareholder pressure to relinquish some control at the company’s upcoming annual meeting. 

As an honorable mention, Nobutsugu Shimizu was the oldest CEO in Japan when he stepped down in 2021 at age 95. He passed away just one year into retirement.

Tags: , , , ,

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO:

PRESIDENT BIDEN OFFICIALLY LAUNCHED HIS RE-ELECTION BID THIS WEEK, AND POLL AFTER POLL SHOWS THE 80-YEAR-OLD’S AGE IS A CONCERN. BUT IN THE BUSINESS WORLD, AGE MEANS EXPERIENCE. WE’VE GOT THE EXECUTIVES GETTING ON IN YEARS IN THIS WEEK’S FIVE FOR FRIDAY:

78-YEAR OLD FREDERICK SMITH FOUNDED FEDEX WITH A $4 MILLION DOLLAR INHERITANCE FROM HIS FATHER. THE COURIER IS PRETTY MUCH EVERYWHERE NOW, BUT GETTING OFF THE GROUND 50 YEARS AGO WAS TOUGH. IN THE EARLY DAYS, STRUGGLING TO PAY THE FUEL BILL, HE TOOK FEDEX’S LAST FIVE GRAND TO VEGAS AND TURNED IT INTO 27K, KEEPING THE COMPANY AFLOAT. SMITH WAS CEO UNTIL JUST LAST YEAR AT 77, AND STILL SERVES AS EXECUTIVE CHAIR.

85-YEAR OLD ALAN MILLER MUST’VE KNOWN HEALTHCARE WAS THE PLACE TO MAKE MONEY IN THE U.S. HE FOUNDED UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES WITH SIX EMPLOYEES IN 1979 AFTER LOSING HIS FIRST HEALTHCARE VENTURE TO A HOSTILE TAKEOVER. UHS RAKED IN MORE THAN $13 BILLION IN 2022 AND IS ONE OF THE 400 LARGEST PUBLIC COMPANIES IN THE NATION. MILLER LEFT HIS CEO POST AT THE END OF 2020 AT AGE 83 AS PART OF AN ESTABLISHED SUCCESSION PLAN. HE STILL SERVES AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD.

86-YEAR OLD ROGER PENSKE MADE A NAME FOR HIMSELF AS A RACECAR DRIVER AND LATER STARTED HIS OWN TEAM, WHICH HAS MORE INDY 500 WINS THAN ANY OTHER AT 18. HE’S SO DOMINANT THERE, HE BOUGHT INDIANAPOLIS MOTOR SPEEDWAY AND THE INDYCAR SERIES IN 2020. HIS DRIVERS HAVE THREE NASCAR CHAMPIONSHIPS TOO. PENSKE SERVES AS BOARD CHAIR AND CEO AT PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, A FORTUNE 500 COMPANY, WHICH DOES ALL KINDS OF CAR STUFF, EVEN SELLING EM AT DEALERSHIPS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY.

92-YEAR OLD RUPERT MURDOCH IS THE MEDIA MOGUL BEST KNOWN FOR FOX NEWS. HE HASN’T BEEN CEO OF ANY OF HIS PROPERTIES SINCE 2018, WHEN HE FINISHED A YEARS-LONG ACTING CEO STINT AFTER ROGER AILES RESIGNED IN DISGRACE. BUT MURDOCH’S STILL THE CHAIR OF FOX CORP, WITH HIS SON AS CEO, AND THE EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN AT NEWS CORP. HE EVEN STILL ENDS UP IN THE NEWS, BE IT A PHONE-HACKING SCANDAL INVOLVING THE BRITISH ROYALS, OR THE FOX-DOMINION DEFAMATION CASE. MURDOCH WAS DEPOSED IN THE LATTER. AND IN THE AFTERMATH, HE WAS REPORTEDLY BEHIND THE DECISION TO PUSH OUT TOP-RATED HOST TUCKER CARLSON. FOX STAYED NUMBER ONE AFTER OUSTING BILL O’REILLY, WE’LL SEE IF THE 92-YEAR-OLD CAN SWING IT AGAIN.

WARREN BUFFETT FINISHES OFF OUR LIST, HE’LL TURN 93 THIS YEAR. HE’S THE LONGEST SERVING CEO OF AN S&P 500 COMPANY, HAVING BEEN AT THE HELM OF BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY SINCE 1970. HE SAYS BUYING UP BERKSHIRE OUT OF SPITE WAS ONE OF THE DUMBEST THINGS HE EVER DID. BUT THE FORMER TEXTILE COMPANY IS NOW A MAJOR CONGLOMERATE WITH 90 BILLION IN PROFIT JUST LAST YEAR. RIGHT NOW THE ORACLE OF OMAHA’S THE WORLD’S 5TH RICHEST PERSON. AND HAS NO RETIREMENT PLANS OTHER THAN NAMING A SUCCESSOR, BUT COULD FACE PRESSURE TO RELINQUISH SOME CONTROL AT THIS YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING.

WE WANTED TO GET IN NOBUTSUGU SHIMIZU WHO STEPPED DOWN AS CEO OF LIFE CORP IN JAPAN TWO YEARS AGO AT AGE 95. BUT SADLY HE PASSED AWAY JUST A YEAR INTO RETIREMENT. MAYBE I SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF A MORE UPLIFTING WAY TO END THIS, BUT THAT’S LIFE? AND THAT’S FIVE FOR FRIDAY, I’M SIMONE DEL ROSARIO. IT’S JUST BUSINESS.

Politics

Here’s how much national debt climbed under each US president since WWII


At $31.4 trillion, the national debt is the subject of a showdown between the White House and House Republicans. Unless Congress raises the debt ceiling, the U.S. is at risk of defaulting on its debt, which would have catastrophic consequences.

House Republicans have proposed raising the debt ceiling into 2024 in exchange for spending cuts, but Democrats are pushing for a clean debt ceiling hike. While Republican leadership insists spending is out of control under the Biden administration, history shows Republican administrations are also guilty of running huge deficits.

The national debt first started rolling under Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt. The debt went up over 1,000% during his 12 years in office before he died. He had taken over the presidency in the depths of the Great Depression, purposefully engineered a debt default, and between the New Deal and World War II, spent a lot of money.

By the end of his term, the national debt had jumped to around a quarter of a trillion dollars, which equals about $4 trillion today. But how did the country go from that to $31.4 trillion in 2023? It’s quite the bipartisan effort.

President Harry Truman, D, FY 1946-1953

  • Debt rose $7.4 billion in eight years, up 2.86%.
  • Truman kept the debt pretty steady over his eight years. He did have the Korean War on his books, but after heavy spending by his predecessor, overall the national debt went up less than 3% on Truman’s watch.

President Dwight Eisenhower, R, FY 1954-1961

  • Debt rose $22.9 billion in eight years, up 8.61%.
  • Eisenhower faced multiple recessions during his time in office, worked with Democrats in Congress to try to curb spending and left office in 1961 with a warning for the nation:

“We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow,” Eisenhower said.

Presidents John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, D, FY 1962-1969

  • Debt rose $64.7 billion between the two presidents, up 22.41% in eight years.
  • John F. Kennedy increased the debt by nearly 8% in three years. Worried about his slim margin of victory and what it would mean for reelection, he proposed tax cuts that were eventually signed.
  • In five years, Lyndon B. Johnson tacked on another 13% to the debt. By his tenure, the U.S. had gotten involved in Vietnam. The total U.S. military cost of the war came to $111 billion, which is around $1 trillion in today’s dollars.

Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, R, FY 1970-1977

  • Debt rose $345.1 billion between the two presidents, up 97.57%.
  • Between Republicans Nixon and Ford, the national debt doubled in eight years’ time. The administration was plagued with soaring inflation.
  • Nixon implemented wage and price controls in the early ’70s that turned disastrous once lifted.
  • When Ford took over, his economy was marred with stagflation, where high inflation meets high unemployment.

President Jimmy Carter, D, FY 1978-1981

  • Debt rose $299 billion, up 42.79% in one term.
  • Democrat Jimmy Carter took the reins with a unified Congress behind him and the national debt went up another 43% in four years. Despite claims his budgets were “lean and tight,” the government repeatedly underestimated the cost of doing business amid skyrocketing inflation and soaring interest rates.
  • Carter never achieved the balanced budget he desired and though inflation started to come down, the country soon entered a recession.

President Ronald Reagan, R, FY 1982-1989

  • Debt rose $1.86 trillion, up 186.36% in eight years.
  • The national debt breached $1 trillion during Reagan’s presidency. The Reaganomics era included two major rounds of tax cuts in the name of economic recovery, but revenues took a hit.
  • Reagan also increased defense spending, pushing debt up 186% during his time in office.

President George H.W. Bush, R, FY 1990-1993

  • Debt rose $1.55 trillion, up 54.39% in four years.
  • Bush tried tackling the deficit he inherited, but with Democrats controlling Congress, they refused to cap spending without raising taxes. Bush conceded and did so, which likely cost him a second term.
  • Voters remembered the broken campaign promise he made in 1988: “Read my lips, no new taxes,” he infamously said.

President Bill Clinton, D, FY 1994-2001

  • Debt rose $1.4 trillion, up 31.64% in eight years.
  • Bill Clinton took Bush’s spending cap plan and ran with it. The debt went up slightly less in two terms than his predecessor’s one.
  • Clinton famously balanced his last four budgets while in office during a time of economic prosperity. Those years of surplus are the last the U.S. has seen.
  • When Clinton left office, the debt stood at less than $6 trillion.

President George W. Bush, R, FY 2002-2009

  • Debt rose $6.1 trillion, up 105.1% in two terms.
  • The national debt more than doubled under the younger Bush. He came in and quickly cut taxes but then spending ballooned with wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • The 2008 financial crash capped off his two terms with a $700 billion bank bailout.

President Barack Obama, D, FY 2010-2017

  • Debt rose $8.33 trillion, up 70% in eight years.
  • Obama came into office under the Great Recession that started under Bush. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act he passed cost hundreds of billions of dollars. Obama’s Affordable Care Act had an equally-expensive price tag.
  • Obama faced two debt-ceiling crises during his terms.

President Donald Trump, R, FY 2018-2021

  • Debt rose $8.18 trillion, up 40.43% in four years.
  • In four years, Trump added nearly as much debt as Obama did in eight.
  • Trump’s tax cuts and defense spending had figures soaring even before the pandemic, with costly COVID relief also on his watch.

President Joe Biden, D, FY 2022

  • Debt rose $2.5 trillion, up 8.79% his first fiscal year.
  • In a short amount of time, Biden has tacked on some trillions. The American Rescue Plan and $1 trillion infrastructure bill passed under his administration.

That’s how the U.S. ballooned to $31.4 trillion in debt. High interest rates are causing the cost of that debt to also soar at the moment. For decades now, every presidential administration is guilty of running a deficit and those deficits add up.

While the math Straight Arrow News used attaches debt accumulation to the president who passed the budgets those fiscal years, Congress and compromise are often at play. Also, the cost — or benefit — of a policy that passes one year can ripple on for decades to come.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: WHEN IT COMES TO THE NATIONAL DEBT, FDR IS PROBABLY THE KING. THE NATIONAL DEBT WENT UP OVER A THOUSAND PERCENT DURING HIS 12 YEARS IN OFFICE BEFORE HE DIED. HE TOOK OVER THE PRESIDENCY IN THE DEPTHS OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION, PURPOSEFULLY ENGINEERED A DEBT DEFAULT, AND BETWEEN THE NEW DEAL AND WORLD WAR TWO, SPENT A LOT.

BY THE END OF HIS TERM, THE NATIONAL DEBT HAD JUMPED UP TO AROUND A QUARTER OF A TRILLION DOLLARS, WHICH EQUALS ABOUT FOUR TRILLION IN TODAY’S TIME.

BUT HOW DID THE COUNTRY GO FROM THAT TO 31.4 TRILLION? IT’S QUITE THE BIPARTISAN EFFORT, LET’S TAKE A LOOK AT THE PILE ON.

DEMOCRAT, PRESIDENT HARRY TRUMAN KEPT THE DEBT PRETTY STEADY IN HIS EIGHT YEARS. HE DID HAVE THE KOREAN WAR ON HIS BOOKS BUT OVERALL THE DEBT WENT UP LESS THAN 3% ON HIS 8-YEAR WATCH.

UNDER REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT DWIGHT EISENHOWER, DEBT ROSE ANOTHER 8.6% IN 8 YEARS. HE FACED MULTIPLE RECESSIONS, WORKED WITH DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO TRY TO CURB SPENDING, AND LEFT OFFICE WITH THIS WARNING:

PRESIDENT EISENHOWER: We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow. 

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: JFK INCREASED THE DEBT BY NEARLY 8% IN 3 YEARS. PRETTY WORRIED ABOUT HIS SLIM MARGIN OF VICTORY, HE PROPOSED TAX CUTS THAT WERE EVENTUALLY SIGNED BY HIS SUCCESSOR. AND IN 5 YEARS, LBJ TACKED ON ANOTHER 13% TO THE DEBT. BY THEN THE U-S HAD GOTTEN INVOLVED IN VIETNAM, WHERE THE TOTAL U-S MILITARY COST CAME TO $111 BILLION, AROUND A TRILLION IN TODAY’S DOLLARS.

BETWEEN REPUBLICANS NIXON AND FORD, THE NATIONAL DEBT DOUBLED IN EIGHT YEARS’ TIME. THE ADMINISTRATION WAS PLAGUED WITH SOARING INFLATION. NIXON IMPLEMENTED WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS, WHICH TURNED DISASTROUS ONCE LIFTED. AND HIS SUCCESSOR GERALD FORD’S ECONOMY WAS MARRED WITH STAGFLATION; WHERE HIGH INFLATION MEETS HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT.

DEMOCRAT JIMMY CARTER TOOK THE REINS WITH A UNIFIED CONGRESS BEHIND HIM, AND TACKED ON A 43% DEBT INCREASE IN FOUR YEARS. DESPITE CLAIMS HIS BUDGETS WERE “LEAN AND TIGHT,” THE GOVERNMENT REPEATEDLY UNDERESTIMATED THE COST OF DOING BUSINESS AMID SKYROCKETING INFLATION AND SOARING INTEREST RATES. HE NEVER ACHIEVED THE BALANCED BUDGET HE DESIRED, AND THOUGH INFLATION STARTED TO COME DOWN THE COUNTRY SOON ENTERED ANOTHER RECESSION IN CARTER’S SINGLE TERM.

THAT’S WHERE REPUBLICAN RONALD REAGAN TAKES OVER…AND THE NATIONAL DEBT BREACHES A TRILLION DOLLARS. THE REAGANOMICS ERA INCLUDED TWO MAJOR ROUNDS OF TAX CUTS IN THE NAME OF ECONOMIC RECOVERY, BUT REVENUES TOOK A BIG HIT. HE ALSO INCREASED DEFENSE SPENDING, PUSHING THE DEBT UP 186% IN HIS EIGHT YEARS.

PRESIDENT GEORGE H.W. BUSH: Congress will push me to raise taxes and i’ll say no, and they’ll push and i’ll say no, and they’ll push again and i’ll say to them read my lips no new taxes.

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: UNDER GEORGE H.W. BUSH, THE NATIONAL DEBT WENT UP ANOTHER 54% IN A SINGLE TERM. BUSH TRIED TACKLING THE DEFICIT HE INHERITED, BUT WITH DEMOCRATS CONTROLLING CONGRESS, THEY REFUSED TO CAP SPENDING WITHOUT RAISING TAXES… A CONCESSION AND BROKEN CAMPAIGN PROMISE THAT LIKELY COST HIM A SECOND TERM.

BILL CLINTON TOOK BUSH’S PLAN AND RAN WITH IT. THE DEBT WENT UP SLIGHTLY LESS IN TWO TERMS THAN HIS PREDECESSOR’S ONE. CLINTON FAMOUSLY BALANCED HIS LAST FOUR BUDGETS WHILE IN OFFICE DURING A TIME OF ECONOMIC PROSPERITY. THOSE YEARS OF SURPLUS ARE THIS COUNTRY’S LAST. THE DEBT STANDS AT LESS THAN SIX TRILLION.

THE NATIONAL DEBT MORE THAN DOUBLED DURING GEORGE W. BUSH’S TIME IN OFFICE. HE CAME IN AND QUICKLY CUT TAXES, BUT THEN SPENDING BALLOONED WITH THE WARS IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN, AND THEN THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRASH CAPPED OFF HIS TERMS WITH A $700 BILLION DOLLAR BANK BAILOUT.

BUDGETS UNDER BARACK OBAMA ADDED ANOTHER 70% TO THE DEBT. COMING INTO OFFICE UNDER THE GREAT RECESSION, THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT ALONE COST HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. HIS AFFORDABLE CARE ACT HAD AN EQUALLY EXPENSIVE PRICE TAG. OBAMA FACED TWO DEBT CEILING CRISES DURING HIS TERMS.

IN FOUR YEARS, DONALD TRUMP ADDED NEARLY AS MUCH DEBT AS OBAMA DID IN EIGHT. THE NATIONAL DEBT RISES ANOTHER 40%. TRUMP’S TAX CUTS AND DEFENSE SPENDING HAD FIGURES SOARING EVEN BEFORE THE PANDEMIC, WITH COSTLY COVID RELIEF ALSO ON HIS WATCH.

IN A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME, JOE BIDEN HAS TACKED ON SOME TRILLIONS…THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN AND TRILLION DOLLAR INFRASTRUCTURE BILL ON HIS PLATE. BUT NOW, HE’S AT ANOTHER CEILING, AND THE DEBT STANDS AT 31.4.

SO THAT’S HOW IT ALL BALLOONED. FOR DECADES NOW, EVERY PRESIDENT’S BEEN GUILTY OF RUNNING A DEFICIT. AND THOSE DEFICITS ADD UP.

HERE ARE THE ANNUAL BUDGETS. IT MIGHT SURPRISE YOU TO SEE THAT SOME OF THESE BIGGER DEFICITS ARE HAPPENING UNDER REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS. BUT AS WE’VE JUST WALKED YOU THROUGH, YOU CAN PICK OUT SOME OF THE CRISES THAT HAPPENED THAT LED TO SOME OF THESE SPIKES.

AND WHILE WE ATTACH DEBT ACCUMULATION TO THE PRESIDENT THAT PASSED THE BUDGETS THOSE YEARS, WE KNOW THAT CONGRESS AND COMPROMISE ARE AT PLAY. AND THAT THE COST – OR BENEFIT – OF A POLICY THAT PASSES ONE YEAR, CAN RIPPLE ON FOR DECADES TO COME.

U.S.

Fatalities climb at national parks as visitors grow, funding and staffing lag


“As I was walking in with my client, a hiker was standing on a cliff and stepped backwards and fell off, and was killed right in front of us,” American Alpine Institute Director Jason Martin said.

Martin has been an avid climber for 31 years.

It’s not just freak accidents taking the lives of park visitors. Raging rivers, wild animals and severe weather can also be deadly. As national parks see more visitors, there are also more accidents and fatalities.

“That’s probably the biggest hazard for everybody being out and unprepared. Not having the right clothing, not having the right food. Being out unexpectedly, not preparing properly. Not having a map, not having the training to use the map. And going to a place that is maybe less well known.”

Martin says in the last 5 years, the sport of mountain climbing has skyrocketed.

“The number one reason is the Oscar-winning film ‘Free Solo,’ but also the access to climbing gyms in every major metropolitan area,” Martin said.

And with more climbers, comes more casualties.

“So when it comes to climbers, the biggest hazard for climbers is falling. And when we talk about falling climbers, technical climbers are using ropes. And so the way that they use the rope, if they’re using the rope appropriately, a fall is not a big deal. But if they’re newer and they’re not using the rope appropriately, sometimes, a fall could be quite catastrophic,” Martin said.

“I think it’s a lack of experience,” Steph Abegg said. Abegg is a data analyst who has been climbing for 28 years.

“Maybe the biggest danger is people who are going out there who just don’t quite know what to do and things aren’t picture perfect. So if the weather turns or if they happen to trip and get a little injured or if the elevation is a little bit more difficult to handle than they thought it would be. I guess I feel like a lot of the accidents and stuff occur from people who were a little bit in over their heads,” Abegg said.

Abegg says stricter regulations don’t always mean safety. 

“You have to get your permit so far in advance that you don’t even know if the weather’s gonna be good. And then you have this permit for this certain date, and you just go because you have it and the weather’s not good. And that bad weather and bad conditions lead to accidents,” Abegg said.

“There’s a limited amount that they can do given the staffing issues that the national parks have right now. It’s hard because they have a lot of budget constraints. And so not every park has a helicopter, for example, on call very easily. Some parks share a helicopter to pick up an injured person. And so it would be great if they had more funding, so they had the ability to monitor this stuff. Is it the park’s fault that a tree branch fell out of the tree and hit somebody? Or that a rock fell off of a mountain,” Martin said.

Tags: , , ,

JASON MARTIN | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AMERICAN ALPINE INSTITUTE: “As I was walking in with my client, a hiker was standing on a cliff and stepped backwards and fell off and was killed right in front of us.”

 

KARAH RUCKER: FREAK ACCIDENTS, RAGING RIVERS, WILD ANIMALS, SEVERE WEATHER. AS NATIONAL PARKS SEE MORE VISITORS, THEY’RE SEEING MORE CLIMBING ACCIDENTS AND FATALITIES. 

 

MARTIN: “That’s probably the biggest hazard for everybody being out and unprepared. Not having the right clothing, not having the right food, being out unexpected, not preparing properly, not having a map, not having the training to use the map. And, and going to a place that is maybe less well known.”

 

JASON MARTIN HAS BEEN ROCK CLIMBING AND MOUNTAINEERING FOR 31 YEARS. HE SAYS IN THE LAST 5 YEARS, THE SPORT HAS SKYROCKETED.

 

MARTIN: “The number one reason is the Oscar winning film Free Solo, but also the access to climbing gyms in every metro major metropolitan area.”

 

AND WITH MORE CLIMBERS, COMES MORE CASUALTIES. 

 

MARTIN: “So when it comes to climbers, the biggest hazard for climbers is falling. And when we talk about falling climbers, technical climbers are using ropes, and so the way that they use the rope, if they’re using the rope appropriately, a fall is not a big deal. But if they’re newer and they’re not using the rope appropriately, sometimes a fall could be quite catastrophic.”

 

STEPH ABEGG | DATA ANALYST, LONGPATH: “I think it’s a lack of experience. Maybe the biggest danger is people who are going out there who just don’t quite know what to do and things aren’t picture perfect. So if the weather turns or if they happen to trip and get a little injured or if the elevation is a little bit more knee difficult to handle than I thought it would be. I guess I feel like a lot of the accidents and stuff occur from people who were in a little bit over their heads.”

 

STEPH ABEGG HAS BEEN CLIMBING FOR 28 YEARS. SHE SAYS STRICTER REGULATIONS DON’T ALWAYS MEAN SAFETY. 

 

ABEGG: “You have to get your permit so far in advance that you don’t even know if the weather’s gonna be good. And then you have this permit for this certain date. And you just go because you have it and the weather’s not good. And that bad weather and bad conditions lead to accidents.”

 

MARTIN: “There’s a limited amount that they can do given the staffing issues that the national parks have right now. It’s hard because they have a lot of budget constraints. And so not every park has a helicopter, for example, on call very easily. Some parks share a helicopter to pick up an injured person. And so it would be great if they had more funding, so they had the ability to monitor this stuff. Is it the park’s fault that a tree branch fell out of the tree and hit somebody or that a rock fell off of a mountain?”

Business

Commanders sale sets record but these 5 teams have even faster growing values


The Washington Commanders will be in the hands of Apollo Global founder Josh Harris after the $6 billion deal is finalized. It’s quite the return on investment for the team’s controversial owner Dan Snyder, who bought the team for $800 million in 1999.

At the time, it was a record price for a U.S. sports franchise. Buying a sports team tends to be a good bet with multiplying values. Here are the major men’s teams with the fastest growing values in this week’s Five For Friday.

5: New York Yankees

The New York Yankees are by far the most valuable MLB franchise. Legends like Babe Ruth, Mickey Mantle, Roger Maris and Derek Jeter have all donned the iconic pinstripes. The team’s value surged to $7.1 billion in 2023, a 78% increase over the last five years.

Television revenue from the YES Network, which the organization partially owns, has been great for the bottom line. Aaron Judge breaking the American League home run record with 62 and a deep playoff run in 2022 keeps Yankee Stadium full and helps pay for that star-studded roster.

4: Las Vegas Raiders

NFL teams are the most expensive in all of sports. The Las Vegas Raiders have gone from a $2.4 billion valuation to $5.1 billion in less than five years, a 113% increase.

The Raiders were the second-least valuable team in 2015. But a move to Las Vegas and a state-of-the-art stadium landed the club a spot in the top 10. The franchise hopes for continued growth after they led the league in ticket sales for the 2021 season at $119 million. The Commanders, meanwhile, were second to last in sales that season.

3: Golden State Warriors

The Dallas Cowboys is proof a team doesn’t need a recent championship track record to be the most valuable franchise in a sport. But winning is how the Golden State Warriors soared to the top of the NBA.

The Dubs are worth $7 billion, according to Forbes, but others have them closer to $7.5 billion. Even the more conservative estimate is more than double the value from five years ago, up 126%. The Warriors have won four titles since 2015 and the brand new Chase Center has upped its value. This is how they can afford to continue employing the highest paid player in the league, Steph Curry.

2: Edmonton Oilers

The NHL’s Edmonton Oilers are the least valuable team on this list at $1.3 billion, but its value has grown 145% over the last half decade. Edmonton is where “The Great One” Wayne Gretzky started his NHL career. The team recently launched Oilers+, a new streaming service that offers fans pretty much everything but the actual game.

Canadian billionaire Daryl Katz bought the team 15 years ago for roughly $200 million. That’s a significant return on investment.

1: Paris Saint-Germain

Paris Saint-Germain has the fastest growing value in all of sports, spiking 280% over the last five years. The club has turned its fortunes around by paying some of the highest salaries in soccer. There’s even a Five For Friday on it.

Superstars like Kylian Mbappe, Lionel Messi and Neymar Jr. helped the squad finish first or second in their league for the last decade. Now there are questions about what will happen with two of its biggest stars looking to make a move. PSG will likely come up with the cash to bring in more since it’s owned by Qatar and the state wealth fund is worth nearly half a trillion dollars.

Tags: , , , , ,

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO:

THE WASHINGTON COMMANDERS JUST COMMANDED SIX BILLION DOLLARS TO SELL. IT’S QUITE THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT FOR PROBLEMATIC OWNER DAN SNYDER, WHO BOUGHT THE TEAM IN 1999 FOR 800 MILLION…WHICH AT THE TIME WAS A RECORD PRICE FOR A U-S SPORTS FRANCHISE. TURNS OUT – SPORTS TEAMS MAKE GREAT BETS – HERE ARE THE MAJOR MEN’S TEAMS WITH THE FASTEST GROWING VALUES IN THEIR SPORT IN THIS WEEK’S FIVE FOR FRIDAY.

THE NEW YORK YANKEES ARE EASILY THE MOST VALUABLE MLB FRANCHISE. LOOK YOU’VE GOT THE GREATS LIKE THE BABE, MANTLE, MARIS, AND JETER ALL DONNING PINSTRIPES. THE YANKS’ VALUE JUMPED TO $7.1 BILLION IN 2023, A 78% INCREASE OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS. TV REVENUE FROM THE YES NETWORK IS A BIG PLUS. PLUS, AARON JUDGE BREAKING THE A-L HOME RUN RECORD WITH 62 AND A DEEP PLAYOFF RUN? THAT’S GONNA KEEP BUTTS IN THE SEATS TO PAY FOR THAT STAR-STUDDED ROSTER.

NFL TEAMS ARE THE MOST EXPENSIVE IN ALL OF SPORTS. AND THE LAS VEGAS RAIDERS HAVE GONE FROM A $2.4 BILLION DOLLAR VALUATION TO $5.1 IN LESS THAN 5 YEARS. THAT’S A 113% INCREASE. NOT TOO SHABBY AFTER BEING THE SECOND CHEAPEST TEAM IN 2015. ALL IT TOOK WAS MOVE TO VEGAS AND A STATE OF THE ART STADIUM AND BAM, THEY CRACKED THE TOP TEN. (VO – ALLEGIANT STADIUM FULL – ADD IN HEADLINE REVEAL) IN FACT, THE RAIDERS LED THE LEAGUE IN TICKET SALES IN 2021 AT $119 MILLION. THE COMMANDERS? WERE SECOND TO LAST.

YOU DON’T ALWAYS HAVE TO WIN TO BE WORTH A LOT, JUST ASK THE COWBOYS, BUT WINNING IS HOW THE GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS SOARED. FORBES HAS ‘EM WORTH $7 BILL, BUT OTHERS SEE IT CLOSER TO $7.5, MORE THAN DOUBLING IN THE LAST 5 YEARS. FOUR TITLES SINCE 2015 AND THE BRAND NEW CHASE CENTER GOT THEM THERE. THAT’S WHY THEY CAN AFFORD THE HIGHEST PAID NBA PLAYER. STEPH CURRY AND KLAY THOMPSON SHOULD BE CALLED THE “CASH” BROTHERS. IF YOU KNOW YOU KNOW.

HOCKEY’S EDMONTON OILERS ARE THE LEAST VALUABLE TEAM ON THIS LIST AT $1.3 BILLION, BUT THE FRANCHISE VALUE’S GROWN 145% IN THE LAST 5 YEARS. FOR THE UNINITIATED, EDMONTON IS WHERE THE GREAT ONE WAYNE GRETZKY STARTED HIS NHL CAREER. LAST YEAR THE TEAM LAUNCHED OILERS PLUS, A NEW STREAMING SERVICE THAT OFFERS FANS EVERYTHING BUT THE ACTUAL GAME. CANADIAN BILLIONAIRE DARYL KATZ BOUGHT THE TEAM 15 YEARS AGO FOR ABOUT $200 MIL. HOW’S THAT FOR R-O-I?

PARIS SAINT GERMAIN HAS THE FASTEST GROWING VALUE IN THE WORLD, UP 280% OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS. HERE’S A CLUB THAT’S REALLY TURNED IT AROUND BY PAYING THE HIGHEST SALARIES! HAHA! WE’VE GOT A FIVE FOR FRIDAY ON IT. WITH SUPERSTARS LIKE MBAPPE, MESSI, AND NEYMAR, THEY’VE FINISHED FIRST OR SECOND IN THEIR LEAGUE FOR THE LAST DECADE. BUT WHAT’S GONNA HAPPEN WITH TWO OF THEIR BRIGHTEST TRYING TO BAIL? SOMETHING TELLS ME THEY’LL COME UP WITH THE MONEY TO BRING IN MORE, THE CLUB IS OWNED BY THE COUNTRY QATAR, AND THE WEALTH FUND IS WORTH NEARLY HALF A TRILLION.

MORAL OF THE STORY, GOT A FEW BILLION AND SOME RICH FRIENDS? POOL IT TOGETHER, A SPORTS TEAM IS A GREAT INVESTMENT. JUST SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT OVER THE WEEKEND. THAT’S FIVE FOR FRIDAY. I’M SIMONE DEL ROSARIO. IT’S JUST BUSINESS.

U.S.

NFL asks Congress for help stopping drone incursions plaguing games


The National Football League is seeking help from Congress as it faces a growing problem of drone interruptions during games. Last season, the NFL dealt with over 2,500 drone incursions, nearly double the previous year’s total.

“The attitude of most of the stadium personnel that I have talked to over the years is it’s just a matter of time before something goes wrong,” Mike McCormick, legal counsel at the Stadium Managers Association, said.

The issue came to the forefront during a Week 3 matchup between the Seattle Seahawks and the visiting Atlanta Falcons when the game was halted for about eight minutes after a drone was spotted flying near the stadium. This came just one day after a college football game between Washington and Stanford that had to be put on hold due to an unmanned aircraft sighting.

This is not a new problem for the NFL either. In 2017, a drone dropped leaflets on NFL fans attending both a San Francisco 49ers vs. Seahawks game at Levi’s Stadium and an Oakland Raiders vs. Denver Broncos contest at Oakland-Alameda County Stadium.

“We are all very fortunate that the drone over Levi’s Stadium dropped only leaflets,” NFL Chief Security Officer Cathy Lanier said. “Drones today are capable of inflicting much greater damage.”

Other sporting leagues have also been affected by drone disruptions, such as Major League Baseball and the Premier League. Drone incursions have been seen at MLB ballparks including Target Field, Fenway Park,Yankee Stadium, and Petco Park. Meanwhile, a Premier League game between Southampton and Aston Villa was briefly stopped because of a drone flying nearby.

Under Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) laws, flying drones in or around stadiums with a capacity of 30,000 or more is prohibited one hour before and one hour after scheduled events. Violations can result in civil penalties worth over $37,000, confiscation of the drone, and possible criminal prosecution.

However, despite these consequences, the NFL believes the problem will only get worse unless Congress passes legislation that would allow law enforcement agencies to mitigate these flights. That would involve deploying technology that prevents drones from entering the area during games, a solution that the NCAA, MLB and NASCAR have all been advocating for as well.

“Some [drone incursions] we don’t know what the intentions are because we are not able to identify the operator,” Lanier said. “Some are hobbyists that are misguided and some that know what the law is but ignore it despite that.”

“Our concern is a security and safety-related issue,” added Kenneth Edmonds, a top NFL lobbyist. “Policymakers talk about the ‘careless, clueless and the criminal.’ But [Lanier] talked about how you can’t necessarily wait to make that distinction in real time.”

This upcoming season, all 32 NFL stadiums will be equipped with devices that allow them to track drones and identify if one is nearby, but they still cannot stop them from entering the airspace. League officials have cited security and safety concerns in asking Congress to grant them that power.

“The frustration is twofold: keeping pace with the technology so that we have the technology to counter the threats as they evolve, but also having the legislation to support our ability to keep pace with that threat,” Lanier said, while adding that unauthorized drones infiltrating stadiums could potentially cause “catastrophic outcomes.”

The issue has been discussed during the NFL’s annual league meeting in Phoenix, Arizona, this week, as the push for a solution from lawmakers continues. The FAA estimates that the U.S. could have over 2.5 million drones by 2025, and absent a legislative fix, this problem may continue to grow.

“If there’s a malign use of drones over stadiums or airports, there’s no authority right now that can knock those drones out of the sky or counter them, and that’s what we’re trying to fix,” Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Business

McCarthy: ‘I have not heard from White House’ in months as debt default nears

Media Landscape

MediaMiss™This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 10% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn more about this data
Left 32% Center 58% Right 10%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

The biggest showdown expected in Washington this summer had a battle stop in New York. On Monday, Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy made his political pitch on the debt ceiling to the New York Stock Exchange during trading hours.

“Without exaggeration, American debt is a ticking time bomb that will detonate unless we take serious, responsible action,” McCarthy said.

After taking extraordinary measures to stretch U.S. funds in the meantime, the Treasury Department said the U.S. will officially default on its debt sometime between July and September if politicians fail to raise the $31.4 trillion debt ceiling.

“Let me be clear, there’s two things I will not do. I will not raise taxes and I will not pass a clean debt ceiling, that just won’t pass,” McCarthy said.

The White House and Democrats are pushing to raise the debt ceiling without conditions to avoid default.

“There is one responsible solution to the debt limit: addressing it promptly, without brinksmanship or hostage taking – as Republicans did three times in the last administration and as Presidents Trump and Reagan argued for in office,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates said in a statement.

An actual default on debt would create an “unfettered economic catastrophe,” according to economists at consulting firm RSM US. In that event, they estimate unemployment would soar above 12% in the first six months, it would trigger a deep and lasting recession and U.S. standing and the dollar would be at risk.

But so far negotiations are at an impasse. McCarthy revealed to Wall Street that he hasn’t spoken to the White House on the issue in more than two months.

“Had the president agreed to negotiate in good faith, we’d already be done. Unfortunately, I have not heard from the White House since our very first meeting,” he said.

And while he said the Democrats’ plan is a nonstarter, Republicans have yet to present their own proposal on paper to save the country from default.

“Okay, so here’s our plan,” McCarthy started. “In the coming weeks, the House will vote on a bill to lift the debt ceiling into the next year, save taxpayers trillions of dollars, make us less dependent on China, curve our high inflation, all without touching Social Security and Medicare.”

In exchange for lifting the ceiling for one more year, Republicans are expected to propose some type of cap on discretionary spending. McCarthy said Monday that out-of-control spending was to blame for inflation, which has led to the Federal Reserve’s tight monetary stance now squeezing the economy.

“It’s not a revenue problem. We’re bringing more money in percentage than anytime before, but we’re spending and there’s no curve on that,” he said. “So the Fed is their own entity, they get to make their own decisions, but they have to make decisions based on what we did to create inflation, so I have a responsibility to curve that so the Fed wouldn’t have to act.”

But two Republican bills McCarthy is behind and touted at the stock exchange would reportedly do the opposite over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. CBO reports that Republicans’ H.R. 1 bill to lower energy costs would increase the deficit by $2.4 billion over a 10-year period, while a vote earlier this year to repeal IRS funding would add $114 billion to the deficit by 2032.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: THE BIGGEST SHOWDOWN EXPECTED IN WASHINGTON THIS YEAR HAD A BATTLE STOP IN NEW YORK.

REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY: Without exaggeration American debt is a ticking time bomb that will detonate unless we take serious responsible action.

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: HOUSE SPEAKER KEVIN MCCARTHY – MAKING A POLITICAL PITCH ON THE DEBT CEILING AT THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE.

REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY: Let me be very clear, there’s two things I will not do. I will not raise taxes, and I will not pass a clean debt ceiling that just won’t pass.

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: THE WHITE HOUSE – FIGHTING BACK ON REPUBLICANS’ REFUSAL TO RAISE THE DEBT CEILING WITHOUT CONDITIONS, WHICH IS THE DEMOCRATS’ PLAN.

WHITE HOUSE DEPUTY PRESS SECRETARY ANDREW BATES SAID IN A STATEMENT, “There is one responsible solution to the debt limit: addressing it promptly, without brinksmanship or hostage taking — as Republicans did three times in the last administration and as Presidents Trump and Reagan argued for in office.”

THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT ESTIMATES SOMETIME BETWEEN JULY AND SEPTEMBER – THE U-S WILL DEFAULT ON ITS DEBT IF POLITICIANS FAIL TO RAISE THE $31.4 TRILLION DEBT LIMIT.

AND THAT WOULD BE AN “UNFETTERED ECONOMIC CATASTROPHE” ACCORDING TO TWO ECONOMISTS AT RMS.

IN THE EVENT OF AN ACTUAL DEFAULT, THEY ESTIMATE UNEMPLOYMENT WOULD SOAR TO 12% IN THE FIRST SIX MONTHS, IT WOULD TRIGGER A DEEP AND LASTING RECESSION, AND U-S STANDING AND THE DOLLAR WOULD BE AT RISK. 

BUT SO FAR NEGOTIATIONS ARE AT AN IMPASSE. THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE LEADER REVEALING THAT HE HASN’T SPOKEN TO THE WHITE HOUSE ON THE ISSUE IN MORE THAN TWO MONTHS. 

REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY: Had the President agreed to negotiate in good faith we’d already be done. Unfortunately, I have not heard from the White House since our very first meeting.

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: AND WHILE HE SAYS THE DEMOCRATS PLAN IS A NONSTARTER, REPUBLICANS HAVE YET TO PRESENT THEIR OWN. THAT IS ABOUT TO CHANGE.

REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY: Okay, so here’s our plan. In the coming weeks, the House will vote on a bill to lift the debt ceiling into the next year, save taxpayers trillions of dollars, make us less dependent upon China curve our high inflation all without touching Social Security and Medicare. 

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: IN EXCHANGE FOR LIFTING THE CEILING FOR ONE MORE YEAR, REPUBLICANS ARE EXPECTED TO PROPOSE SOME TYPE OF CAP ON DISCRETIONARY SPENDING. 

MCCARTHY TOLD WALL STREET OUT OF CONTROL SPENDING WAS TO BLAME FOR INFLATION, WHICH HAS LED TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S TIGHT MONETARY STANCE NOW SQUEEZING THE ECONOMY.

REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY: It’s not a revenue problem. We’re bringing more money in percentage than anytime before, but we’re spending and there’s no curve on that. So the fed is their own entity, they get to make their own decisions, but they have to make decisions based upon what we did to create inflation. So I have a responsibility to curve that so the Fed wouldn’t have to act.

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: BUT TWO REPUBLICAN BILLS MCCARTHY IS BEHIND AND TOUTED AT THE STOCK EXCHANGE WOULD REPORTEDLY DO THE OPPOSITE OVER THE NEXT DECADE. THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE SAYS REPUBLICANS’ H-R ONE BILL TO LOWER ENERGY COSTS WOULD INCREASE THE DEFICIT BY $2.4 BILLION OVER A 10-YEAR PERIOD. WHILE A VOTE EARLIER THIS YEAR TO REPEAL IRS FUNDING WOULD ADD 114 BILLION TO THE DEFICIT BY 2032.

I’M SIMONE DEL ROSARIO. IN NEW YORK IT’S JUST BUSINESS. 


Business

What bank crisis? Chase sees record revenue as other banks beat the Street

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 0% Center 0% Right 0%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Big banks started off earnings season with a bang despite concerns of contagion from the second and third largest failures in American history. The nation’s largest financial institutions reaped the benefits of the Federal Reserve’s aggressive rate hike campaign.

The nation’s largest bank easily beat Wall Street expectations. JPMorgan Chase said profit surged 52% to $12.62 billion in the first quarter of 2023. The company’s revenue rose by 25% to $39.34 billion.

Following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in March, bank customers throughout the U.S. withdrew funds from smaller, regional banks and moved money to larger institutions. JPMorgan Chase secured an additional $37 billion in deposits in the first three months of the year.

All large banks that reported earnings Friday, April 14, posted large increases in net interest income, which measures what the bank makes lending money minus what it pays out to depositors. With the Federal Reserve hiking its interest rate from near zero early last year to nearly 5% in April, banks have been charging higher interest rates for loans, increasing that cushion. In Chase’s case, one of its biggest highlights was a 49% rise in that net interest income for the quarter.

The country’s third-largest bank, Citigroup, also beat projections with revenue up 12% from the first quarter of 2022. Citigroup’s net interest income rose 23% to $13.3 billion on the back of higher interest rates.

Wells Fargo’s revenue rose 17% from the first quarter of 2022. The country’s fourth-largest bank said its net interest income increased by 45% as well. Non-interest income fell by 13%, which the bank said was due to “a decline in mortgage banking income on lower originations.” Earlier in 2023, Wells Fargo laid off hundreds of mortgage bankers as it shifted priorities.

PNC Financial Services Group reported revenue was up 19% to $5.6 billion. The Pittsburgh-based institution also benefited from higher rates with net interest income up 28%.

Despite the banner quarter, executives warned of tougher times ahead as the banks reported setting aside more cash to prepare.

“The storm clouds that we have been monitoring for the past year remain on the horizon, and the banking industry turmoil adds to these risks,” JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO: WHAT BANKING CRISIS?

THE BIG BANKS, AT LEAST, SAILED THROUGH THE START OF THE YEAR.

JUST LOOK AT JPMORGAN CHASE…WHICH DEFIED ANY GRAVITY CAUSED BY THE BANKING TURMOIL. ITS PROFITS SOARED 52% IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2023.

THE NATION’S LARGEST BANK POSTED A QUARTERLY REVENUE RECORD.

WHILE BANK CUSTOMERS SCRAMBLED TO PULL OUT FUNDS AT SMALLER INSTITUTIONS FOLLOWING THE FAILURES OF SILICON VALLEY BANK AND SIGNATURE BANK…CHASE SECURED AN ADDITIONAL $37 BILLION IN DEPOSITS THE FIRST THREE MONTHS OF THE YEAR.

FRIDAY KICKED OFF A SERIES OF BANK EARNINGS THAT WALL STREET IS CLOSELY WATCHING TO TAKE THE COUNTRY’S ECONOMIC PULSE.

SO FAR, THE INDUSTRY AT THE CENTER OF MARCH’S CONFIDENCE CRISIS AND CREDIT TIGHTENING, IS DOING BETTER THAN EXPECTED.

WELLS FARGO’S REVENUE AND EARNINGS PER SHARE BOTH SOLIDLY BEAT FORECASTS.

CITIGROUP ALSO BEAT THE STREET IN PROFITS, REVENUE AND EARNINGS.

WHILE PNC HAD BETTER THAN EXPECTED EARNINGS GROWTH.

EACH OF THESE BANKS IS CASHING IN ON HIGHER INTEREST RATES.

NET INTEREST INCOME IS THE MONEY BANKS EARN ON LOANS MINUS WHAT IT PAYS OUT TO DEPOSITORS.

ALL FOUR BANKS POSTED DOUBLE DIGIT GAINS IN Q1 AS THE FED’S RATE HIKE CAMPAIGN ALLOWED BANKS TO CHARGE HIGHER INTEREST RATES ON LOANS.

BUT DESPITE THE GREAT QUARTER, BANKS STILL SEE “STORM CLOUDS” BREWING. BANKS REPORTED SETTING ASIDE MORE CASH THIS QUARTER TO PREPARE FOR TOUGH TIMES AHEAD.

I’M SIMONE DEL ROSARIO AND IT’S JUST BUSINESS.


U.S.

Protests, violence on college campuses challenge free speech protections


First Amendment free speech protections are supposed to work both ways. Speech everyone likes is not what needs protecting, rather it is controversial speech that the founders of this nation sought to defend. In the American tradition, the answer to this type of speech has been more speech, because when a controversial speaker is given a platform, their remarks are protected by the Constitution.

Likewise, those who disagree with the speaker are also allowed to protest or offer counter arguments in their own venues. However, debate over what is known as the “heckler’s veto” is on the rise following recent incidents on college campuses. These incidents have brought a question into discussion: At what point do protests move into the realm of infringing upon the right to speak freely?

For example, earlier in 2023, Stanford Law School students disrupted and stopped the address of Stuart Kyle Duncan, a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, who had been invited to the campus by the school’s chapter of the Federalist Society. Stanford’s associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion, Tirien Steinbach, also joined the protest, taking the microphone to interrupt the judge.

“For many people in this law school who work here, who study here and who live here, your advocacy, your opinions from the bench, land as absolute disenfranchisement of their rights,” Steinbach said in a video of the incident.

Stanford responded by requiring all of its law students to attend a half-day session aimed at educating them on freedom of speech, placing Steinbach on leave, and imposing new training for staff. The school cited its policy that “protest is allowed but disruption is not.” In an an open letter following the incident, Dean Jenny S. Martinez said that “commitment to diversity and inclusion means that we must protect the expression of all views.”

“Apparently, America’s future lawyers and future judges fundamentally misunderstand free speech rights. Shouting down speakers is just like any other form of censorship,” Nico Perrino wrote. Perrino is the executive vice president at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, and published a Los Angeles Times opinion piece about the incident at Stanford. “It’s the few deciding for the many what they can hear. Protesters have every right to engage in peaceful, nondisruptive protest. But they do not have the right to take over someone else’s event and make it their own.”

A more violent incident occurred during an event put on by conservative nonprofit Turning Point USA at San Francisco State University. Former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines, TPUSA’s featured speaker, was reportedly assaulted at the venue by protestors.

Gaines, who competed against Lia Thomas, the first openly transgender athlete to win an NCAA Division I national championship, had been invited to discuss women’s athletics and the inequalities that female competitors may face against transgender opponents. An altercation with protestors following the event forced officials to barricade Gaines in a campus room for three hours with police for her safety, as one activist suggested that she should pay them off in order to be allowed out.

“I give my speech and, of course, there’s many protesters in the room. But I welcome protesters. I welcome people with different perspectives,” Gaines said. “After the event, almost as soon as it finished, it was as if the floodgates opened and I was rushed. People from outside the classroom rushed in. They flickered the lights off. They stormed the podium and they were pushing and shoving and hitting. And I was supposed to meet with the head of campus police a half an hour before the event to discuss an exit strategy if this happened but the police never showed up to meet me. And so, I had no idea there was even police in the room. So at this moment I feared for my life. It’s so chilling to know what these people want to do to you and what they’re willing to do to you.”

“Universities are sites of discussion, debate, and disagreement,” Kristen Shahverdian, PEN America’s senior manager in free expression and education, said in a statement about the incident. “What happened at SFSU makes a mockery of the principles of free speech that allow higher education to function. This is unacceptable, and anathema to how a campus should operate.”

However, a statement released afterwards by Dr. Jamillah Moore, the school’s vice president for student affairs and enrollment management, made no mention of this, and instead thanked students who participated “peacefully.” Gaines has said that San Francisco State University Police have reached out to her to set up a meeting in an attempt to clarify what happened, but that no one else from the school has contacted her.

Meanwhile, a pro-life meeting at Virginia Commonwealth University in March was shut down after event participants were similarly assaulted and sheltered in a campus room, while two protestors were arrested for their actions. The pro-life group is now threatening legal action against VCU due to the lack of security the school provided and the delayed response of campus police, who reportedly did not arrive at the scene for nearly half an hour despite prior warnings that event would be disrupted by protests.

Massive protests and threats of violence have lead to the cancellations of numerous other speaking events at campuses around the country. These include Uncensored America’s planned speech at Penn State in 2022, Ben Shapiro’s anticipated event at Gonzaga University in 2019, and Milo Yiannopoulos’ scheduled appearance at UC Berkeley in 2017, which protests over led to $100,000 in campus property damages.

Though college students have every right to protest speakers or organizations whose viewpoints they disagree with, when it bars speech from even happening or turns into violent threats, and in some cases actual violence, that brings on what some have deemed a suppression of free speech.

“Of course we have the right to protest and of course we have the freedom of speech,” Gaines said of her experience at SFSU. “But, when I was ambushed, that mob that was taking it further than protesting, that was resorting to violence, verbally and physically to prove your point.”

As for Gaines, she’s pushing back at those who she believes aim to silence her, and has already indicated on social media that she may take legal action against SFSU for the university’s response to her assault.

“[The incident at SFSU] still only further assures me I’m doing something right,” Gaines said. “When they want you silent, speak louder.”

Tags: ,

Tech

Just Max: Streaming wars heat up as HBO tries climbing this top 5 list

Media Landscape

MediaMiss™This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 13% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn more about this data
Left 21% Center 67% Right 13%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

The streaming wars are heating up with more and more competition entering the chat, even though most streaming services still fail to turn a profit. The streaming audience, at least, can’t get enough content. The majority of streamers have at least three subscriptions, according to tracking data from CivicScience. Here are the top streaming platforms fighting for your downtime in this week’s Five For Friday.

#5: Hulu

Hulu is one of the old guards in streaming, created in the olden times of 2007. It was initially launched as a joint venture between NBC and Fox to stream their programming online. At the time, skeptics dubbed it Clown Co. Who’s laughing now? Disney is the current majority stakeholder in the service and it has built up 48 million subscribers. Hulu has acclaimed originals like “The Handmaid’s Tale.” It’s also paving the way for a new cable age with Hulu + LiveTV, which is a big step for those looking to cut the cord and still maintain access to live sports.

#4: Max

Warner Bros. Discovery made moves in the streaming space this week by combining HBO Max with Discovery+. The two platforms have a combined 96 million subscribers. Starting in May, the final season of “Succession” can sit in your list right next to “Dr. Pimple Popper.” The new service is simply called Max. It’s been hard for anyone to squeeze out a profit in the streaming game, but Warner Bros. Discovery thinks this family combo could help them break even sometime next year.

#3: Disney+

Disney+ has been around for less than four years but has amassed more than 160 million subscribers, though it sheds a few million subscribers at the start of the year. Originals in the Star Wars and Marvel universes helped make it a major player. Disney+ also shook things up by releasing blockbusters like “Black Widow” straight to streaming, which resulted in a lawsuit. The platform is wading into live content with “Dancing with the Stars” and animated ESPN hockey in an effort to get kids interested in the sport – shaping them into future ESPN viewers, which Disney also owns.

#2: Prime Video

Amazon Prime Video may have the most subscribers of any streaming platform, according to at least one firm. But the company’s latest tally in 2021 showed it has 200 million users, which puts it squarely in second place. That said, its service is bundled with Prime 2-day shipping, so there’s always an asterisk next to its name in the streaming wars. Prime Video has original content like “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” and has the most movies of any service. The only problem is analytics firm Reelgood say less than 6% of those films are actually good.

#1: Netflix

Netflix is still the king of streaming. It may have started business by mailing DVDs, but the world’s biggest streamer has 230 million subscribers. Netflix made headlines when it lost customers last year but growth is coming back. There’s no shortage of content on the platform with hits like “Stranger Things” and comedy specials. They’ve also made multi-movie deals with superstars Adam Sandler and Ryan Reynolds. Netflix is the only profitable player in the game but with more competition, it’s taking a page out of its competitors’ books by offering a lower-tier subscription for those willing to deal with ads.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Simone Del Rosario: THE STREAMING WARS ARE HEATING UP THIS YEAR AS MORE COMPETITORS TRY TO MAKE A SPLASH FOR YOUR CASH. ON ONE HAND, THERE’S A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE TO GO AROUND. THIS YEAR A MAJORITY OF STREAMERS HAVE AT LEAST THREE SUBSCRIPTIONS. HERE ARE THE OFFERINGS FIGHTING FOR YOUR DOWNTIME IN THIS WEEK’S FIVE FOR FRIDAY.

AS ONE OF THE OLD GUARDS, HULU IS A STEADY SURVIVOR. NBC AND FOX JOINED FORCES IN ‘07 TO BRING TV TO WEB – AND SKEPTICS DUBBED IT CLOWN COMPANY. NOW DISNEY’S THE MAJORITY STAKEHOLDER, THEY’VE GOT 48 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS, AND HULU’S PAVING THE NEW CABLE AGE WITH LIVE TV ALONG WITH TOP TIER ORIGINALS LIKE THE HANDMAID’S TALE… A BIG STEP FOR ANYONE WANTING TO CUT THE CORD BUT STILL WATCH LIVE SPORTS. IT ALSO OFFERS BUNDLES WITH ONE OF ITS FRIENDS ON THIS LIST.

WATCH OUT FOR HBO – MAKING MOVES THIS YEAR TO JOIN WITH DISCOVERY PLUS FOR A COMBINED 96 MILLION SUBS. BECAUSE WHO DOESN’T WANT TO BREAK UP A SUCCESSION BINGE WITH DOCTOR PIMPLE POPPER? THE NEW SERVICE WILL GO BY … JUST MAX, AND IT’LL COST THE SAME AS HBO MAX FOR AD FREE. PRETTY MUCH EVERYONE’S STILL LOSING MONEY IN THE STREAMING WORLD, BUT WARNER BROTHERS DISCOVERY THINKS THIS FAMILY COMBO COULD HELP IT BREAK EVEN SOMETIME NEXT YEAR.

LESS THAN FOUR YEARS IN THE MAKING, DISNEY PLUS IS SURGING WITH MORE THAN 160 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS, THOUGH THEY LOST A FEW MIL TO START OFF THE YEAR. STAR WARS AND MARVEL ORIGINALS HELPED MAKE IT A MAJOR PLAYER. THEY SHOOK THINGS UP, RELEASING BLOCKBUSTERS LIKE BLACK WIDOW STRAIGHT TO STREAMING, WHICH LED TO A LAWSUIT. AND THEY’RE LEANING IN TO LIVE CONTENT LIKE DANCING WITH THE STARS AND ANIMATED ESPN HOCKEY COVERAGE TO GET THE KIDS IN ON THE ACTION…AND MAKE ‘EM FUTURE ESPN VIEWERS. IT’S ALL IN THE FAMILY.

AT LEAST ONE FIRM THINKS AMAZON PRIME VIDEO HAS TAKEN THE TOP SUBSCRIBER SPOT, WE KNOW IT AT LEAST SITS AT 200 MILLION, ACCORDING TO THE COMPANY’S LATEST TALLY IN 2021. BUT HERE’S THE THING, IT’S BUNDLED WITH PRIME 2-DAY SHIPPING, SO ON THE STREAMING SIDE, IT’LL ALWAYS HAVE AN ASTERISK. PRIME VIDEO HAS ORIGINAL HITS LIKE THE MARVELOUS MRS MAISEL. IT ALSO HAS THE MOST MOVIES OF ANY SERVICE, BUT ANALYTICS FIRM REELGOOD SAYS LESS THAN 6% OF ITS MOVIES ARE ACTUALLY GOOD.

FOR NOW NETFLIX IS STILL THE KING. IT MAY HAVE STARTED BUSINESS BY MAILING DVDS, BUT THE WORLD’S BIGGEST STREAMER HAS 230 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS. THE COMPANY HAD A ROUGH GO OF IT LAST YEAR AFTER LOSING CUSTOMERS BUT GROWTH IS COMING BACK. FROM STRANGER THINGS TO COMEDY SPECIALS, THERE’S NO SHORTAGE OF CONTENT. NETFLIX IS THE ONLY PROFITABLE PLAYER IN THE GAME, BUT WITH MORE COMPETITION, THE O-G TOOK A PAGE FROM ITS COMPETITORS, OFFERING A LOWER-PRICED SUB FOR THOSE WILLING TO SIT THROUGH ADS.

PARAMOUNT PLUS BARELY MISSED THE LIST. IT’S CURRENTLY THE FASTEST-GROWING STREAMING SERVICE IN THE U-S AND IS EVEN IN ITS OWN STREAMING WARS FIGHT OVER SOUTH PARK. BUT HEY GOTTA BE IN THE TOP FIVE FOR FIVE FOR FRIDAY. I’M SIMONE DEL ROSARIO AND IT’S JUST BUSINESS.


U.S.

Dominion defamation lawsuit against Fox News heads to trial


A jury trial is set to begin April 17 to determine if Fox News defamed Dominion Voting Systems by claiming the company rigged the 2020 elections. In late March, Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis denied a judgment on the alleged defamation. However, he did rule that Fox’s claims about Dominion were false, stating, “the evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that [it] is CRYSTAL clear that none of the Statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true.”

Fox News had maintained its broadcasts were protected by the First Amendment. However, Davis barred the network from using some potential arguments, including “neutral report privilege,” “fair report privilege,” and “opinion privilege.”

This is a setback for Fox News after depositions and text messages exposed executives and hosts knew they were broadcasting false information.

For instance, much of that false information came from Trump attorney Sidney Powell. Powell had sent Fox host Maria Bartiromo an email with her source of the election fraud claims before their interview on Nov. 8. Bartiromo later testified that it was “nonsense” and “inherently unreliable.”

Fox News had tried to get Fox Corporation Chairman Rupert Murdoch excused from traveling to Delaware to testify in court. Davis, citing a letter that claimed it would be an inconvenience, said Murdoch was “hardly infirm.” The judge also pointed out that the 92-year-old was recently engaged and had travel plans to visit his various homes. Attorneys replied, saying Murdoch had already completed seven hours of deposition. Ultimately, Davis ruled that Murdoch could be compelled to testify.

According to Fox, the network’s Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Maria Bartiromo will be available to testify.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

SHANNON LONGWORTH: DID FOX NEWS DEFAME DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS WITH ITS CLAIMS THAT THE COMPANY RIGGED THE 2020 ELECTIONS?

THAT’S FOR A JURY TO DECIDE.

WHILE DELAWARE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE ERIC DAVIS DENIED A JUDGMENT ON THE ALLEGED DEFAMATION, PUSHING IT TO A JURY TRIAL…HE *DID* RULE THAT FOX’S CLAIMS ABOUT DOMINION WERE FALSE, SAYING,

“THE EVIDENCE DEVELOPED IN THIS CIVIL PROCEEDING DEMONSTRATES THAT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT NONE OF THE STATEMENTS RELATING TO DOMINION ABOUT THE 2020 ELECTION ARE TRUE.”

MARIA BARTIROMO: “SIDNEY, WE TALKED ABOUT THE DOMINION SOFTWARE. I KNOW THAT THERE WERE VOTING IRREGULARITIES. TELL ME ABOUT THAT.”

JEANINE PIRRO: “WHY WAS THERE AN OVERNIGHT POPPING OF THE VOTE TABULATION THAT CANNOT BE EXPLAINED FOR BIDEN?”

SIDNEY POWELL: “THEY USED THE MACHINES TO TRASH LARGE BATCHES OF VOTES THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARDED TO PRESIDENT TRUMP. THEY USED THE MACHINES TO INJECT AND ADD MASSIVE QUANTITIES OF VOTES FOR MR. BIDEN.”

WHILE FOX MAINTAINED ITS BROADCASTS WERE PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT…

DAVIS BARRED THE NETWORK FROM USING SOME POTENTIAL ARGUMENTS, INCLUDING “NEUTRAL REPORT PRIVILEGE,” WHICH PROTECTS OUTLETS PUBLISHING NEWSWORTHY ALLEGATIONS IN AN UNBIASED WAY AND “FAIR REPORT PRIVILEGE,” WHICH PROTECTS THOSE PUBLISHING INFORMATION FROM OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OR DOCUMENTS.

DAVIS ALSO SAID THE NETWORK COULDN’T USE “OPINION PRIVILEGE”–THAT PROTECTS PURE OPINION CONTENT. DAVIS WROTE, “IT APPEARS OXYMORONIC TO CALL THE STATEMENTS ‘OPINIONS’ WHILE ALSO ASSERTING THE STATEMENTS ARE NEWSWORTHY ALLEGATIONS AND/OR SUBSTANTIALLY ACCURATE REPORTS OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS.”

THIS IS ALL A SETBACK FOR FOX NEWS, AFTER THE DEPOSITIONS AND TEXT MESSAGES REVEALED EXECUTIVES AND HOSTS KNEW THEY WERE BROADCASTING FALSE INFORMATION.

FOR EXAMPLE, MUCH OF THAT FALSE INFORMATION CAME FROM TRUMP ATTORNEY, SIDNEY POWELL. POWELL HAD SENT FOX HOST MARIA BARTIROMO AN EMAIL WITH HER SOURCE OF THE ELECTION FRAUD CLAIMS BEFORE THEIR INTERVIEW ON NOVEMBER 8…

AND BARTIROMO LATER TESTIFIED THAT IT WAS “NONSENSE” AND “INHERENTLY UNRELIABLE.”

THE NETWORK’S LAWYERS TRIED TO GET FOX CORP. CHAIRMAN RUPERT MURDOCH EXCUSED FROM TRAVELING TO DELAWARE TO TESTIFY IN COURT. DAVIS, CITING A LETTER THAT CLAIMED IT WOULD BE AN INCONVENIENCE, SAID MURDOCH WAS “HARDLY INFIRM.” AND POINTED OUT THAT THE 92-YEAR-OLD WAS RECENTLY ENGAGED AND HAD TRAVEL PLANS TO VISIT HIS VARIOUS HOMES.

ATTORNEYS REPLIED, SAYING MURDOCH HAD ALREADY COMPLETED SEVEN HOURS OF DEPOSITION.

ULTIMATELY, DAVIS RULED THAT MURDOCH CAN BE COMPELLED TO TESTIFY. AND, ACCORDING TO FOX, TUCKER CARLSON, SEAN HANNITY, AND MARIA BARTIROMO WILL BE AVAILABLE TO TESTIFY.

THE TRIAL IS SET TO BEGIN APRIL 17TH.